GL-Carlink Technology Holding Limited
GL-Carlink Technology Holding Limited (2531.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (2531.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2531.HK | HK$9.85 | -12.52% | 3.6B | 70.36 | HK$0.14 | N/A |
| 3606.HK | HK$56.75 | -0.26% | 155.8B | 16.64 | HK$3.41 | +3.41% |
| 0564.HK | HK$15.00 | -1.45% | 30.1B | 6.12 | HK$2.45 | +8.14% |
| 0425.HK | HK$25.95 | -0.19% | 29.5B | 11.74 | HK$2.21 | +1.68% |
| 0666.HK | HK$11.64 | -4.12% | 27.7B | -20.79 | -HK$0.56 | N/A |
| 0179.HK | HK$23.30 | -1.48% | 21.5B | 10.54 | HK$2.21 | +2.62% |
| 9690.HK | HK$20.10 | -0.50% | 15.1B | 30.45 | HK$0.66 | N/A |
| 1316.HK | HK$5.90 | -0.67% | 14.8B | 29.50 | HK$0.20 | +1.15% |
| 1057.HK | HK$5.18 | -2.63% | 9.6B | 22.52 | HK$0.23 | +1.25% |
| 0819.HK | HK$6.79 | -5.43% | 7.6B | 6.12 | HK$1.11 | +2.50% |
Stock Comparison
2531.HK vs 3606.HK Comparison August 2025
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 3606.HK has a market cap of 155.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$9.85, while 3606.HK trades at HK$56.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 70.36, whereas 3606.HK's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3606.HK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 3606.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.Check 3606.HK's competition here
2531.HK vs 0564.HK Comparison August 2025
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 0564.HK has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$9.85, while 0564.HK trades at HK$15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 70.36, whereas 0564.HK's P/E ratio is 6.12. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0564.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 0564.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.Check 0564.HK's competition here
2531.HK vs 0425.HK Comparison August 2025
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 0425.HK has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$9.85, while 0425.HK trades at HK$25.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 70.36, whereas 0425.HK's P/E ratio is 11.74. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0425.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 0425.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.Check 0425.HK's competition here
2531.HK vs 0666.HK Comparison August 2025
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 0666.HK has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$9.85, while 0666.HK trades at HK$11.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 70.36, whereas 0666.HK's P/E ratio is -20.79. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0666.HK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 0666.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.Check 0666.HK's competition here
2531.HK vs 0179.HK Comparison August 2025
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 0179.HK has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$9.85, while 0179.HK trades at HK$23.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 70.36, whereas 0179.HK's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0179.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 0179.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.Check 0179.HK's competition here
2531.HK vs 9690.HK Comparison August 2025
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 9690.HK has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$9.85, while 9690.HK trades at HK$20.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 70.36, whereas 9690.HK's P/E ratio is 30.45. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9690.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 9690.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.Check 9690.HK's competition here
2531.HK vs 1316.HK Comparison August 2025
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 1316.HK has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$9.85, while 1316.HK trades at HK$5.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 70.36, whereas 1316.HK's P/E ratio is 29.50. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1316.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 1316.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.Check 1316.HK's competition here
2531.HK vs 1057.HK Comparison August 2025
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 1057.HK has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$9.85, while 1057.HK trades at HK$5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 70.36, whereas 1057.HK's P/E ratio is 22.52. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1057.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 1057.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.Check 1057.HK's competition here
2531.HK vs 0819.HK Comparison August 2025
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 0819.HK has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$9.85, while 0819.HK trades at HK$6.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 70.36, whereas 0819.HK's P/E ratio is 6.12. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0819.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 0819.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.Check 0819.HK's competition here
2531.HK vs 1809.HK Comparison August 2025
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 1809.HK has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$9.85, while 1809.HK trades at HK$7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 70.36, whereas 1809.HK's P/E ratio is 3.47. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1809.HK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 1809.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.Check 1809.HK's competition here
2531.HK vs 2488.HK Comparison August 2025
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 2488.HK has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$9.85, while 2488.HK trades at HK$11.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 70.36, whereas 2488.HK's P/E ratio is 13.04. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2488.HK's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 2488.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.Check 2488.HK's competition here
2531.HK vs 1571.HK Comparison August 2025
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 1571.HK has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$9.85, while 1571.HK trades at HK$4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 70.36, whereas 1571.HK's P/E ratio is 6.72. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1571.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 1571.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.Check 1571.HK's competition here
2531.HK vs 1274.HK Comparison August 2025
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 1274.HK has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$9.85, while 1274.HK trades at HK$14.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 70.36, whereas 1274.HK's P/E ratio is -10.75. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1274.HK's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 1274.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.Check 1274.HK's competition here
2531.HK vs 2025.HK Comparison August 2025
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 2025.HK has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$9.85, while 2025.HK trades at HK$4.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 70.36, whereas 2025.HK's P/E ratio is 142.33. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2025.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 2025.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.Check 2025.HK's competition here
2531.HK vs 1899.HK Comparison August 2025
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 1899.HK has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$9.85, while 1899.HK trades at HK$1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 70.36, whereas 1899.HK's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1899.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 1899.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.Check 1899.HK's competition here
2531.HK vs 1760.HK Comparison August 2025
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 1760.HK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$9.85, while 1760.HK trades at HK$1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 70.36, whereas 1760.HK's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1760.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 1760.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.Check 1760.HK's competition here
2531.HK vs 0305.HK Comparison August 2025
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 0305.HK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$9.85, while 0305.HK trades at HK$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 70.36, whereas 0305.HK's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0305.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 0305.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.Check 0305.HK's competition here
2531.HK vs 0951.HK Comparison August 2025
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 0951.HK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$9.85, while 0951.HK trades at HK$1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 70.36, whereas 0951.HK's P/E ratio is 4.89. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0951.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 0951.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.Check 0951.HK's competition here
2531.HK vs 0360.HK Comparison August 2025
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 0360.HK has a market cap of 929.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$9.85, while 0360.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 70.36, whereas 0360.HK's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0360.HK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 0360.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.Check 0360.HK's competition here
2531.HK vs 6830.HK Comparison August 2025
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 6830.HK has a market cap of 504.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$9.85, while 6830.HK trades at HK$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 70.36, whereas 6830.HK's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6830.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 6830.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.Check 6830.HK's competition here
2531.HK vs 8418.HK Comparison August 2025
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 8418.HK has a market cap of 408M. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$9.85, while 8418.HK trades at HK$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 70.36, whereas 8418.HK's P/E ratio is -48.00. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8418.HK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 8418.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.Check 8418.HK's competition here
2531.HK vs 0096.HK Comparison August 2025
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 0096.HK has a market cap of 362.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$9.85, while 0096.HK trades at HK$0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 70.36, whereas 0096.HK's P/E ratio is 3.80. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0096.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 0096.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.Check 0096.HK's competition here
2531.HK vs 1148.HK Comparison August 2025
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 1148.HK has a market cap of 291.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$9.85, while 1148.HK trades at HK$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 70.36, whereas 1148.HK's P/E ratio is 7.57. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1148.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 1148.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.Check 1148.HK's competition here
2531.HK vs 2339.HK Comparison August 2025
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 2339.HK has a market cap of 284.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$9.85, while 2339.HK trades at HK$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 70.36, whereas 2339.HK's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2339.HK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 2339.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.Check 2339.HK's competition here
2531.HK vs 1930.HK Comparison August 2025
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 1930.HK has a market cap of 254M. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$9.85, while 1930.HK trades at HK$0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 70.36, whereas 1930.HK's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1930.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 1930.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.Check 1930.HK's competition here
2531.HK vs 1188.HK Comparison August 2025
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 1188.HK has a market cap of 244.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$9.85, while 1188.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 70.36, whereas 1188.HK's P/E ratio is -10.91. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1188.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is less volatile compared to 1188.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.Check 1188.HK's competition here
2531.HK vs 6162.HK Comparison August 2025
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 6162.HK has a market cap of 230M. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$9.85, while 6162.HK trades at HK$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 70.36, whereas 6162.HK's P/E ratio is 55.21. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6162.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 6162.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.Check 6162.HK's competition here
2531.HK vs 6928.HK Comparison August 2025
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 6928.HK has a market cap of 218.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$9.85, while 6928.HK trades at HK$0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 70.36, whereas 6928.HK's P/E ratio is -12.12. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6928.HK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 6928.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.Check 6928.HK's competition here
2531.HK vs 8135.HK Comparison August 2025
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 8135.HK has a market cap of 187.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$9.85, while 8135.HK trades at HK$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 70.36, whereas 8135.HK's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8135.HK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 8135.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.Check 8135.HK's competition here
2531.HK vs 0872.HK Comparison August 2025
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 0872.HK has a market cap of 123.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$9.85, while 0872.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 70.36, whereas 0872.HK's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0872.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 0872.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.Check 0872.HK's competition here
2531.HK vs 1991.HK Comparison August 2025
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 1991.HK has a market cap of 103.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$9.85, while 1991.HK trades at HK$0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 70.36, whereas 1991.HK's P/E ratio is -14.40. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1991.HK's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 1991.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.Check 1991.HK's competition here
2531.HK vs 1269.HK Comparison August 2025
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 1269.HK has a market cap of 97.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$9.85, while 1269.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 70.36, whereas 1269.HK's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1269.HK's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is less volatile compared to 1269.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.Check 1269.HK's competition here
2531.HK vs 1241.HK Comparison August 2025
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 1241.HK has a market cap of 80.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$9.85, while 1241.HK trades at HK$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 70.36, whereas 1241.HK's P/E ratio is -4.13. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1241.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 1241.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.Check 1241.HK's competition here
2531.HK vs 6163.HK Comparison August 2025
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 6163.HK has a market cap of 55.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$9.85, while 6163.HK trades at HK$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 70.36, whereas 6163.HK's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6163.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 6163.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.Check 6163.HK's competition here
2531.HK vs 0479.HK Comparison August 2025
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 0479.HK has a market cap of 52M. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$9.85, while 0479.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 70.36, whereas 0479.HK's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0479.HK's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 0479.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.Check 0479.HK's competition here
2531.HK vs 8283.HK Comparison August 2025
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 8283.HK has a market cap of 44.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$9.85, while 8283.HK trades at HK$0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 70.36, whereas 8283.HK's P/E ratio is 3.39. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8283.HK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 8283.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.Check 8283.HK's competition here