Tomen Devices Corporation
Tomen Devices Corporation (2737.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (2737.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2737.T | ¥14,640.00 | +0.14% | 98.1B | 9.80 | ¥1,472.23 | +3.74% |
| 6857.T | ¥29,750.00 | +1.05% | 22.9T | 88.43 | ¥356.22 | +0.17% |
| 8035.T | ¥45,150.00 | -1.53% | 21.6T | 39.97 | ¥1,178.35 | +1.28% |
| 6146.T | ¥76,440.00 | +6.61% | 8.2T | 60.94 | ¥1,247.58 | +0.66% |
| 6723.T | ¥2,913.00 | -7.26% | 5.7T | -109.31 | -¥28.58 | +0.90% |
| 5016.T | ¥4,824.00 | +4.30% | 4.5T | 44.15 | ¥110.08 | N/A |
| 6920.T | ¥44,330.00 | -1.62% | 4.1T | 47.30 | ¥967.68 | +0.76% |
| 7735.T | ¥10,445.00 | -1.56% | 2T | 34.63 | ¥312.01 | +1.30% |
| 6525.T | ¥6,512.00 | -2.02% | 1.6T | 46.89 | ¥143.55 | +0.53% |
| 6963.T | ¥3,431.00 | -8.87% | 1.3T | -30.68 | -¥111.44 | +1.46% |
Stock Comparison
2737.T vs 6857.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 6857.T has a market cap of 22.9T. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 6857.T trades at ¥29,750.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 6857.T's P/E ratio is 88.43. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 6857.T's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is less volatile compared to 6857.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 6857.T's competition here
2737.T vs 8035.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 8035.T has a market cap of 21.6T. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 8035.T trades at ¥45,150.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 8035.T's P/E ratio is 39.97. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 8035.T's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is less volatile compared to 8035.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 8035.T's competition here
2737.T vs 6146.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 6146.T has a market cap of 8.2T. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 6146.T trades at ¥76,440.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 6146.T's P/E ratio is 60.94. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 6146.T's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is less volatile compared to 6146.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 6146.T's competition here
2737.T vs 6723.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 6723.T has a market cap of 5.7T. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 6723.T trades at ¥2,913.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 6723.T's P/E ratio is -109.31. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 6723.T's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is less volatile compared to 6723.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 6723.T's competition here
2737.T vs 5016.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 5016.T has a market cap of 4.5T. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 5016.T trades at ¥4,824.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 5016.T's P/E ratio is 44.15. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 5016.T's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is less volatile compared to 5016.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 5016.T's competition here
2737.T vs 6920.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 6920.T has a market cap of 4.1T. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 6920.T trades at ¥44,330.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 6920.T's P/E ratio is 47.30. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 6920.T's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is less volatile compared to 6920.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 6920.T's competition here
2737.T vs 7735.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 7735.T has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 7735.T trades at ¥10,445.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 7735.T's P/E ratio is 34.63. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 7735.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is less volatile compared to 7735.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 7735.T's competition here
2737.T vs 6525.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 6525.T has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 6525.T trades at ¥6,512.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 6525.T's P/E ratio is 46.89. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 6525.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is less volatile compared to 6525.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 6525.T's competition here
2737.T vs 6963.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 6963.T has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 6963.T trades at ¥3,431.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 6963.T's P/E ratio is -30.68. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 6963.T's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is less volatile compared to 6963.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 6963.T's competition here
2737.T vs 3436.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 3436.T has a market cap of 832.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 3436.T trades at ¥2,347.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 3436.T's P/E ratio is -70.76. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 3436.T's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is less volatile compared to 3436.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 3436.T's competition here
2737.T vs 6967.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 6967.T has a market cap of 797.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 6967.T trades at ¥5,900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 6967.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 6967.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is more volatile compared to 6967.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 6967.T's competition here
2737.T vs 7729.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 7729.T has a market cap of 704B. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 7729.T trades at ¥17,355.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 7729.T's P/E ratio is 32.64. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 7729.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is more volatile compared to 7729.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 7729.T's competition here
2737.T vs 6323.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 6323.T has a market cap of 693B. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 6323.T trades at ¥3,855.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 6323.T's P/E ratio is 36.50. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 6323.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is more volatile compared to 6323.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 6323.T's competition here
2737.T vs 6871.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 6871.T has a market cap of 517.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 6871.T trades at ¥13,090.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 6871.T's P/E ratio is 42.88. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 6871.T's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is less volatile compared to 6871.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 6871.T's competition here
2737.T vs 3132.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 3132.T has a market cap of 462.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 3132.T trades at ¥2,638.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 3132.T's P/E ratio is 21.98. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 3132.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is more volatile compared to 3132.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 3132.T's competition here
2737.T vs 6890.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 6890.T has a market cap of 338.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 6890.T trades at ¥7,750.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 6890.T's P/E ratio is 30.25. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 6890.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is less volatile compared to 6890.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 6890.T's competition here
2737.T vs 5384.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 5384.T has a market cap of 235.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 5384.T trades at ¥3,200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 5384.T's P/E ratio is 24.16. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 5384.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is more volatile compared to 5384.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 5384.T's competition here
2737.T vs 6315.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 6315.T has a market cap of 205.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 6315.T trades at ¥2,870.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 6315.T's P/E ratio is 33.49. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 6315.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is less volatile compared to 6315.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 6315.T's competition here
2737.T vs 6707.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 6707.T has a market cap of 196.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 6707.T trades at ¥9,481.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 6707.T's P/E ratio is 148.26. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 6707.T's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is less volatile compared to 6707.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 6707.T's competition here
2737.T vs 7826.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 7826.T has a market cap of 178.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 7826.T trades at ¥7,430.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 7826.T's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 7826.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is less volatile compared to 7826.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 7826.T's competition here
2737.T vs 6875.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 6875.T has a market cap of 161.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 6875.T trades at ¥10,070.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 6875.T's P/E ratio is 65.44. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 6875.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is less volatile compared to 6875.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 6875.T's competition here
2737.T vs 3445.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 3445.T has a market cap of 143.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 3445.T trades at ¥5,300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 3445.T's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 3445.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is more volatile compared to 3445.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 3445.T's competition here
2737.T vs 6966.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 6966.T has a market cap of 123.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 6966.T trades at ¥667.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 6966.T's P/E ratio is 39.37. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 6966.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is more volatile compared to 6966.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 6966.T's competition here
2737.T vs 8155.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 8155.T has a market cap of 118.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 8155.T trades at ¥3,690.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 8155.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 8155.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is more volatile compared to 8155.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 8155.T's competition here
2737.T vs 6855.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 6855.T has a market cap of 97.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 6855.T trades at ¥6,770.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 6855.T's P/E ratio is 22.40. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 6855.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is less volatile compared to 6855.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 6855.T's competition here
2737.T vs 6627.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 6627.T has a market cap of 92.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 6627.T trades at ¥10,040.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 6627.T's P/E ratio is 27.47. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 6627.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is more volatile compared to 6627.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 6627.T's competition here
2737.T vs 6387.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 6387.T has a market cap of 89.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 6387.T trades at ¥11,250.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 6387.T's P/E ratio is 51.36. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 6387.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is less volatile compared to 6387.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 6387.T's competition here
2737.T vs 3156.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 3156.T has a market cap of 79.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 3156.T trades at ¥2,871.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 3156.T's P/E ratio is 16.70. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 3156.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is more volatile compared to 3156.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 3156.T's competition here
2737.T vs 8084.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 8084.T has a market cap of 74.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 8084.T trades at ¥3,500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 8084.T's P/E ratio is 15.28. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 8084.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is more volatile compared to 8084.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 8084.T's competition here
2737.T vs 6613.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 6613.T has a market cap of 64B. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 6613.T trades at ¥1,459.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 6613.T's P/E ratio is -209.14. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 6613.T's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is less volatile compared to 6613.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 6613.T's competition here
2737.T vs 7609.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 7609.T has a market cap of 60.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 7609.T trades at ¥2,894.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 7609.T's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 7609.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is more volatile compared to 7609.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 7609.T's competition here
2737.T vs 6697.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 6697.T has a market cap of 52.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 6697.T trades at ¥2,794.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 6697.T's P/E ratio is 21.74. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 6697.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is more volatile compared to 6697.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 6697.T's competition here
2737.T vs 6625.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 6625.T has a market cap of 42.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 6625.T trades at ¥387.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 6625.T's P/E ratio is -229.52. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 6625.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is more volatile compared to 6625.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 6625.T's competition here
2737.T vs 7510.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 7510.T has a market cap of 37.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 7510.T trades at ¥2,362.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 7510.T's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 7510.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is more volatile compared to 7510.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 7510.T's competition here
2737.T vs 7467.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 7467.T has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 7467.T trades at ¥3,685.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 7467.T's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 7467.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is more volatile compared to 7467.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 7467.T's competition here
2737.T vs 8150.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 8150.T has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 8150.T trades at ¥2,683.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 8150.T's P/E ratio is 6.99. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 8150.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is more volatile compared to 8150.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 8150.T's competition here
2737.T vs 6832.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 6832.T has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 6832.T trades at ¥2,841.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 6832.T's P/E ratio is 286.19. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 6832.T's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is less volatile compared to 6832.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 6832.T's competition here
2737.T vs 7420.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 7420.T has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 7420.T trades at ¥1,886.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 7420.T's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 7420.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is more volatile compared to 7420.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 7420.T's competition here
2737.T vs 7888.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 7888.T has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 7888.T trades at ¥860.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 7888.T's P/E ratio is 6.47. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 7888.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is more volatile compared to 7888.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 7888.T's competition here
2737.T vs 9995.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 9995.T has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 9995.T trades at ¥748.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 9995.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 9995.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is more volatile compared to 9995.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 9995.T's competition here
2737.T vs 5217.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 5217.T has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 5217.T trades at ¥5,600.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 5217.T's P/E ratio is 7.93. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 5217.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is less volatile compared to 5217.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 5217.T's competition here
2737.T vs 6616.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 6616.T has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 6616.T trades at ¥1,948.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 6616.T's P/E ratio is -10.56. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 6616.T's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is more volatile compared to 6616.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 6616.T's competition here
2737.T vs 3640.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 3640.T has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 3640.T trades at ¥2,967.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 3640.T's P/E ratio is 6.09. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 3640.T's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is more volatile compared to 3640.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 3640.T's competition here
2737.T vs 6337.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 6337.T has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 6337.T trades at ¥2,782.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 6337.T's P/E ratio is 30.34. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 6337.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is more volatile compared to 6337.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 6337.T's competition here
2737.T vs 6769.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 6769.T has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 6769.T trades at ¥1,161.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 6769.T's P/E ratio is -38.56. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 6769.T's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is less volatile compared to 6769.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 6769.T's competition here
2737.T vs 6730.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 6730.T has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 6730.T trades at ¥1,166.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 6730.T's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 6730.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is more volatile compared to 6730.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 6730.T's competition here
2737.T vs 6973.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 6973.T has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 6973.T trades at ¥3,920.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 6973.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 6973.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is more volatile compared to 6973.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 6973.T's competition here
2737.T vs 4238.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 4238.T has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 4238.T trades at ¥1,265.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 4238.T's P/E ratio is 18.78. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 4238.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is less volatile compared to 4238.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 4238.T's competition here
2737.T vs 6338.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 6338.T has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 6338.T trades at ¥1,699.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 6338.T's P/E ratio is 15.87. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 6338.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is more volatile compared to 6338.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 6338.T's competition here
2737.T vs 7087.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 7087.T has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 7087.T trades at ¥1,289.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 7087.T's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 7087.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is more volatile compared to 7087.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 7087.T's competition here
2737.T vs 6938.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 6938.T has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 6938.T trades at ¥479.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 6938.T's P/E ratio is 714.93. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 6938.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is more volatile compared to 6938.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 6938.T's competition here
2737.T vs 6228.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 6228.T has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 6228.T trades at ¥609.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 6228.T's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 6228.T's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is less volatile compared to 6228.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 6228.T's competition here
2737.T vs 6513.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 6513.T has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 6513.T trades at ¥1,059.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 6513.T's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 6513.T's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is more volatile compared to 6513.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 6513.T's competition here
2737.T vs 3131.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 3131.T has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 3131.T trades at ¥2,797.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 3131.T's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 3131.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is more volatile compared to 3131.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 3131.T's competition here
2737.T vs 6614.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 6614.T has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 6614.T trades at ¥809.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 6614.T's P/E ratio is -41.56. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 6614.T's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is less volatile compared to 6614.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 6614.T's competition here
2737.T vs 6656.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 6656.T has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 6656.T trades at ¥772.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 6656.T's P/E ratio is -7.31. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 6656.T's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is more volatile compared to 6656.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 6656.T's competition here
2737.T vs 3089.T Comparison April 2026
2737.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2737.T stands at 98.1B. In comparison, 3089.T has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2737.T is priced at ¥14,640.00, while 3089.T trades at ¥1,061.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2737.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.80, whereas 3089.T's P/E ratio is 4.45. In terms of profitability, 2737.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 3089.T's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 2737.T is more volatile compared to 3089.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2737.T.Check 3089.T's competition here