Synspective Inc.
Synspective Inc. (290A.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (290A.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 290A.T | ¥1,209.00 | +5.13% | 129.8B | -373.15 | -¥3.24 | N/A |
| 6702.T | ¥3,273.00 | +0.40% | 5.7T | 20.12 | ¥162.64 | +1.31% |
| 9613.T | ¥3,965.00 | +0.00% | 5.6T | 0.00 | ¥26,026,666,000.00 | N/A |
| 6701.T | ¥4,046.00 | +0.57% | 5.4T | 23.00 | ¥175.89 | +0.71% |
| 4307.T | ¥4,451.00 | +0.79% | 2.6T | 25.07 | ¥177.52 | +1.66% |
| 9719.T | ¥5,680.00 | +0.18% | 1.8T | 0.00 | ¥6,830,379,500.00 | +1.48% |
| 3626.T | ¥3,498.00 | +0.92% | 783.4B | 15.30 | ¥228.67 | +1.95% |
| 2327.T | ¥3,820.00 | +4.09% | 699B | 26.01 | ¥146.85 | +1.88% |
| 9749.T | ¥9,800.00 | -0.20% | 617.6B | 0.00 | ¥397,698,368.00 | +0.43% |
| 1973.T | ¥3,285.00 | +0.00% | 489.4B | 28.33 | ¥115.96 | +1.60% |
Stock Comparison
290A.T vs 6702.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 6702.T has a market cap of 5.7T. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 6702.T trades at ¥3,273.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 6702.T's P/E ratio is 20.12. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 6702.T's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 6702.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 6702.T's competition here
290A.T vs 9613.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 9613.T has a market cap of 5.6T. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 9613.T trades at ¥3,965.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 9613.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 9613.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 9613.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 9613.T's competition here
290A.T vs 6701.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 6701.T has a market cap of 5.4T. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 6701.T trades at ¥4,046.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 6701.T's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 6701.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 6701.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 6701.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4307.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 4307.T has a market cap of 2.6T. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 4307.T trades at ¥4,451.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 4307.T's P/E ratio is 25.07. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 4307.T's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 4307.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4307.T's competition here
290A.T vs 9719.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 9719.T has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 9719.T trades at ¥5,680.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 9719.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 9719.T's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 9719.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 9719.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3626.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 3626.T has a market cap of 783.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 3626.T trades at ¥3,498.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 3626.T's P/E ratio is 15.30. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 3626.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3626.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3626.T's competition here
290A.T vs 2327.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 2327.T has a market cap of 699B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 2327.T trades at ¥3,820.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 2327.T's P/E ratio is 26.01. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 2327.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is less volatile compared to 2327.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 2327.T's competition here
290A.T vs 9749.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 9749.T has a market cap of 617.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 9749.T trades at ¥9,800.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 9749.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 9749.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 9749.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 9749.T's competition here
290A.T vs 1973.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 1973.T has a market cap of 489.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 1973.T trades at ¥3,285.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 1973.T's P/E ratio is 28.33. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 1973.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 1973.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 1973.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4733.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 4733.T has a market cap of 475.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 4733.T trades at ¥6,327.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 4733.T's P/E ratio is 28.24. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 4733.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 4733.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4733.T's competition here
290A.T vs 8056.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 8056.T has a market cap of 446.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 8056.T trades at ¥4,620.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 8056.T's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 8056.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 8056.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 8056.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4812.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 4812.T has a market cap of 392.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 4812.T trades at ¥2,010.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 4812.T's P/E ratio is 23.95. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 4812.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 4812.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4812.T's competition here
290A.T vs 7518.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 7518.T has a market cap of 355.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 7518.T trades at ¥4,480.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 7518.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 7518.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 7518.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 7518.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3923.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 3923.T has a market cap of 274B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 3923.T trades at ¥760.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 3923.T's P/E ratio is 25.75. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 3923.T's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3923.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3923.T's competition here
290A.T vs 9746.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 9746.T has a market cap of 189.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 9746.T trades at ¥3,770.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 9746.T's P/E ratio is 16.08. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 9746.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 9746.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 9746.T's competition here
290A.T vs 8096.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 8096.T has a market cap of 177.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 8096.T trades at ¥6,190.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 8096.T's P/E ratio is 18.58. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 8096.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 8096.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 8096.T's competition here
290A.T vs 9682.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 9682.T has a market cap of 167B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 9682.T trades at ¥1,048.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 9682.T's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 9682.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 9682.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 9682.T's competition here
290A.T vs 2317.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 2317.T has a market cap of 149.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 2317.T trades at ¥419.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 2317.T's P/E ratio is 18.08. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 2317.T's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 2317.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 2317.T's competition here
290A.T vs 9715.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 9715.T has a market cap of 148.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 9715.T trades at ¥3,960.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 9715.T's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 9715.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 9715.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 9715.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4722.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 4722.T has a market cap of 143.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 4722.T trades at ¥1,620.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 4722.T's P/E ratio is 12.27. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 4722.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 4722.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4722.T's competition here
290A.T vs 7595.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 7595.T has a market cap of 101.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 7595.T trades at ¥1,471.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 7595.T's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 7595.T's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 7595.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 7595.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4708.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 4708.T has a market cap of 94.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 4708.T trades at ¥1,464.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 4708.T's P/E ratio is 22.06. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 4708.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 4708.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4708.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4819.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 4819.T has a market cap of 94.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 4819.T trades at ¥2,061.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 4819.T's P/E ratio is 30.38. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 4819.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 4819.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4819.T's competition here
290A.T vs 9889.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 9889.T has a market cap of 75.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 9889.T trades at ¥1,230.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 9889.T's P/E ratio is 15.92. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 9889.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 9889.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 9889.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3636.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 3636.T has a market cap of 75.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 3636.T trades at ¥4,785.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 3636.T's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 3636.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3636.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3636.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3762.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 3762.T has a market cap of 72.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 3762.T trades at ¥1,811.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 3762.T's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 3762.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3762.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3762.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3962.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 3962.T has a market cap of 65.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 3962.T trades at ¥938.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 3962.T's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 3962.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3962.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3962.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3817.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 3817.T has a market cap of 60.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 3817.T trades at ¥4,795.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 3817.T's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 3817.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3817.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3817.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4413.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 4413.T has a market cap of 60B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 4413.T trades at ¥1,926.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 4413.T's P/E ratio is 29.56. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 4413.T's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 4413.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4413.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4674.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 4674.T has a market cap of 58.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 4674.T trades at ¥1,446.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 4674.T's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 4674.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 4674.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4674.T's competition here
290A.T vs 202A.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 202A.T has a market cap of 56.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 202A.T trades at ¥3,535.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 202A.T's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 202A.T's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 202A.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 202A.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3371.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 3371.T has a market cap of 48.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 3371.T trades at ¥1,952.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 3371.T's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 3371.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3371.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3371.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3844.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 3844.T has a market cap of 46.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 3844.T trades at ¥1,469.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 3844.T's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 3844.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3844.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3844.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4743.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 4743.T has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 4743.T trades at ¥1,692.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 4743.T's P/E ratio is 15.92. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 4743.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 4743.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4743.T's competition here
290A.T vs 9742.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 9742.T has a market cap of 42.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 9742.T trades at ¥2,030.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 9742.T's P/E ratio is 32.51. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 9742.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 9742.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 9742.T's competition here
290A.T vs 9600.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 9600.T has a market cap of 38.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 9600.T trades at ¥2,516.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 9600.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 9600.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 9600.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 9600.T's competition here
290A.T vs 9739.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 9739.T has a market cap of 37.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 9739.T trades at ¥2,506.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 9739.T's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 9739.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 9739.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 9739.T's competition here
290A.T vs 9640.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 9640.T has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 9640.T trades at ¥2,264.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 9640.T's P/E ratio is 23.83. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 9640.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 9640.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 9640.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3857.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 3857.T has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 3857.T trades at ¥1,156.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 3857.T's P/E ratio is 23.20. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 3857.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3857.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3857.T's competition here
290A.T vs 2359.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 2359.T has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 2359.T trades at ¥2,273.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 2359.T's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 2359.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 2359.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 2359.T's competition here
290A.T vs 2158.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 2158.T has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 2158.T trades at ¥833.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 2158.T's P/E ratio is 119.86. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 2158.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 2158.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 2158.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4709.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 4709.T has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 4709.T trades at ¥944.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 4709.T's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 4709.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 4709.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4709.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4725.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 4725.T has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 4725.T trades at ¥1,843.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 4725.T's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 4725.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 4725.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4725.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4072.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 4072.T has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 4072.T trades at ¥2,940.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 4072.T's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 4072.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 4072.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4072.T's competition here
290A.T vs 9658.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 9658.T has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 9658.T trades at ¥947.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 9658.T's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 9658.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 9658.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 9658.T's competition here
290A.T vs 8275.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 8275.T has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 8275.T trades at ¥1,120.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 8275.T's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 8275.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 8275.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 8275.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3798.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 3798.T has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 3798.T trades at ¥517.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 3798.T's P/E ratio is 17.69. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 3798.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3798.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3798.T's competition here
290A.T vs 5574.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 5574.T has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 5574.T trades at ¥2,917.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 5574.T's P/E ratio is 63.17. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 5574.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is less volatile compared to 5574.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 5574.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3916.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 3916.T has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 3916.T trades at ¥926.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 3916.T's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 3916.T's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3916.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3916.T's competition here
290A.T vs 2349.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 2349.T has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 2349.T trades at ¥2,392.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 2349.T's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 2349.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 2349.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 2349.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3393.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 3393.T has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 3393.T trades at ¥2,740.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 3393.T's P/E ratio is 13.74. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 3393.T's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3393.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3393.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3837.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 3837.T has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 3837.T trades at ¥1,466.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 3837.T's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 3837.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3837.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3837.T's competition here
290A.T vs 9709.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 9709.T has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 9709.T trades at ¥1,606.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 9709.T's P/E ratio is 10.20. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 9709.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 9709.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 9709.T's competition here
290A.T vs 2185.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 2185.T has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 2185.T trades at ¥1,868.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 2185.T's P/E ratio is 11.39. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 2185.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 2185.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 2185.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4662.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 4662.T has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 4662.T trades at ¥1,589.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 4662.T's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 4662.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 4662.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4662.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3984.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 3984.T has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 3984.T trades at ¥1,456.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 3984.T's P/E ratio is 14.12. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 3984.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3984.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3984.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4258.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 4258.T has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 4258.T trades at ¥2,776.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 4258.T's P/E ratio is 31.39. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 4258.T's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 4258.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4258.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3788.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 3788.T has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 3788.T trades at ¥1,983.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 3788.T's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 3788.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3788.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3788.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4396.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 4396.T has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 4396.T trades at ¥1,083.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 4396.T's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 4396.T's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 4396.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4396.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3666.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 3666.T has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 3666.T trades at ¥1,151.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 3666.T's P/E ratio is 20.41. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 3666.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3666.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3666.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4783.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 4783.T has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 4783.T trades at ¥2,716.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 4783.T's P/E ratio is 13.48. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 4783.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 4783.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4783.T's competition here
290A.T vs 7505.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 7505.T has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 7505.T trades at ¥1,871.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 7505.T's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 7505.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 7505.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 7505.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4813.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 4813.T has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 4813.T trades at ¥559.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 4813.T's P/E ratio is -2.76. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 4813.T's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 4813.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4813.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3968.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 3968.T has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 3968.T trades at ¥535.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 3968.T's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 3968.T's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3968.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3968.T's competition here
290A.T vs 6199.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 6199.T has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 6199.T trades at ¥1,467.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 6199.T's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 6199.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 6199.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 6199.T's competition here
290A.T vs 6050.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 6050.T has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 6050.T trades at ¥1,654.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 6050.T's P/E ratio is 20.30. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 6050.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 6050.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 6050.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4498.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 4498.T has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 4498.T trades at ¥1,181.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 4498.T's P/E ratio is 21.64. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 4498.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 4498.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4498.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3676.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 3676.T has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 3676.T trades at ¥855.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 3676.T's P/E ratio is 20.47. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 3676.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3676.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3676.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3925.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 3925.T has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 3925.T trades at ¥1,404.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 3925.T's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 3925.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3925.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3925.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3565.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 3565.T has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 3565.T trades at ¥1,261.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 3565.T's P/E ratio is 13.48. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 3565.T's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is less volatile compared to 3565.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3565.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4053.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 4053.T has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 4053.T trades at ¥454.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 4053.T's P/E ratio is 37.52. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 4053.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 4053.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4053.T's competition here
290A.T vs 5246.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 5246.T has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 5246.T trades at ¥607.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 5246.T's P/E ratio is -21.55. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 5246.T's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 5246.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 5246.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3924.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 3924.T has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 3924.T trades at ¥915.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 3924.T's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 3924.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3924.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3924.T's competition here
290A.T vs 9799.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 9799.T has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 9799.T trades at ¥1,027.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 9799.T's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 9799.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 9799.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 9799.T's competition here
290A.T vs 2335.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 2335.T has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 2335.T trades at ¥1,036.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 2335.T's P/E ratio is 13.52. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 2335.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 2335.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 2335.T's competition here
290A.T vs 2354.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 2354.T has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 2354.T trades at ¥873.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 2354.T's P/E ratio is 18.16. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 2354.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is less volatile compared to 2354.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 2354.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4371.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 4371.T has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 4371.T trades at ¥943.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 4371.T's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 4371.T's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 4371.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4371.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3997.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 3997.T has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 3997.T trades at ¥372.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 3997.T's P/E ratio is 249.66. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 3997.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is less volatile compared to 3997.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3997.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4761.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 4761.T has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 4761.T trades at ¥1,317.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 4761.T's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 4761.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is less volatile compared to 4761.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4761.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4418.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 4418.T has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 4418.T trades at ¥812.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 4418.T's P/E ratio is 24.82. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 4418.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 4418.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4418.T's competition here
290A.T vs 9753.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 9753.T has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 9753.T trades at ¥1,326.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 9753.T's P/E ratio is 8.56. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 9753.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 9753.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 9753.T's competition here
290A.T vs 6572.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 6572.T has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 6572.T trades at ¥226.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 6572.T's P/E ratio is 31.30. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 6572.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 6572.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 6572.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3683.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 3683.T has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 3683.T trades at ¥996.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 3683.T's P/E ratio is 8.66. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 3683.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3683.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3683.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4055.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 4055.T has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 4055.T trades at ¥1,428.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 4055.T's P/E ratio is 21.35. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 4055.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 4055.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4055.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3657.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 3657.T has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 3657.T trades at ¥300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 3657.T's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 3657.T's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3657.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3657.T's competition here
290A.T vs 5137.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 5137.T has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 5137.T trades at ¥281.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 5137.T's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 5137.T's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is less volatile compared to 5137.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 5137.T's competition here
290A.T vs 339A.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 339A.T has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 339A.T trades at ¥1,342.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 339A.T's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 339A.T's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is less volatile compared to 339A.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 339A.T's competition here
290A.T vs 1447.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 1447.T has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 1447.T trades at ¥423.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 1447.T's P/E ratio is 46.84. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 1447.T's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is less volatile compared to 1447.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 1447.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3918.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 3918.T has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 3918.T trades at ¥1,035.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 3918.T's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 3918.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3918.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3918.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3979.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 3979.T has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 3979.T trades at ¥368.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 3979.T's P/E ratio is 15.28. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 3979.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is less volatile compared to 3979.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3979.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3847.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 3847.T has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 3847.T trades at ¥6,780.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 3847.T's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 3847.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3847.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3847.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4356.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 4356.T has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 4356.T trades at ¥1,730.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 4356.T's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 4356.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 4356.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4356.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3799.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 3799.T has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 3799.T trades at ¥1,112.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 3799.T's P/E ratio is 8.54. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 3799.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3799.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3799.T's competition here
290A.T vs 5578.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 5578.T has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 5578.T trades at ¥895.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 5578.T's P/E ratio is 20.44. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 5578.T's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is less volatile compared to 5578.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 5578.T's competition here
290A.T vs 155A.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 155A.T has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 155A.T trades at ¥842.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 155A.T's P/E ratio is 30.07. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 155A.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 155A.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 155A.T's competition here
290A.T vs 2391.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 2391.T has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 2391.T trades at ¥1,253.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 2391.T's P/E ratio is 19.48. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 2391.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 2391.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 2391.T's competition here
290A.T vs 9360.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 9360.T has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 9360.T trades at ¥2,890.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 9360.T's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 9360.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 9360.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 9360.T's competition here
290A.T vs 5599.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 5599.T has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 5599.T trades at ¥1,449.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 5599.T's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 5599.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 5599.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 5599.T's competition here
290A.T vs 2332.T Comparison April 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 129.8B. In comparison, 2332.T has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,209.00, while 2332.T trades at ¥1,492.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -373.15, whereas 2332.T's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 2332.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 2332.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 2332.T's competition here