Shangshan Gold International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1939.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See 1939.HK's competitors and their performance on the HKSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for 1939.HK and its HKSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1939.HK | HK$0.39 | -6.10% | 197.1M | -6.49 | -HK$0.06 | N/A |
| 9988.HK | HK$110.00 | -4.26% | 2.1T | 27.35 | HK$4.02 | +0.94% |
| 89988.HK | HK$95.00 | -3.94% | 1.8T | 4.98 | HK$19.06 | +0.94% |
| 3690.HK | HK$86.70 | -0.69% | 535.1B | -13.85 | -HK$6.26 | N/A |
| 83690.HK | HK$74.95 | -0.40% | 457.8B | -22.99 | -HK$3.26 | N/A |
| 9618.HK | HK$118.10 | -1.25% | 322.6B | 14.69 | HK$8.04 | +3.32% |
| 89618.HK | HK$102.00 | -0.97% | 279.8B | 21.82 | HK$4.68 | +3.32% |
| 1880.HK | HK$48.84 | -2.42% | 121.6B | 16.98 | HK$2.88 | +1.62% |
| 7618.HK | HK$13.34 | -1.91% | 36.2B | 31.76 | HK$0.42 | N/A |
| 9896.HK | HK$23.96 | -2.52% | 29.2B | 7.62 | HK$3.15 | +5.45% |
Stock Comparison
Alibaba Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 9988.HK)
1939.HK vs 9988.HK Comparison July 2026
Shangshan Gold International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1939.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 197.1M. In comparison, 9988.HK has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.39 on the HKSE, while 9988.HK trades at HK$110.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas 9988.HK's P/E ratio is 27.35. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 9988.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 9988.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 9988.HK's competition here
Alibaba Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 89988.HK)
1939.HK vs 89988.HK Comparison July 2026
Shangshan Gold International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1939.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 197.1M. In comparison, 89988.HK has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.39 on the HKSE, while 89988.HK trades at HK$95.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas 89988.HK's P/E ratio is 4.98. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 89988.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 89988.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 89988.HK's competition here
Meituan (HKSE: 3690.HK)
1939.HK vs 3690.HK Comparison July 2026
Shangshan Gold International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1939.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 197.1M. In comparison, 3690.HK has a market cap of 535.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.39 on the HKSE, while 3690.HK trades at HK$86.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas 3690.HK's P/E ratio is -13.85. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 3690.HK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 3690.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 3690.HK's competition here
Meituan (HKSE: 83690.HK)
1939.HK vs 83690.HK Comparison July 2026
Shangshan Gold International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1939.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 197.1M. In comparison, 83690.HK has a market cap of 457.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.39 on the HKSE, while 83690.HK trades at HK$74.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas 83690.HK's P/E ratio is -22.99. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 83690.HK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 83690.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 83690.HK's competition here
JD.com, Inc. (HKSE: 9618.HK)
1939.HK vs 9618.HK Comparison July 2026
Shangshan Gold International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1939.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 197.1M. In comparison, 9618.HK has a market cap of 322.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.39 on the HKSE, while 9618.HK trades at HK$118.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas 9618.HK's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 9618.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 9618.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 9618.HK's competition here
JD.com, Inc. (HKSE: 89618.HK)
1939.HK vs 89618.HK Comparison July 2026
Shangshan Gold International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1939.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 197.1M. In comparison, 89618.HK has a market cap of 279.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.39 on the HKSE, while 89618.HK trades at HK$102.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas 89618.HK's P/E ratio is 21.82. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 89618.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 89618.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 89618.HK's competition here
China Tourism Group Duty Free Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1880.HK)
1939.HK vs 1880.HK Comparison July 2026
Shangshan Gold International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1939.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 197.1M. In comparison, 1880.HK has a market cap of 121.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.39 on the HKSE, while 1880.HK trades at HK$48.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas 1880.HK's P/E ratio is 16.98. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 1880.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 1880.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 1880.HK's competition here
JINGDONG Industrials, Inc. (HKSE: 7618.HK)
1939.HK vs 7618.HK Comparison July 2026
Shangshan Gold International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1939.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 197.1M. In comparison, 7618.HK has a market cap of 36.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.39 on the HKSE, while 7618.HK trades at HK$13.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas 7618.HK's P/E ratio is 31.76. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 7618.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 7618.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 7618.HK's competition here
MINISO Group Holding Ltd (HKSE: 9896.HK)
1939.HK vs 9896.HK Comparison July 2026
Shangshan Gold International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1939.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 197.1M. In comparison, 9896.HK has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.39 on the HKSE, while 9896.HK trades at HK$23.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas 9896.HK's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 9896.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 9896.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 9896.HK's competition here
Vesync Co., Ltd (HKSE: 2148.HK)
1939.HK vs 2148.HK Comparison July 2026
Shangshan Gold International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1939.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 197.1M. In comparison, 2148.HK has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.39 on the HKSE, while 2148.HK trades at HK$5.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas 2148.HK's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 2148.HK's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 2148.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 2148.HK's competition here
Quantgroup Holding Limited (HKSE: 2685.HK)
1939.HK vs 2685.HK Comparison July 2026
Shangshan Gold International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1939.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 197.1M. In comparison, 2685.HK has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.39 on the HKSE, while 2685.HK trades at HK$12.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas 2685.HK's P/E ratio is 26.84. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 2685.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is less volatile compared to 2685.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 2685.HK's competition here
Viva Goods Company Limited (HKSE: 0933.HK)
1939.HK vs 0933.HK Comparison July 2026
Shangshan Gold International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1939.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 197.1M. In comparison, 0933.HK has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.39 on the HKSE, while 0933.HK trades at HK$0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas 0933.HK's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0933.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 0933.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 0933.HK's competition here
Sa Sa International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0178.HK)
1939.HK vs 0178.HK Comparison July 2026
Shangshan Gold International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1939.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 197.1M. In comparison, 0178.HK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.39 on the HKSE, while 0178.HK trades at HK$0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas 0178.HK's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0178.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 0178.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 0178.HK's competition here
China Qidian Guofeng Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1280.HK)
1939.HK vs 1280.HK Comparison July 2026
Shangshan Gold International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1939.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 197.1M. In comparison, 1280.HK has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.39 on the HKSE, while 1280.HK trades at HK$1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas 1280.HK's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 1280.HK's ROE of -2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 1280.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 1280.HK's competition here
Shenzhen Pagoda Industrial (Group) Corporation Limited (HKSE: 2411.HK)
1939.HK vs 2411.HK Comparison July 2026
Shangshan Gold International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1939.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 197.1M. In comparison, 2411.HK has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.39 on the HKSE, while 2411.HK trades at HK$1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas 2411.HK's P/E ratio is -6.10. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 2411.HK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 2411.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 2411.HK's competition here
ZXZN Qi-House Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8395.HK)
1939.HK vs 8395.HK Comparison July 2026
Shangshan Gold International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1939.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 197.1M. In comparison, 8395.HK has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.39 on the HKSE, while 8395.HK trades at HK$1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas 8395.HK's P/E ratio is 223.40. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 8395.HK's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 8395.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 8395.HK's competition here
Lung Fung Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 2290.HK)
1939.HK vs 2290.HK Comparison July 2026
Shangshan Gold International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1939.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 197.1M. In comparison, 2290.HK has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.39 on the HKSE, while 2290.HK trades at HK$3.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas 2290.HK's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 2290.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 2290.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 2290.HK's competition here
Zibuyu Group Limited (HKSE: 2420.HK)
1939.HK vs 2420.HK Comparison July 2026
Shangshan Gold International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1939.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 197.1M. In comparison, 2420.HK has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.39 on the HKSE, while 2420.HK trades at HK$3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas 2420.HK's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 2420.HK's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 2420.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 2420.HK's competition here
Lisi Group (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0526.HK)
1939.HK vs 0526.HK Comparison July 2026
Shangshan Gold International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1939.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 197.1M. In comparison, 0526.HK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.39 on the HKSE, while 0526.HK trades at HK$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas 0526.HK's P/E ratio is 194.12. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0526.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is less volatile compared to 0526.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 0526.HK's competition here
YesAsia Holdings Limited (HKSE: 2209.HK)
1939.HK vs 2209.HK Comparison July 2026
Shangshan Gold International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1939.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 197.1M. In comparison, 2209.HK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.39 on the HKSE, while 2209.HK trades at HK$2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas 2209.HK's P/E ratio is 6.37. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 2209.HK's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 2209.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 2209.HK's competition here
Baozun Inc. (HKSE: 9991.HK)
1939.HK vs 9991.HK Comparison July 2026
Shangshan Gold International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1939.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 197.1M. In comparison, 9991.HK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.39 on the HKSE, while 9991.HK trades at HK$6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas 9991.HK's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 9991.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 9991.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 9991.HK's competition here
Hong Kong Technology Venture Company Limited (HKSE: 1137.HK)
1939.HK vs 1137.HK Comparison July 2026
Shangshan Gold International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1939.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 197.1M. In comparison, 1137.HK has a market cap of 839M. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.39 on the HKSE, while 1137.HK trades at HK$1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas 1137.HK's P/E ratio is -30.53. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 1137.HK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 1137.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 1137.HK's competition here
Ciprun Technology Holdings Company Limited (HKSE: 1020.HK)
1939.HK vs 1020.HK Comparison July 2026
Shangshan Gold International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1939.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 197.1M. In comparison, 1020.HK has a market cap of 805.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.39 on the HKSE, while 1020.HK trades at HK$0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas 1020.HK's P/E ratio is -50.24. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 1020.HK's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 1020.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 1020.HK's competition here
Fulu Holdings Limited (HKSE: 2101.HK)
1939.HK vs 2101.HK Comparison July 2026
Shangshan Gold International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1939.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 197.1M. In comparison, 2101.HK has a market cap of 568.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.39 on the HKSE, while 2101.HK trades at HK$1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas 2101.HK's P/E ratio is 5.03. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 2101.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 2101.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 2101.HK's competition here
Precious Dragon Technology Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1861.HK)
1939.HK vs 1861.HK Comparison July 2026
Shangshan Gold International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1939.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 197.1M. In comparison, 1861.HK has a market cap of 556.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.39 on the HKSE, while 1861.HK trades at HK$2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas 1861.HK's P/E ratio is 34.37. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 1861.HK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 1861.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 1861.HK's competition here
International Housewares Retail Company Limited (HKSE: 1373.HK)
1939.HK vs 1373.HK Comparison July 2026
Shangshan Gold International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1939.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 197.1M. In comparison, 1373.HK has a market cap of 460.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.39 on the HKSE, while 1373.HK trades at HK$0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas 1373.HK's P/E ratio is 7.73. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 1373.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 1373.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 1373.HK's competition here
Yoho Group Holdings Ltd. (HKSE: 2347.HK)
1939.HK vs 2347.HK Comparison July 2026
Shangshan Gold International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1939.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 197.1M. In comparison, 2347.HK has a market cap of 363.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.39 on the HKSE, while 2347.HK trades at HK$0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas 2347.HK's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 2347.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 2347.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 2347.HK's competition here
Beijing Digital Telecom Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 6188.HK)
1939.HK vs 6188.HK Comparison July 2026
Shangshan Gold International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1939.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 197.1M. In comparison, 6188.HK has a market cap of 285.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.39 on the HKSE, while 6188.HK trades at HK$0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas 6188.HK's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 6188.HK's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 6188.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 6188.HK's competition here
Design Capital Limited (HKSE: 1545.HK)
1939.HK vs 1545.HK Comparison July 2026
Shangshan Gold International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1939.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 197.1M. In comparison, 1545.HK has a market cap of 276M. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.39 on the HKSE, while 1545.HK trades at HK$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas 1545.HK's P/E ratio is -24.82. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 1545.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 1545.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 1545.HK's competition here
DTXS Silk Road Investment Holdings Company Limited (HKSE: 0620.HK)
1939.HK vs 0620.HK Comparison July 2026
Shangshan Gold International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1939.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 197.1M. In comparison, 0620.HK has a market cap of 272.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.39 on the HKSE, while 0620.HK trades at HK$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas 0620.HK's P/E ratio is -9.57. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0620.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is less volatile compared to 0620.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 0620.HK's competition here
Telecom Digital Holdings Limited (HKSE: 6033.HK)
1939.HK vs 6033.HK Comparison July 2026
Shangshan Gold International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1939.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 197.1M. In comparison, 6033.HK has a market cap of 214M. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.39 on the HKSE, while 6033.HK trades at HK$0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas 6033.HK's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 6033.HK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 6033.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 6033.HK's competition here
Asia Commercial Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0104.HK)
1939.HK vs 0104.HK Comparison July 2026
Shangshan Gold International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1939.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 197.1M. In comparison, 0104.HK has a market cap of 177.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.39 on the HKSE, while 0104.HK trades at HK$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas 0104.HK's P/E ratio is 2.59. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0104.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 0104.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 0104.HK's competition here
Kidsland International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 2122.HK)
1939.HK vs 2122.HK Comparison July 2026
Shangshan Gold International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1939.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 197.1M. In comparison, 2122.HK has a market cap of 154.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.39 on the HKSE, while 2122.HK trades at HK$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas 2122.HK's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 2122.HK's ROE of +1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 2122.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 2122.HK's competition here
Beijing Jingkelong Company Limited (HKSE: 0814.HK)
1939.HK vs 0814.HK Comparison July 2026
Shangshan Gold International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1939.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 197.1M. In comparison, 0814.HK has a market cap of 115.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.39 on the HKSE, while 0814.HK trades at HK$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas 0814.HK's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0814.HK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 0814.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 0814.HK's competition here
Mi Ming Mart Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8473.HK)
1939.HK vs 8473.HK Comparison July 2026
Shangshan Gold International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1939.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 197.1M. In comparison, 8473.HK has a market cap of 106.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.39 on the HKSE, while 8473.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas 8473.HK's P/E ratio is 41.30. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 8473.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 8473.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 8473.HK's competition here
Ulferts International Limited (HKSE: 1711.HK)
1939.HK vs 1711.HK Comparison July 2026
Shangshan Gold International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1939.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 197.1M. In comparison, 1711.HK has a market cap of 100.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.39 on the HKSE, while 1711.HK trades at HK$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas 1711.HK's P/E ratio is -3.74. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 1711.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 1711.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 1711.HK's competition here
Changyou Alliance Group Limited (HKSE: 1039.HK)
1939.HK vs 1039.HK Comparison July 2026
Shangshan Gold International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1939.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 197.1M. In comparison, 1039.HK has a market cap of 86.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.39 on the HKSE, while 1039.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas 1039.HK's P/E ratio is -4.17. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 1039.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is less volatile compared to 1039.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 1039.HK's competition here
Bonjour Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0653.HK)
1939.HK vs 0653.HK Comparison July 2026
Shangshan Gold International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1939.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 197.1M. In comparison, 0653.HK has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.39 on the HKSE, while 0653.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas 0653.HK's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0653.HK's ROE of -1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is less volatile compared to 0653.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 0653.HK's competition here
Smartac International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0395.HK)
1939.HK vs 0395.HK Comparison July 2026
Shangshan Gold International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1939.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 197.1M. In comparison, 0395.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.39 on the HKSE, while 0395.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas 0395.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0395.HK's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 0395.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 0395.HK's competition here