GL-Carlink Technology Holding Limited
GL-Carlink Technology Holding Limited 2531.HK Peers
See (2531.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2531.HK | HK$16.78 | -1.18% | 6.2B | 119.86 | HK$0.14 | N/A |
| 3606.HK | HK$56.45 | +0.71% | 159.3B | 16.55 | HK$3.41 | +3.43% |
| 0564.HK | HK$14.80 | -0.40% | 30.4B | 6.07 | HK$2.44 | +8.25% |
| 0666.HK | HK$11.42 | -1.55% | 25.9B | -20.39 | -HK$0.56 | N/A |
| 0425.HK | HK$22.35 | -0.22% | 25.4B | 10.11 | HK$2.21 | +1.95% |
| 0179.HK | HK$21.70 | +0.46% | 20B | 9.82 | HK$2.21 | +2.81% |
| 9690.HK | HK$19.70 | +1.76% | 16.1B | 29.85 | HK$0.66 | N/A |
| 1316.HK | HK$5.56 | +1.46% | 14.3B | 28.50 | HK$0.20 | +1.22% |
| 1057.HK | HK$5.35 | -0.93% | 9.9B | 23.26 | HK$0.23 | +1.21% |
| 0819.HK | HK$6.31 | +0.32% | 7.1B | 5.74 | HK$1.10 | +2.69% |
Stock Comparison
2531.HK vs 3606.HK Comparison
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 6.2B. In comparison, 3606.HK has a market cap of 159.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$16.78, while 3606.HK trades at HK$56.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 119.86, whereas 3606.HK's P/E ratio is 16.55. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3606.HK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 3606.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.
2531.HK vs 0564.HK Comparison
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 6.2B. In comparison, 0564.HK has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$16.78, while 0564.HK trades at HK$14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 119.86, whereas 0564.HK's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0564.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 0564.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.
2531.HK vs 0666.HK Comparison
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 6.2B. In comparison, 0666.HK has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$16.78, while 0666.HK trades at HK$11.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 119.86, whereas 0666.HK's P/E ratio is -20.39. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0666.HK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 0666.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.
2531.HK vs 0425.HK Comparison
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 6.2B. In comparison, 0425.HK has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$16.78, while 0425.HK trades at HK$22.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 119.86, whereas 0425.HK's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0425.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 0425.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.
2531.HK vs 0179.HK Comparison
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 6.2B. In comparison, 0179.HK has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$16.78, while 0179.HK trades at HK$21.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 119.86, whereas 0179.HK's P/E ratio is 9.82. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0179.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is less volatile compared to 0179.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.
2531.HK vs 9690.HK Comparison
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 6.2B. In comparison, 9690.HK has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$16.78, while 9690.HK trades at HK$19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 119.86, whereas 9690.HK's P/E ratio is 29.85. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9690.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is less volatile compared to 9690.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.
2531.HK vs 1316.HK Comparison
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 6.2B. In comparison, 1316.HK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$16.78, while 1316.HK trades at HK$5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 119.86, whereas 1316.HK's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1316.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 1316.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.
2531.HK vs 1057.HK Comparison
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 6.2B. In comparison, 1057.HK has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$16.78, while 1057.HK trades at HK$5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 119.86, whereas 1057.HK's P/E ratio is 23.26. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1057.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is less volatile compared to 1057.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.
2531.HK vs 0819.HK Comparison
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 6.2B. In comparison, 0819.HK has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$16.78, while 0819.HK trades at HK$6.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 119.86, whereas 0819.HK's P/E ratio is 5.74. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0819.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 0819.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.
2531.HK vs 2488.HK Comparison
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 6.2B. In comparison, 2488.HK has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$16.78, while 2488.HK trades at HK$13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 119.86, whereas 2488.HK's P/E ratio is 14.61. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2488.HK's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 2488.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.
2531.HK vs 1809.HK Comparison
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 6.2B. In comparison, 1809.HK has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$16.78, while 1809.HK trades at HK$7.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 119.86, whereas 1809.HK's P/E ratio is 3.38. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1809.HK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 1809.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.
2531.HK vs 1571.HK Comparison
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 6.2B. In comparison, 1571.HK has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$16.78, while 1571.HK trades at HK$3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 119.86, whereas 1571.HK's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1571.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 1571.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.
2531.HK vs 1274.HK Comparison
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 6.2B. In comparison, 1274.HK has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$16.78, while 1274.HK trades at HK$14.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 119.86, whereas 1274.HK's P/E ratio is -10.06. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1274.HK's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is less volatile compared to 1274.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.
2531.HK vs 2025.HK Comparison
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 6.2B. In comparison, 2025.HK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$16.78, while 2025.HK trades at HK$4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 119.86, whereas 2025.HK's P/E ratio is 133.33. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2025.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 2025.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.
2531.HK vs 1899.HK Comparison
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 6.2B. In comparison, 1899.HK has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$16.78, while 1899.HK trades at HK$1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 119.86, whereas 1899.HK's P/E ratio is 7.93. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1899.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is less volatile compared to 1899.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.
2531.HK vs 1760.HK Comparison
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 6.2B. In comparison, 1760.HK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$16.78, while 1760.HK trades at HK$1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 119.86, whereas 1760.HK's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1760.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 1760.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.
2531.HK vs 0305.HK Comparison
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 6.2B. In comparison, 0305.HK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$16.78, while 0305.HK trades at HK$0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 119.86, whereas 0305.HK's P/E ratio is 23.25. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0305.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is less volatile compared to 0305.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.
2531.HK vs 0951.HK Comparison
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 6.2B. In comparison, 0951.HK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$16.78, while 0951.HK trades at HK$1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 119.86, whereas 0951.HK's P/E ratio is 4.82. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0951.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 0951.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.
2531.HK vs 0360.HK Comparison
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 6.2B. In comparison, 0360.HK has a market cap of 964.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$16.78, while 0360.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 119.86, whereas 0360.HK's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0360.HK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 0360.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.
2531.HK vs 6830.HK Comparison
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 6.2B. In comparison, 6830.HK has a market cap of 419.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$16.78, while 6830.HK trades at HK$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 119.86, whereas 6830.HK's P/E ratio is 7.90. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6830.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 6830.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.
2531.HK vs 0096.HK Comparison
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 6.2B. In comparison, 0096.HK has a market cap of 356.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$16.78, while 0096.HK trades at HK$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 119.86, whereas 0096.HK's P/E ratio is 3.73. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0096.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 0096.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.
2531.HK vs 8418.HK Comparison
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 6.2B. In comparison, 8418.HK has a market cap of 348.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$16.78, while 8418.HK trades at HK$0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 119.86, whereas 8418.HK's P/E ratio is -41.00. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8418.HK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is less volatile compared to 8418.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.
2531.HK vs 2339.HK Comparison
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 6.2B. In comparison, 2339.HK has a market cap of 284.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$16.78, while 2339.HK trades at HK$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 119.86, whereas 2339.HK's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2339.HK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 2339.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.
2531.HK vs 1930.HK Comparison
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 6.2B. In comparison, 1930.HK has a market cap of 260.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$16.78, while 1930.HK trades at HK$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 119.86, whereas 1930.HK's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1930.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 1930.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.
2531.HK vs 1148.HK Comparison
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 6.2B. In comparison, 1148.HK has a market cap of 256.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$16.78, while 1148.HK trades at HK$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 119.86, whereas 1148.HK's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1148.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 1148.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.
2531.HK vs 1188.HK Comparison
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 6.2B. In comparison, 1188.HK has a market cap of 244.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$16.78, while 1188.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 119.86, whereas 1188.HK's P/E ratio is -10.91. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1188.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is less volatile compared to 1188.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.
2531.HK vs 6162.HK Comparison
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 6.2B. In comparison, 6162.HK has a market cap of 238M. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$16.78, while 6162.HK trades at HK$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 119.86, whereas 6162.HK's P/E ratio is 57.13. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6162.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is less volatile compared to 6162.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.
2531.HK vs 8135.HK Comparison
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 6.2B. In comparison, 8135.HK has a market cap of 187.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$16.78, while 8135.HK trades at HK$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 119.86, whereas 8135.HK's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8135.HK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is less volatile compared to 8135.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.
2531.HK vs 6928.HK Comparison
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 6.2B. In comparison, 6928.HK has a market cap of 153M. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$16.78, while 6928.HK trades at HK$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 119.86, whereas 6928.HK's P/E ratio is -11.33. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6928.HK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is less volatile compared to 6928.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.
2531.HK vs 0872.HK Comparison
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 6.2B. In comparison, 0872.HK has a market cap of 123.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$16.78, while 0872.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 119.86, whereas 0872.HK's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0872.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is less volatile compared to 0872.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.
2531.HK vs 1991.HK Comparison
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 6.2B. In comparison, 1991.HK has a market cap of 93.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$16.78, while 1991.HK trades at HK$0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 119.86, whereas 1991.HK's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1991.HK's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 1991.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.
2531.HK vs 1241.HK Comparison
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 6.2B. In comparison, 1241.HK has a market cap of 71.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$16.78, while 1241.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 119.86, whereas 1241.HK's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1241.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is less volatile compared to 1241.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.
2531.HK vs 1269.HK Comparison
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 6.2B. In comparison, 1269.HK has a market cap of 66.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$16.78, while 1269.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 119.86, whereas 1269.HK's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1269.HK's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 1269.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.
2531.HK vs 0479.HK Comparison
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 6.2B. In comparison, 0479.HK has a market cap of 52M. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$16.78, while 0479.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 119.86, whereas 0479.HK's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0479.HK's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 0479.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.
2531.HK vs 6163.HK Comparison
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 6.2B. In comparison, 6163.HK has a market cap of 51.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$16.78, while 6163.HK trades at HK$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 119.86, whereas 6163.HK's P/E ratio is -6.20. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6163.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is more volatile compared to 6163.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.
2531.HK vs 8283.HK Comparison
2531.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2531.HK stands at 6.2B. In comparison, 8283.HK has a market cap of 35M. Regarding current trading prices, 2531.HK is priced at HK$16.78, while 8283.HK trades at HK$0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2531.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 119.86, whereas 8283.HK's P/E ratio is 3.17. In terms of profitability, 2531.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8283.HK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 2531.HK is less volatile compared to 8283.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2531.HK.