Marketingforce Management Ltd
Marketingforce Management Ltd 2556.HK Peers
See (2556.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2556.HK | HK$43.45 | +8.49% | 11.1B | -9.66 | -HK$4.50 | N/A |
| 9660.HK | HK$7.37 | +3.37% | 81.6B | -40.94 | -HK$0.18 | N/A |
| 0020.HK | HK$1.47 | +5.00% | 53.5B | -10.50 | -HK$0.14 | N/A |
| 0268.HK | HK$14.40 | +11.80% | 51B | -360.00 | -HK$0.04 | N/A |
| 9899.HK | HK$220.00 | +0.55% | 46.3B | 27.26 | HK$8.07 | N/A |
| 3896.HK | HK$6.90 | +7.98% | 27.6B | -12.11 | -HK$0.57 | N/A |
| 9911.HK | HK$10.42 | +12.28% | 14.9B | 22.65 | HK$0.46 | N/A |
| 9878.HK | HK$17.42 | +0.23% | 9.7B | 32.87 | HK$0.53 | N/A |
| 0596.HK | HK$8.50 | +3.53% | 9.7B | 25.00 | HK$0.34 | +0.35% |
| 1675.HK | HK$9.93 | +3.33% | 9.3B | 15.52 | HK$0.64 | +6.30% |
Stock Comparison
2556.HK vs 9660.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.1B. In comparison, 9660.HK has a market cap of 81.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$43.45, while 9660.HK trades at HK$7.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.66, whereas 9660.HK's P/E ratio is -40.94. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 9660.HK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 9660.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 0020.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.1B. In comparison, 0020.HK has a market cap of 53.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$43.45, while 0020.HK trades at HK$1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.66, whereas 0020.HK's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 0020.HK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 0020.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 0268.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.1B. In comparison, 0268.HK has a market cap of 51B. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$43.45, while 0268.HK trades at HK$14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.66, whereas 0268.HK's P/E ratio is -360.00. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 0268.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is less volatile compared to 0268.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 9899.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.1B. In comparison, 9899.HK has a market cap of 46.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$43.45, while 9899.HK trades at HK$220.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.66, whereas 9899.HK's P/E ratio is 27.26. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 9899.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 9899.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 3896.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.1B. In comparison, 3896.HK has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$43.45, while 3896.HK trades at HK$6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.66, whereas 3896.HK's P/E ratio is -12.11. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 3896.HK's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is less volatile compared to 3896.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 9911.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.1B. In comparison, 9911.HK has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$43.45, while 9911.HK trades at HK$10.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.66, whereas 9911.HK's P/E ratio is 22.65. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 9911.HK's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is less volatile compared to 9911.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 9878.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.1B. In comparison, 9878.HK has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$43.45, while 9878.HK trades at HK$17.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.66, whereas 9878.HK's P/E ratio is 32.87. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 9878.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 9878.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 0596.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.1B. In comparison, 0596.HK has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$43.45, while 0596.HK trades at HK$8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.66, whereas 0596.HK's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 0596.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 0596.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 1675.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.1B. In comparison, 1675.HK has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$43.45, while 1675.HK trades at HK$9.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.66, whereas 1675.HK's P/E ratio is 15.52. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 1675.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 1675.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 2586.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.1B. In comparison, 2586.HK has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$43.45, while 2586.HK trades at HK$9.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.66, whereas 2586.HK's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 2586.HK's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 2586.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 6657.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.1B. In comparison, 6657.HK has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$43.45, while 6657.HK trades at HK$37.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.66, whereas 6657.HK's P/E ratio is -12.46. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 6657.HK's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 6657.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 3738.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.1B. In comparison, 3738.HK has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$43.45, while 3738.HK trades at HK$3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.66, whereas 3738.HK's P/E ratio is 56.17. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 3738.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 3738.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 0863.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.1B. In comparison, 0863.HK has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$43.45, while 0863.HK trades at HK$12.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.66, whereas 0863.HK's P/E ratio is 134.67. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 0863.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is less volatile compared to 0863.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 2013.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.1B. In comparison, 2013.HK has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$43.45, while 2013.HK trades at HK$1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.66, whereas 2013.HK's P/E ratio is -2.90. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 2013.HK's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 2013.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 0909.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.1B. In comparison, 0909.HK has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$43.45, while 0909.HK trades at HK$2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.66, whereas 0909.HK's P/E ratio is -25.73. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 0909.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 0909.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 1782.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.1B. In comparison, 1782.HK has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$43.45, while 1782.HK trades at HK$3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.66, whereas 1782.HK's P/E ratio is -35.27. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 1782.HK's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 1782.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 8083.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.1B. In comparison, 8083.HK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$43.45, while 8083.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.66, whereas 8083.HK's P/E ratio is -9.20. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 8083.HK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 8083.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 1588.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.1B. In comparison, 1588.HK has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$43.45, while 1588.HK trades at HK$6.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.66, whereas 1588.HK's P/E ratio is 63.45. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 1588.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is less volatile compared to 1588.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 2576.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.1B. In comparison, 2576.HK has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$43.45, while 2576.HK trades at HK$3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.66, whereas 2576.HK's P/E ratio is -8.10. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 2576.HK's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 2576.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 2571.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.1B. In comparison, 2571.HK has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$43.45, while 2571.HK trades at HK$13.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.66, whereas 2571.HK's P/E ratio is 29.59. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 2571.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 2571.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 6959.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.1B. In comparison, 6959.HK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$43.45, while 6959.HK trades at HK$6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.66, whereas 6959.HK's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 6959.HK's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 6959.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 1450.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.1B. In comparison, 1450.HK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$43.45, while 1450.HK trades at HK$0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.66, whereas 1450.HK's P/E ratio is 15.17. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 1450.HK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 1450.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 0418.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.1B. In comparison, 0418.HK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$43.45, while 0418.HK trades at HK$1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.66, whereas 0418.HK's P/E ratio is 25.50. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 0418.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 0418.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 1808.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.1B. In comparison, 1808.HK has a market cap of 891.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$43.45, while 1808.HK trades at HK$3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.66, whereas 1808.HK's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 1808.HK's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 1808.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 0536.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.1B. In comparison, 0536.HK has a market cap of 739M. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$43.45, while 0536.HK trades at HK$0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.66, whereas 0536.HK's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 0536.HK's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 0536.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 8148.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.1B. In comparison, 8148.HK has a market cap of 668.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$43.45, while 8148.HK trades at HK$1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.66, whereas 8148.HK's P/E ratio is -43.75. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 8148.HK's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is less volatile compared to 8148.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 6610.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.1B. In comparison, 6610.HK has a market cap of 573.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$43.45, while 6610.HK trades at HK$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.66, whereas 6610.HK's P/E ratio is -8.83. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 6610.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is less volatile compared to 6610.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 2392.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.1B. In comparison, 2392.HK has a market cap of 526.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$43.45, while 2392.HK trades at HK$0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.66, whereas 2392.HK's P/E ratio is 94.00. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 2392.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is less volatile compared to 2392.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 8353.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.1B. In comparison, 8353.HK has a market cap of 443.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$43.45, while 8353.HK trades at HK$1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.66, whereas 8353.HK's P/E ratio is 54.50. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 8353.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 8353.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 1297.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.1B. In comparison, 1297.HK has a market cap of 403.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$43.45, while 1297.HK trades at HK$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.66, whereas 1297.HK's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 1297.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 1297.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 9600.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.1B. In comparison, 9600.HK has a market cap of 290.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$43.45, while 9600.HK trades at HK$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.66, whereas 9600.HK's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 9600.HK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is less volatile compared to 9600.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 8635.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.1B. In comparison, 8635.HK has a market cap of 224M. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$43.45, while 8635.HK trades at HK$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.66, whereas 8635.HK's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 8635.HK's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is less volatile compared to 8635.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 8071.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.1B. In comparison, 8071.HK has a market cap of 164M. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$43.45, while 8071.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.66, whereas 8071.HK's P/E ratio is -15.91. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 8071.HK's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is less volatile compared to 8071.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 8205.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.1B. In comparison, 8205.HK has a market cap of 139.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$43.45, while 8205.HK trades at HK$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.66, whereas 8205.HK's P/E ratio is -29.00. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 8205.HK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 8205.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 8156.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.1B. In comparison, 8156.HK has a market cap of 101.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$43.45, while 8156.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.66, whereas 8156.HK's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 8156.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 8156.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 0802.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.1B. In comparison, 0802.HK has a market cap of 92.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$43.45, while 0802.HK trades at HK$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.66, whereas 0802.HK's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 0802.HK's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is less volatile compared to 0802.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 8100.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.1B. In comparison, 8100.HK has a market cap of 76.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$43.45, while 8100.HK trades at HK$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.66, whereas 8100.HK's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 8100.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 8100.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 1933.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.1B. In comparison, 1933.HK has a market cap of 59.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$43.45, while 1933.HK trades at HK$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.66, whereas 1933.HK's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 1933.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 1933.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 8290.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.1B. In comparison, 8290.HK has a market cap of 40M. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$43.45, while 8290.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.66, whereas 8290.HK's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 8290.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 8290.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 8131.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.1B. In comparison, 8131.HK has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$43.45, while 8131.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.66, whereas 8131.HK's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 8131.HK's ROE of -4.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 8131.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 8048.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.1B. In comparison, 8048.HK has a market cap of 35.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$43.45, while 8048.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.66, whereas 8048.HK's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 8048.HK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is less volatile compared to 8048.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 8036.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.1B. In comparison, 8036.HK has a market cap of 34.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$43.45, while 8036.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.66, whereas 8036.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 8036.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 8036.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 8060.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.1B. In comparison, 8060.HK has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$43.45, while 8060.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.66, whereas 8060.HK's P/E ratio is -9.60. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 8060.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is more volatile compared to 8060.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 8018.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.1B. In comparison, 8018.HK has a market cap of 13.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$43.45, while 8018.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.66, whereas 8018.HK's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 8018.HK's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is less volatile compared to 8018.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.
2556.HK vs 8255.HK Comparison
2556.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2556.HK stands at 11.1B. In comparison, 8255.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 2556.HK is priced at HK$43.45, while 8255.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2556.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -9.66, whereas 8255.HK's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, 2556.HK's ROE is -1.50%, compared to 8255.HK's ROE of -1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, 2556.HK is less volatile compared to 8255.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2556.HK.