Ritamix Global Limited
Ritamix Global Limited (1936.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (1936.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Farm Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1936.HK | HK$0.82 | -1.20% | 382.7M | 20.50 | HK$0.04 | N/A |
| 2714.HK | HK$40.20 | +4.31% | 279.3B | 12.48 | HK$3.22 | N/A |
| 9858.HK | HK$4.21 | +5.78% | 17.6B | -35.08 | -HK$0.12 | N/A |
| 1117.HK | HK$1.48 | +4.96% | 11.7B | -9.25 | -HK$0.16 | +0.90% |
| 2419.HK | HK$66.35 | +5.99% | 10.3B | 15.87 | HK$4.18 | +1.46% |
| 1432.HK | HK$0.34 | +0.00% | 2.8B | -6.80 | -HK$0.05 | N/A |
| 1431.HK | HK$0.34 | +0.00% | 1.6B | 2.62 | HK$0.13 | N/A |
| 1084.HK | HK$0.68 | +1.49% | 590M | 17.00 | HK$0.04 | +1.76% |
| 2497.HK | HK$0.58 | +0.00% | 290M | 3.62 | HK$0.16 | N/A |
| 0875.HK | HK$0.54 | +5.88% | 248M | -1.54 | -HK$0.35 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
1936.HK vs 2714.HK Comparison April 2026
1936.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1936.HK stands at 382.7M. In comparison, 2714.HK has a market cap of 279.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1936.HK is priced at HK$0.82, while 2714.HK trades at HK$40.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1936.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas 2714.HK's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, 1936.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2714.HK's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 1936.HK is less volatile compared to 2714.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1936.HK.Check 2714.HK's competition here
1936.HK vs 9858.HK Comparison April 2026
1936.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1936.HK stands at 382.7M. In comparison, 9858.HK has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1936.HK is priced at HK$0.82, while 9858.HK trades at HK$4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1936.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas 9858.HK's P/E ratio is -35.08. In terms of profitability, 1936.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9858.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1936.HK is less volatile compared to 9858.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1936.HK.Check 9858.HK's competition here
1936.HK vs 1117.HK Comparison April 2026
1936.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1936.HK stands at 382.7M. In comparison, 1117.HK has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1936.HK is priced at HK$0.82, while 1117.HK trades at HK$1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1936.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas 1117.HK's P/E ratio is -9.25. In terms of profitability, 1936.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1117.HK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1936.HK is less volatile compared to 1117.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1936.HK.Check 1117.HK's competition here
1936.HK vs 2419.HK Comparison April 2026
1936.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1936.HK stands at 382.7M. In comparison, 2419.HK has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1936.HK is priced at HK$0.82, while 2419.HK trades at HK$66.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1936.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas 2419.HK's P/E ratio is 15.87. In terms of profitability, 1936.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2419.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 1936.HK is less volatile compared to 2419.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1936.HK.Check 2419.HK's competition here
1936.HK vs 1432.HK Comparison April 2026
1936.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1936.HK stands at 382.7M. In comparison, 1432.HK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1936.HK is priced at HK$0.82, while 1432.HK trades at HK$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1936.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas 1432.HK's P/E ratio is -6.80. In terms of profitability, 1936.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1432.HK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1936.HK is less volatile compared to 1432.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1936.HK.Check 1432.HK's competition here
1936.HK vs 1431.HK Comparison April 2026
1936.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1936.HK stands at 382.7M. In comparison, 1431.HK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1936.HK is priced at HK$0.82, while 1431.HK trades at HK$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1936.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas 1431.HK's P/E ratio is 2.62. In terms of profitability, 1936.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1431.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1936.HK is less volatile compared to 1431.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1936.HK.Check 1431.HK's competition here
1936.HK vs 1084.HK Comparison April 2026
1936.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1936.HK stands at 382.7M. In comparison, 1084.HK has a market cap of 590M. Regarding current trading prices, 1936.HK is priced at HK$0.82, while 1084.HK trades at HK$0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1936.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas 1084.HK's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, 1936.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1084.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1936.HK is less volatile compared to 1084.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1936.HK.Check 1084.HK's competition here
1936.HK vs 2497.HK Comparison April 2026
1936.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1936.HK stands at 382.7M. In comparison, 2497.HK has a market cap of 290M. Regarding current trading prices, 1936.HK is priced at HK$0.82, while 2497.HK trades at HK$0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1936.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas 2497.HK's P/E ratio is 3.62. In terms of profitability, 1936.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2497.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1936.HK is more volatile compared to 2497.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1936.HK.Check 2497.HK's competition here
1936.HK vs 0875.HK Comparison April 2026
1936.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1936.HK stands at 382.7M. In comparison, 0875.HK has a market cap of 248M. Regarding current trading prices, 1936.HK is priced at HK$0.82, while 0875.HK trades at HK$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1936.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas 0875.HK's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, 1936.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0875.HK's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 1936.HK is less volatile compared to 0875.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1936.HK.Check 0875.HK's competition here
1936.HK vs 1699.HK Comparison April 2026
1936.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1936.HK stands at 382.7M. In comparison, 1699.HK has a market cap of 90M. Regarding current trading prices, 1936.HK is priced at HK$0.82, while 1699.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1936.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas 1699.HK's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, 1936.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1699.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1936.HK is less volatile compared to 1699.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1936.HK.Check 1699.HK's competition here
1936.HK vs 6911.HK Comparison April 2026
1936.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1936.HK stands at 382.7M. In comparison, 6911.HK has a market cap of 80.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1936.HK is priced at HK$0.82, while 6911.HK trades at HK$2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1936.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas 6911.HK's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, 1936.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 6911.HK's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, 1936.HK is more volatile compared to 6911.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1936.HK.Check 6911.HK's competition here
1936.HK vs 0197.HK Comparison April 2026
1936.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1936.HK stands at 382.7M. In comparison, 0197.HK has a market cap of 48.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1936.HK is priced at HK$0.82, while 0197.HK trades at HK$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1936.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas 0197.HK's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, 1936.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0197.HK's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 1936.HK is less volatile compared to 0197.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1936.HK.Check 0197.HK's competition here
1936.HK vs 0682.HK Comparison April 2026
1936.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1936.HK stands at 382.7M. In comparison, 0682.HK has a market cap of 37.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1936.HK is priced at HK$0.82, while 0682.HK trades at HK$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1936.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas 0682.HK's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, 1936.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0682.HK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1936.HK is less volatile compared to 0682.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1936.HK.Check 0682.HK's competition here
1936.HK vs 0073.HK Comparison April 2026
1936.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1936.HK stands at 382.7M. In comparison, 0073.HK has a market cap of 30.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1936.HK is priced at HK$0.82, while 0073.HK trades at HK$2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1936.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas 0073.HK's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, 1936.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0073.HK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1936.HK is more volatile compared to 0073.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1936.HK.Check 0073.HK's competition here
1936.HK vs 0904.HK Comparison April 2026
1936.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1936.HK stands at 382.7M. In comparison, 0904.HK has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1936.HK is priced at HK$0.82, while 0904.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1936.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas 0904.HK's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, 1936.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0904.HK's ROE of -12.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 1936.HK is more volatile compared to 0904.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1936.HK.Check 0904.HK's competition here
1936.HK vs 0043.HK Comparison April 2026
1936.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1936.HK stands at 382.7M. In comparison, 0043.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1936.HK is priced at HK$0.82, while 0043.HK trades at HK$1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1936.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas 0043.HK's P/E ratio is 10.73. In terms of profitability, 1936.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0043.HK's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, 1936.HK is more volatile compared to 0043.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1936.HK.Check 0043.HK's competition here
1936.HK vs 1533.HK Comparison April 2026
1936.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1936.HK stands at 382.7M. In comparison, 1533.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1936.HK is priced at HK$0.82, while 1533.HK trades at HK$10.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1936.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas 1533.HK's P/E ratio is 49.27. In terms of profitability, 1936.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1533.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1936.HK is more volatile compared to 1533.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1936.HK.Check 1533.HK's competition here
1936.HK vs 0462.HK Comparison April 2026
1936.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1936.HK stands at 382.7M. In comparison, 0462.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1936.HK is priced at HK$0.82, while 0462.HK trades at HK$2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1936.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.50, whereas 0462.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1936.HK's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0462.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1936.HK is more volatile compared to 0462.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1936.HK.Check 0462.HK's competition here