Shanghai Jin Jiang Capital Company Limited (2006.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (2006.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Lodging Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006.HK | HK$3.09 | +0.65% | 0 | 22.78 | HK$0.14 | N/A |
| 1179.HK | HK$32.78 | -2.73% | 100.8B | 17.91 | HK$1.83 | +4.90% |
| 0069.HK | HK$4.04 | +0.50% | 14.4B | 16.16 | HK$0.25 | +3.73% |
| 0045.HK | HK$5.27 | -0.38% | 8.8B | 27.74 | HK$0.19 | N/A |
| 0199.HK | HK$2.70 | +2.66% | 2.9B | -5.74 | -HK$0.47 | N/A |
| 1221.HK | HK$1.56 | -1.27% | 1.9B | 15.60 | HK$0.10 | +1.92% |
| 1270.HK | HK$0.48 | -1.03% | 1.7B | 24.00 | HK$0.02 | +6.60% |
| 0184.HK | HK$2.34 | +1.30% | 796.1M | 3.08 | HK$0.76 | +5.13% |
| 0201.HK | HK$0.07 | +2.99% | 617.3M | -6.90 | -HK$0.01 | N/A |
| 0078.HK | HK$0.46 | -1.09% | 409M | -0.31 | -HK$1.46 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
2006.HK vs 1179.HK Comparison June 2026
2006.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2006.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 1179.HK has a market cap of 100.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2006.HK is priced at HK$3.09, while 1179.HK trades at HK$32.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2006.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas 1179.HK's P/E ratio is 17.91. In terms of profitability, 2006.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1179.HK's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, 2006.HK is less volatile compared to 1179.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2006.HK.Check 1179.HK's competition here
2006.HK vs 0069.HK Comparison June 2026
2006.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2006.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 0069.HK has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2006.HK is priced at HK$3.09, while 0069.HK trades at HK$4.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2006.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas 0069.HK's P/E ratio is 16.16. In terms of profitability, 2006.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0069.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2006.HK is less volatile compared to 0069.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2006.HK.Check 0069.HK's competition here
2006.HK vs 0045.HK Comparison June 2026
2006.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2006.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 0045.HK has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2006.HK is priced at HK$3.09, while 0045.HK trades at HK$5.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2006.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas 0045.HK's P/E ratio is 27.74. In terms of profitability, 2006.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0045.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2006.HK is less volatile compared to 0045.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2006.HK.Check 0045.HK's competition here
2006.HK vs 0199.HK Comparison June 2026
2006.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2006.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 0199.HK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2006.HK is priced at HK$3.09, while 0199.HK trades at HK$2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2006.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas 0199.HK's P/E ratio is -5.74. In terms of profitability, 2006.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0199.HK's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 2006.HK is less volatile compared to 0199.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2006.HK.Check 0199.HK's competition here
2006.HK vs 1221.HK Comparison June 2026
2006.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2006.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 1221.HK has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2006.HK is priced at HK$3.09, while 1221.HK trades at HK$1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2006.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas 1221.HK's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, 2006.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1221.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2006.HK is more volatile compared to 1221.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2006.HK.Check 1221.HK's competition here
2006.HK vs 1270.HK Comparison June 2026
2006.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2006.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 1270.HK has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2006.HK is priced at HK$3.09, while 1270.HK trades at HK$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2006.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas 1270.HK's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, 2006.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1270.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2006.HK is less volatile compared to 1270.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2006.HK.Check 1270.HK's competition here
2006.HK vs 0184.HK Comparison June 2026
2006.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2006.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 0184.HK has a market cap of 796.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 2006.HK is priced at HK$3.09, while 0184.HK trades at HK$2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2006.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas 0184.HK's P/E ratio is 3.08. In terms of profitability, 2006.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0184.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2006.HK is more volatile compared to 0184.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2006.HK.Check 0184.HK's competition here
2006.HK vs 0201.HK Comparison June 2026
2006.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2006.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 0201.HK has a market cap of 617.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 2006.HK is priced at HK$3.09, while 0201.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2006.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas 0201.HK's P/E ratio is -6.90. In terms of profitability, 2006.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0201.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2006.HK is less volatile compared to 0201.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2006.HK.Check 0201.HK's competition here
2006.HK vs 0078.HK Comparison June 2026
2006.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2006.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 0078.HK has a market cap of 409M. Regarding current trading prices, 2006.HK is priced at HK$3.09, while 0078.HK trades at HK$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2006.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas 0078.HK's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, 2006.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0078.HK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 2006.HK is less volatile compared to 0078.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2006.HK.Check 0078.HK's competition here
2006.HK vs 1832.HK Comparison June 2026
2006.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2006.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 1832.HK has a market cap of 388.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2006.HK is priced at HK$3.09, while 1832.HK trades at HK$1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2006.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas 1832.HK's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, 2006.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1832.HK's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, 2006.HK is less volatile compared to 1832.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2006.HK.Check 1832.HK's competition here
2006.HK vs 0219.HK Comparison June 2026
2006.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2006.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 0219.HK has a market cap of 368.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2006.HK is priced at HK$3.09, while 0219.HK trades at HK$0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2006.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas 0219.HK's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, 2006.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0219.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2006.HK is more volatile compared to 0219.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2006.HK.Check 0219.HK's competition here
2006.HK vs 1215.HK Comparison June 2026
2006.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2006.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 1215.HK has a market cap of 281.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 2006.HK is priced at HK$3.09, while 1215.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2006.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas 1215.HK's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, 2006.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1215.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2006.HK is less volatile compared to 1215.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2006.HK.Check 1215.HK's competition here
2006.HK vs 0557.HK Comparison June 2026
2006.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2006.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 0557.HK has a market cap of 271.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 2006.HK is priced at HK$3.09, while 0557.HK trades at HK$0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2006.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas 0557.HK's P/E ratio is -7.56. In terms of profitability, 2006.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0557.HK's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 2006.HK is less volatile compared to 0557.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2006.HK.Check 0557.HK's competition here
2006.HK vs 0042.HK Comparison June 2026
2006.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2006.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 0042.HK has a market cap of 240.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2006.HK is priced at HK$3.09, while 0042.HK trades at HK$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2006.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas 0042.HK's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, 2006.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0042.HK's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 2006.HK is less volatile compared to 0042.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2006.HK.Check 0042.HK's competition here
2006.HK vs 8237.HK Comparison June 2026
2006.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2006.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 8237.HK has a market cap of 207.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 2006.HK is priced at HK$3.09, while 8237.HK trades at HK$1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2006.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas 8237.HK's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, 2006.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 8237.HK's ROE of +1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, 2006.HK is less volatile compared to 8237.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2006.HK.Check 8237.HK's competition here
2006.HK vs 0617.HK Comparison June 2026
2006.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2006.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 0617.HK has a market cap of 195.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 2006.HK is priced at HK$3.09, while 0617.HK trades at HK$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2006.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas 0617.HK's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, 2006.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0617.HK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 2006.HK is less volatile compared to 0617.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2006.HK.Check 0617.HK's competition here
2006.HK vs 0355.HK Comparison June 2026
2006.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2006.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 0355.HK has a market cap of 194.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2006.HK is priced at HK$3.09, while 0355.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2006.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas 0355.HK's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, 2006.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0355.HK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2006.HK is less volatile compared to 0355.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2006.HK.Check 0355.HK's competition here
2006.HK vs 0253.HK Comparison June 2026
2006.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2006.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 0253.HK has a market cap of 157.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 2006.HK is priced at HK$3.09, while 0253.HK trades at HK$0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2006.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas 0253.HK's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, 2006.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0253.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 2006.HK is more volatile compared to 0253.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2006.HK.Check 0253.HK's competition here
2006.HK vs 0181.HK Comparison June 2026
2006.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2006.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 0181.HK has a market cap of 136.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 2006.HK is priced at HK$3.09, while 0181.HK trades at HK$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2006.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas 0181.HK's P/E ratio is -11.90. In terms of profitability, 2006.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0181.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2006.HK is less volatile compared to 0181.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2006.HK.Check 0181.HK's competition here
2006.HK vs 1355.HK Comparison June 2026
2006.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2006.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 1355.HK has a market cap of 135.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 2006.HK is priced at HK$3.09, while 1355.HK trades at HK$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2006.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas 1355.HK's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, 2006.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1355.HK's ROE of +1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, 2006.HK is less volatile compared to 1355.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2006.HK.Check 1355.HK's competition here
2006.HK vs 0022.HK Comparison June 2026
2006.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2006.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 0022.HK has a market cap of 88.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 2006.HK is priced at HK$3.09, while 0022.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2006.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas 0022.HK's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, 2006.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0022.HK's ROE of +1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 2006.HK is less volatile compared to 0022.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2006.HK.Check 0022.HK's competition here
2006.HK vs 0559.HK Comparison June 2026
2006.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2006.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 0559.HK has a market cap of 65.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 2006.HK is priced at HK$3.09, while 0559.HK trades at HK$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2006.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas 0559.HK's P/E ratio is 2.52. In terms of profitability, 2006.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0559.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2006.HK is more volatile compared to 0559.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2006.HK.Check 0559.HK's competition here
2006.HK vs 0193.HK Comparison June 2026
2006.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2006.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 0193.HK has a market cap of 47.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 2006.HK is priced at HK$3.09, while 0193.HK trades at HK$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2006.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas 0193.HK's P/E ratio is -10.20. In terms of profitability, 2006.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0193.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2006.HK is less volatile compared to 0193.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2006.HK.Check 0193.HK's competition here
2006.HK vs 1189.HK Comparison June 2026
2006.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2006.HK stands at 0. In comparison, 1189.HK has a market cap of 37.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 2006.HK is priced at HK$3.09, while 1189.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2006.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas 1189.HK's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, 2006.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1189.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2006.HK is less volatile compared to 1189.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2006.HK.Check 1189.HK's competition here