OneForce Holdings Limited (1933.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (1933.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1933.HK | HK$0.18 | -5.64% | 91.2M | -0.84 | -HK$0.22 | N/A |
| 0020.HK | HK$1.45 | -2.03% | 58B | -24.17 | -HK$0.06 | N/A |
| 9660.HK | HK$4.15 | -1.89% | 52B | -4.41 | -HK$0.94 | N/A |
| 6651.HK | HK$99.80 | -1.58% | 39.4B | -178.21 | -HK$0.56 | N/A |
| 2723.HK | HK$330.20 | +10.14% | 29.9B | 2751.67 | HK$0.12 | N/A |
| 2026.HK | HK$63.95 | +0.24% | 27.7B | -23.34 | -HK$2.74 | N/A |
| 3896.HK | HK$5.14 | -2.10% | 23.1B | -19.04 | -HK$0.27 | N/A |
| 9899.HK | HK$107.30 | -3.25% | 22.7B | 7.19 | HK$14.92 | N/A |
| 0268.HK | HK$6.29 | -2.48% | 22B | 209.67 | HK$0.03 | N/A |
| 0800.HK | HK$16.72 | -1.94% | 16.6B | -8.44 | -HK$1.98 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
1933.HK vs 0020.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 0020.HK has a market cap of 58B. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 0020.HK trades at HK$1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 0020.HK's P/E ratio is -24.17. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 0020.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 0020.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 0020.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 9660.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 9660.HK has a market cap of 52B. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 9660.HK trades at HK$4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 9660.HK's P/E ratio is -4.41. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 9660.HK's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 9660.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 9660.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 6651.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 6651.HK has a market cap of 39.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 6651.HK trades at HK$99.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 6651.HK's P/E ratio is -178.21. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 6651.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 6651.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 6651.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 2723.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 2723.HK has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 2723.HK trades at HK$330.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 2723.HK's P/E ratio is 2751.67. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 2723.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is less volatile compared to 2723.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 2723.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 2026.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 2026.HK has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 2026.HK trades at HK$63.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 2026.HK's P/E ratio is -23.34. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 2026.HK's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 2026.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 2026.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 3896.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 3896.HK has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 3896.HK trades at HK$5.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 3896.HK's P/E ratio is -19.04. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 3896.HK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 3896.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 3896.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 9899.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 9899.HK has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 9899.HK trades at HK$107.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 9899.HK's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 9899.HK's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 9899.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 9899.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 0268.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 0268.HK has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 0268.HK trades at HK$6.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 0268.HK's P/E ratio is 209.67. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 0268.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 0268.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 0268.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 0800.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 0800.HK has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 0800.HK trades at HK$16.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 0800.HK's P/E ratio is -8.44. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 0800.HK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 0800.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 0800.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 1384.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 1384.HK has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 1384.HK trades at HK$48.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 1384.HK's P/E ratio is -13.16. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 1384.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 1384.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 1384.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 6682.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 6682.HK has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 6682.HK trades at HK$27.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 6682.HK's P/E ratio is -454.00. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 6682.HK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 6682.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 6682.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 9911.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 9911.HK has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 9911.HK trades at HK$8.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 9911.HK's P/E ratio is 10.33. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 9911.HK's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 9911.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 9911.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 6636.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 6636.HK has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 6636.HK trades at HK$90.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 6636.HK's P/E ratio is -193.19. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 6636.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 6636.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 6636.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 2687.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 2687.HK has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 2687.HK trades at HK$142.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 2687.HK's P/E ratio is 57.07. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 2687.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 2687.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 2687.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 2556.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 2556.HK has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 2556.HK trades at HK$31.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 2556.HK's P/E ratio is 76.59. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 2556.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 2556.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 2556.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 3738.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 3738.HK has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 3738.HK trades at HK$2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 3738.HK's P/E ratio is 30.13. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 3738.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 3738.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 3738.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 6687.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 6687.HK has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 6687.HK trades at HK$14.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 6687.HK's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 6687.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 6687.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 6687.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 0068.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 0068.HK has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 0068.HK trades at HK$13.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 0068.HK's P/E ratio is -45.72. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 0068.HK's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 0068.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 0068.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 2586.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 2586.HK has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 2586.HK trades at HK$6.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 2586.HK's P/E ratio is 37.71. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 2586.HK's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 2586.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 2586.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 2013.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 2013.HK has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 2013.HK trades at HK$1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 2013.HK's P/E ratio is -18.43. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 2013.HK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 2013.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 2013.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 8083.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 8083.HK has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 8083.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 8083.HK's P/E ratio is 16.20. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 8083.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 8083.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 8083.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 1675.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 1675.HK has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 1675.HK trades at HK$4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 1675.HK's P/E ratio is 35.43. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 1675.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is less volatile compared to 1675.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 1675.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 9878.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 9878.HK has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 9878.HK trades at HK$7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 9878.HK's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 9878.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 9878.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 9878.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 2576.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 2576.HK has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 2576.HK trades at HK$5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 2576.HK's P/E ratio is -66.11. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 2576.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 2576.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 2576.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 0596.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 0596.HK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 0596.HK trades at HK$2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 0596.HK's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 0596.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 0596.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 0596.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 2431.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 2431.HK has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 2431.HK trades at HK$9.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 2431.HK's P/E ratio is -7.87. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 2431.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 2431.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 2431.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 9669.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 9669.HK has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 9669.HK trades at HK$3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 9669.HK's P/E ratio is -35.60. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 9669.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 9669.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 9669.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 0909.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 0909.HK has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 0909.HK trades at HK$1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 0909.HK's P/E ratio is 73.00. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 0909.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 0909.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 0909.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 1782.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 1782.HK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 1782.HK trades at HK$3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 1782.HK's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 1782.HK's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 1782.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 1782.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 6657.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 6657.HK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 6657.HK trades at HK$11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 6657.HK's P/E ratio is -222.00. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 6657.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 6657.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 6657.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 6051.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 6051.HK has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 6051.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 6051.HK's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 6051.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 6051.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 6051.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 9885.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 9885.HK has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 9885.HK trades at HK$3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 9885.HK's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 9885.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 9885.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 9885.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 2571.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 2571.HK has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 2571.HK trades at HK$15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 2571.HK's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 2571.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 2571.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 2571.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 8148.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 8148.HK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 8148.HK trades at HK$3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 8148.HK's P/E ratio is 126.67. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 8148.HK's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 8148.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 8148.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 1588.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 1588.HK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 1588.HK trades at HK$4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 1588.HK's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 1588.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 1588.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 1588.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 1450.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 1450.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 1450.HK trades at HK$0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 1450.HK's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 1450.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 1450.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 1450.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 0536.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 0536.HK has a market cap of 891.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 0536.HK trades at HK$1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 0536.HK's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 0536.HK's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 0536.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 0536.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 0418.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 0418.HK has a market cap of 795.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 0418.HK trades at HK$0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 0418.HK's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 0418.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 0418.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 0418.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 6959.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 6959.HK has a market cap of 684.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 6959.HK trades at HK$3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 6959.HK's P/E ratio is 4.24. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 6959.HK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 6959.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 6959.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 2392.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 2392.HK has a market cap of 632.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 2392.HK trades at HK$1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 2392.HK's P/E ratio is -14.25. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 2392.HK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is less volatile compared to 2392.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 2392.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 1808.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 1808.HK has a market cap of 553.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 1808.HK trades at HK$2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 1808.HK's P/E ratio is 3.14. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 1808.HK's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 1808.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 1808.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 8353.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 8353.HK has a market cap of 443.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 8353.HK trades at HK$1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 8353.HK's P/E ratio is 54.50. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 8353.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 8353.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 8353.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 1297.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 1297.HK has a market cap of 403.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 1297.HK trades at HK$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 1297.HK's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 1297.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 1297.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 1297.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 1490.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 1490.HK has a market cap of 345.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 1490.HK trades at HK$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 1490.HK's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 1490.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 1490.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 1490.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 9600.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 9600.HK has a market cap of 152.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 9600.HK trades at HK$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 9600.HK's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 9600.HK's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 9600.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 9600.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 8635.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 8635.HK has a market cap of 148.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 8635.HK trades at HK$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 8635.HK's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 8635.HK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 8635.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 8635.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 8156.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 8156.HK has a market cap of 138.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 8156.HK trades at HK$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 8156.HK's P/E ratio is 21.80. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 8156.HK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 8156.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 8156.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 8205.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 8205.HK has a market cap of 122.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 8205.HK trades at HK$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 8205.HK's P/E ratio is -12.75. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 8205.HK's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 8205.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 8205.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 6610.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 6610.HK has a market cap of 105.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 6610.HK trades at HK$0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 6610.HK's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 6610.HK's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 6610.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 6610.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 8100.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 8100.HK has a market cap of 97.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 8100.HK trades at HK$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 8100.HK's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 8100.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 8100.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 8100.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 0802.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 0802.HK has a market cap of 92.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 0802.HK trades at HK$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 0802.HK's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 0802.HK's ROE of -10.91%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is less volatile compared to 0802.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 0802.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 8290.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 8290.HK has a market cap of 84M. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 8290.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 8290.HK's P/E ratio is 32.31. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 8290.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 8290.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 8290.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 8131.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 8131.HK has a market cap of 59.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 8131.HK trades at HK$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 8131.HK's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 8131.HK's ROE of +4.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 8131.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 8131.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 8071.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 8071.HK has a market cap of 46.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 8071.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 8071.HK's P/E ratio is -4.55. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 8071.HK's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 8071.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 8071.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 8036.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 8036.HK has a market cap of 44.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 8036.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 8036.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 8036.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 8036.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 8036.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 8048.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 8048.HK has a market cap of 35.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 8048.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 8048.HK's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 8048.HK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is less volatile compared to 8048.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 8048.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 8060.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 8060.HK has a market cap of 31M. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 8060.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 8060.HK's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 8060.HK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 8060.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 8060.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 8018.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 8018.HK has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 8018.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 8018.HK's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 8018.HK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is more volatile compared to 8018.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 8018.HK's competition here
1933.HK vs 8255.HK Comparison June 2026
1933.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1933.HK stands at 91.2M. In comparison, 8255.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1933.HK is priced at HK$0.18, while 8255.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1933.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.84, whereas 8255.HK's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, 1933.HK's ROE is -0.47%, compared to 8255.HK's ROE of -1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, 1933.HK is less volatile compared to 8255.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1933.HK.Check 8255.HK's competition here