Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See 2869.HK's competitors and their performance on the HKSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for 2869.HK and its HKSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2869.HK | HK$4.18 | -1.65% | 13.2B | 13.73 | HK$0.30 | +5.73% |
| 2423.HK | HK$43.96 | +0.96% | 140.4B | 26.10 | HK$1.68 | +1.64% |
| 1997.HK | HK$32.08 | +6.93% | 97.4B | -24.49 | -HK$1.31 | +4.11% |
| 1209.HK | HK$39.96 | +1.58% | 91.2B | 20.88 | HK$1.91 | +4.86% |
| 1821.HK | HK$12.94 | +0.15% | 54.9B | -9.73 | -HK$1.33 | N/A |
| 2602.HK | HK$17.21 | +1.00% | 19.8B | 26.08 | HK$0.66 | +9.69% |
| 6098.HK | HK$5.39 | -0.37% | 17.5B | 26.50 | HK$0.20 | +9.91% |
| 6666.HK | HK$1.04 | +1.46% | 11.2B | 10.31 | HK$0.10 | N/A |
| 2669.HK | HK$3.40 | +0.59% | 11.2B | 7.44 | HK$0.46 | +5.88% |
| 1528.HK | HK$1.05 | -0.47% | 9B | -0.18 | -HK$5.97 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
KE Holdings Inc. (HKSE: 2423.HK)
2869.HK vs 2423.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 2423.HK has a market cap of 140.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 2423.HK trades at HK$43.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 2423.HK's P/E ratio is 26.10. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2423.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 2423.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 2423.HK's competition here
Wharf Real Estate Investment Company Limited (HKSE: 1997.HK)
2869.HK vs 1997.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 1997.HK has a market cap of 97.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 1997.HK trades at HK$32.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 1997.HK's P/E ratio is -24.49. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1997.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is less volatile compared to 1997.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 1997.HK's competition here
China Resources Mixc Lifestyle Services Limited (HKSE: 1209.HK)
2869.HK vs 1209.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 1209.HK has a market cap of 91.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 1209.HK trades at HK$39.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 1209.HK's P/E ratio is 20.88. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1209.HK's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 1209.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 1209.HK's competition here
ESR Group Limited (HKSE: 1821.HK)
2869.HK vs 1821.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 1821.HK has a market cap of 54.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 1821.HK trades at HK$12.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 1821.HK's P/E ratio is -9.73. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1821.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 1821.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 1821.HK's competition here
Onewo Inc. (HKSE: 2602.HK)
2869.HK vs 2602.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 2602.HK has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 2602.HK trades at HK$17.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 2602.HK's P/E ratio is 26.08. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2602.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 2602.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 2602.HK's competition here
Country Garden Services Holdings Company Limited (HKSE: 6098.HK)
2869.HK vs 6098.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 6098.HK has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 6098.HK trades at HK$5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 6098.HK's P/E ratio is 26.50. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 6098.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 6098.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 6098.HK's competition here
Evergrande Property Services Group Limited (HKSE: 6666.HK)
2869.HK vs 6666.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 6666.HK has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 6666.HK trades at HK$1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 6666.HK's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 6666.HK's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 6666.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 6666.HK's competition here
China Overseas Property Holdings Limited (HKSE: 2669.HK)
2869.HK vs 2669.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 2669.HK has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 2669.HK trades at HK$3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 2669.HK's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2669.HK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 2669.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 2669.HK's competition here
Red Star Macalline Group Corporation Ltd. (HKSE: 1528.HK)
2869.HK vs 1528.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 1528.HK has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 1528.HK trades at HK$1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 1528.HK's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1528.HK's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 1528.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 1528.HK's competition here
Art Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0565.HK)
2869.HK vs 0565.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 0565.HK has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 0565.HK trades at HK$2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 0565.HK's P/E ratio is -37.57. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0565.HK's ROE of -778.83%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 0565.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 0565.HK's competition here
Miramar Hotel and Investment Company, Limited (HKSE: 0071.HK)
2869.HK vs 0071.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 0071.HK has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 0071.HK trades at HK$10.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 0071.HK's P/E ratio is 10.36. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0071.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 0071.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 0071.HK's competition here
Binjiang Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 3316.HK)
2869.HK vs 3316.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 3316.HK has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 3316.HK trades at HK$22.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 3316.HK's P/E ratio is 9.51. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 3316.HK's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 3316.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 3316.HK's competition here
China Dili Group (HKSE: 1387.HK)
2869.HK vs 1387.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 1387.HK has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 1387.HK trades at HK$0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 1387.HK's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1387.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is less volatile compared to 1387.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 1387.HK's competition here
GR Life Style Company Limited (HKSE: 0108.HK)
2869.HK vs 0108.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 0108.HK has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 0108.HK trades at HK$1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 0108.HK's P/E ratio is -5.45. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0108.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 0108.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 0108.HK's competition here
Jinke Smart Services Group Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 9666.HK)
2869.HK vs 9666.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 9666.HK has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 9666.HK trades at HK$8.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 9666.HK's P/E ratio is -14.02. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 9666.HK's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 9666.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 9666.HK's competition here
Desun Real Estate Investment Services Group Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2270.HK)
2869.HK vs 2270.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 2270.HK has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 2270.HK trades at HK$7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 2270.HK's P/E ratio is 106.62. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2270.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 2270.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 2270.HK's competition here
C&D Property Management Group Co. Limited (HKSE: 2156.HK)
2869.HK vs 2156.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 2156.HK has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 2156.HK trades at HK$2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 2156.HK's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2156.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 2156.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 2156.HK's competition here
Greentown Management Holdings Company Limited (HKSE: 9979.HK)
2869.HK vs 9979.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 9979.HK has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 9979.HK trades at HK$1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 9979.HK's P/E ratio is 5.73. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 9979.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 9979.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 9979.HK's competition here
CIFI Ever Sunshine Services Group Limited (HKSE: 1995.HK)
2869.HK vs 1995.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 1995.HK has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 1995.HK trades at HK$1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 1995.HK's P/E ratio is 6.57. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1995.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 1995.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 1995.HK's competition here
Huafa Property Services Group Company Limited (HKSE: 0982.HK)
2869.HK vs 0982.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 0982.HK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 0982.HK trades at HK$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 0982.HK's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0982.HK's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 0982.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 0982.HK's competition here
Riverine China Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1417.HK)
2869.HK vs 1417.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 1417.HK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 1417.HK trades at HK$7.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 1417.HK's P/E ratio is -53.22. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1417.HK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is less volatile compared to 1417.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 1417.HK's competition here
Yuexiu Services Group Ltd. (HKSE: 6626.HK)
2869.HK vs 6626.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 6626.HK has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 6626.HK trades at HK$1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 6626.HK's P/E ratio is 6.84. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 6626.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 6626.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 6626.HK's competition here
A-Living Smart City Services Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 3319.HK)
2869.HK vs 3319.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 3319.HK has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 3319.HK trades at HK$1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 3319.HK's P/E ratio is 22.27. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 3319.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is less volatile compared to 3319.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 3319.HK's competition here
Sunac Services Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1516.HK)
2869.HK vs 1516.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 1516.HK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 1516.HK trades at HK$0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 1516.HK's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1516.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 1516.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 1516.HK's competition here
S-Enjoy Service Group Co., Limited (HKSE: 1755.HK)
2869.HK vs 1755.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 1755.HK has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 1755.HK trades at HK$2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 1755.HK's P/E ratio is -2.89. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1755.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 1755.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 1755.HK's competition here
Jinmao Property Services Co., Limited (HKSE: 0816.HK)
2869.HK vs 0816.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 0816.HK has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 0816.HK trades at HK$2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 0816.HK's P/E ratio is 4.02. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0816.HK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 0816.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 0816.HK's competition here
International Entertainment Corporation (HKSE: 1009.HK)
2869.HK vs 1009.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 1009.HK has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 1009.HK trades at HK$1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 1009.HK's P/E ratio is -10.40. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1009.HK's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 1009.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 1009.HK's competition here
LHN Limited (HKSE: 1730.HK)
2869.HK vs 1730.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 1730.HK has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 1730.HK trades at HK$4.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 1730.HK's P/E ratio is 6.49. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1730.HK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 1730.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 1730.HK's competition here
Soundwill Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0878.HK)
2869.HK vs 0878.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 0878.HK has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 0878.HK trades at HK$6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 0878.HK's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0878.HK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 0878.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 0878.HK's competition here
Zhong An Intelligent Living Service Limited (HKSE: 2271.HK)
2869.HK vs 2271.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 2271.HK has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 2271.HK trades at HK$3.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 2271.HK's P/E ratio is 45.43. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2271.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is less volatile compared to 2271.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 2271.HK's competition here
Auto Italia Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0720.HK)
2869.HK vs 0720.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 0720.HK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 0720.HK trades at HK$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 0720.HK's P/E ratio is -13.47. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0720.HK's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 0720.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 0720.HK's competition here
New Hope Service Holdings Limited (HKSE: 3658.HK)
2869.HK vs 3658.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 3658.HK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 3658.HK trades at HK$1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 3658.HK's P/E ratio is 6.16. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 3658.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 3658.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 3658.HK's competition here
Midland Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1200.HK)
2869.HK vs 1200.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 1200.HK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 1200.HK trades at HK$2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 1200.HK's P/E ratio is 4.66. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1200.HK's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is less volatile compared to 1200.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 1200.HK's competition here
Melbourne Enterprises Limited (HKSE: 0158.HK)
2869.HK vs 0158.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 0158.HK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 0158.HK trades at HK$58.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 0158.HK's P/E ratio is -2.26. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0158.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 0158.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 0158.HK's competition here
Powerlong Commercial Management Holdings Limited (HKSE: 9909.HK)
2869.HK vs 9909.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 9909.HK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 9909.HK trades at HK$2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 9909.HK's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 9909.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 9909.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 9909.HK's competition here
E-Star Commercial Management Company Limited (HKSE: 6668.HK)
2869.HK vs 6668.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 6668.HK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 6668.HK trades at HK$1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 6668.HK's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 6668.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 6668.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 6668.HK's competition here
Shimao Services Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0873.HK)
2869.HK vs 0873.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 0873.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 0873.HK trades at HK$0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 0873.HK's P/E ratio is 9.31. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0873.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is less volatile compared to 0873.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 0873.HK's competition here
Hailan Holdings Limited (HKSE: 2278.HK)
2869.HK vs 2278.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 2278.HK has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 2278.HK trades at HK$3.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 2278.HK's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2278.HK's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is less volatile compared to 2278.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 2278.HK's competition here
Nanyang Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0212.HK)
2869.HK vs 0212.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 0212.HK has a market cap of 968.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 0212.HK trades at HK$28.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 0212.HK's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0212.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 0212.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 0212.HK's competition here
Hongkong Chinese Limited (HKSE: 0655.HK)
2869.HK vs 0655.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 0655.HK has a market cap of 929.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 0655.HK trades at HK$0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 0655.HK's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0655.HK's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 0655.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 0655.HK's competition here
Safety Godown Company, Limited (HKSE: 0237.HK)
2869.HK vs 0237.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 0237.HK has a market cap of 915.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 0237.HK trades at HK$2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 0237.HK's P/E ratio is -52.67. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0237.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 0237.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 0237.HK's competition here
Tian Teck Land Limited (HKSE: 0266.HK)
2869.HK vs 0266.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 0266.HK has a market cap of 911.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 0266.HK trades at HK$1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 0266.HK's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0266.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 0266.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 0266.HK's competition here
Multifield International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0898.HK)
2869.HK vs 0898.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 0898.HK has a market cap of 811M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 0898.HK trades at HK$0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 0898.HK's P/E ratio is 3.45. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0898.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 0898.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 0898.HK's competition here
Emperor International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0163.HK)
2869.HK vs 0163.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 0163.HK has a market cap of 799.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 0163.HK trades at HK$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 0163.HK's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0163.HK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 0163.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 0163.HK's competition here
Financial Street Property Co., Limited (HKSE: 1502.HK)
2869.HK vs 1502.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 1502.HK has a market cap of 739.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 1502.HK trades at HK$1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 1502.HK's P/E ratio is 2.64. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1502.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 1502.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 1502.HK's competition here
Pioneer Global Group Limited (HKSE: 0224.HK)
2869.HK vs 0224.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 0224.HK has a market cap of 646.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 0224.HK trades at HK$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 0224.HK's P/E ratio is -4.04. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0224.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is less volatile compared to 0224.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 0224.HK's competition here
Vanke Overseas Investment Holding Company Limited (HKSE: 1036.HK)
2869.HK vs 1036.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 1036.HK has a market cap of 642.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 1036.HK trades at HK$1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 1036.HK's P/E ratio is -5.26. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1036.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 1036.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 1036.HK's competition here
Excellence Commercial Property & Facilities Management Group Limited (HKSE: 6989.HK)
2869.HK vs 6989.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 6989.HK has a market cap of 628.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 6989.HK trades at HK$0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 6989.HK's P/E ratio is 1.85. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 6989.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is less volatile compared to 6989.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 6989.HK's competition here
Pokfulam Development Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 0225.HK)
2869.HK vs 0225.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 0225.HK has a market cap of 591.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 0225.HK trades at HK$5.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 0225.HK's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0225.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 0225.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 0225.HK's competition here
Zhong Ao Home Group Limited (HKSE: 1538.HK)
2869.HK vs 1538.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 1538.HK has a market cap of 572.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 1538.HK trades at HK$0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 1538.HK's P/E ratio is 6.02. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1538.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 1538.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 1538.HK's competition here
Thing On Enterprise Limited (HKSE: 2292.HK)
2869.HK vs 2292.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 2292.HK has a market cap of 554.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 2292.HK trades at HK$0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 2292.HK's P/E ratio is -8.56. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2292.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 2292.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 2292.HK's competition here
Tai Sang Land Development Limited (HKSE: 0089.HK)
2869.HK vs 0089.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 0089.HK has a market cap of 543.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 0089.HK trades at HK$1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 0089.HK's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0089.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 0089.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 0089.HK's competition here
Wah Ha Realty Company Limited (HKSE: 0278.HK)
2869.HK vs 0278.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 0278.HK has a market cap of 518.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 0278.HK trades at HK$4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 0278.HK's P/E ratio is -19.50. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0278.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is less volatile compared to 0278.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 0278.HK's competition here
Times Neighborhood Holdings Limited (HKSE: 9928.HK)
2869.HK vs 9928.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 9928.HK has a market cap of 486.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 9928.HK trades at HK$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 9928.HK's P/E ratio is 18.53. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 9928.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 9928.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 9928.HK's competition here
Pacific Century Premium Developments Limited (HKSE: 0432.HK)
2869.HK vs 0432.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 0432.HK has a market cap of 464.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 0432.HK trades at HK$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 0432.HK's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0432.HK's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 0432.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 0432.HK's competition here
SCE Intelligent Commercial Management Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0606.HK)
2869.HK vs 0606.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 0606.HK has a market cap of 456.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 0606.HK trades at HK$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 0606.HK's P/E ratio is 6.11. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0606.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is less volatile compared to 0606.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 0606.HK's competition here
Suxin Joyful Life Services Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2152.HK)
2869.HK vs 2152.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 2152.HK has a market cap of 432.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 2152.HK trades at HK$4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 2152.HK's P/E ratio is 5.56. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2152.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 2152.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 2152.HK's competition here
Hevol Services Group Co. Limited (HKSE: 6093.HK)
2869.HK vs 6093.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 6093.HK has a market cap of 425.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 6093.HK trades at HK$0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 6093.HK's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 6093.HK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 6093.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 6093.HK's competition here
Chuang's Consortium International Limited (HKSE: 0367.HK)
2869.HK vs 0367.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 0367.HK has a market cap of 414.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 0367.HK trades at HK$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 0367.HK's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0367.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 0367.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 0367.HK's competition here
Central China New Life Limited (HKSE: 9983.HK)
2869.HK vs 9983.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 9983.HK has a market cap of 406M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 9983.HK trades at HK$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 9983.HK's P/E ratio is 1.84. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 9983.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 9983.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 9983.HK's competition here
China Oceanwide Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0715.HK)
2869.HK vs 0715.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 0715.HK has a market cap of 403.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 0715.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 0715.HK's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0715.HK's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is less volatile compared to 0715.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 0715.HK's competition here
Ruisen Life Service Co, Limited (HKSE: 1922.HK)
2869.HK vs 1922.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 1922.HK has a market cap of 363.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 1922.HK trades at HK$1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 1922.HK's P/E ratio is 7.56. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1922.HK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 1922.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 1922.HK's competition here
Gangyu Smart Urban Services Holding Limited (HKSE: 0265.HK)
2869.HK vs 0265.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 0265.HK has a market cap of 361.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 0265.HK trades at HK$1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 0265.HK's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0265.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 0265.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 0265.HK's competition here
Sino-Ocean Service Holding Limited (HKSE: 6677.HK)
2869.HK vs 6677.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 6677.HK has a market cap of 355.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 6677.HK trades at HK$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 6677.HK's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 6677.HK's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is less volatile compared to 6677.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 6677.HK's competition here
Fineland Living Services Group Limited (HKSE: 9978.HK)
2869.HK vs 9978.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 9978.HK has a market cap of 348M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 9978.HK trades at HK$0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 9978.HK's P/E ratio is -8.60. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 9978.HK's ROE of -11.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is less volatile compared to 9978.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 9978.HK's competition here
Great Wall Pan Asia Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0583.HK)
2869.HK vs 0583.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 0583.HK has a market cap of 333.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 0583.HK trades at HK$0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 0583.HK's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0583.HK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is less volatile compared to 0583.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 0583.HK's competition here
KWG Living Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 3913.HK)
2869.HK vs 3913.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 3913.HK has a market cap of 326.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 3913.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 3913.HK's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 3913.HK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 3913.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 3913.HK's competition here
Tern Properties Company Limited (HKSE: 0277.HK)
2869.HK vs 0277.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 0277.HK has a market cap of 318.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 0277.HK trades at HK$1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 0277.HK's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0277.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 0277.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 0277.HK's competition here
Colour Life Services Group Co., Limited (HKSE: 1778.HK)
2869.HK vs 1778.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 1778.HK has a market cap of 306.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 1778.HK trades at HK$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 1778.HK's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1778.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is less volatile compared to 1778.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 1778.HK's competition here
Ronshine Service Holding Co., Ltd (HKSE: 2207.HK)
2869.HK vs 2207.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 2207.HK has a market cap of 304.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 2207.HK trades at HK$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 2207.HK's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2207.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 2207.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 2207.HK's competition here
Dexin Services Group Limited (HKSE: 2215.HK)
2869.HK vs 2215.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 2215.HK has a market cap of 304.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 2215.HK trades at HK$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 2215.HK's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2215.HK's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is less volatile compared to 2215.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 2215.HK's competition here
Lushang Life Services Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2376.HK)
2869.HK vs 2376.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 2376.HK has a market cap of 274M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 2376.HK trades at HK$2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 2376.HK's P/E ratio is 7.09. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2376.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 2376.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 2376.HK's competition here
Starjoy Wellness and Travel Company Limited (HKSE: 3662.HK)
2869.HK vs 3662.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 3662.HK has a market cap of 261.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 3662.HK trades at HK$0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 3662.HK's P/E ratio is 6.10. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 3662.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is less volatile compared to 3662.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 3662.HK's competition here
Jiayuan Services Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1153.HK)
2869.HK vs 1153.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 1153.HK has a market cap of 244.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 1153.HK trades at HK$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 1153.HK's P/E ratio is 1.67. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1153.HK's ROE of +31.48%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 1153.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 1153.HK's competition here
Legend Upstar Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0459.HK)
2869.HK vs 0459.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 0459.HK has a market cap of 240.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 0459.HK trades at HK$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 0459.HK's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0459.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 0459.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 0459.HK's competition here
Ye Xing Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1941.HK)
2869.HK vs 1941.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 1941.HK has a market cap of 233.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 1941.HK trades at HK$0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 1941.HK's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1941.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is less volatile compared to 1941.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 1941.HK's competition here
Dowell Service Group Co. Limited (HKSE: 2352.HK)
2869.HK vs 2352.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 2352.HK has a market cap of 221.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 2352.HK trades at HK$3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 2352.HK's P/E ratio is 7.02. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2352.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 2352.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 2352.HK's competition here
China Asia Valley Group Limited (HKSE: 0063.HK)
2869.HK vs 0063.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 0063.HK has a market cap of 216M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 0063.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 0063.HK's P/E ratio is 42.50. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0063.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 0063.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 0063.HK's competition here
Redco Healthy Living Company Limited (HKSE: 2370.HK)
2869.HK vs 2370.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 2370.HK has a market cap of 210M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 2370.HK trades at HK$1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 2370.HK's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2370.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is less volatile compared to 2370.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 2370.HK's competition here
Runhua Living Service Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 2455.HK)
2869.HK vs 2455.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 2455.HK has a market cap of 200.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 2455.HK trades at HK$0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 2455.HK's P/E ratio is 3.58. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2455.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 2455.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 2455.HK's competition here
Modern Living Investments Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8426.HK)
2869.HK vs 8426.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 8426.HK has a market cap of 200M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 8426.HK trades at HK$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 8426.HK's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8426.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 8426.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 8426.HK's competition here
Sundy Service Group Co. Ltd (HKSE: 9608.HK)
2869.HK vs 9608.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 9608.HK has a market cap of 199.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 9608.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 9608.HK's P/E ratio is 22.13. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 9608.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is less volatile compared to 9608.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 9608.HK's competition here
Roiserv Lifestyle Services Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2146.HK)
2869.HK vs 2146.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 2146.HK has a market cap of 196M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 2146.HK trades at HK$2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 2146.HK's P/E ratio is 6.39. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2146.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 2146.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 2146.HK's competition here
Asiasec Properties Limited (HKSE: 0271.HK)
2869.HK vs 0271.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 0271.HK has a market cap of 193.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 0271.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 0271.HK's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0271.HK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is less volatile compared to 0271.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 0271.HK's competition here
Asset Chain Limited (HKSE: 0616.HK)
2869.HK vs 0616.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 0616.HK has a market cap of 190.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 0616.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 0616.HK's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0616.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is less volatile compared to 0616.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 0616.HK's competition here
Everbright Grand China Assets Limited (HKSE: 3699.HK)
2869.HK vs 3699.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 3699.HK has a market cap of 178.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 3699.HK trades at HK$0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 3699.HK's P/E ratio is 6.62. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 3699.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 3699.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 3699.HK's competition here
Xinyuan Property Management Service (Cayman) Ltd. (HKSE: 1895.HK)
2869.HK vs 1895.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 1895.HK has a market cap of 172M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 1895.HK trades at HK$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 1895.HK's P/E ratio is 1.63. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1895.HK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is less volatile compared to 1895.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 1895.HK's competition here
Qingdao Holdings International Limited (HKSE: 0499.HK)
2869.HK vs 0499.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 0499.HK has a market cap of 171.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 0499.HK trades at HK$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 0499.HK's P/E ratio is -4.57. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0499.HK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 0499.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 0499.HK's competition here
Winfair Investment Company Limited (HKSE: 0287.HK)
2869.HK vs 0287.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 0287.HK has a market cap of 163.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 0287.HK trades at HK$4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 0287.HK's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0287.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 0287.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 0287.HK's competition here
AUX International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 2080.HK)
2869.HK vs 2080.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 2080.HK has a market cap of 157.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 2080.HK trades at HK$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 2080.HK's P/E ratio is 6.99. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2080.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is less volatile compared to 2080.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 2080.HK's competition here
Kaisa Prosperity Holdings Limited (HKSE: 2168.HK)
2869.HK vs 2168.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 2168.HK has a market cap of 152.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 2168.HK trades at HK$0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 2168.HK's P/E ratio is 7.39. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2168.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 2168.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 2168.HK's competition here
Hopefluent Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0733.HK)
2869.HK vs 0733.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 0733.HK has a market cap of 149M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 0733.HK trades at HK$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 0733.HK's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0733.HK's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 0733.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 0733.HK's competition here
Xingye Wulian Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 9916.HK)
2869.HK vs 9916.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 9916.HK has a market cap of 144M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 9916.HK trades at HK$0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 9916.HK's P/E ratio is 2.96. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 9916.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 9916.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 9916.HK's competition here
Wenling Zhejiang Measuring and Cutting Tools Trading Centre Company Limited (HKSE: 1379.HK)
2869.HK vs 1379.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 1379.HK has a market cap of 139.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 1379.HK trades at HK$1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 1379.HK's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1379.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 1379.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 1379.HK's competition here
Redsun Services Group Limited (HKSE: 1971.HK)
2869.HK vs 1971.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 1971.HK has a market cap of 134.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 1971.HK trades at HK$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 1971.HK's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1971.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 1971.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 1971.HK's competition here
Oriental Explorer Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0430.HK)
2869.HK vs 0430.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 0430.HK has a market cap of 133.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 0430.HK trades at HK$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 0430.HK's P/E ratio is -3.53. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0430.HK's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is less volatile compared to 0430.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 0430.HK's competition here
Zhongchang International Holdings Group Limited (HKSE: 0859.HK)
2869.HK vs 0859.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 0859.HK has a market cap of 132.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 0859.HK trades at HK$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 0859.HK's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0859.HK's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is less volatile compared to 0859.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 0859.HK's competition here
Xian Kingfar Property Services Co Ltd (HKSE: 1354.HK)
2869.HK vs 1354.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 1354.HK has a market cap of 127M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 1354.HK trades at HK$1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 1354.HK's P/E ratio is 190.50. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1354.HK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 1354.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 1354.HK's competition here
Global Digital Creations Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8271.HK)
2869.HK vs 8271.HK Comparison August 2026
Greentown Service Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2869.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2869.HK stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 8271.HK has a market cap of 108.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2869.HK is priced at HK$4.18 on the HKSE, while 8271.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.73, whereas 8271.HK's P/E ratio is -6.83. In terms of profitability, 2869.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8271.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2869.HK is more volatile compared to 8271.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2869.HK.Check 8271.HK's competition here