Weimob Inc.
Weimob Inc. (2013.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (2013.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013.HK | HK$1.50 | +3.45% | 6B | -20.71 | -HK$0.07 | N/A |
| 9660.HK | HK$6.91 | +1.62% | 77.8B | -7.27 | -HK$0.91 | N/A |
| 0020.HK | HK$1.89 | +1.61% | 73.4B | -30.67 | -HK$0.06 | N/A |
| 3896.HK | HK$7.40 | +2.21% | 30.6B | -26.54 | -HK$0.26 | N/A |
| 0268.HK | HK$8.53 | +0.35% | 30.2B | 285.67 | HK$0.03 | N/A |
| 9899.HK | HK$131.60 | +1.78% | 27.3B | 8.85 | HK$14.58 | N/A |
| 0800.HK | HK$20.72 | +4.54% | 20.8B | -9.86 | -HK$2.05 | N/A |
| 6682.HK | HK$37.34 | +2.41% | 16.7B | -79.91 | -HK$0.44 | N/A |
| 9911.HK | HK$8.79 | +10.43% | 11.2B | 10.08 | HK$0.79 | N/A |
| 3738.HK | HK$3.60 | +1.98% | 8.7B | 42.88 | HK$0.08 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
2013.HK vs 9660.HK Comparison April 2026
2013.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2013.HK stands at 6B. In comparison, 9660.HK has a market cap of 77.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2013.HK is priced at HK$1.50, while 9660.HK trades at HK$6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2013.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.71, whereas 9660.HK's P/E ratio is -7.27. In terms of profitability, 2013.HK's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 9660.HK's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, 2013.HK is more volatile compared to 9660.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2013.HK.Check 9660.HK's competition here
2013.HK vs 0020.HK Comparison April 2026
2013.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2013.HK stands at 6B. In comparison, 0020.HK has a market cap of 73.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2013.HK is priced at HK$1.50, while 0020.HK trades at HK$1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2013.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.71, whereas 0020.HK's P/E ratio is -30.67. In terms of profitability, 2013.HK's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 0020.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2013.HK is more volatile compared to 0020.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2013.HK.Check 0020.HK's competition here
2013.HK vs 3896.HK Comparison April 2026
2013.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2013.HK stands at 6B. In comparison, 3896.HK has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2013.HK is priced at HK$1.50, while 3896.HK trades at HK$7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2013.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.71, whereas 3896.HK's P/E ratio is -26.54. In terms of profitability, 2013.HK's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 3896.HK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 2013.HK is less volatile compared to 3896.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2013.HK.Check 3896.HK's competition here
2013.HK vs 0268.HK Comparison April 2026
2013.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2013.HK stands at 6B. In comparison, 0268.HK has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2013.HK is priced at HK$1.50, while 0268.HK trades at HK$8.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2013.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.71, whereas 0268.HK's P/E ratio is 285.67. In terms of profitability, 2013.HK's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 0268.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2013.HK is less volatile compared to 0268.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2013.HK.Check 0268.HK's competition here
2013.HK vs 9899.HK Comparison April 2026
2013.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2013.HK stands at 6B. In comparison, 9899.HK has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2013.HK is priced at HK$1.50, while 9899.HK trades at HK$131.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2013.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.71, whereas 9899.HK's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, 2013.HK's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 9899.HK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 2013.HK is less volatile compared to 9899.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2013.HK.Check 9899.HK's competition here
2013.HK vs 0800.HK Comparison April 2026
2013.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2013.HK stands at 6B. In comparison, 0800.HK has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2013.HK is priced at HK$1.50, while 0800.HK trades at HK$20.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2013.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.71, whereas 0800.HK's P/E ratio is -9.86. In terms of profitability, 2013.HK's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 0800.HK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 2013.HK is less volatile compared to 0800.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2013.HK.Check 0800.HK's competition here
2013.HK vs 6682.HK Comparison April 2026
2013.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2013.HK stands at 6B. In comparison, 6682.HK has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2013.HK is priced at HK$1.50, while 6682.HK trades at HK$37.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2013.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.71, whereas 6682.HK's P/E ratio is -79.91. In terms of profitability, 2013.HK's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 6682.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2013.HK is less volatile compared to 6682.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2013.HK.Check 6682.HK's competition here
2013.HK vs 9911.HK Comparison April 2026
2013.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2013.HK stands at 6B. In comparison, 9911.HK has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2013.HK is priced at HK$1.50, while 9911.HK trades at HK$8.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2013.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.71, whereas 9911.HK's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, 2013.HK's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 9911.HK's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, 2013.HK is less volatile compared to 9911.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2013.HK.Check 9911.HK's competition here
2013.HK vs 3738.HK Comparison April 2026
2013.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2013.HK stands at 6B. In comparison, 3738.HK has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2013.HK is priced at HK$1.50, while 3738.HK trades at HK$3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2013.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.71, whereas 3738.HK's P/E ratio is 42.88. In terms of profitability, 2013.HK's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 3738.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2013.HK is less volatile compared to 3738.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2013.HK.Check 3738.HK's competition here
2013.HK vs 2556.HK Comparison April 2026
2013.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2013.HK stands at 6B. In comparison, 2556.HK has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2013.HK is priced at HK$1.50, while 2556.HK trades at HK$31.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2013.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.71, whereas 2556.HK's P/E ratio is 77.95. In terms of profitability, 2013.HK's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 2556.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2013.HK is more volatile compared to 2556.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2013.HK.Check 2556.HK's competition here
2013.HK vs 2586.HK Comparison April 2026
2013.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2013.HK stands at 6B. In comparison, 2586.HK has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2013.HK is priced at HK$1.50, while 2586.HK trades at HK$7.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2013.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.71, whereas 2586.HK's P/E ratio is 43.47. In terms of profitability, 2013.HK's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 2586.HK's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, 2013.HK is more volatile compared to 2586.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2013.HK.Check 2586.HK's competition here
2013.HK vs 1675.HK Comparison April 2026
2013.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2013.HK stands at 6B. In comparison, 1675.HK has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2013.HK is priced at HK$1.50, while 1675.HK trades at HK$5.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2013.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.71, whereas 1675.HK's P/E ratio is 40.93. In terms of profitability, 2013.HK's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 1675.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2013.HK is more volatile compared to 1675.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2013.HK.Check 1675.HK's competition here
2013.HK vs 9878.HK Comparison April 2026
2013.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2013.HK stands at 6B. In comparison, 9878.HK has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2013.HK is priced at HK$1.50, while 9878.HK trades at HK$7.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2013.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.71, whereas 9878.HK's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, 2013.HK's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 9878.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2013.HK is less volatile compared to 9878.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2013.HK.Check 9878.HK's competition here
2013.HK vs 0909.HK Comparison April 2026
2013.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2013.HK stands at 6B. In comparison, 0909.HK has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2013.HK is priced at HK$1.50, while 0909.HK trades at HK$2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2013.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.71, whereas 0909.HK's P/E ratio is 104.50. In terms of profitability, 2013.HK's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 0909.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2013.HK is more volatile compared to 0909.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2013.HK.Check 0909.HK's competition here
2013.HK vs 9885.HK Comparison April 2026
2013.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2013.HK stands at 6B. In comparison, 9885.HK has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2013.HK is priced at HK$1.50, while 9885.HK trades at HK$5.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2013.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.71, whereas 9885.HK's P/E ratio is 20.40. In terms of profitability, 2013.HK's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 9885.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2013.HK is less volatile compared to 9885.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2013.HK.Check 9885.HK's competition here
2013.HK vs 6657.HK Comparison April 2026
2013.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2013.HK stands at 6B. In comparison, 6657.HK has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2013.HK is priced at HK$1.50, while 6657.HK trades at HK$16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2013.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.71, whereas 6657.HK's P/E ratio is -306.00. In terms of profitability, 2013.HK's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 6657.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2013.HK is less volatile compared to 6657.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2013.HK.Check 6657.HK's competition here
2013.HK vs 8083.HK Comparison April 2026
2013.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2013.HK stands at 6B. In comparison, 8083.HK has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2013.HK is priced at HK$1.50, while 8083.HK trades at HK$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2013.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.71, whereas 8083.HK's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, 2013.HK's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 8083.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2013.HK is less volatile compared to 8083.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2013.HK.Check 8083.HK's competition here
2013.HK vs 1782.HK Comparison April 2026
2013.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2013.HK stands at 6B. In comparison, 1782.HK has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2013.HK is priced at HK$1.50, while 1782.HK trades at HK$3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2013.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.71, whereas 1782.HK's P/E ratio is -43.33. In terms of profitability, 2013.HK's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 1782.HK's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 2013.HK is more volatile compared to 1782.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2013.HK.Check 1782.HK's competition here
2013.HK vs 2576.HK Comparison April 2026
2013.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2013.HK stands at 6B. In comparison, 2576.HK has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2013.HK is priced at HK$1.50, while 2576.HK trades at HK$4.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2013.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.71, whereas 2576.HK's P/E ratio is -36.69. In terms of profitability, 2013.HK's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 2576.HK's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 2013.HK is more volatile compared to 2576.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2013.HK.Check 2576.HK's competition here
2013.HK vs 0596.HK Comparison April 2026
2013.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2013.HK stands at 6B. In comparison, 0596.HK has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2013.HK is priced at HK$1.50, while 0596.HK trades at HK$2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2013.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.71, whereas 0596.HK's P/E ratio is 4.74. In terms of profitability, 2013.HK's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 0596.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 2013.HK is less volatile compared to 0596.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2013.HK.Check 0596.HK's competition here
2013.HK vs 1588.HK Comparison April 2026
2013.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2013.HK stands at 6B. In comparison, 1588.HK has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2013.HK is priced at HK$1.50, while 1588.HK trades at HK$7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2013.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.71, whereas 1588.HK's P/E ratio is 25.38. In terms of profitability, 2013.HK's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 1588.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2013.HK is less volatile compared to 1588.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2013.HK.Check 1588.HK's competition here
2013.HK vs 2571.HK Comparison April 2026
2013.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2013.HK stands at 6B. In comparison, 2571.HK has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2013.HK is priced at HK$1.50, while 2571.HK trades at HK$13.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2013.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.71, whereas 2571.HK's P/E ratio is 25.75. In terms of profitability, 2013.HK's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 2571.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 2013.HK is more volatile compared to 2571.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2013.HK.Check 2571.HK's competition here
2013.HK vs 8148.HK Comparison April 2026
2013.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2013.HK stands at 6B. In comparison, 8148.HK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2013.HK is priced at HK$1.50, while 8148.HK trades at HK$3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2013.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.71, whereas 8148.HK's P/E ratio is -190.50. In terms of profitability, 2013.HK's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 8148.HK's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 2013.HK is more volatile compared to 8148.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2013.HK.Check 8148.HK's competition here
2013.HK vs 1450.HK Comparison April 2026
2013.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2013.HK stands at 6B. In comparison, 1450.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2013.HK is priced at HK$1.50, while 1450.HK trades at HK$0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2013.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.71, whereas 1450.HK's P/E ratio is 19.75. In terms of profitability, 2013.HK's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 1450.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 2013.HK is less volatile compared to 1450.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2013.HK.Check 1450.HK's competition here
2013.HK vs 6959.HK Comparison April 2026
2013.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2013.HK stands at 6B. In comparison, 6959.HK has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2013.HK is priced at HK$1.50, while 6959.HK trades at HK$4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2013.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.71, whereas 6959.HK's P/E ratio is 6.41. In terms of profitability, 2013.HK's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 6959.HK's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 2013.HK is less volatile compared to 6959.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2013.HK.Check 6959.HK's competition here
2013.HK vs 0536.HK Comparison April 2026
2013.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2013.HK stands at 6B. In comparison, 0536.HK has a market cap of 874.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 2013.HK is priced at HK$1.50, while 0536.HK trades at HK$1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2013.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.71, whereas 0536.HK's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, 2013.HK's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 0536.HK's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 2013.HK is more volatile compared to 0536.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2013.HK.Check 0536.HK's competition here
2013.HK vs 0418.HK Comparison April 2026
2013.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2013.HK stands at 6B. In comparison, 0418.HK has a market cap of 843.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 2013.HK is priced at HK$1.50, while 0418.HK trades at HK$0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2013.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.71, whereas 0418.HK's P/E ratio is 24.33. In terms of profitability, 2013.HK's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 0418.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2013.HK is less volatile compared to 0418.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2013.HK.Check 0418.HK's competition here
2013.HK vs 2392.HK Comparison April 2026
2013.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2013.HK stands at 6B. In comparison, 2392.HK has a market cap of 727.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 2013.HK is priced at HK$1.50, while 2392.HK trades at HK$1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2013.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.71, whereas 2392.HK's P/E ratio is -43.67. In terms of profitability, 2013.HK's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 2392.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2013.HK is more volatile compared to 2392.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2013.HK.Check 2392.HK's competition here
2013.HK vs 1808.HK Comparison April 2026
2013.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2013.HK stands at 6B. In comparison, 1808.HK has a market cap of 636.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 2013.HK is priced at HK$1.50, while 1808.HK trades at HK$2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2013.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.71, whereas 1808.HK's P/E ratio is 3.71. In terms of profitability, 2013.HK's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 1808.HK's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 2013.HK is less volatile compared to 1808.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2013.HK.Check 1808.HK's competition here
2013.HK vs 8353.HK Comparison April 2026
2013.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2013.HK stands at 6B. In comparison, 8353.HK has a market cap of 443.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 2013.HK is priced at HK$1.50, while 8353.HK trades at HK$1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2013.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.71, whereas 8353.HK's P/E ratio is 54.50. In terms of profitability, 2013.HK's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 8353.HK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2013.HK is more volatile compared to 8353.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2013.HK.Check 8353.HK's competition here
2013.HK vs 1297.HK Comparison April 2026
2013.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2013.HK stands at 6B. In comparison, 1297.HK has a market cap of 403.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2013.HK is priced at HK$1.50, while 1297.HK trades at HK$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2013.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.71, whereas 1297.HK's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, 2013.HK's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 1297.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2013.HK is more volatile compared to 1297.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2013.HK.Check 1297.HK's competition here
2013.HK vs 1490.HK Comparison April 2026
2013.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2013.HK stands at 6B. In comparison, 1490.HK has a market cap of 321M. Regarding current trading prices, 2013.HK is priced at HK$1.50, while 1490.HK trades at HK$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2013.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.71, whereas 1490.HK's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, 2013.HK's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 1490.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2013.HK is less volatile compared to 1490.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2013.HK.Check 1490.HK's competition here
2013.HK vs 8205.HK Comparison April 2026
2013.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2013.HK stands at 6B. In comparison, 8205.HK has a market cap of 211.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2013.HK is priced at HK$1.50, while 8205.HK trades at HK$0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2013.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.71, whereas 8205.HK's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, 2013.HK's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 8205.HK's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2013.HK is less volatile compared to 8205.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2013.HK.Check 8205.HK's competition here
2013.HK vs 9600.HK Comparison April 2026
2013.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2013.HK stands at 6B. In comparison, 9600.HK has a market cap of 204.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 2013.HK is priced at HK$1.50, while 9600.HK trades at HK$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2013.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.71, whereas 9600.HK's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, 2013.HK's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 9600.HK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 2013.HK is less volatile compared to 9600.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2013.HK.Check 9600.HK's competition here
2013.HK vs 8635.HK Comparison April 2026
2013.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2013.HK stands at 6B. In comparison, 8635.HK has a market cap of 192M. Regarding current trading prices, 2013.HK is priced at HK$1.50, while 8635.HK trades at HK$0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2013.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.71, whereas 8635.HK's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, 2013.HK's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 8635.HK's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 2013.HK is less volatile compared to 8635.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2013.HK.Check 8635.HK's competition here
2013.HK vs 8156.HK Comparison April 2026
2013.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2013.HK stands at 6B. In comparison, 8156.HK has a market cap of 183.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2013.HK is priced at HK$1.50, while 8156.HK trades at HK$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2013.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.71, whereas 8156.HK's P/E ratio is 29.00. In terms of profitability, 2013.HK's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 8156.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2013.HK is more volatile compared to 8156.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2013.HK.Check 8156.HK's competition here
2013.HK vs 8100.HK Comparison April 2026
2013.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2013.HK stands at 6B. In comparison, 8100.HK has a market cap of 140M. Regarding current trading prices, 2013.HK is priced at HK$1.50, while 8100.HK trades at HK$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2013.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.71, whereas 8100.HK's P/E ratio is -31.50. In terms of profitability, 2013.HK's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 8100.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2013.HK is more volatile compared to 8100.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2013.HK.Check 8100.HK's competition here
2013.HK vs 6610.HK Comparison April 2026
2013.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2013.HK stands at 6B. In comparison, 6610.HK has a market cap of 110.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 2013.HK is priced at HK$1.50, while 6610.HK trades at HK$0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2013.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.71, whereas 6610.HK's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, 2013.HK's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 6610.HK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 2013.HK is less volatile compared to 6610.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2013.HK.Check 6610.HK's competition here
2013.HK vs 1933.HK Comparison April 2026
2013.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2013.HK stands at 6B. In comparison, 1933.HK has a market cap of 106.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 2013.HK is priced at HK$1.50, while 1933.HK trades at HK$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2013.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.71, whereas 1933.HK's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, 2013.HK's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 1933.HK's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, 2013.HK is more volatile compared to 1933.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2013.HK.Check 1933.HK's competition here
2013.HK vs 0802.HK Comparison April 2026
2013.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2013.HK stands at 6B. In comparison, 0802.HK has a market cap of 92.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 2013.HK is priced at HK$1.50, while 0802.HK trades at HK$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2013.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.71, whereas 0802.HK's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, 2013.HK's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 0802.HK's ROE of -10.91%. Regarding short-term risk, 2013.HK is less volatile compared to 0802.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2013.HK.Check 0802.HK's competition here
2013.HK vs 8071.HK Comparison April 2026
2013.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2013.HK stands at 6B. In comparison, 8071.HK has a market cap of 89M. Regarding current trading prices, 2013.HK is priced at HK$1.50, while 8071.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2013.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.71, whereas 8071.HK's P/E ratio is -8.64. In terms of profitability, 2013.HK's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 8071.HK's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, 2013.HK is more volatile compared to 8071.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2013.HK.Check 8071.HK's competition here
2013.HK vs 8290.HK Comparison April 2026
2013.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2013.HK stands at 6B. In comparison, 8290.HK has a market cap of 62M. Regarding current trading prices, 2013.HK is priced at HK$1.50, while 8290.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2013.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.71, whereas 8290.HK's P/E ratio is 23.85. In terms of profitability, 2013.HK's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 8290.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2013.HK is less volatile compared to 8290.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2013.HK.Check 8290.HK's competition here
2013.HK vs 8048.HK Comparison April 2026
2013.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2013.HK stands at 6B. In comparison, 8048.HK has a market cap of 35.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 2013.HK is priced at HK$1.50, while 8048.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2013.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.71, whereas 8048.HK's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, 2013.HK's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 8048.HK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 2013.HK is less volatile compared to 8048.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2013.HK.Check 8048.HK's competition here
2013.HK vs 8060.HK Comparison April 2026
2013.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2013.HK stands at 6B. In comparison, 8060.HK has a market cap of 28.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 2013.HK is priced at HK$1.50, while 8060.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2013.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.71, whereas 8060.HK's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, 2013.HK's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 8060.HK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 2013.HK is less volatile compared to 8060.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2013.HK.Check 8060.HK's competition here
2013.HK vs 8036.HK Comparison April 2026
2013.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2013.HK stands at 6B. In comparison, 8036.HK has a market cap of 28.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 2013.HK is priced at HK$1.50, while 8036.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2013.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.71, whereas 8036.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2013.HK's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 8036.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2013.HK is more volatile compared to 8036.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2013.HK.Check 8036.HK's competition here
2013.HK vs 8018.HK Comparison April 2026
2013.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2013.HK stands at 6B. In comparison, 8018.HK has a market cap of 22.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 2013.HK is priced at HK$1.50, while 8018.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2013.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.71, whereas 8018.HK's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, 2013.HK's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 8018.HK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 2013.HK is less volatile compared to 8018.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2013.HK.Check 8018.HK's competition here
2013.HK vs 8131.HK Comparison April 2026
2013.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2013.HK stands at 6B. In comparison, 8131.HK has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2013.HK is priced at HK$1.50, while 8131.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2013.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.71, whereas 8131.HK's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, 2013.HK's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 8131.HK's ROE of +4.65%. Regarding short-term risk, 2013.HK is less volatile compared to 8131.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2013.HK.Check 8131.HK's competition here
2013.HK vs 8255.HK Comparison April 2026
2013.HK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2013.HK stands at 6B. In comparison, 8255.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 2013.HK is priced at HK$1.50, while 8255.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2013.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.71, whereas 8255.HK's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, 2013.HK's ROE is -0.10%, compared to 8255.HK's ROE of -1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, 2013.HK is less volatile compared to 8255.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2013.HK.Check 8255.HK's competition here