Shanghai Zhida Technology Development Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2650.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See 2650.HK's competitors and their performance on the HKSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for 2650.HK and its HKSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2650.HK | HK$10.30 | +0.49% | 3.3B | -14.93 | -HK$0.69 | N/A |
| 3750.HK | HK$652.50 | +3.74% | 3T | 31.18 | HK$20.93 | +1.63% |
| 1888.HK | HK$37.28 | +3.73% | 117.5B | 47.86 | HK$0.78 | +1.82% |
| 6656.HK | HK$341.20 | +6.43% | 48.4B | 24.96 | HK$13.67 | N/A |
| 3931.HK | HK$20.26 | +2.12% | 35.9B | 17.40 | HK$1.16 | N/A |
| 1729.HK | HK$15.25 | +0.93% | 34.1B | 41.22 | HK$0.37 | +0.26% |
| 2579.HK | HK$25.82 | +5.04% | 26.1B | 43.32 | HK$0.60 | +1.69% |
| 3393.HK | HK$16.44 | +3.14% | 17.1B | 13.98 | HK$1.18 | +2.92% |
| 3677.HK | HK$5.33 | +2.50% | 13.6B | 14.01 | HK$0.38 | N/A |
| 8137.HK | HK$0.48 | +3.23% | 7B | -11.36 | -HK$0.04 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited (HKSE: 3750.HK)
2650.HK vs 3750.HK Comparison August 2026
Shanghai Zhida Technology Development Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2650.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2650.HK stands at 3.3B. In comparison, 3750.HK has a market cap of 3T. Regarding current trading prices, 2650.HK is priced at HK$10.30 on the HKSE, while 3750.HK trades at HK$652.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.93, whereas 3750.HK's P/E ratio is 31.18. In terms of profitability, 2650.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 3750.HK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 2650.HK is more volatile compared to 3750.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2650.HK.Check 3750.HK's competition here
Kingboard Laminates Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1888.HK)
2650.HK vs 1888.HK Comparison August 2026
Shanghai Zhida Technology Development Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2650.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2650.HK stands at 3.3B. In comparison, 1888.HK has a market cap of 117.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2650.HK is priced at HK$10.30 on the HKSE, while 1888.HK trades at HK$37.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.93, whereas 1888.HK's P/E ratio is 47.86. In terms of profitability, 2650.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 1888.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 2650.HK is more volatile compared to 1888.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2650.HK.Check 1888.HK's competition here
Sigenergy Technology Co., Ltd (HKSE: 6656.HK)
2650.HK vs 6656.HK Comparison August 2026
Shanghai Zhida Technology Development Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2650.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2650.HK stands at 3.3B. In comparison, 6656.HK has a market cap of 48.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2650.HK is priced at HK$10.30 on the HKSE, while 6656.HK trades at HK$341.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.93, whereas 6656.HK's P/E ratio is 24.96. In terms of profitability, 2650.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 6656.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 2650.HK is less volatile compared to 6656.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2650.HK.Check 6656.HK's competition here
CALB Group Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 3931.HK)
2650.HK vs 3931.HK Comparison August 2026
Shanghai Zhida Technology Development Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2650.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2650.HK stands at 3.3B. In comparison, 3931.HK has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2650.HK is priced at HK$10.30 on the HKSE, while 3931.HK trades at HK$20.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.93, whereas 3931.HK's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, 2650.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 3931.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2650.HK is more volatile compared to 3931.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2650.HK.Check 3931.HK's competition here
Time Interconnect Technology Limited (HKSE: 1729.HK)
2650.HK vs 1729.HK Comparison August 2026
Shanghai Zhida Technology Development Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2650.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2650.HK stands at 3.3B. In comparison, 1729.HK has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2650.HK is priced at HK$10.30 on the HKSE, while 1729.HK trades at HK$15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.93, whereas 1729.HK's P/E ratio is 41.22. In terms of profitability, 2650.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 1729.HK's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 2650.HK is more volatile compared to 1729.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2650.HK.Check 1729.HK's competition here
CNGR Advanced Material Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2579.HK)
2650.HK vs 2579.HK Comparison August 2026
Shanghai Zhida Technology Development Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2650.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2650.HK stands at 3.3B. In comparison, 2579.HK has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2650.HK is priced at HK$10.30 on the HKSE, while 2579.HK trades at HK$25.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.93, whereas 2579.HK's P/E ratio is 43.32. In terms of profitability, 2650.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 2579.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2650.HK is more volatile compared to 2579.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2650.HK.Check 2579.HK's competition here
Wasion Holdings Limited (HKSE: 3393.HK)
2650.HK vs 3393.HK Comparison August 2026
Shanghai Zhida Technology Development Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2650.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2650.HK stands at 3.3B. In comparison, 3393.HK has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2650.HK is priced at HK$10.30 on the HKSE, while 3393.HK trades at HK$16.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.93, whereas 3393.HK's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, 2650.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 3393.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 2650.HK is more volatile compared to 3393.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2650.HK.Check 3393.HK's competition here
Jiangsu Zenergy Battery Technologies Group Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 3677.HK)
2650.HK vs 3677.HK Comparison August 2026
Shanghai Zhida Technology Development Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2650.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2650.HK stands at 3.3B. In comparison, 3677.HK has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2650.HK is priced at HK$10.30 on the HKSE, while 3677.HK trades at HK$5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.93, whereas 3677.HK's P/E ratio is 14.01. In terms of profitability, 2650.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 3677.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 2650.HK is more volatile compared to 3677.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2650.HK.Check 3677.HK's competition here
Honbridge Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8137.HK)
2650.HK vs 8137.HK Comparison August 2026
Shanghai Zhida Technology Development Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2650.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2650.HK stands at 3.3B. In comparison, 8137.HK has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2650.HK is priced at HK$10.30 on the HKSE, while 8137.HK trades at HK$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.93, whereas 8137.HK's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, 2650.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 8137.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2650.HK is more volatile compared to 8137.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2650.HK.Check 8137.HK's competition here
Guoxia Technology Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2655.HK)
2650.HK vs 2655.HK Comparison August 2026
Shanghai Zhida Technology Development Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2650.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2650.HK stands at 3.3B. In comparison, 2655.HK has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2650.HK is priced at HK$10.30 on the HKSE, while 2655.HK trades at HK$17.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.93, whereas 2655.HK's P/E ratio is 65.46. In terms of profitability, 2650.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 2655.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 2650.HK is more volatile compared to 2655.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2650.HK.Check 2655.HK's competition here
Tianneng Power International Limited (HKSE: 0819.HK)
2650.HK vs 0819.HK Comparison August 2026
Shanghai Zhida Technology Development Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2650.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2650.HK stands at 3.3B. In comparison, 0819.HK has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2650.HK is priced at HK$10.30 on the HKSE, while 0819.HK trades at HK$4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.93, whereas 0819.HK's P/E ratio is 3.25. In terms of profitability, 2650.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 0819.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2650.HK is more volatile compared to 0819.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2650.HK.Check 0819.HK's competition here
Dajin (HKSE: 1081.HK)
2650.HK vs 1081.HK Comparison August 2026
Shanghai Zhida Technology Development Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2650.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2650.HK stands at 3.3B. In comparison, 1081.HK has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2650.HK is priced at HK$10.30 on the HKSE, while 1081.HK trades at HK$32.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.93, whereas 1081.HK's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, 2650.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 1081.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 2650.HK is more volatile compared to 1081.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2650.HK.Check 1081.HK's competition here
Shuangdeng Group Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 6960.HK)
2650.HK vs 6960.HK Comparison August 2026
Shanghai Zhida Technology Development Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2650.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2650.HK stands at 3.3B. In comparison, 6960.HK has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2650.HK is priced at HK$10.30 on the HKSE, while 6960.HK trades at HK$7.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.93, whereas 6960.HK's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, 2650.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 6960.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 2650.HK is more volatile compared to 6960.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2650.HK.Check 6960.HK's competition here
Jiangnan Group Limited (HKSE: 1366.HK)
2650.HK vs 1366.HK Comparison August 2026
Shanghai Zhida Technology Development Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2650.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2650.HK stands at 3.3B. In comparison, 1366.HK has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2650.HK is priced at HK$10.30 on the HKSE, while 1366.HK trades at HK$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.93, whereas 1366.HK's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, 2650.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 1366.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2650.HK is more volatile compared to 1366.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2650.HK.Check 1366.HK's competition here
Sun.King Technology Group Limited (HKSE: 0580.HK)
2650.HK vs 0580.HK Comparison August 2026
Shanghai Zhida Technology Development Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2650.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2650.HK stands at 3.3B. In comparison, 0580.HK has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2650.HK is priced at HK$10.30 on the HKSE, while 0580.HK trades at HK$1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.93, whereas 0580.HK's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, 2650.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 0580.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2650.HK is more volatile compared to 0580.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2650.HK.Check 0580.HK's competition here
Ten Pao Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1979.HK)
2650.HK vs 1979.HK Comparison August 2026
Shanghai Zhida Technology Development Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2650.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2650.HK stands at 3.3B. In comparison, 1979.HK has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2650.HK is priced at HK$10.30 on the HKSE, while 1979.HK trades at HK$1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.93, whereas 1979.HK's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, 2650.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 1979.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 2650.HK is more volatile compared to 1979.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2650.HK.Check 1979.HK's competition here
Shanghai REFIRE Group Ltd (HKSE: 2570.HK)
2650.HK vs 2570.HK Comparison August 2026
Shanghai Zhida Technology Development Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2650.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2650.HK stands at 3.3B. In comparison, 2570.HK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2650.HK is priced at HK$10.30 on the HKSE, while 2570.HK trades at HK$16.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.93, whereas 2570.HK's P/E ratio is -1.99. In terms of profitability, 2650.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 2570.HK's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 2650.HK is more volatile compared to 2570.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2650.HK.Check 2570.HK's competition here
ShenZhen Woer Heat-Shrinkable Material Co.,Ltd. (HKSE: 9981.HK)
2650.HK vs 9981.HK Comparison August 2026
Shanghai Zhida Technology Development Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2650.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2650.HK stands at 3.3B. In comparison, 9981.HK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2650.HK is priced at HK$10.30 on the HKSE, while 9981.HK trades at HK$10.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.93, whereas 9981.HK's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, 2650.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 9981.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 2650.HK is more volatile compared to 9981.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2650.HK.Check 9981.HK's competition here
Leoch International Technology Limited (HKSE: 0842.HK)
2650.HK vs 0842.HK Comparison August 2026
Shanghai Zhida Technology Development Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2650.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2650.HK stands at 3.3B. In comparison, 0842.HK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2650.HK is priced at HK$10.30 on the HKSE, while 0842.HK trades at HK$0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.93, whereas 0842.HK's P/E ratio is 2.10. In terms of profitability, 2650.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 0842.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2650.HK is more volatile compared to 0842.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2650.HK.Check 0842.HK's competition here
Unity Group Holdings International Limited (HKSE: 1539.HK)
2650.HK vs 1539.HK Comparison August 2026
Shanghai Zhida Technology Development Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2650.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2650.HK stands at 3.3B. In comparison, 1539.HK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2650.HK is priced at HK$10.30 on the HKSE, while 1539.HK trades at HK$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.93, whereas 1539.HK's P/E ratio is 17.78. In terms of profitability, 2650.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 1539.HK's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 2650.HK is less volatile compared to 1539.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2650.HK.Check 1539.HK's competition here
Zhaowei (HKSE: 2692.HK)
2650.HK vs 2692.HK Comparison August 2026
Shanghai Zhida Technology Development Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2650.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2650.HK stands at 3.3B. In comparison, 2692.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2650.HK is priced at HK$10.30 on the HKSE, while 2692.HK trades at HK$42.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.93, whereas 2692.HK's P/E ratio is 219.60. In terms of profitability, 2650.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 2692.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 2650.HK is more volatile compared to 2692.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2650.HK.Check 2692.HK's competition here
Sino-Synergy Hydrogen Energy (HKSE: 9663.HK)
2650.HK vs 9663.HK Comparison August 2026
Shanghai Zhida Technology Development Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2650.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2650.HK stands at 3.3B. In comparison, 9663.HK has a market cap of 968.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2650.HK is priced at HK$10.30 on the HKSE, while 9663.HK trades at HK$2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.93, whereas 9663.HK's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, 2650.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 9663.HK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 2650.HK is more volatile compared to 9663.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2650.HK.Check 9663.HK's competition here
Trio Industrial Electronics Group Limited (HKSE: 1710.HK)
2650.HK vs 1710.HK Comparison August 2026
Shanghai Zhida Technology Development Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2650.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2650.HK stands at 3.3B. In comparison, 1710.HK has a market cap of 695M. Regarding current trading prices, 2650.HK is priced at HK$10.30 on the HKSE, while 1710.HK trades at HK$0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.93, whereas 1710.HK's P/E ratio is 81.19. In terms of profitability, 2650.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 1710.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2650.HK is more volatile compared to 1710.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2650.HK.Check 1710.HK's competition here
Tesson Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1201.HK)
2650.HK vs 1201.HK Comparison August 2026
Shanghai Zhida Technology Development Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2650.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2650.HK stands at 3.3B. In comparison, 1201.HK has a market cap of 494.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2650.HK is priced at HK$10.30 on the HKSE, while 1201.HK trades at HK$2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.93, whereas 1201.HK's P/E ratio is -3.02. In terms of profitability, 2650.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 1201.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2650.HK is more volatile compared to 1201.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2650.HK.Check 1201.HK's competition here
SMC Electric Limited (HKSE: 2381.HK)
2650.HK vs 2381.HK Comparison August 2026
Shanghai Zhida Technology Development Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2650.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2650.HK stands at 3.3B. In comparison, 2381.HK has a market cap of 488M. Regarding current trading prices, 2650.HK is priced at HK$10.30 on the HKSE, while 2381.HK trades at HK$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.93, whereas 2381.HK's P/E ratio is 18.56. In terms of profitability, 2650.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 2381.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2650.HK is more volatile compared to 2381.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2650.HK.Check 2381.HK's competition here
VPower Group International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1608.HK)
2650.HK vs 1608.HK Comparison August 2026
Shanghai Zhida Technology Development Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2650.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2650.HK stands at 3.3B. In comparison, 1608.HK has a market cap of 413.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 2650.HK is priced at HK$10.30 on the HKSE, while 1608.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.93, whereas 1608.HK's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, 2650.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 1608.HK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 2650.HK is more volatile compared to 1608.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2650.HK.Check 1608.HK's competition here
Neo-Neon Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1868.HK)
2650.HK vs 1868.HK Comparison August 2026
Shanghai Zhida Technology Development Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2650.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2650.HK stands at 3.3B. In comparison, 1868.HK has a market cap of 399.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2650.HK is priced at HK$10.30 on the HKSE, while 1868.HK trades at HK$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.93, whereas 1868.HK's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, 2650.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 1868.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2650.HK is more volatile compared to 1868.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2650.HK.Check 1868.HK's competition here
Computime Group Limited (HKSE: 0320.HK)
2650.HK vs 0320.HK Comparison August 2026
Shanghai Zhida Technology Development Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2650.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2650.HK stands at 3.3B. In comparison, 0320.HK has a market cap of 387.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 2650.HK is priced at HK$10.30 on the HKSE, while 0320.HK trades at HK$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.93, whereas 0320.HK's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, 2650.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 0320.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2650.HK is more volatile compared to 0320.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2650.HK.Check 0320.HK's competition here
Veson Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1399.HK)
2650.HK vs 1399.HK Comparison August 2026
Shanghai Zhida Technology Development Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2650.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2650.HK stands at 3.3B. In comparison, 1399.HK has a market cap of 381.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 2650.HK is priced at HK$10.30 on the HKSE, while 1399.HK trades at HK$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.93, whereas 1399.HK's P/E ratio is -14.76. In terms of profitability, 2650.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 1399.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2650.HK is less volatile compared to 1399.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2650.HK.Check 1399.HK's competition here
Xinyi Electric Storage Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8328.HK)
2650.HK vs 8328.HK Comparison August 2026
Shanghai Zhida Technology Development Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2650.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2650.HK stands at 3.3B. In comparison, 8328.HK has a market cap of 259.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2650.HK is priced at HK$10.30 on the HKSE, while 8328.HK trades at HK$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.93, whereas 8328.HK's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, 2650.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 8328.HK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2650.HK is more volatile compared to 8328.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2650.HK.Check 8328.HK's competition here
Century Energy International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8132.HK)
2650.HK vs 8132.HK Comparison August 2026
Shanghai Zhida Technology Development Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2650.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2650.HK stands at 3.3B. In comparison, 8132.HK has a market cap of 202.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 2650.HK is priced at HK$10.30 on the HKSE, while 8132.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.93, whereas 8132.HK's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, 2650.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 8132.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 2650.HK is more volatile compared to 8132.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2650.HK.Check 8132.HK's competition here
Perennial International Limited (HKSE: 0725.HK)
2650.HK vs 0725.HK Comparison August 2026
Shanghai Zhida Technology Development Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2650.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2650.HK stands at 3.3B. In comparison, 0725.HK has a market cap of 195M. Regarding current trading prices, 2650.HK is priced at HK$10.30 on the HKSE, while 0725.HK trades at HK$0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.93, whereas 0725.HK's P/E ratio is 7.56. In terms of profitability, 2650.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 0725.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2650.HK is more volatile compared to 0725.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2650.HK.Check 0725.HK's competition here
REM Group (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 1750.HK)
2650.HK vs 1750.HK Comparison August 2026
Shanghai Zhida Technology Development Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2650.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2650.HK stands at 3.3B. In comparison, 1750.HK has a market cap of 153M. Regarding current trading prices, 2650.HK is priced at HK$10.30 on the HKSE, while 1750.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.93, whereas 1750.HK's P/E ratio is 92.39. In terms of profitability, 2650.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 1750.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2650.HK is more volatile compared to 1750.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2650.HK.Check 1750.HK's competition here
Sanergy Group Limited (HKSE: 2950.HK)
2650.HK vs 2950.HK Comparison August 2026
Shanghai Zhida Technology Development Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2650.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2650.HK stands at 3.3B. In comparison, 2950.HK has a market cap of 127.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 2650.HK is priced at HK$10.30 on the HKSE, while 2950.HK trades at HK$0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.93, whereas 2950.HK's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, 2650.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 2950.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 2650.HK is more volatile compared to 2950.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2650.HK.Check 2950.HK's competition here
China Titans Energy Technology Group Co., Limited (HKSE: 2188.HK)
2650.HK vs 2188.HK Comparison August 2026
Shanghai Zhida Technology Development Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2650.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2650.HK stands at 3.3B. In comparison, 2188.HK has a market cap of 123.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2650.HK is priced at HK$10.30 on the HKSE, while 2188.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.93, whereas 2188.HK's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, 2650.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 2188.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2650.HK is less volatile compared to 2188.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2650.HK.Check 2188.HK's competition here
SK Target Group Limited (HKSE: 8427.HK)
2650.HK vs 8427.HK Comparison August 2026
Shanghai Zhida Technology Development Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2650.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2650.HK stands at 3.3B. In comparison, 8427.HK has a market cap of 65.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2650.HK is priced at HK$10.30 on the HKSE, while 8427.HK trades at HK$4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.93, whereas 8427.HK's P/E ratio is 25.11. In terms of profitability, 2650.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 8427.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2650.HK is more volatile compared to 8427.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2650.HK.Check 8427.HK's competition here
IMS Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8136.HK)
2650.HK vs 8136.HK Comparison August 2026
Shanghai Zhida Technology Development Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2650.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2650.HK stands at 3.3B. In comparison, 8136.HK has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, 2650.HK is priced at HK$10.30 on the HKSE, while 8136.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.93, whereas 8136.HK's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, 2650.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 8136.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2650.HK is less volatile compared to 8136.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2650.HK.Check 8136.HK's competition here
Solartech International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1166.HK)
2650.HK vs 1166.HK Comparison August 2026
Shanghai Zhida Technology Development Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2650.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2650.HK stands at 3.3B. In comparison, 1166.HK has a market cap of 29.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2650.HK is priced at HK$10.30 on the HKSE, while 1166.HK trades at HK$0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.93, whereas 1166.HK's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, 2650.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 1166.HK's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 2650.HK is more volatile compared to 1166.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2650.HK.Check 1166.HK's competition here
China Saftower International Holding Group Limited (HKSE: 8623.HK)
2650.HK vs 8623.HK Comparison August 2026
Shanghai Zhida Technology Development Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2650.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2650.HK stands at 3.3B. In comparison, 8623.HK has a market cap of 25.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 2650.HK is priced at HK$10.30 on the HKSE, while 8623.HK trades at HK$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.93, whereas 8623.HK's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, 2650.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 8623.HK's ROE of +1.91%. Regarding short-term risk, 2650.HK is more volatile compared to 8623.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2650.HK.Check 8623.HK's competition here
Golden Power Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 3919.HK)
2650.HK vs 3919.HK Comparison August 2026
Shanghai Zhida Technology Development Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2650.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2650.HK stands at 3.3B. In comparison, 3919.HK has a market cap of 25.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 2650.HK is priced at HK$10.30 on the HKSE, while 3919.HK trades at HK$0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.93, whereas 3919.HK's P/E ratio is -54.66. In terms of profitability, 2650.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 3919.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2650.HK is more volatile compared to 3919.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2650.HK.Check 3919.HK's competition here
Ruixin International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0724.HK)
2650.HK vs 0724.HK Comparison August 2026
Shanghai Zhida Technology Development Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2650.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2650.HK stands at 3.3B. In comparison, 0724.HK has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2650.HK is priced at HK$10.30 on the HKSE, while 0724.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.93, whereas 0724.HK's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, 2650.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 0724.HK's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, 2650.HK is more volatile compared to 0724.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2650.HK.Check 0724.HK's competition here
Coslight Technology International Group Limited (HKSE: 1043.HK)
2650.HK vs 1043.HK Comparison August 2026
Shanghai Zhida Technology Development Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2650.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2650.HK stands at 3.3B. In comparison, 1043.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 2650.HK is priced at HK$10.30 on the HKSE, while 1043.HK trades at HK$0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.93, whereas 1043.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2650.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 1043.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2650.HK is more volatile compared to 1043.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2650.HK.Check 1043.HK's competition here
FDG Kinetic Limited (HKSE: 0378.HK)
2650.HK vs 0378.HK Comparison August 2026
Shanghai Zhida Technology Development Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2650.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2650.HK stands at 3.3B. In comparison, 0378.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 2650.HK is priced at HK$10.30 on the HKSE, while 0378.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.93, whereas 0378.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2650.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 0378.HK's ROE of +2.94%. Regarding short-term risk, 2650.HK is less volatile compared to 0378.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2650.HK.Check 0378.HK's competition here
Government of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region 3.5% 17-DEC-2027 (HKSE: 4286.HK)
2650.HK vs 4286.HK Comparison August 2026
Shanghai Zhida Technology Development Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2650.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2650.HK stands at 3.3B. In comparison, 4286.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 2650.HK is priced at HK$10.30 on the HKSE, while 4286.HK trades at HK$101.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2650.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.93, whereas 4286.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2650.HK's ROE is N/A, compared to 4286.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 2650.HK is more volatile compared to 4286.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2650.HK.Check 4286.HK's competition here