Shangshan Gold International Holdings Limited
Shangshan Gold International Holdings Limited (1939.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (1939.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1939.HK | HK$0.50 | +0.00% | 255.9M | -12.50 | -HK$0.04 | N/A |
| 9988.HK | HK$118.50 | -3.42% | 2.3T | 21.58 | HK$5.49 | +1.60% |
| 89988.HK | HK$104.20 | -3.07% | 1.9T | N/A | N/A | +1.67% |
| 3690.HK | HK$80.25 | -2.07% | 495.5B | -18.07 | -HK$4.44 | N/A |
| 83690.HK | HK$70.45 | -1.95% | 428.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 9618.HK | HK$111.90 | -0.89% | 345.4B | 15.31 | HK$7.31 | +3.48% |
| 89618.HK | HK$98.40 | -0.76% | 276.6B | N/A | N/A | +3.48% |
| 1880.HK | HK$66.55 | +0.15% | 165.7B | 33.78 | HK$1.97 | +2.13% |
| 9896.HK | HK$32.04 | -1.42% | 38.8B | 16.26 | HK$1.97 | +3.69% |
| 2148.HK | HK$5.57 | +0.72% | 6.3B | 8.31 | HK$0.67 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
1939.HK vs 9988.HK Comparison April 2026
1939.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 255.9M. In comparison, 9988.HK has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 9988.HK trades at HK$118.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas 9988.HK's P/E ratio is 21.58. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 9988.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 9988.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 9988.HK's competition here
1939.HK vs 89988.HK Comparison April 2026
1939.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 255.9M. In comparison, 89988.HK has a market cap of 1.9T. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 89988.HK trades at HK$104.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas 89988.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 89988.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 89988.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 89988.HK's competition here
1939.HK vs 3690.HK Comparison April 2026
1939.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 255.9M. In comparison, 3690.HK has a market cap of 495.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 3690.HK trades at HK$80.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas 3690.HK's P/E ratio is -18.07. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 3690.HK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 3690.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 3690.HK's competition here
1939.HK vs 83690.HK Comparison April 2026
1939.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 255.9M. In comparison, 83690.HK has a market cap of 428.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 83690.HK trades at HK$70.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas 83690.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 83690.HK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 83690.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 83690.HK's competition here
1939.HK vs 9618.HK Comparison April 2026
1939.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 255.9M. In comparison, 9618.HK has a market cap of 345.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 9618.HK trades at HK$111.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas 9618.HK's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 9618.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 9618.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 9618.HK's competition here
1939.HK vs 89618.HK Comparison April 2026
1939.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 255.9M. In comparison, 89618.HK has a market cap of 276.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 89618.HK trades at HK$98.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas 89618.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 89618.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 89618.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 89618.HK's competition here
1939.HK vs 1880.HK Comparison April 2026
1939.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 255.9M. In comparison, 1880.HK has a market cap of 165.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 1880.HK trades at HK$66.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas 1880.HK's P/E ratio is 33.78. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 1880.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 1880.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 1880.HK's competition here
1939.HK vs 9896.HK Comparison April 2026
1939.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 255.9M. In comparison, 9896.HK has a market cap of 38.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 9896.HK trades at HK$32.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas 9896.HK's P/E ratio is 16.26. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 9896.HK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 9896.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 9896.HK's competition here
1939.HK vs 2148.HK Comparison April 2026
1939.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 255.9M. In comparison, 2148.HK has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 2148.HK trades at HK$5.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas 2148.HK's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 2148.HK's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 2148.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 2148.HK's competition here
1939.HK vs 1280.HK Comparison April 2026
1939.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 255.9M. In comparison, 1280.HK has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 1280.HK trades at HK$2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas 1280.HK's P/E ratio is -8.23. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 1280.HK's ROE of -11.57%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 1280.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 1280.HK's competition here
1939.HK vs 2411.HK Comparison April 2026
1939.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 255.9M. In comparison, 2411.HK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 2411.HK trades at HK$1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas 2411.HK's P/E ratio is -2.98. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 2411.HK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 2411.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 2411.HK's competition here
1939.HK vs 0178.HK Comparison April 2026
1939.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 255.9M. In comparison, 0178.HK has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 0178.HK trades at HK$0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas 0178.HK's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 0178.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 0178.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 0178.HK's competition here
1939.HK vs 2420.HK Comparison April 2026
1939.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 255.9M. In comparison, 2420.HK has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 2420.HK trades at HK$4.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas 2420.HK's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 2420.HK's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 2420.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 2420.HK's competition here
1939.HK vs 0370.HK Comparison April 2026
1939.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 255.9M. In comparison, 0370.HK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 0370.HK trades at HK$0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas 0370.HK's P/E ratio is -9.75. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 0370.HK's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is less volatile compared to 0370.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 0370.HK's competition here
1939.HK vs 1020.HK Comparison April 2026
1939.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 255.9M. In comparison, 1020.HK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 1020.HK trades at HK$0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas 1020.HK's P/E ratio is -35.50. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 1020.HK's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is less volatile compared to 1020.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 1020.HK's competition here
1939.HK vs 2209.HK Comparison April 2026
1939.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 255.9M. In comparison, 2209.HK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 2209.HK trades at HK$3.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas 2209.HK's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 2209.HK's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 2209.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 2209.HK's competition here
1939.HK vs 9991.HK Comparison April 2026
1939.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 255.9M. In comparison, 9991.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 9991.HK trades at HK$6.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas 9991.HK's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 9991.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 9991.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 9991.HK's competition here
1939.HK vs 1137.HK Comparison April 2026
1939.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 255.9M. In comparison, 1137.HK has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 1137.HK trades at HK$1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas 1137.HK's P/E ratio is -6.84. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 1137.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 1137.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 1137.HK's competition here
1939.HK vs 0493.HK Comparison April 2026
1939.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 255.9M. In comparison, 0493.HK has a market cap of 635.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 0493.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas 0493.HK's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 0493.HK's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 0493.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 0493.HK's competition here
1939.HK vs 2101.HK Comparison April 2026
1939.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 255.9M. In comparison, 2101.HK has a market cap of 462.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 2101.HK trades at HK$1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas 2101.HK's P/E ratio is 38.00. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 2101.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 2101.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 2101.HK's competition here
1939.HK vs 1861.HK Comparison April 2026
1939.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 255.9M. In comparison, 1861.HK has a market cap of 418.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 1861.HK trades at HK$1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas 1861.HK's P/E ratio is 7.16. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 1861.HK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 1861.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 1861.HK's competition here
1939.HK vs 8395.HK Comparison April 2026
1939.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 255.9M. In comparison, 8395.HK has a market cap of 380.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 8395.HK trades at HK$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas 8395.HK's P/E ratio is 0.32. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 8395.HK's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is less volatile compared to 8395.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 8395.HK's competition here
1939.HK vs 2347.HK Comparison April 2026
1939.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 255.9M. In comparison, 2347.HK has a market cap of 340M. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 2347.HK trades at HK$0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas 2347.HK's P/E ratio is 17.25. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 2347.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 2347.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 2347.HK's competition here
1939.HK vs 6033.HK Comparison April 2026
1939.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 255.9M. In comparison, 6033.HK has a market cap of 238.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 6033.HK trades at HK$0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas 6033.HK's P/E ratio is 59.00. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 6033.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 6033.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 6033.HK's competition here
1939.HK vs 6188.HK Comparison April 2026
1939.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 255.9M. In comparison, 6188.HK has a market cap of 222.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 6188.HK trades at HK$0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas 6188.HK's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 6188.HK's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 6188.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 6188.HK's competition here
1939.HK vs 1759.HK Comparison April 2026
1939.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 255.9M. In comparison, 1759.HK has a market cap of 218.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 1759.HK trades at HK$1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas 1759.HK's P/E ratio is -16.83. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 1759.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 1759.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 1759.HK's competition here
1939.HK vs 1545.HK Comparison April 2026
1939.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 255.9M. In comparison, 1545.HK has a market cap of 216M. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 1545.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas 1545.HK's P/E ratio is -10.80. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 1545.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 1545.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 1545.HK's competition here
1939.HK vs 0104.HK Comparison April 2026
1939.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 255.9M. In comparison, 0104.HK has a market cap of 157.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 0104.HK trades at HK$0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas 0104.HK's P/E ratio is 7.03. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 0104.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 0104.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 0104.HK's competition here
1939.HK vs 1572.HK Comparison April 2026
1939.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 255.9M. In comparison, 1572.HK has a market cap of 153.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 1572.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas 1572.HK's P/E ratio is 9.10. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 1572.HK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 1572.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 1572.HK's competition here
1939.HK vs 2122.HK Comparison April 2026
1939.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 255.9M. In comparison, 2122.HK has a market cap of 151.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 2122.HK trades at HK$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas 2122.HK's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 2122.HK's ROE of +2.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is less volatile compared to 2122.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 2122.HK's competition here
1939.HK vs 0620.HK Comparison April 2026
1939.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 255.9M. In comparison, 0620.HK has a market cap of 150.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 0620.HK trades at HK$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas 0620.HK's P/E ratio is -4.70. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 0620.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is less volatile compared to 0620.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 0620.HK's competition here
1939.HK vs 8473.HK Comparison April 2026
1939.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 255.9M. In comparison, 8473.HK has a market cap of 126.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 8473.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas 8473.HK's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 8473.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 8473.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 8473.HK's competition here
1939.HK vs 0814.HK Comparison April 2026
1939.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 255.9M. In comparison, 0814.HK has a market cap of 121.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 0814.HK trades at HK$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas 0814.HK's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 0814.HK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 0814.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 0814.HK's competition here
1939.HK vs 1711.HK Comparison April 2026
1939.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 255.9M. In comparison, 1711.HK has a market cap of 111.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 1711.HK trades at HK$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas 1711.HK's P/E ratio is -3.47. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 1711.HK's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is less volatile compared to 1711.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 1711.HK's competition here
1939.HK vs 1039.HK Comparison April 2026
1939.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 255.9M. In comparison, 1039.HK has a market cap of 99.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 1039.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas 1039.HK's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 1039.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 1039.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 1039.HK's competition here
1939.HK vs 0915.HK Comparison April 2026
1939.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 255.9M. In comparison, 0915.HK has a market cap of 78.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 0915.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas 0915.HK's P/E ratio is 1.30. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 0915.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is less volatile compared to 0915.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 0915.HK's competition here
1939.HK vs 6880.HK Comparison April 2026
1939.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 255.9M. In comparison, 6880.HK has a market cap of 58.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 6880.HK trades at HK$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas 6880.HK's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 6880.HK's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is less volatile compared to 6880.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 6880.HK's competition here
1939.HK vs 8536.HK Comparison April 2026
1939.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 255.9M. In comparison, 8536.HK has a market cap of 57.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 8536.HK trades at HK$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas 8536.HK's P/E ratio is -6.75. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 8536.HK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 8536.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 8536.HK's competition here
1939.HK vs 0653.HK Comparison April 2026
1939.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 255.9M. In comparison, 0653.HK has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 0653.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas 0653.HK's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 0653.HK's ROE of -1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is less volatile compared to 0653.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 0653.HK's competition here
1939.HK vs 0395.HK Comparison April 2026
1939.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1939.HK stands at 255.9M. In comparison, 0395.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1939.HK is priced at HK$0.50, while 0395.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1939.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -12.50, whereas 0395.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1939.HK's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 0395.HK's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, 1939.HK is more volatile compared to 0395.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1939.HK.Check 0395.HK's competition here