Chu Kong Petroleum and Natural Gas Steel Pipe Holdings Limited
Chu Kong Petroleum and Natural Gas Steel Pipe Holdings Limited (1938.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (1938.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Steel Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1938.HK | HK$0.34 | +4.69% | 338.7M | 1.20 | HK$0.28 | N/A |
| 0323.HK | HK$2.63 | -1.13% | 33.9B | -87.67 | -HK$0.03 | N/A |
| 0347.HK | HK$1.48 | -0.67% | 19.6B | -2.43 | -HK$0.61 | N/A |
| 0990.HK | HK$0.75 | -1.32% | 11.1B | 15.00 | HK$0.05 | N/A |
| 1053.HK | HK$1.10 | +0.00% | 9.8B | -2.97 | -HK$0.37 | N/A |
| 0826.HK | HK$3.52 | -0.85% | 9.6B | 20.71 | HK$0.17 | +1.63% |
| 3788.HK | HK$3.63 | +0.00% | 8.1B | 36.30 | HK$0.10 | +1.10% |
| 0581.HK | HK$1.35 | +0.75% | 5B | 19.29 | HK$0.07 | +4.44% |
| 1231.HK | HK$0.33 | +0.00% | 1.3B | -33.00 | -HK$0.01 | N/A |
| 0103.HK | HK$2.22 | +0.91% | 1.2B | 20.18 | HK$0.11 | +3.85% |
Stock Comparison
1938.HK vs 0323.HK Comparison May 2026
1938.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1938.HK stands at 338.7M. In comparison, 0323.HK has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1938.HK is priced at HK$0.34, while 0323.HK trades at HK$2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1938.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.20, whereas 0323.HK's P/E ratio is -87.67. In terms of profitability, 1938.HK's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0323.HK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1938.HK is more volatile compared to 0323.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1938.HK.Check 0323.HK's competition here
1938.HK vs 0347.HK Comparison May 2026
1938.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1938.HK stands at 338.7M. In comparison, 0347.HK has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1938.HK is priced at HK$0.34, while 0347.HK trades at HK$1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1938.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.20, whereas 0347.HK's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, 1938.HK's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0347.HK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1938.HK is more volatile compared to 0347.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1938.HK.Check 0347.HK's competition here
1938.HK vs 0990.HK Comparison May 2026
1938.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1938.HK stands at 338.7M. In comparison, 0990.HK has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1938.HK is priced at HK$0.34, while 0990.HK trades at HK$0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1938.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.20, whereas 0990.HK's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, 1938.HK's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0990.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1938.HK is more volatile compared to 0990.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1938.HK.Check 0990.HK's competition here
1938.HK vs 1053.HK Comparison May 2026
1938.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1938.HK stands at 338.7M. In comparison, 1053.HK has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1938.HK is priced at HK$0.34, while 1053.HK trades at HK$1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1938.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.20, whereas 1053.HK's P/E ratio is -2.97. In terms of profitability, 1938.HK's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 1053.HK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1938.HK is more volatile compared to 1053.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1938.HK.Check 1053.HK's competition here
1938.HK vs 0826.HK Comparison May 2026
1938.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1938.HK stands at 338.7M. In comparison, 0826.HK has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1938.HK is priced at HK$0.34, while 0826.HK trades at HK$3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1938.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.20, whereas 0826.HK's P/E ratio is 20.71. In terms of profitability, 1938.HK's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0826.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1938.HK is more volatile compared to 0826.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1938.HK.Check 0826.HK's competition here
1938.HK vs 3788.HK Comparison May 2026
1938.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1938.HK stands at 338.7M. In comparison, 3788.HK has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1938.HK is priced at HK$0.34, while 3788.HK trades at HK$3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1938.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.20, whereas 3788.HK's P/E ratio is 36.30. In terms of profitability, 1938.HK's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 3788.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1938.HK is less volatile compared to 3788.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1938.HK.Check 3788.HK's competition here
1938.HK vs 0581.HK Comparison May 2026
1938.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1938.HK stands at 338.7M. In comparison, 0581.HK has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1938.HK is priced at HK$0.34, while 0581.HK trades at HK$1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1938.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.20, whereas 0581.HK's P/E ratio is 19.29. In terms of profitability, 1938.HK's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0581.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1938.HK is more volatile compared to 0581.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1938.HK.Check 0581.HK's competition here
1938.HK vs 1231.HK Comparison May 2026
1938.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1938.HK stands at 338.7M. In comparison, 1231.HK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1938.HK is priced at HK$0.34, while 1231.HK trades at HK$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1938.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.20, whereas 1231.HK's P/E ratio is -33.00. In terms of profitability, 1938.HK's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 1231.HK's ROE of -1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, 1938.HK is more volatile compared to 1231.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1938.HK.Check 1231.HK's competition here
1938.HK vs 0103.HK Comparison May 2026
1938.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1938.HK stands at 338.7M. In comparison, 0103.HK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1938.HK is priced at HK$0.34, while 0103.HK trades at HK$2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1938.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.20, whereas 0103.HK's P/E ratio is 20.18. In terms of profitability, 1938.HK's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0103.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1938.HK is more volatile compared to 0103.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1938.HK.Check 0103.HK's competition here
1938.HK vs 1090.HK Comparison May 2026
1938.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1938.HK stands at 338.7M. In comparison, 1090.HK has a market cap of 993M. Regarding current trading prices, 1938.HK is priced at HK$0.34, while 1090.HK trades at HK$0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1938.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.20, whereas 1090.HK's P/E ratio is -26.33. In terms of profitability, 1938.HK's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 1090.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1938.HK is less volatile compared to 1090.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1938.HK.Check 1090.HK's competition here
1938.HK vs 0217.HK Comparison May 2026
1938.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1938.HK stands at 338.7M. In comparison, 0217.HK has a market cap of 952.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1938.HK is priced at HK$0.34, while 0217.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1938.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.20, whereas 0217.HK's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, 1938.HK's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0217.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1938.HK is less volatile compared to 0217.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1938.HK.Check 0217.HK's competition here
1938.HK vs 1553.HK Comparison May 2026
1938.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1938.HK stands at 338.7M. In comparison, 1553.HK has a market cap of 702.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1938.HK is priced at HK$0.34, while 1553.HK trades at HK$1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1938.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.20, whereas 1553.HK's P/E ratio is 4.38. In terms of profitability, 1938.HK's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 1553.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1938.HK is less volatile compared to 1553.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1938.HK.Check 1553.HK's competition here
1938.HK vs 1118.HK Comparison May 2026
1938.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1938.HK stands at 338.7M. In comparison, 1118.HK has a market cap of 672M. Regarding current trading prices, 1938.HK is priced at HK$0.34, while 1118.HK trades at HK$1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1938.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.20, whereas 1118.HK's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, 1938.HK's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 1118.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1938.HK is more volatile compared to 1118.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1938.HK.Check 1118.HK's competition here
1938.HK vs 1203.HK Comparison May 2026
1938.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1938.HK stands at 338.7M. In comparison, 1203.HK has a market cap of 644.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1938.HK is priced at HK$0.34, while 1203.HK trades at HK$0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1938.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.20, whereas 1203.HK's P/E ratio is 5.92. In terms of profitability, 1938.HK's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 1203.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1938.HK is more volatile compared to 1203.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1938.HK.Check 1203.HK's competition here
1938.HK vs 1116.HK Comparison May 2026
1938.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1938.HK stands at 338.7M. In comparison, 1116.HK has a market cap of 539.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1938.HK is priced at HK$0.34, while 1116.HK trades at HK$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1938.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.20, whereas 1116.HK's P/E ratio is -8.33. In terms of profitability, 1938.HK's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 1116.HK's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 1938.HK is more volatile compared to 1116.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1938.HK.Check 1116.HK's competition here
1938.HK vs 6890.HK Comparison May 2026
1938.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1938.HK stands at 338.7M. In comparison, 6890.HK has a market cap of 315.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1938.HK is priced at HK$0.34, while 6890.HK trades at HK$0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1938.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.20, whereas 6890.HK's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, 1938.HK's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 6890.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1938.HK is less volatile compared to 6890.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1938.HK.Check 6890.HK's competition here
1938.HK vs 0893.HK Comparison May 2026
1938.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1938.HK stands at 338.7M. In comparison, 0893.HK has a market cap of 166.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1938.HK is priced at HK$0.34, while 0893.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1938.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.20, whereas 0893.HK's P/E ratio is -7.40. In terms of profitability, 1938.HK's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0893.HK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1938.HK is more volatile compared to 0893.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1938.HK.Check 0893.HK's competition here
1938.HK vs 2459.HK Comparison May 2026
1938.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1938.HK stands at 338.7M. In comparison, 2459.HK has a market cap of 157M. Regarding current trading prices, 1938.HK is priced at HK$0.34, while 2459.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1938.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.20, whereas 2459.HK's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, 1938.HK's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 2459.HK's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 1938.HK is less volatile compared to 2459.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1938.HK.Check 2459.HK's competition here
1938.HK vs 8140.HK Comparison May 2026
1938.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1938.HK stands at 338.7M. In comparison, 8140.HK has a market cap of 108M. Regarding current trading prices, 1938.HK is priced at HK$0.34, while 8140.HK trades at HK$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1938.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.20, whereas 8140.HK's P/E ratio is 3.38. In terms of profitability, 1938.HK's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 8140.HK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1938.HK is more volatile compared to 8140.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1938.HK.Check 8140.HK's competition here
1938.HK vs 8402.HK Comparison May 2026
1938.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1938.HK stands at 338.7M. In comparison, 8402.HK has a market cap of 73.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1938.HK is priced at HK$0.34, while 8402.HK trades at HK$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1938.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.20, whereas 8402.HK's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, 1938.HK's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 8402.HK's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, 1938.HK is less volatile compared to 8402.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1938.HK.Check 8402.HK's competition here
1938.HK vs 2738.HK Comparison May 2026
1938.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1938.HK stands at 338.7M. In comparison, 2738.HK has a market cap of 66.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1938.HK is priced at HK$0.34, while 2738.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1938.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.20, whereas 2738.HK's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, 1938.HK's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 2738.HK's ROE of +2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, 1938.HK is more volatile compared to 2738.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1938.HK.Check 2738.HK's competition here
1938.HK vs 0899.HK Comparison May 2026
1938.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1938.HK stands at 338.7M. In comparison, 0899.HK has a market cap of 27M. Regarding current trading prices, 1938.HK is priced at HK$0.34, while 0899.HK trades at HK$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1938.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.20, whereas 0899.HK's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, 1938.HK's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0899.HK's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, 1938.HK is more volatile compared to 0899.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1938.HK.Check 0899.HK's competition here
1938.HK vs 1266.HK Comparison May 2026
1938.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1938.HK stands at 338.7M. In comparison, 1266.HK has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1938.HK is priced at HK$0.34, while 1266.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1938.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.20, whereas 1266.HK's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, 1938.HK's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 1266.HK's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 1938.HK is less volatile compared to 1266.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1938.HK.Check 1266.HK's competition here
1938.HK vs 1894.HK Comparison May 2026
1938.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1938.HK stands at 338.7M. In comparison, 1894.HK has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1938.HK is priced at HK$0.34, while 1894.HK trades at HK$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1938.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.20, whereas 1894.HK's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, 1938.HK's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 1894.HK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1938.HK is more volatile compared to 1894.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1938.HK.Check 1894.HK's competition here
1938.HK vs 0803.HK Comparison May 2026
1938.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1938.HK stands at 338.7M. In comparison, 0803.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1938.HK is priced at HK$0.34, while 0803.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1938.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 1.20, whereas 0803.HK's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, 1938.HK's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0803.HK's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, 1938.HK is less volatile compared to 0803.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1938.HK.Check 0803.HK's competition here