Marketingforce Management Ltd
Marketingforce Management Ltd 2556.HK Peers
See (2556.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2556.HK | HK$44.10 | +1.50% | 11.3B | -9.80 | -HK$4.50 | N/A |
| 9660.HK | HK$7.40 | +0.41% | 82B | -38.95 | -HK$0.19 | N/A |
| 0020.HK | HK$1.46 | -0.68% | 53.1B | -10.43 | -HK$0.14 | N/A |
| 0268.HK | HK$13.94 | -3.19% | 49.3B | -348.50 | -HK$0.04 | N/A |
| 9899.HK | HK$230.00 | +4.55% | 48.4B | 28.57 | HK$8.05 | N/A |
| 3896.HK | HK$6.93 | +0.43% | 27.8B | -12.16 | -HK$0.57 | N/A |
| 9911.HK | HK$11.30 | +8.45% | 16.1B | 24.57 | HK$0.46 | N/A |
| 9878.HK | HK$17.74 | +1.84% | 9.9B | 33.47 | HK$0.53 | N/A |
| 0596.HK | HK$8.35 | -1.76% | 9.5B | 22.57 | HK$0.37 | +0.36% |
| 1675.HK | HK$9.44 | -4.93% | 8.8B | 14.75 | HK$0.64 | +6.62% |
Stock Comparison
2556.HK vs 9660.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.3B. In comparison, 9660.HK has a market cap of 82B. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$44.10, while 9660.HK trades at HK$7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.80, whereas 9660.HK's P/E ratio is -38.95. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 9660.HK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 9660.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 0020.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.3B. In comparison, 0020.HK has a market cap of 53.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$44.10, while 0020.HK trades at HK$1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.80, whereas 0020.HK's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 0020.HK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 0020.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 0268.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.3B. In comparison, 0268.HK has a market cap of 49.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$44.10, while 0268.HK trades at HK$13.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.80, whereas 0268.HK's P/E ratio is -348.50. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 0268.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is less volatile compared to 0268.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 9899.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.3B. In comparison, 9899.HK has a market cap of 48.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$44.10, while 9899.HK trades at HK$230.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.80, whereas 9899.HK's P/E ratio is 28.57. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 9899.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 9899.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 3896.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.3B. In comparison, 3896.HK has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$44.10, while 3896.HK trades at HK$6.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.80, whereas 3896.HK's P/E ratio is -12.16. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 3896.HK's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is less volatile compared to 3896.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 9911.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.3B. In comparison, 9911.HK has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$44.10, while 9911.HK trades at HK$11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.80, whereas 9911.HK's P/E ratio is 24.57. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 9911.HK's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is less volatile compared to 9911.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 9878.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.3B. In comparison, 9878.HK has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$44.10, while 9878.HK trades at HK$17.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.80, whereas 9878.HK's P/E ratio is 33.47. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 9878.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 9878.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 0596.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.3B. In comparison, 0596.HK has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$44.10, while 0596.HK trades at HK$8.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.80, whereas 0596.HK's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 0596.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 0596.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 1675.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.3B. In comparison, 1675.HK has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$44.10, while 1675.HK trades at HK$9.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.80, whereas 1675.HK's P/E ratio is 14.75. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 1675.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is less volatile compared to 1675.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 2586.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.3B. In comparison, 2586.HK has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$44.10, while 2586.HK trades at HK$9.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.80, whereas 2586.HK's P/E ratio is -1.97. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 2586.HK's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 2586.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 6657.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.3B. In comparison, 6657.HK has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$44.10, while 6657.HK trades at HK$36.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.80, whereas 6657.HK's P/E ratio is -12.42. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 6657.HK's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 6657.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 3738.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.3B. In comparison, 3738.HK has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$44.10, while 3738.HK trades at HK$3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.80, whereas 3738.HK's P/E ratio is 54.67. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 3738.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 3738.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 0863.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.3B. In comparison, 0863.HK has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$44.10, while 0863.HK trades at HK$12.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.80, whereas 0863.HK's P/E ratio is 139.56. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 0863.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 0863.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 2013.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.3B. In comparison, 2013.HK has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$44.10, while 2013.HK trades at HK$1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.80, whereas 2013.HK's P/E ratio is -2.97. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 2013.HK's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 2013.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 0909.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.3B. In comparison, 0909.HK has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$44.10, while 0909.HK trades at HK$2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.80, whereas 0909.HK's P/E ratio is -25.73. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 0909.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 0909.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 8083.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.3B. In comparison, 8083.HK has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$44.10, while 8083.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.80, whereas 8083.HK's P/E ratio is -9.60. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 8083.HK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 8083.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 1782.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.3B. In comparison, 1782.HK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$44.10, while 1782.HK trades at HK$3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.80, whereas 1782.HK's P/E ratio is -34.55. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 1782.HK's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 1782.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 1588.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.3B. In comparison, 1588.HK has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$44.10, while 1588.HK trades at HK$6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.80, whereas 1588.HK's P/E ratio is 63.55. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 1588.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 1588.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 2576.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.3B. In comparison, 2576.HK has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$44.10, while 2576.HK trades at HK$3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.80, whereas 2576.HK's P/E ratio is -8.10. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 2576.HK's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 2576.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 2571.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.3B. In comparison, 2571.HK has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$44.10, while 2571.HK trades at HK$12.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.80, whereas 2571.HK's P/E ratio is 29.45. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 2571.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 2571.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 6959.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.3B. In comparison, 6959.HK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$44.10, while 6959.HK trades at HK$6.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.80, whereas 6959.HK's P/E ratio is 7.36. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 6959.HK's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 6959.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 1450.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.3B. In comparison, 1450.HK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$44.10, while 1450.HK trades at HK$0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.80, whereas 1450.HK's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 1450.HK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 1450.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 0418.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.3B. In comparison, 0418.HK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$44.10, while 0418.HK trades at HK$1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.80, whereas 0418.HK's P/E ratio is 25.50. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 0418.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 0418.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 1808.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.3B. In comparison, 1808.HK has a market cap of 884M. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$44.10, while 1808.HK trades at HK$3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.80, whereas 1808.HK's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 1808.HK's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 1808.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 0536.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.3B. In comparison, 0536.HK has a market cap of 739M. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$44.10, while 0536.HK trades at HK$0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.80, whereas 0536.HK's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 0536.HK's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 0536.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 8148.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.3B. In comparison, 8148.HK has a market cap of 668.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$44.10, while 8148.HK trades at HK$1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.80, whereas 8148.HK's P/E ratio is -43.75. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 8148.HK's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is less volatile compared to 8148.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 6610.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.3B. In comparison, 6610.HK has a market cap of 616.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$44.10, while 6610.HK trades at HK$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.80, whereas 6610.HK's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 6610.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is less volatile compared to 6610.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 2392.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.3B. In comparison, 2392.HK has a market cap of 532.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$44.10, while 2392.HK trades at HK$0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.80, whereas 2392.HK's P/E ratio is 95.00. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 2392.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 2392.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 8353.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.3B. In comparison, 8353.HK has a market cap of 443.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$44.10, while 8353.HK trades at HK$1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.80, whereas 8353.HK's P/E ratio is 54.50. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 8353.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 8353.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 1297.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.3B. In comparison, 1297.HK has a market cap of 403.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$44.10, while 1297.HK trades at HK$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.80, whereas 1297.HK's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 1297.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 1297.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 9600.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.3B. In comparison, 9600.HK has a market cap of 295.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$44.10, while 9600.HK trades at HK$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.80, whereas 9600.HK's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 9600.HK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is less volatile compared to 9600.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 8635.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.3B. In comparison, 8635.HK has a market cap of 212M. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$44.10, while 8635.HK trades at HK$0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.80, whereas 8635.HK's P/E ratio is -13.25. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 8635.HK's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 8635.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 8071.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.3B. In comparison, 8071.HK has a market cap of 164M. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$44.10, while 8071.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.80, whereas 8071.HK's P/E ratio is -15.91. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 8071.HK's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is less volatile compared to 8071.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 8205.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.3B. In comparison, 8205.HK has a market cap of 139.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$44.10, while 8205.HK trades at HK$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.80, whereas 8205.HK's P/E ratio is -29.00. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 8205.HK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 8205.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 8156.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.3B. In comparison, 8156.HK has a market cap of 101.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$44.10, while 8156.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.80, whereas 8156.HK's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 8156.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 8156.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 0802.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.3B. In comparison, 0802.HK has a market cap of 92.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$44.10, while 0802.HK trades at HK$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.80, whereas 0802.HK's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 0802.HK's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is less volatile compared to 0802.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 8100.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.3B. In comparison, 8100.HK has a market cap of 76.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$44.10, while 8100.HK trades at HK$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.80, whereas 8100.HK's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 8100.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 8100.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 1933.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.3B. In comparison, 1933.HK has a market cap of 59.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$44.10, while 1933.HK trades at HK$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.80, whereas 1933.HK's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 1933.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 1933.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 8131.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.3B. In comparison, 8131.HK has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$44.10, while 8131.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.80, whereas 8131.HK's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 8131.HK's ROE of -4.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 8131.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 8290.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.3B. In comparison, 8290.HK has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$44.10, while 8290.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.80, whereas 8290.HK's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 8290.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is less volatile compared to 8290.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 8048.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.3B. In comparison, 8048.HK has a market cap of 35.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$44.10, while 8048.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.80, whereas 8048.HK's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 8048.HK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is less volatile compared to 8048.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 8060.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.3B. In comparison, 8060.HK has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$44.10, while 8060.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.80, whereas 8060.HK's P/E ratio is -9.60. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 8060.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 8060.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 8036.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.3B. In comparison, 8036.HK has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$44.10, while 8036.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.80, whereas 8036.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 8036.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is less volatile compared to 8036.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 8018.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.3B. In comparison, 8018.HK has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$44.10, while 8018.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.80, whereas 8018.HK's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 8018.HK's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 8018.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 8255.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.3B. In comparison, 8255.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$44.10, while 8255.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.80, whereas 8255.HK's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 8255.HK's ROE of -1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is less volatile compared to 8255.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.