The Kodensha Co., Ltd.
The Kodensha Co., Ltd. (1948.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (1948.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Engineering & Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1948.T | ¥2,400.00 | +2.17% | 20.5B | 7.57 | ¥309.76 | +3.58% |
| 1812.T | ¥4,147.00 | +7.60% | 1.9T | 14.78 | ¥266.31 | +2.64% |
| 1802.T | ¥2,404.00 | +4.66% | 1.7T | 11.46 | ¥203.97 | +3.42% |
| 1801.T | ¥9,688.00 | +4.41% | 1.6T | 13.87 | ¥680.15 | +2.23% |
| 1803.T | ¥1,775.50 | +3.71% | 1.2T | 18.26 | ¥94.83 | +2.02% |
| 1944.T | ¥5,120.00 | +4.68% | 975.1B | 20.85 | ¥236.24 | +1.02% |
| 1942.T | ¥3,844.00 | +3.81% | 765.3B | 18.05 | ¥207.37 | +2.14% |
| 1959.T | ¥7,067.00 | +5.32% | 486B | 16.57 | ¥414.68 | +2.04% |
| 1951.T | ¥2,104.00 | +4.11% | 421.1B | 15.79 | ¥128.94 | +3.10% |
| 1721.T | ¥3,596.00 | +2.10% | 416.7B | 14.00 | ¥252.88 | +3.25% |
Stock Comparison
1948.T vs 1812.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1812.T has a market cap of 1.9T. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1812.T trades at ¥4,147.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1812.T's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1812.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 1812.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1812.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1802.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1802.T has a market cap of 1.7T. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1802.T trades at ¥2,404.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1802.T's P/E ratio is 11.46. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1802.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 1802.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1802.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1801.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1801.T has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1801.T trades at ¥9,688.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1801.T's P/E ratio is 13.87. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1801.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 1801.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1801.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1803.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1803.T has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1803.T trades at ¥1,775.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1803.T's P/E ratio is 18.26. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1803.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 1803.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1803.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1944.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1944.T has a market cap of 975.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1944.T trades at ¥5,120.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1944.T's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1944.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 1944.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1944.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1942.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1942.T has a market cap of 765.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1942.T trades at ¥3,844.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1942.T's P/E ratio is 18.05. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1942.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 1942.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1942.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1959.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1959.T has a market cap of 486B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1959.T trades at ¥7,067.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1959.T's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1959.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 1959.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1959.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1951.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1951.T has a market cap of 421.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1951.T trades at ¥2,104.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1951.T's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1951.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 1951.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1951.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1721.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1721.T has a market cap of 416.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1721.T trades at ¥3,596.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1721.T's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1721.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 1721.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1721.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1963.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1963.T has a market cap of 329B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1963.T trades at ¥1,387.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1963.T's P/E ratio is -845.65. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1963.T's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is more volatile compared to 1963.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1963.T's competition here
1948.T vs 5076.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 5076.T has a market cap of 323.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 5076.T trades at ¥1,330.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 5076.T's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5076.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is more volatile compared to 5076.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 5076.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1860.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1860.T has a market cap of 305.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1860.T trades at ¥1,051.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1860.T's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1860.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 1860.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1860.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1893.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1893.T has a market cap of 277.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1893.T trades at ¥1,019.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1893.T's P/E ratio is 22.33. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1893.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 1893.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1893.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1719.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1719.T has a market cap of 258B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1719.T trades at ¥1,671.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1719.T's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1719.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is more volatile compared to 1719.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1719.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1417.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1417.T has a market cap of 252.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1417.T trades at ¥2,894.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1417.T's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1417.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T and 1417.T have similar daily volatility (2.13).Check 1417.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1414.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1414.T has a market cap of 250B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1414.T trades at ¥4,968.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1414.T's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1414.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is more volatile compared to 1414.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1414.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1961.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1961.T has a market cap of 247.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1961.T trades at ¥4,880.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1961.T's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1961.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 1961.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1961.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1949.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1949.T has a market cap of 236.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1949.T trades at ¥6,890.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1949.T's P/E ratio is 18.46. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1949.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 1949.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1949.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1980.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1980.T has a market cap of 209.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1980.T trades at ¥5,040.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1980.T's P/E ratio is 11.99. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1980.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 1980.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1980.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1941.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1941.T has a market cap of 205B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1941.T trades at ¥3,865.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1941.T's P/E ratio is 10.32. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1941.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is more volatile compared to 1941.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1941.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1820.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1820.T has a market cap of 203.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1820.T trades at ¥5,267.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1820.T's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1820.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 1820.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1820.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1861.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1861.T has a market cap of 197B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1861.T trades at ¥4,745.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1861.T's P/E ratio is 21.10. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1861.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 1861.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1861.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1934.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1934.T has a market cap of 176.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1934.T trades at ¥2,678.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1934.T's P/E ratio is 15.13. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1934.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 1934.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1934.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1890.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1890.T has a market cap of 166.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1890.T trades at ¥1,784.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1890.T's P/E ratio is 19.97. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1890.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is more volatile compared to 1890.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1890.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1833.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1833.T has a market cap of 165.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1833.T trades at ¥4,690.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1833.T's P/E ratio is 61.76. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1833.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 1833.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1833.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1885.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1885.T has a market cap of 157.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1885.T trades at ¥2,051.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1885.T's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1885.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 1885.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1885.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1835.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1835.T has a market cap of 146.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1835.T trades at ¥4,335.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1835.T's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1835.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is more volatile compared to 1835.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1835.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1926.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1926.T has a market cap of 140.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1926.T trades at ¥3,235.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1926.T's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1926.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 1926.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1926.T's competition here
1948.T vs 6055.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 6055.T has a market cap of 140.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 6055.T trades at ¥1,360.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 6055.T's P/E ratio is 17.83. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 6055.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is more volatile compared to 6055.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 6055.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1946.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1946.T has a market cap of 130B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1946.T trades at ¥1,445.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1946.T's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1946.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 1946.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1946.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1952.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1952.T has a market cap of 124.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1952.T trades at ¥2,887.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1952.T's P/E ratio is 12.99. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1952.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 1952.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1952.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1720.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1720.T has a market cap of 113.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1720.T trades at ¥1,089.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1720.T's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1720.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is more volatile compared to 1720.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1720.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1762.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1762.T has a market cap of 110.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1762.T trades at ¥3,290.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1762.T's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1762.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 1762.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1762.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1884.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1884.T has a market cap of 110.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1884.T trades at ¥2,511.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1884.T's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1884.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is more volatile compared to 1884.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1884.T's competition here
1948.T vs 5911.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 5911.T has a market cap of 108.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 5911.T trades at ¥2,755.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 5911.T's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5911.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is more volatile compared to 5911.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 5911.T's competition here
1948.T vs 9716.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 9716.T has a market cap of 107.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 9716.T trades at ¥972.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 9716.T's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9716.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is more volatile compared to 9716.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 9716.T's competition here
1948.T vs 9663.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 9663.T has a market cap of 105.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 9663.T trades at ¥6,850.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 9663.T's P/E ratio is 24.96. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9663.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is more volatile compared to 9663.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 9663.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1879.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1879.T has a market cap of 104.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1879.T trades at ¥1,802.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1879.T's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1879.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is more volatile compared to 1879.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1879.T's competition here
1948.T vs 6366.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 6366.T has a market cap of 99.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 6366.T trades at ¥377.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 6366.T's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 6366.T's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 6366.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 6366.T's competition here
1948.T vs 9161.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 9161.T has a market cap of 97.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 9161.T trades at ¥6,480.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 9161.T's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9161.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is more volatile compared to 9161.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 9161.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1982.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1982.T has a market cap of 92.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1982.T trades at ¥4,550.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1982.T's P/E ratio is 15.92. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1982.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 1982.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1982.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1965.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1965.T has a market cap of 88.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1965.T trades at ¥4,390.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1965.T's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1965.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 1965.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1965.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1870.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1870.T has a market cap of 88B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1870.T trades at ¥2,243.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1870.T's P/E ratio is 15.59. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1870.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 1870.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1870.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1871.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1871.T has a market cap of 88B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1871.T trades at ¥1,910.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1871.T's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1871.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is more volatile compared to 1871.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1871.T's competition here
1948.T vs 9621.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 9621.T has a market cap of 87.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 9621.T trades at ¥3,190.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 9621.T's P/E ratio is 12.93. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9621.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is more volatile compared to 9621.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 9621.T's competition here
1948.T vs 6330.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 6330.T has a market cap of 84.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 6330.T trades at ¥1,527.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 6330.T's P/E ratio is 42.39. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 6330.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 6330.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 6330.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1976.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1976.T has a market cap of 76B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1976.T trades at ¥1,607.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1976.T's P/E ratio is 9.14. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1976.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is more volatile compared to 1976.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1976.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1822.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1822.T has a market cap of 75.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1822.T trades at ¥871.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1822.T's P/E ratio is 20.47. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1822.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is more volatile compared to 1822.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1822.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1882.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1882.T has a market cap of 73.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1882.T trades at ¥1,622.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1882.T's P/E ratio is 17.91. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1882.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is more volatile compared to 1882.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1882.T's competition here
1948.T vs 9755.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 9755.T has a market cap of 72.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 9755.T trades at ¥3,230.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 9755.T's P/E ratio is 15.29. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9755.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 9755.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 9755.T's competition here
1948.T vs 6226.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 6226.T has a market cap of 72.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 6226.T trades at ¥4,270.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 6226.T's P/E ratio is 25.71. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 6226.T's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 6226.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 6226.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1888.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1888.T has a market cap of 71.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1888.T trades at ¥5,770.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1888.T's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1888.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 1888.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1888.T's competition here
1948.T vs 3443.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 3443.T has a market cap of 69.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 3443.T trades at ¥4,145.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 3443.T's P/E ratio is 6.24. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3443.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 3443.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 3443.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1852.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1852.T has a market cap of 66B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1852.T trades at ¥840.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1852.T's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1852.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 1852.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1852.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1775.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1775.T has a market cap of 64.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1775.T trades at ¥7,160.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1775.T's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1775.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 1775.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1775.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1799.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1799.T has a market cap of 63.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1799.T trades at ¥3,440.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1799.T's P/E ratio is 11.46. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1799.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 1799.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1799.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1939.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1939.T has a market cap of 62.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1939.T trades at ¥1,346.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1939.T's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1939.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is more volatile compared to 1939.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1939.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1945.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1945.T has a market cap of 57.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1945.T trades at ¥1,815.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1945.T's P/E ratio is 19.97. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1945.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 1945.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1945.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1954.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1954.T has a market cap of 56.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1954.T trades at ¥3,740.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1954.T's P/E ratio is 13.35. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1954.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is more volatile compared to 1954.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1954.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1921.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1921.T has a market cap of 56.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1921.T trades at ¥1,545.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1921.T's P/E ratio is 4.06. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1921.T's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 1921.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1921.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1898.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1898.T has a market cap of 53.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1898.T trades at ¥1,509.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1898.T's P/E ratio is 13.81. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1898.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 1898.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1898.T's competition here
1948.T vs 3431.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 3431.T has a market cap of 52.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 3431.T trades at ¥2,025.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 3431.T's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3431.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is more volatile compared to 3431.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 3431.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1786.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1786.T has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1786.T trades at ¥404.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1786.T's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1786.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is more volatile compared to 1786.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1786.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1929.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1929.T has a market cap of 50.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1929.T trades at ¥1,247.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1929.T's P/E ratio is 20.97. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1929.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 1929.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1929.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1967.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1967.T has a market cap of 50B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1967.T trades at ¥2,025.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1967.T's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1967.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 1967.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1967.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1899.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1899.T has a market cap of 45.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1899.T trades at ¥5,640.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1899.T's P/E ratio is 9.16. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1899.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 1899.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1899.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1815.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1815.T has a market cap of 45.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1815.T trades at ¥3,400.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1815.T's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1815.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 1815.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1815.T's competition here
1948.T vs 5959.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 5959.T has a market cap of 41.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 5959.T trades at ¥933.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 5959.T's P/E ratio is -48.20. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5959.T's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 5959.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 5959.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1930.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1930.T has a market cap of 38.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1930.T trades at ¥1,423.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1930.T's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1930.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 1930.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1930.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1887.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1887.T has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1887.T trades at ¥485.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1887.T's P/E ratio is 28.87. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1887.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is more volatile compared to 1887.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1887.T's competition here
1948.T vs 256A.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 256A.T has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 256A.T trades at ¥2,023.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 256A.T's P/E ratio is 10.28. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 256A.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 256A.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 256A.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1810.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1810.T has a market cap of 37.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1810.T trades at ¥1,348.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1810.T's P/E ratio is 13.74. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1810.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 1810.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1810.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1813.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1813.T has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1813.T trades at ¥2,680.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1813.T's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1813.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 1813.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1813.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1793.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1793.T has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1793.T trades at ¥1,327.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1793.T's P/E ratio is 20.32. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1793.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 1793.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1793.T's competition here
1948.T vs 9622.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 9622.T has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 9622.T trades at ¥1,327.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 9622.T's P/E ratio is 12.76. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9622.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is more volatile compared to 9622.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 9622.T's competition here
1948.T vs 2153.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 2153.T has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 2153.T trades at ¥1,841.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 2153.T's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 2153.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 2153.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 2153.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1811.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1811.T has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1811.T trades at ¥4,590.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1811.T's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1811.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 1811.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1811.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1805.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1805.T has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1805.T trades at ¥1,439.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1805.T's P/E ratio is 8.09. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1805.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is more volatile compared to 1805.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1805.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1828.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1828.T has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1828.T trades at ¥2,623.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1828.T's P/E ratio is 10.45. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1828.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is more volatile compared to 1828.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1828.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1780.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1780.T has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1780.T trades at ¥1,379.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1780.T's P/E ratio is 8.61. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1780.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is more volatile compared to 1780.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1780.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1827.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1827.T has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1827.T trades at ¥774.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1827.T's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1827.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 1827.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1827.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1866.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1866.T has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1866.T trades at ¥4,010.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1866.T's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1866.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is more volatile compared to 1866.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1866.T's competition here
1948.T vs 9788.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 9788.T has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 9788.T trades at ¥561.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 9788.T's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9788.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is more volatile compared to 9788.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 9788.T's competition here
1948.T vs 9233.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 9233.T has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 9233.T trades at ¥1,193.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 9233.T's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9233.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is more volatile compared to 9233.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 9233.T's competition here
1948.T vs 9768.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 9768.T has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 9768.T trades at ¥3,110.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 9768.T's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9768.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 9768.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 9768.T's competition here
1948.T vs 9163.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 9163.T has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 9163.T trades at ¥2,353.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 9163.T's P/E ratio is 8.70. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9163.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is more volatile compared to 9163.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 9163.T's competition here
1948.T vs 6540.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 6540.T has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 6540.T trades at ¥1,839.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 6540.T's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 6540.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 6540.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 6540.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1826.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1826.T has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1826.T trades at ¥1,244.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1826.T's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1826.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 1826.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1826.T's competition here
1948.T vs 9765.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 9765.T has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 9765.T trades at ¥1,056.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 9765.T's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9765.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is more volatile compared to 9765.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 9765.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1726.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1726.T has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1726.T trades at ¥351.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1726.T's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1726.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is more volatile compared to 1726.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1726.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1716.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1716.T has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1716.T trades at ¥1,358.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1716.T's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1716.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is more volatile compared to 1716.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1716.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1960.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1960.T has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1960.T trades at ¥981.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1960.T's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1960.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is more volatile compared to 1960.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1960.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1770.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1770.T has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1770.T trades at ¥1,600.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1770.T's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1770.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is more volatile compared to 1770.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1770.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1776.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1776.T has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1776.T trades at ¥1,546.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1776.T's P/E ratio is 86.21. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1776.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 1776.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1776.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1867.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1867.T has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1867.T trades at ¥2,255.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1867.T's P/E ratio is 7.39. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1867.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is less volatile compared to 1867.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1867.T's competition here
1948.T vs 5079.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 5079.T has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 5079.T trades at ¥2,693.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 5079.T's P/E ratio is 23.83. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5079.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is more volatile compared to 5079.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 5079.T's competition here
1948.T vs 5918.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 5918.T has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 5918.T trades at ¥6,390.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 5918.T's P/E ratio is 71.43. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5918.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is more volatile compared to 5918.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 5918.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1914.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1914.T has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1914.T trades at ¥690.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1914.T's P/E ratio is 9.18. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1914.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is more volatile compared to 1914.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1914.T's competition here
1948.T vs 1450.T Comparison August 2025
1948.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1948.T stands at 20.5B. In comparison, 1450.T has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1948.T is priced at ¥2,400.00, while 1450.T trades at ¥1,461.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1948.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.57, whereas 1450.T's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, 1948.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1450.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 1948.T is more volatile compared to 1450.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1948.T.Check 1450.T's competition here