Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group Limited
Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group Limited (1929.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (1929.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Luxury Goods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1929.HK | HK$13.53 | +2.50% | 133.5B | 22.93 | HK$0.59 | +3.70% |
| 6181.HK | HK$733.00 | +6.23% | 119.1B | 70.82 | HK$10.35 | +0.94% |
| 1913.HK | HK$41.56 | +2.36% | 106.3B | 14.09 | HK$2.95 | +3.45% |
| 0590.HK | HK$20.46 | +1.54% | 12B | 10.94 | HK$1.87 | +5.82% |
| 0116.HK | HK$8.40 | +2.07% | 5.6B | 7.37 | HK$1.14 | +6.07% |
| 0887.HK | HK$0.40 | +3.90% | 2.9B | 10.00 | HK$0.04 | +2.75% |
| 0113.HK | HK$5.34 | +0.00% | 2.1B | 10.68 | HK$0.50 | +8.43% |
| 1815.HK | HK$1.59 | +6.00% | 2B | 79.50 | HK$0.02 | N/A |
| 0256.HK | HK$0.39 | +2.63% | 1.7B | -6.50 | -HK$0.06 | N/A |
| 0398.HK | HK$3.37 | +0.00% | 1.6B | 8.22 | HK$0.41 | +14.12% |
Stock Comparison
1929.HK vs 6181.HK Comparison August 2025
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 133.5B. In comparison, 6181.HK has a market cap of 119.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$13.53, while 6181.HK trades at HK$733.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas 6181.HK's P/E ratio is 70.82. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 6181.HK's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is less volatile compared to 6181.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 6181.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 1913.HK Comparison August 2025
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 133.5B. In comparison, 1913.HK has a market cap of 106.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$13.53, while 1913.HK trades at HK$41.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas 1913.HK's P/E ratio is 14.09. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 1913.HK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is more volatile compared to 1913.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 1913.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 0590.HK Comparison August 2025
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 133.5B. In comparison, 0590.HK has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$13.53, while 0590.HK trades at HK$20.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas 0590.HK's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0590.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is more volatile compared to 0590.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 0590.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 0116.HK Comparison August 2025
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 133.5B. In comparison, 0116.HK has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$13.53, while 0116.HK trades at HK$8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas 0116.HK's P/E ratio is 7.37. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0116.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is more volatile compared to 0116.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 0116.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 0887.HK Comparison August 2025
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 133.5B. In comparison, 0887.HK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$13.53, while 0887.HK trades at HK$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas 0887.HK's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0887.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is less volatile compared to 0887.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 0887.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 0113.HK Comparison August 2025
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 133.5B. In comparison, 0113.HK has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$13.53, while 0113.HK trades at HK$5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas 0113.HK's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0113.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is more volatile compared to 0113.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 0113.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 1815.HK Comparison August 2025
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 133.5B. In comparison, 1815.HK has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$13.53, while 1815.HK trades at HK$1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas 1815.HK's P/E ratio is 79.50. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 1815.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is less volatile compared to 1815.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 1815.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 0256.HK Comparison August 2025
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 133.5B. In comparison, 0256.HK has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$13.53, while 0256.HK trades at HK$0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas 0256.HK's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0256.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is less volatile compared to 0256.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 0256.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 0398.HK Comparison August 2025
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 133.5B. In comparison, 0398.HK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$13.53, while 0398.HK trades at HK$3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas 0398.HK's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0398.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is more volatile compared to 0398.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 0398.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 0860.HK Comparison August 2025
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 133.5B. In comparison, 0860.HK has a market cap of 807.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$13.53, while 0860.HK trades at HK$0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas 0860.HK's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0860.HK's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is less volatile compared to 0860.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 0860.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 3389.HK Comparison August 2025
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 133.5B. In comparison, 3389.HK has a market cap of 550.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$13.53, while 3389.HK trades at HK$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas 3389.HK's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 3389.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is more volatile compared to 3389.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 3389.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 1856.HK Comparison August 2025
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 133.5B. In comparison, 1856.HK has a market cap of 533.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$13.53, while 1856.HK trades at HK$1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas 1856.HK's P/E ratio is -11.38. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 1856.HK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is more volatile compared to 1856.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 1856.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 1466.HK Comparison August 2025
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 133.5B. In comparison, 1466.HK has a market cap of 517.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$13.53, while 1466.HK trades at HK$0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas 1466.HK's P/E ratio is -33.50. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 1466.HK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is more volatile compared to 1466.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 1466.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 0789.HK Comparison August 2025
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 133.5B. In comparison, 0789.HK has a market cap of 430.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$13.53, while 0789.HK trades at HK$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas 0789.HK's P/E ratio is 32.50. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0789.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is less volatile compared to 0789.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 0789.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 0280.HK Comparison August 2025
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 133.5B. In comparison, 0280.HK has a market cap of 400.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$13.53, while 0280.HK trades at HK$0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas 0280.HK's P/E ratio is 4.40. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0280.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is more volatile compared to 0280.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 0280.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 0213.HK Comparison August 2025
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 133.5B. In comparison, 0213.HK has a market cap of 352.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$13.53, while 0213.HK trades at HK$0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas 0213.HK's P/E ratio is 3.85. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0213.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is less volatile compared to 0213.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 0213.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 8026.HK Comparison August 2025
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 133.5B. In comparison, 8026.HK has a market cap of 349.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$13.53, while 8026.HK trades at HK$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas 8026.HK's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 8026.HK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is more volatile compared to 8026.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 8026.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 3326.HK Comparison August 2025
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 133.5B. In comparison, 3326.HK has a market cap of 309.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$13.53, while 3326.HK trades at HK$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas 3326.HK's P/E ratio is 23.20. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 3326.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is more volatile compared to 3326.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 3326.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 6838.HK Comparison August 2025
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 133.5B. In comparison, 6838.HK has a market cap of 174M. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$13.53, while 6838.HK trades at HK$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas 6838.HK's P/E ratio is -9.67. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 6838.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is more volatile compared to 6838.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 6838.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 0417.HK Comparison August 2025
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 133.5B. In comparison, 0417.HK has a market cap of 164.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$13.53, while 0417.HK trades at HK$0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas 0417.HK's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0417.HK's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is less volatile compared to 0417.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 0417.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 2882.HK Comparison August 2025
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 133.5B. In comparison, 2882.HK has a market cap of 159.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$13.53, while 2882.HK trades at HK$0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas 2882.HK's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 2882.HK's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is more volatile compared to 2882.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 2882.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 0513.HK Comparison August 2025
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 133.5B. In comparison, 0513.HK has a market cap of 157.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$13.53, while 0513.HK trades at HK$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas 0513.HK's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0513.HK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is more volatile compared to 0513.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 0513.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 1327.HK Comparison August 2025
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 133.5B. In comparison, 1327.HK has a market cap of 146.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$13.53, while 1327.HK trades at HK$0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas 1327.HK's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 1327.HK's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is less volatile compared to 1327.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 1327.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 1150.HK Comparison August 2025
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 133.5B. In comparison, 1150.HK has a market cap of 139.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$13.53, while 1150.HK trades at HK$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas 1150.HK's P/E ratio is -4.40. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 1150.HK's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is less volatile compared to 1150.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 1150.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 0442.HK Comparison August 2025
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 133.5B. In comparison, 0442.HK has a market cap of 134.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$13.53, while 0442.HK trades at HK$0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas 0442.HK's P/E ratio is -15.60. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0442.HK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is more volatile compared to 0442.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 0442.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 0986.HK Comparison August 2025
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 133.5B. In comparison, 0986.HK has a market cap of 112.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$13.53, while 0986.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas 0986.HK's P/E ratio is -8.70. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0986.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is less volatile compared to 0986.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 0986.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 0125.HK Comparison August 2025
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 133.5B. In comparison, 0125.HK has a market cap of 97.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$13.53, while 0125.HK trades at HK$0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas 0125.HK's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0125.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is more volatile compared to 0125.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 0125.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 0084.HK Comparison August 2025
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 133.5B. In comparison, 0084.HK has a market cap of 72.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$13.53, while 0084.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas 0084.HK's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0084.HK's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is more volatile compared to 0084.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 0084.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 0444.HK Comparison August 2025
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 133.5B. In comparison, 0444.HK has a market cap of 60.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$13.53, while 0444.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas 0444.HK's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0444.HK's ROE of +52.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is more volatile compared to 0444.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 0444.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 1470.HK Comparison August 2025
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 133.5B. In comparison, 1470.HK has a market cap of 53.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$13.53, while 1470.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas 1470.HK's P/E ratio is 6.70. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 1470.HK's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is less volatile compared to 1470.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 1470.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 8537.HK Comparison August 2025
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 133.5B. In comparison, 8537.HK has a market cap of 48.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$13.53, while 8537.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas 8537.HK's P/E ratio is 1.07. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 8537.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is less volatile compared to 8537.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 8537.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 8219.HK Comparison August 2025
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 133.5B. In comparison, 8219.HK has a market cap of 47.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$13.53, while 8219.HK trades at HK$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas 8219.HK's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 8219.HK's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is less volatile compared to 8219.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 8219.HK's competition here