Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See 285A.T's competitors and their performance on the JPX and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for 285A.T and its JPX peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 285A.T | ¥56,010.00 | -9.49% | 30.7T | 55.06 | ¥1,017.33 | N/A |
| 6981.T | ¥8,311.00 | -2.66% | 15.1T | 65.39 | ¥127.09 | +0.78% |
| 6762.T | ¥3,021.00 | -3.05% | 5.7T | 28.75 | ¥105.08 | +1.19% |
| 4062.T | ¥17,370.00 | -3.90% | 4.9T | 76.08 | ¥228.30 | +0.17% |
| 6479.T | ¥3,879.00 | -2.32% | 1.6T | 15.73 | ¥246.60 | +1.29% |
| 6976.T | ¥11,415.00 | -6.09% | 1.4T | 96.34 | ¥118.49 | +0.79% |
| 7701.T | ¥4,164.00 | +2.49% | 1.2T | 19.88 | ¥209.47 | +1.66% |
| 6806.T | ¥28,340.00 | +0.50% | 894.3B | 28.57 | ¥991.91 | +1.78% |
| 5344.T | ¥57,560.00 | -1.51% | 710.3B | 39.10 | ¥1,472.06 | +0.18% |
| 6965.T | ¥2,360.00 | -2.62% | 687.1B | 51.79 | ¥45.57 | +1.61% |
Stock Comparison
Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (JPX: 6981.T)
285A.T vs 6981.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6981.T has a market cap of 15.1T. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6981.T trades at ¥8,311.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6981.T's P/E ratio is 65.39. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6981.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6981.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6981.T's competition here
TDK Corporation (JPX: 6762.T)
285A.T vs 6762.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6762.T has a market cap of 5.7T. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6762.T trades at ¥3,021.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6762.T's P/E ratio is 28.75. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6762.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6762.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6762.T's competition here
Ibiden Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 4062.T)
285A.T vs 4062.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 4062.T has a market cap of 4.9T. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 4062.T trades at ¥17,370.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 4062.T's P/E ratio is 76.08. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 4062.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 4062.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 4062.T's competition here
MinebeaMitsumi Inc. (JPX: 6479.T)
285A.T vs 6479.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6479.T has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6479.T trades at ¥3,879.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6479.T's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6479.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6479.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6479.T's competition here
Taiyo Yuden Co., Ltd. (JPX: 6976.T)
285A.T vs 6976.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6976.T has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6976.T trades at ¥11,415.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6976.T's P/E ratio is 96.34. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6976.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6976.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6976.T's competition here
Shimadzu Corporation (JPX: 7701.T)
285A.T vs 7701.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 7701.T has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 7701.T trades at ¥4,164.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 7701.T's P/E ratio is 19.88. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 7701.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 7701.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 7701.T's competition here
Hirose Electric Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 6806.T)
285A.T vs 6806.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6806.T has a market cap of 894.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6806.T trades at ¥28,340.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6806.T's P/E ratio is 28.57. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6806.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6806.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6806.T's competition here
Maruwa Co., Ltd. (JPX: 5344.T)
285A.T vs 5344.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 5344.T has a market cap of 710.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 5344.T trades at ¥57,560.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 5344.T's P/E ratio is 39.10. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 5344.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 5344.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 5344.T's competition here
Hamamatsu Photonics K.K. (JPX: 6965.T)
285A.T vs 6965.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6965.T has a market cap of 687.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6965.T trades at ¥2,360.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6965.T's P/E ratio is 51.79. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6965.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6965.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6965.T's competition here
Dexerials Corporation (JPX: 4980.T)
285A.T vs 4980.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 4980.T has a market cap of 594.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 4980.T trades at ¥3,551.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 4980.T's P/E ratio is 21.33. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 4980.T's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 4980.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 4980.T's competition here
Meiko Electronics Co., Ltd. (JPX: 6787.T)
285A.T vs 6787.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6787.T has a market cap of 592.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6787.T trades at ¥23,100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6787.T's P/E ratio is 30.43. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6787.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6787.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6787.T's competition here
Anritsu Corporation (JPX: 6754.T)
285A.T vs 6754.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6754.T has a market cap of 505.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6754.T trades at ¥3,950.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6754.T's P/E ratio is 43.31. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6754.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6754.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6754.T's competition here
Rigaku Holdings Corp (JPX: 268A.T)
285A.T vs 268A.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 268A.T has a market cap of 483.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 268A.T trades at ¥2,134.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 268A.T's P/E ratio is 1461.64. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 268A.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 268A.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 268A.T's competition here
Alps Alpine Co., Ltd. (JPX: 6770.T)
285A.T vs 6770.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6770.T has a market cap of 422.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6770.T trades at ¥2,166.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6770.T's P/E ratio is 16.07. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6770.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6770.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6770.T's competition here
Nippon Electric Glass Co., Ltd. (JPX: 5214.T)
285A.T vs 5214.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 5214.T has a market cap of 408.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 5214.T trades at ¥5,517.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 5214.T's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 5214.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 5214.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 5214.T's competition here
JEOL Ltd. (JPX: 6951.T)
285A.T vs 6951.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6951.T has a market cap of 399.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6951.T trades at ¥8,194.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6951.T's P/E ratio is 18.94. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6951.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6951.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6951.T's competition here
Topcon Corporation (JPX: 7732.T)
285A.T vs 7732.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 7732.T has a market cap of 346.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 7732.T trades at ¥3,285.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 7732.T's P/E ratio is -35.90. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 7732.T's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 7732.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 7732.T's competition here
Amano Corporation (JPX: 6436.T)
285A.T vs 6436.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6436.T has a market cap of 268.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6436.T trades at ¥3,879.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6436.T's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6436.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6436.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6436.T's competition here
Furuno Electric Co., Ltd. (JPX: 6814.T)
285A.T vs 6814.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6814.T has a market cap of 234.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6814.T trades at ¥7,420.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6814.T's P/E ratio is 12.82. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6814.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6814.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6814.T's competition here
santec Holdings Corporation (JPX: 6777.T)
285A.T vs 6777.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6777.T has a market cap of 222.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6777.T trades at ¥18,950.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6777.T's P/E ratio is 29.07. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6777.T's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6777.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6777.T's competition here
Nichicon Corporation (JPX: 6996.T)
285A.T vs 6996.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6996.T has a market cap of 204.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6996.T trades at ¥3,045.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6996.T's P/E ratio is 32.40. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6996.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6996.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6996.T's competition here
Japan Display Inc. (JPX: 6740.T)
285A.T vs 6740.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6740.T has a market cap of 200.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6740.T trades at ¥47.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6740.T's P/E ratio is -14.69. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6740.T's ROE of +2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6740.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6740.T's competition here
SEIKOH GIKEN Co., Ltd. (JPX: 6834.T)
285A.T vs 6834.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6834.T has a market cap of 183.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6834.T trades at ¥20,540.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6834.T's P/E ratio is 29.53. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6834.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6834.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6834.T's competition here
Yamaichi Electronics Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 6941.T)
285A.T vs 6941.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6941.T has a market cap of 168.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6941.T trades at ¥9,130.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6941.T's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6941.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6941.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6941.T's competition here
Japan Aviation Electronics Industry, Limited (JPX: 6807.T)
285A.T vs 6807.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6807.T has a market cap of 165.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6807.T trades at ¥2,461.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6807.T's P/E ratio is 23.47. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6807.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6807.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6807.T's competition here
Nihon Dengi Co., Ltd. (JPX: 1723.T)
285A.T vs 1723.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 1723.T has a market cap of 160B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 1723.T trades at ¥2,510.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 1723.T's P/E ratio is 18.94. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 1723.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is less volatile compared to 1723.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 1723.T's competition here
Hioki E.E. Corporation (JPX: 6866.T)
285A.T vs 6866.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6866.T has a market cap of 155.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6866.T trades at ¥11,570.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6866.T's P/E ratio is 21.82. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6866.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6866.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6866.T's competition here
Hosiden Corporation (JPX: 6804.T)
285A.T vs 6804.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6804.T has a market cap of 136.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6804.T trades at ¥2,765.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6804.T's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6804.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6804.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6804.T's competition here
AIMECHATEC, Ltd. (JPX: 6227.T)
285A.T vs 6227.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6227.T has a market cap of 132.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6227.T trades at ¥7,020.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6227.T's P/E ratio is 33.44. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6227.T's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6227.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6227.T's competition here
OPTEX Group Company, Limited (JPX: 6914.T)
285A.T vs 6914.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6914.T has a market cap of 128.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6914.T trades at ¥3,605.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6914.T's P/E ratio is 18.26. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6914.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6914.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6914.T's competition here
Enplas Corporation (JPX: 6961.T)
285A.T vs 6961.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6961.T has a market cap of 118.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6961.T trades at ¥13,150.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6961.T's P/E ratio is 22.37. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6961.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6961.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6961.T's competition here
Kohoku Kogyo CO.,LTD. (JPX: 6524.T)
285A.T vs 6524.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6524.T has a market cap of 117.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6524.T trades at ¥4,520.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6524.T's P/E ratio is 32.01. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6524.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6524.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6524.T's competition here
TOKYO KEIKI Inc. (JPX: 7721.T)
285A.T vs 7721.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 7721.T has a market cap of 114.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 7721.T trades at ¥6,980.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 7721.T's P/E ratio is 28.64. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 7721.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 7721.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 7721.T's competition here
Tokyo Electron Device Limited (JPX: 2760.T)
285A.T vs 2760.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 2760.T has a market cap of 112.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 2760.T trades at ¥3,835.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 2760.T's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 2760.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 2760.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 2760.T's competition here
Shibaura Electronics Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 6957.T)
285A.T vs 6957.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6957.T has a market cap of 107.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6957.T trades at ¥7,110.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6957.T's P/E ratio is 33.83. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6957.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6957.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6957.T's competition here
KOA Corporation (JPX: 6999.T)
285A.T vs 6999.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6999.T has a market cap of 103.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6999.T trades at ¥2,782.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6999.T's P/E ratio is 26.15. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6999.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6999.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6999.T's competition here
Yokowo Co., Ltd. (JPX: 6800.T)
285A.T vs 6800.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6800.T has a market cap of 102.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6800.T trades at ¥4,395.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6800.T's P/E ratio is 26.36. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6800.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6800.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6800.T's competition here
Espec Corp. (JPX: 6859.T)
285A.T vs 6859.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6859.T has a market cap of 88.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6859.T trades at ¥4,155.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6859.T's P/E ratio is 15.37. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6859.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6859.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6859.T's competition here
Hakuto Co., Ltd. (JPX: 7433.T)
285A.T vs 7433.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 7433.T has a market cap of 86.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 7433.T trades at ¥4,590.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 7433.T's P/E ratio is 17.25. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 7433.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 7433.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 7433.T's competition here
Arisawa Mfg. Co., Ltd. (JPX: 5208.T)
285A.T vs 5208.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 5208.T has a market cap of 82.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 5208.T trades at ¥2,510.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 5208.T's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 5208.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 5208.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 5208.T's competition here
A&D HOLON Holdings Company Limited (JPX: 7745.T)
285A.T vs 7745.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 7745.T has a market cap of 79.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 7745.T trades at ¥2,901.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 7745.T's P/E ratio is 13.41. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 7745.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 7745.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 7745.T's competition here
Nippon Kodoshi Corporation (JPX: 3891.T)
285A.T vs 3891.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 3891.T has a market cap of 75.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 3891.T trades at ¥7,130.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 3891.T's P/E ratio is 28.44. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 3891.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 3891.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 3891.T's competition here
Nippon Chemi-Con Corporation (JPX: 6997.T)
285A.T vs 6997.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6997.T has a market cap of 72.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6997.T trades at ¥3,240.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6997.T's P/E ratio is 30.48. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6997.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6997.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6997.T's competition here
Nagano Keiki Co., Ltd. (JPX: 7715.T)
285A.T vs 7715.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 7715.T has a market cap of 71.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 7715.T trades at ¥3,835.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 7715.T's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 7715.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 7715.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 7715.T's competition here
Tamura Corporation (JPX: 6768.T)
285A.T vs 6768.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6768.T has a market cap of 70.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6768.T trades at ¥891.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6768.T's P/E ratio is -51.53. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6768.T's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6768.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6768.T's competition here
SIIX Corporation (JPX: 7613.T)
285A.T vs 7613.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 7613.T has a market cap of 66.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 7613.T trades at ¥1,404.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 7613.T's P/E ratio is 23.11. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 7613.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 7613.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 7613.T's competition here
Nihon Dempa Kogyo Co., Ltd. (JPX: 6779.T)
285A.T vs 6779.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6779.T has a market cap of 64.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6779.T trades at ¥2,817.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6779.T's P/E ratio is 31.39. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6779.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6779.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6779.T's competition here
Tazmo Co., Ltd. (JPX: 6266.T)
285A.T vs 6266.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6266.T has a market cap of 64.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6266.T trades at ¥4,440.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6266.T's P/E ratio is 22.96. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6266.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6266.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6266.T's competition here
Nissha Co., Ltd. (JPX: 7915.T)
285A.T vs 7915.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 7915.T has a market cap of 63.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 7915.T trades at ¥1,341.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 7915.T's P/E ratio is 47.54. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 7915.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 7915.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 7915.T's competition here
Iriso Electronics Co., Ltd. (JPX: 6908.T)
285A.T vs 6908.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6908.T has a market cap of 59.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6908.T trades at ¥2,798.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6908.T's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6908.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6908.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6908.T's competition here
V Technology Co., Ltd. (JPX: 7717.T)
285A.T vs 7717.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 7717.T has a market cap of 59.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 7717.T trades at ¥6,310.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 7717.T's P/E ratio is 25.92. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 7717.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 7717.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 7717.T's competition here
Kyosan Electric Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (JPX: 6742.T)
285A.T vs 6742.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6742.T has a market cap of 56.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6742.T trades at ¥910.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6742.T's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6742.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6742.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6742.T's competition here
Cosel Co., Ltd. (JPX: 6905.T)
285A.T vs 6905.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6905.T has a market cap of 52B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6905.T trades at ¥1,264.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6905.T's P/E ratio is -15.26. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6905.T's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6905.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6905.T's competition here
CMK Corporation (JPX: 6958.T)
285A.T vs 6958.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6958.T has a market cap of 45.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6958.T trades at ¥636.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6958.T's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6958.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6958.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6958.T's competition here
Sumida Corporation (JPX: 6817.T)
285A.T vs 6817.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6817.T has a market cap of 44.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6817.T trades at ¥1,335.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6817.T's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6817.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6817.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6817.T's competition here
Suzuki Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 6785.T)
285A.T vs 6785.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6785.T has a market cap of 42.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6785.T trades at ¥2,980.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6785.T's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6785.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6785.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6785.T's competition here
TOYO Corporation (JPX: 8151.T)
285A.T vs 8151.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 8151.T has a market cap of 42.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 8151.T trades at ¥1,973.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 8151.T's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 8151.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 8151.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 8151.T's competition here
IMV Corporation (JPX: 7760.T)
285A.T vs 7760.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 7760.T has a market cap of 38.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 7760.T trades at ¥2,410.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 7760.T's P/E ratio is 17.41. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 7760.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 7760.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 7760.T's competition here
OXIDE Corporation (JPX: 6521.T)
285A.T vs 6521.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6521.T has a market cap of 38.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6521.T trades at ¥3,290.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6521.T's P/E ratio is -197.01. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6521.T's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6521.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6521.T's competition here
Ryoyu Systems Co., Ltd. (JPX: 4685.T)
285A.T vs 4685.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 4685.T has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 4685.T trades at ¥2,850.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 4685.T's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 4685.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 4685.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 4685.T's competition here
SK-Electronics CO.,LTD. (JPX: 6677.T)
285A.T vs 6677.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6677.T has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6677.T trades at ¥3,430.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6677.T's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6677.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6677.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6677.T's competition here
Shindengen Electric Manufacturing Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 6844.T)
285A.T vs 6844.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6844.T has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6844.T trades at ¥3,480.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6844.T's P/E ratio is 6.34. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6844.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6844.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6844.T's competition here
Nishikawa Keisoku Co., Ltd. (JPX: 7500.T)
285A.T vs 7500.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 7500.T has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 7500.T trades at ¥9,930.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 7500.T's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 7500.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 7500.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 7500.T's competition here
Ohara Inc. (JPX: 5218.T)
285A.T vs 5218.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 5218.T has a market cap of 33.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 5218.T trades at ¥1,405.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 5218.T's P/E ratio is 23.83. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 5218.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 5218.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 5218.T's competition here
Kyoden Company, Limited (JPX: 6881.T)
285A.T vs 6881.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6881.T has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6881.T trades at ¥599.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6881.T's P/E ratio is 10.88. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6881.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6881.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6881.T's competition here
Chiyoda Integre Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 6915.T)
285A.T vs 6915.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6915.T has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6915.T trades at ¥3,340.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6915.T's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6915.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6915.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6915.T's competition here
GL Sciences Inc. (JPX: 7705.T)
285A.T vs 7705.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 7705.T has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 7705.T trades at ¥2,759.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 7705.T's P/E ratio is 7.95. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 7705.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 7705.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 7705.T's competition here
Nippo Ltd. (JPX: 9913.T)
285A.T vs 9913.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 9913.T has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 9913.T trades at ¥3,065.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 9913.T's P/E ratio is 19.24. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 9913.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 9913.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 9913.T's competition here
Teikoku Tsushin Kogyo Co., Ltd. (JPX: 6763.T)
285A.T vs 6763.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6763.T has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6763.T trades at ¥2,951.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6763.T's P/E ratio is 21.66. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6763.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6763.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6763.T's competition here
Adtec Plasma Technology Co., Ltd. (JPX: 6668.T)
285A.T vs 6668.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6668.T has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6668.T trades at ¥3,135.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6668.T's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6668.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6668.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6668.T's competition here
Chino Corporation (JPX: 6850.T)
285A.T vs 6850.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6850.T has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6850.T trades at ¥1,598.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6850.T's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6850.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6850.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6850.T's competition here
Futaba Corporation (JPX: 6986.T)
285A.T vs 6986.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6986.T has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6986.T trades at ¥593.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6986.T's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6986.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6986.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6986.T's competition here
Daishinku Corp. (JPX: 6962.T)
285A.T vs 6962.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6962.T has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6962.T trades at ¥765.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6962.T's P/E ratio is 57.91. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6962.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6962.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6962.T's competition here
KEIWA Incorporated (JPX: 4251.T)
285A.T vs 4251.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 4251.T has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 4251.T trades at ¥1,208.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 4251.T's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 4251.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 4251.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 4251.T's competition here
Y.A.C. Holdings Co., Ltd. (JPX: 6298.T)
285A.T vs 6298.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6298.T has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6298.T trades at ¥1,162.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6298.T's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6298.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6298.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6298.T's competition here
Nireco Corporation (JPX: 6863.T)
285A.T vs 6863.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6863.T has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6863.T trades at ¥2,802.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6863.T's P/E ratio is 14.24. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6863.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6863.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6863.T's competition here
Hokuriku Electric Industry Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 6989.T)
285A.T vs 6989.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6989.T has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6989.T trades at ¥2,498.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6989.T's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6989.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6989.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6989.T's competition here
SEMITEC Corporation (JPX: 6626.T)
285A.T vs 6626.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6626.T has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6626.T trades at ¥2,002.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6626.T's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6626.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6626.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6626.T's competition here
SMK Corporation (JPX: 6798.T)
285A.T vs 6798.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6798.T has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6798.T trades at ¥2,992.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6798.T's P/E ratio is 337.32. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6798.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6798.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6798.T's competition here
Okamoto Glass Co., Ltd. (JPX: 7746.T)
285A.T vs 7746.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 7746.T has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 7746.T trades at ¥758.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 7746.T's P/E ratio is -134.88. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 7746.T's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 7746.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 7746.T's competition here
Inter Action Corporation (JPX: 7725.T)
285A.T vs 7725.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 7725.T has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 7725.T trades at ¥1,700.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 7725.T's P/E ratio is 32.92. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 7725.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 7725.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 7725.T's competition here
Enomoto Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 6928.T)
285A.T vs 6928.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6928.T has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6928.T trades at ¥2,576.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6928.T's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6928.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6928.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6928.T's competition here
Dkk-Toa Corporation (JPX: 6848.T)
285A.T vs 6848.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6848.T has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6848.T trades at ¥852.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6848.T's P/E ratio is 17.75. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6848.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6848.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6848.T's competition here
Muto Seiko Co. (JPX: 7927.T)
285A.T vs 7927.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 7927.T has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 7927.T trades at ¥2,330.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 7927.T's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 7927.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 7927.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 7927.T's competition here
Techno Horizon Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 6629.T)
285A.T vs 6629.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6629.T has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6629.T trades at ¥1,031.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6629.T's P/E ratio is 5.64. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6629.T's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6629.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6629.T's competition here
Sigmakoki Co., Ltd. (JPX: 7713.T)
285A.T vs 7713.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 7713.T has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 7713.T trades at ¥1,929.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 7713.T's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 7713.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 7713.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 7713.T's competition here
Mitachi Co., Ltd. (JPX: 3321.T)
285A.T vs 3321.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 3321.T has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 3321.T trades at ¥1,533.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 3321.T's P/E ratio is 6.31. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 3321.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 3321.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 3321.T's competition here
Mansei Corporation (JPX: 7565.T)
285A.T vs 7565.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 7565.T has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 7565.T trades at ¥6,730.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 7565.T's P/E ratio is 9.81. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 7565.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 7565.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 7565.T's competition here
NF Holdings Corporation (JPX: 6864.T)
285A.T vs 6864.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6864.T has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6864.T trades at ¥1,540.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6864.T's P/E ratio is 16.69. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6864.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6864.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6864.T's competition here
nms Holdings Corporation (JPX: 2162.T)
285A.T vs 2162.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 2162.T has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 2162.T trades at ¥536.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 2162.T's P/E ratio is 33.35. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 2162.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 2162.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 2162.T's competition here
Kimoto Co., Ltd. (JPX: 7908.T)
285A.T vs 7908.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 7908.T has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 7908.T trades at ¥235.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 7908.T's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 7908.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 7908.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 7908.T's competition here
KEL Corporation (JPX: 6919.T)
285A.T vs 6919.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6919.T has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6919.T trades at ¥1,390.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6919.T's P/E ratio is 48.06. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6919.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6919.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6919.T's competition here
Lecip Holdings Corporation (JPX: 7213.T)
285A.T vs 7213.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 7213.T has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 7213.T trades at ¥614.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 7213.T's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 7213.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 7213.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 7213.T's competition here
Solekia Limited (JPX: 9867.T)
285A.T vs 9867.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 9867.T has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 9867.T trades at ¥10,260.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 9867.T's P/E ratio is 5.21. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 9867.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 9867.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 9867.T's competition here
WILLTEC Co., Ltd. (JPX: 7087.T)
285A.T vs 7087.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 7087.T has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 7087.T trades at ¥1,350.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 7087.T's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 7087.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 7087.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 7087.T's competition here
Kuramoto Co., Ltd. (JPX: 5216.T)
285A.T vs 5216.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 5216.T has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 5216.T trades at ¥155.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 5216.T's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 5216.T's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 5216.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 5216.T's competition here
Asti Corporation (JPX: 6899.T)
285A.T vs 6899.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6899.T has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6899.T trades at ¥2,401.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6899.T's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6899.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6899.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6899.T's competition here
Tokyo Cosmos Electric Co., Ltd. (JPX: 6772.T)
285A.T vs 6772.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6772.T has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6772.T trades at ¥1,066.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6772.T's P/E ratio is 256.50. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6772.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6772.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6772.T's competition here
Shirai Electronics Industrial Co., Ltd. (JPX: 6658.T)
285A.T vs 6658.T Comparison July 2026
Kioxia Holdings Corp. (JPX: 285A.T) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 285A.T stands at 30.7T. In comparison, 6658.T has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 285A.T is priced at ¥56,010.00 on the JPX, while 6658.T trades at ¥450.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
285A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 55.06, whereas 6658.T's P/E ratio is 5.14. In terms of profitability, 285A.T's ROE is +0.56%, compared to 6658.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 285A.T is more volatile compared to 6658.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 285A.T.Check 6658.T's competition here