VNET Group, Inc.
VNET Group, Inc. 217A.F Peers
See (217A.F) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 217A.F | €5.15 | -1.90% | 1.4B | -515.00 | -€0.01 | N/A |
| IBM.DE | €235.60 | +0.92% | 219B | 46.11 | €5.11 | +2.36% |
| FIV.DE | €219.40 | +0.27% | 126.3B | 62.87 | €3.49 | N/A |
| COZ.DE | €84.46 | -0.68% | 41.6B | 19.78 | €4.27 | +1.33% |
| BC8.DE | €39.82 | N/A | 5B | 22.12 | €1.80 | +3.52% |
| 4018.F | €1,197.00 | -0.17% | 1.9B | 69.80 | €17.15 | N/A |
| NB2.F | €27.04 | -1.74% | 1.7B | -12.24 | -€2.21 | N/A |
| NB2.DE | €26.98 | -2.39% | 1.7B | -12.21 | -€2.21 | N/A |
| CHG.DE | €43.10 | -0.23% | 990.7M | -86.20 | -€0.50 | N/A |
| COK.DE | €30.05 | -1.64% | 947M | 37.56 | €0.80 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
217A.F vs IBM.DE Comparison
217A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 217A.F stands at 1.4B. In comparison, IBM.DE has a market cap of 219B. Regarding current trading prices, 217A.F is priced at €5.15, while IBM.DE trades at €235.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
217A.F currently has a P/E ratio of -515.00, whereas IBM.DE's P/E ratio is 46.11. In terms of profitability, 217A.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IBM.DE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 217A.F is less volatile compared to IBM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 217A.F.
217A.F vs FIV.DE Comparison
217A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 217A.F stands at 1.4B. In comparison, FIV.DE has a market cap of 126.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 217A.F is priced at €5.15, while FIV.DE trades at €219.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
217A.F currently has a P/E ratio of -515.00, whereas FIV.DE's P/E ratio is 62.87. In terms of profitability, 217A.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FIV.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 217A.F is more volatile compared to FIV.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 217A.F.
217A.F vs COZ.DE Comparison
217A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 217A.F stands at 1.4B. In comparison, COZ.DE has a market cap of 41.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 217A.F is priced at €5.15, while COZ.DE trades at €84.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
217A.F currently has a P/E ratio of -515.00, whereas COZ.DE's P/E ratio is 19.78. In terms of profitability, 217A.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to COZ.DE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 217A.F is more volatile compared to COZ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 217A.F.
217A.F vs BC8.DE Comparison
217A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 217A.F stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BC8.DE has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, 217A.F is priced at €5.15, while BC8.DE trades at €39.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
217A.F currently has a P/E ratio of -515.00, whereas BC8.DE's P/E ratio is 22.12. In terms of profitability, 217A.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BC8.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 217A.F is less volatile compared to BC8.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 217A.F.
217A.F vs 4018.F Comparison
217A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 217A.F stands at 1.4B. In comparison, 4018.F has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 217A.F is priced at €5.15, while 4018.F trades at €1,197.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
217A.F currently has a P/E ratio of -515.00, whereas 4018.F's P/E ratio is 69.80. In terms of profitability, 217A.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 4018.F's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 217A.F is more volatile compared to 4018.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 217A.F.
217A.F vs NB2.F Comparison
217A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 217A.F stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NB2.F has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 217A.F is priced at €5.15, while NB2.F trades at €27.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
217A.F currently has a P/E ratio of -515.00, whereas NB2.F's P/E ratio is -12.24. In terms of profitability, 217A.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NB2.F's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 217A.F is less volatile compared to NB2.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 217A.F.
217A.F vs NB2.DE Comparison
217A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 217A.F stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NB2.DE has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 217A.F is priced at €5.15, while NB2.DE trades at €26.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
217A.F currently has a P/E ratio of -515.00, whereas NB2.DE's P/E ratio is -12.21. In terms of profitability, 217A.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NB2.DE's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 217A.F is less volatile compared to NB2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 217A.F.
217A.F vs CHG.DE Comparison
217A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 217A.F stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CHG.DE has a market cap of 990.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 217A.F is priced at €5.15, while CHG.DE trades at €43.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
217A.F currently has a P/E ratio of -515.00, whereas CHG.DE's P/E ratio is -86.20. In terms of profitability, 217A.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CHG.DE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 217A.F is less volatile compared to CHG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 217A.F.
217A.F vs COK.DE Comparison
217A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 217A.F stands at 1.4B. In comparison, COK.DE has a market cap of 947M. Regarding current trading prices, 217A.F is priced at €5.15, while COK.DE trades at €30.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
217A.F currently has a P/E ratio of -515.00, whereas COK.DE's P/E ratio is 37.56. In terms of profitability, 217A.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to COK.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 217A.F is less volatile compared to COK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 217A.F.
217A.F vs DE000A3H2200.SG Comparison
217A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 217A.F stands at 1.4B. In comparison, DE000A3H2200.SG has a market cap of 787.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 217A.F is priced at €5.15, while DE000A3H2200.SG trades at €57.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
217A.F currently has a P/E ratio of -515.00, whereas DE000A3H2200.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 217A.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DE000A3H2200.SG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 217A.F is less volatile compared to DE000A3H2200.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 217A.F.
217A.F vs NA9.F Comparison
217A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 217A.F stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NA9.F has a market cap of 761.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 217A.F is priced at €5.15, while NA9.F trades at €58.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
217A.F currently has a P/E ratio of -515.00, whereas NA9.F's P/E ratio is 17.68. In terms of profitability, 217A.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NA9.F's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 217A.F is more volatile compared to NA9.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 217A.F.
217A.F vs NA9.DE Comparison
217A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 217A.F stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NA9.DE has a market cap of 745.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 217A.F is priced at €5.15, while NA9.DE trades at €57.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
217A.F currently has a P/E ratio of -515.00, whereas NA9.DE's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, 217A.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NA9.DE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 217A.F is less volatile compared to NA9.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 217A.F.
217A.F vs USY1.DE Comparison
217A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 217A.F stands at 1.4B. In comparison, USY1.DE has a market cap of 700.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 217A.F is priced at €5.15, while USY1.DE trades at €10.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
217A.F currently has a P/E ratio of -515.00, whereas USY1.DE's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, 217A.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to USY1.DE's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 217A.F is more volatile compared to USY1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 217A.F.
217A.F vs GFT.DE Comparison
217A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 217A.F stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GFT.DE has a market cap of 608.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 217A.F is priced at €5.15, while GFT.DE trades at €23.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
217A.F currently has a P/E ratio of -515.00, whereas GFT.DE's P/E ratio is 14.09. In terms of profitability, 217A.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GFT.DE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 217A.F is less volatile compared to GFT.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 217A.F.
217A.F vs ADN1.DE Comparison
217A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 217A.F stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ADN1.DE has a market cap of 580.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 217A.F is priced at €5.15, while ADN1.DE trades at €89.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
217A.F currently has a P/E ratio of -515.00, whereas ADN1.DE's P/E ratio is -809.09. In terms of profitability, 217A.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ADN1.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 217A.F is less volatile compared to ADN1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 217A.F.
217A.F vs SHF.DE Comparison
217A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 217A.F stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SHF.DE has a market cap of 522.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 217A.F is priced at €5.15, while SHF.DE trades at €71.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
217A.F currently has a P/E ratio of -515.00, whereas SHF.DE's P/E ratio is 23.24. In terms of profitability, 217A.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SHF.DE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 217A.F is less volatile compared to SHF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 217A.F.
217A.F vs D6H.DE Comparison
217A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 217A.F stands at 1.4B. In comparison, D6H.DE has a market cap of 479.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 217A.F is priced at €5.15, while D6H.DE trades at €57.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
217A.F currently has a P/E ratio of -515.00, whereas D6H.DE's P/E ratio is 19.30. In terms of profitability, 217A.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to D6H.DE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 217A.F is less volatile compared to D6H.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 217A.F.
217A.F vs IXX.DE Comparison
217A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 217A.F stands at 1.4B. In comparison, IXX.DE has a market cap of 398M. Regarding current trading prices, 217A.F is priced at €5.15, while IXX.DE trades at €40.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
217A.F currently has a P/E ratio of -515.00, whereas IXX.DE's P/E ratio is 27.05. In terms of profitability, 217A.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IXX.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 217A.F is less volatile compared to IXX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 217A.F.
217A.F vs A1OS.DE Comparison
217A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 217A.F stands at 1.4B. In comparison, A1OS.DE has a market cap of 267.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 217A.F is priced at €5.15, while A1OS.DE trades at €55.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
217A.F currently has a P/E ratio of -515.00, whereas A1OS.DE's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, 217A.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to A1OS.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 217A.F is less volatile compared to A1OS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 217A.F.
217A.F vs MCE.DE Comparison
217A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 217A.F stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MCE.DE has a market cap of 232.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 217A.F is priced at €5.15, while MCE.DE trades at €14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
217A.F currently has a P/E ratio of -515.00, whereas MCE.DE's P/E ratio is -39.17. In terms of profitability, 217A.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MCE.DE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 217A.F is more volatile compared to MCE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 217A.F.
217A.F vs AEIN.DE Comparison
217A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 217A.F stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AEIN.DE has a market cap of 229.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 217A.F is priced at €5.15, while AEIN.DE trades at €19.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
217A.F currently has a P/E ratio of -515.00, whereas AEIN.DE's P/E ratio is 28.10. In terms of profitability, 217A.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AEIN.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 217A.F is less volatile compared to AEIN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 217A.F.
217A.F vs OSP2.DE Comparison
217A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 217A.F stands at 1.4B. In comparison, OSP2.DE has a market cap of 185.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 217A.F is priced at €5.15, while OSP2.DE trades at €18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
217A.F currently has a P/E ratio of -515.00, whereas OSP2.DE's P/E ratio is 32.95. In terms of profitability, 217A.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OSP2.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 217A.F is more volatile compared to OSP2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 217A.F.
217A.F vs 30L3.DE Comparison
217A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 217A.F stands at 1.4B. In comparison, 30L3.DE has a market cap of 134.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 217A.F is priced at €5.15, while 30L3.DE trades at €1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
217A.F currently has a P/E ratio of -515.00, whereas 30L3.DE's P/E ratio is 6.29. In terms of profitability, 217A.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 30L3.DE's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 217A.F is less volatile compared to 30L3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 217A.F.
217A.F vs QBY.DE Comparison
217A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 217A.F stands at 1.4B. In comparison, QBY.DE has a market cap of 109.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 217A.F is priced at €5.15, while QBY.DE trades at €0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
217A.F currently has a P/E ratio of -515.00, whereas QBY.DE's P/E ratio is -29.33. In terms of profitability, 217A.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to QBY.DE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 217A.F is less volatile compared to QBY.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 217A.F.
217A.F vs OBS.DE Comparison
217A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 217A.F stands at 1.4B. In comparison, OBS.DE has a market cap of 69.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 217A.F is priced at €5.15, while OBS.DE trades at €7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
217A.F currently has a P/E ratio of -515.00, whereas OBS.DE's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, 217A.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OBS.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 217A.F is more volatile compared to OBS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 217A.F.
217A.F vs IE2A.F Comparison
217A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 217A.F stands at 1.4B. In comparison, IE2A.F has a market cap of 66.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 217A.F is priced at €5.15, while IE2A.F trades at €0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
217A.F currently has a P/E ratio of -515.00, whereas IE2A.F's P/E ratio is 5.10. In terms of profitability, 217A.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IE2A.F's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 217A.F is more volatile compared to IE2A.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 217A.F.
217A.F vs 3IT.F Comparison
217A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 217A.F stands at 1.4B. In comparison, 3IT.F has a market cap of 65.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 217A.F is priced at €5.15, while 3IT.F trades at €13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
217A.F currently has a P/E ratio of -515.00, whereas 3IT.F's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, 217A.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 3IT.F's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 217A.F is more volatile compared to 3IT.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 217A.F.
217A.F vs 3IT.DE Comparison
217A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 217A.F stands at 1.4B. In comparison, 3IT.DE has a market cap of 64.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 217A.F is priced at €5.15, while 3IT.DE trades at €13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
217A.F currently has a P/E ratio of -515.00, whereas 3IT.DE's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, 217A.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 3IT.DE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 217A.F is less volatile compared to 3IT.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 217A.F.
217A.F vs SYT.DE Comparison
217A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 217A.F stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SYT.DE has a market cap of 36.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 217A.F is priced at €5.15, while SYT.DE trades at €3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
217A.F currently has a P/E ratio of -515.00, whereas SYT.DE's P/E ratio is -11.21. In terms of profitability, 217A.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SYT.DE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 217A.F is more volatile compared to SYT.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 217A.F.
217A.F vs KSC.DE Comparison
217A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 217A.F stands at 1.4B. In comparison, KSC.DE has a market cap of 36M. Regarding current trading prices, 217A.F is priced at €5.15, while KSC.DE trades at €0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
217A.F currently has a P/E ratio of -515.00, whereas KSC.DE's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, 217A.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KSC.DE's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 217A.F is less volatile compared to KSC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 217A.F.
217A.F vs T3T1.DE Comparison
217A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 217A.F stands at 1.4B. In comparison, T3T1.DE has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 217A.F is priced at €5.15, while T3T1.DE trades at €5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
217A.F currently has a P/E ratio of -515.00, whereas T3T1.DE's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, 217A.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to T3T1.DE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 217A.F is more volatile compared to T3T1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 217A.F.
217A.F vs PDA.DE Comparison
217A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 217A.F stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PDA.DE has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 217A.F is priced at €5.15, while PDA.DE trades at €2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
217A.F currently has a P/E ratio of -515.00, whereas PDA.DE's P/E ratio is 30.50. In terms of profitability, 217A.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PDA.DE's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 217A.F is less volatile compared to PDA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 217A.F.
217A.F vs AMI.F Comparison
217A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 217A.F stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AMI.F has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 217A.F is priced at €5.15, while AMI.F trades at €0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
217A.F currently has a P/E ratio of -515.00, whereas AMI.F's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, 217A.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AMI.F's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 217A.F is less volatile compared to AMI.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 217A.F.
217A.F vs SHWK.DE Comparison
217A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 217A.F stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SHWK.DE has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 217A.F is priced at €5.15, while SHWK.DE trades at €3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
217A.F currently has a P/E ratio of -515.00, whereas SHWK.DE's P/E ratio is -3.34. In terms of profitability, 217A.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SHWK.DE's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, 217A.F is less volatile compared to SHWK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 217A.F.
217A.F vs AMI.DE Comparison
217A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 217A.F stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AMI.DE has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 217A.F is priced at €5.15, while AMI.DE trades at €0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
217A.F currently has a P/E ratio of -515.00, whereas AMI.DE's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, 217A.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AMI.DE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 217A.F is more volatile compared to AMI.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 217A.F.
217A.F vs RTC.DE Comparison
217A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 217A.F stands at 1.4B. In comparison, RTC.DE has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 217A.F is priced at €5.15, while RTC.DE trades at €1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
217A.F currently has a P/E ratio of -515.00, whereas RTC.DE's P/E ratio is 34.33. In terms of profitability, 217A.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RTC.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 217A.F is more volatile compared to RTC.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 217A.F.
217A.F vs ASKN.DE Comparison
217A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 217A.F stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ASKN.DE has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 217A.F is priced at €5.15, while ASKN.DE trades at €0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
217A.F currently has a P/E ratio of -515.00, whereas ASKN.DE's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, 217A.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ASKN.DE's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 217A.F is less volatile compared to ASKN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 217A.F.
217A.F vs MDV.DU Comparison
217A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 217A.F stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MDV.DU has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 217A.F is priced at €5.15, while MDV.DU trades at €6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
217A.F currently has a P/E ratio of -515.00, whereas MDV.DU's P/E ratio is -71.26. In terms of profitability, 217A.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MDV.DU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 217A.F is more volatile compared to MDV.DU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 217A.F.
217A.F vs SFD1.DE Comparison
217A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 217A.F stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SFD1.DE has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 217A.F is priced at €5.15, while SFD1.DE trades at €0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
217A.F currently has a P/E ratio of -515.00, whereas SFD1.DE's P/E ratio is -45.00. In terms of profitability, 217A.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SFD1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 217A.F is more volatile compared to SFD1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 217A.F.
217A.F vs EUCA.DE Comparison
217A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 217A.F stands at 1.4B. In comparison, EUCA.DE has a market cap of 990.6K. Regarding current trading prices, 217A.F is priced at €5.15, while EUCA.DE trades at €0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
217A.F currently has a P/E ratio of -515.00, whereas EUCA.DE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, 217A.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EUCA.DE's ROE of +2.90%. Regarding short-term risk, 217A.F is less volatile compared to EUCA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 217A.F.
217A.F vs WDL.DE Comparison
217A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 217A.F stands at 1.4B. In comparison, WDL.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 217A.F is priced at €5.15, while WDL.DE trades at €1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
217A.F currently has a P/E ratio of -515.00, whereas WDL.DE's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, 217A.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WDL.DE's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 217A.F is less volatile compared to WDL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 217A.F.
217A.F vs 2QU.DE Comparison
217A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 217A.F stands at 1.4B. In comparison, 2QU.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 217A.F is priced at €5.15, while 2QU.DE trades at €17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
217A.F currently has a P/E ratio of -515.00, whereas 2QU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 217A.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 2QU.DE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 217A.F is more volatile compared to 2QU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 217A.F.