Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group Limited
Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group Limited (1929.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (1929.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Luxury Goods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1929.HK | HK$11.25 | +3.97% | 107.3B | 18.44 | HK$0.59 | +4.96% |
| 6181.HK | HK$650.50 | +5.34% | 107.4B | 19.55 | HK$31.99 | +2.78% |
| 1913.HK | HK$37.54 | +2.85% | 94.5B | 12.27 | HK$3.01 | +3.88% |
| 0590.HK | HK$23.90 | +2.14% | 13.6B | 10.66 | HK$2.18 | +4.73% |
| 0116.HK | HK$14.06 | +6.76% | 9.1B | 5.49 | HK$2.47 | +4.20% |
| 6168.HK | HK$20.42 | +1.79% | 9B | 9.62 | HK$2.13 | N/A |
| 0113.HK | HK$6.23 | -2.20% | 2.4B | 11.16 | HK$0.56 | +4.80% |
| 0887.HK | HK$0.32 | +4.92% | 2.2B | 5.00 | HK$0.06 | +3.33% |
| 0398.HK | HK$3.30 | -0.30% | 1.6B | 8.92 | HK$0.37 | +11.36% |
| 1815.HK | HK$1.07 | -14.40% | 1.4B | 34.33 | HK$0.03 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
1929.HK vs 6181.HK Comparison April 2026
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 107.3B. In comparison, 6181.HK has a market cap of 107.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$11.25, while 6181.HK trades at HK$650.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.44, whereas 6181.HK's P/E ratio is 19.55. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 6181.HK's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is less volatile compared to 6181.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 6181.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 1913.HK Comparison April 2026
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 107.3B. In comparison, 1913.HK has a market cap of 94.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$11.25, while 1913.HK trades at HK$37.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.44, whereas 1913.HK's P/E ratio is 12.27. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 1913.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is more volatile compared to 1913.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 1913.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 0590.HK Comparison April 2026
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 107.3B. In comparison, 0590.HK has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$11.25, while 0590.HK trades at HK$23.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.44, whereas 0590.HK's P/E ratio is 10.66. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0590.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is more volatile compared to 0590.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 0590.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 0116.HK Comparison April 2026
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 107.3B. In comparison, 0116.HK has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$11.25, while 0116.HK trades at HK$14.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.44, whereas 0116.HK's P/E ratio is 5.49. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0116.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is less volatile compared to 0116.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 0116.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 6168.HK Comparison April 2026
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 107.3B. In comparison, 6168.HK has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$11.25, while 6168.HK trades at HK$20.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.44, whereas 6168.HK's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 6168.HK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is less volatile compared to 6168.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 6168.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 0113.HK Comparison April 2026
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 107.3B. In comparison, 0113.HK has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$11.25, while 0113.HK trades at HK$6.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.44, whereas 0113.HK's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0113.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is more volatile compared to 0113.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 0113.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 0887.HK Comparison April 2026
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 107.3B. In comparison, 0887.HK has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$11.25, while 0887.HK trades at HK$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.44, whereas 0887.HK's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0887.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is less volatile compared to 0887.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 0887.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 0398.HK Comparison April 2026
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 107.3B. In comparison, 0398.HK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$11.25, while 0398.HK trades at HK$3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.44, whereas 0398.HK's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0398.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is more volatile compared to 0398.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 0398.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 1815.HK Comparison April 2026
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 107.3B. In comparison, 1815.HK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$11.25, while 1815.HK trades at HK$1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.44, whereas 1815.HK's P/E ratio is 34.33. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 1815.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is less volatile compared to 1815.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 1815.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 3389.HK Comparison April 2026
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 107.3B. In comparison, 3389.HK has a market cap of 792.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$11.25, while 3389.HK trades at HK$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.44, whereas 3389.HK's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 3389.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is more volatile compared to 3389.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 3389.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 1856.HK Comparison April 2026
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 107.3B. In comparison, 1856.HK has a market cap of 583.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$11.25, while 1856.HK trades at HK$1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.44, whereas 1856.HK's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 1856.HK's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is less volatile compared to 1856.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 1856.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 8026.HK Comparison April 2026
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 107.3B. In comparison, 8026.HK has a market cap of 544.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$11.25, while 8026.HK trades at HK$0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.44, whereas 8026.HK's P/E ratio is 35.50. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 8026.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is less volatile compared to 8026.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 8026.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 0860.HK Comparison April 2026
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 107.3B. In comparison, 0860.HK has a market cap of 521.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$11.25, while 0860.HK trades at HK$0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.44, whereas 0860.HK's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0860.HK's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is more volatile compared to 0860.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 0860.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 0280.HK Comparison April 2026
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 107.3B. In comparison, 0280.HK has a market cap of 463.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$11.25, while 0280.HK trades at HK$0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.44, whereas 0280.HK's P/E ratio is 5.10. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0280.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is more volatile compared to 0280.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 0280.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 1466.HK Comparison April 2026
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 107.3B. In comparison, 1466.HK has a market cap of 456.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$11.25, while 1466.HK trades at HK$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.44, whereas 1466.HK's P/E ratio is 59.00. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 1466.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is less volatile compared to 1466.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 1466.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 0789.HK Comparison April 2026
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 107.3B. In comparison, 0789.HK has a market cap of 390.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$11.25, while 0789.HK trades at HK$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.44, whereas 0789.HK's P/E ratio is 29.50. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0789.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is less volatile compared to 0789.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 0789.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 0256.HK Comparison April 2026
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 107.3B. In comparison, 0256.HK has a market cap of 369.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$11.25, while 0256.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.44, whereas 0256.HK's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0256.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is less volatile compared to 0256.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 0256.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 0213.HK Comparison April 2026
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 107.3B. In comparison, 0213.HK has a market cap of 361.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$11.25, while 0213.HK trades at HK$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.44, whereas 0213.HK's P/E ratio is 3.59. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0213.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is less volatile compared to 0213.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 0213.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 3326.HK Comparison April 2026
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 107.3B. In comparison, 3326.HK has a market cap of 331.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$11.25, while 3326.HK trades at HK$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.44, whereas 3326.HK's P/E ratio is -24.80. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 3326.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is more volatile compared to 3326.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 3326.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 0417.HK Comparison April 2026
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 107.3B. In comparison, 0417.HK has a market cap of 164.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$11.25, while 0417.HK trades at HK$0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.44, whereas 0417.HK's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0417.HK's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is more volatile compared to 0417.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 0417.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 6838.HK Comparison April 2026
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 107.3B. In comparison, 6838.HK has a market cap of 140.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$11.25, while 6838.HK trades at HK$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.44, whereas 6838.HK's P/E ratio is -7.80. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 6838.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is more volatile compared to 6838.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 6838.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 0442.HK Comparison April 2026
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 107.3B. In comparison, 0442.HK has a market cap of 137.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$11.25, while 0442.HK trades at HK$0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.44, whereas 0442.HK's P/E ratio is -11.43. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0442.HK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is more volatile compared to 0442.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 0442.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 2882.HK Comparison April 2026
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 107.3B. In comparison, 2882.HK has a market cap of 137.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$11.25, while 2882.HK trades at HK$0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.44, whereas 2882.HK's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 2882.HK's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is more volatile compared to 2882.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 2882.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 1150.HK Comparison April 2026
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 107.3B. In comparison, 1150.HK has a market cap of 132.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$11.25, while 1150.HK trades at HK$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.44, whereas 1150.HK's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 1150.HK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is less volatile compared to 1150.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 1150.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 1470.HK Comparison April 2026
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 107.3B. In comparison, 1470.HK has a market cap of 125.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$11.25, while 1470.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.44, whereas 1470.HK's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 1470.HK's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is less volatile compared to 1470.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 1470.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 1327.HK Comparison April 2026
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 107.3B. In comparison, 1327.HK has a market cap of 120.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$11.25, while 1327.HK trades at HK$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.44, whereas 1327.HK's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 1327.HK's ROE of -1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is more volatile compared to 1327.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 1327.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 0125.HK Comparison April 2026
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 107.3B. In comparison, 0125.HK has a market cap of 90.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$11.25, while 0125.HK trades at HK$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.44, whereas 0125.HK's P/E ratio is -2.16. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0125.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is less volatile compared to 0125.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 0125.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 0986.HK Comparison April 2026
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 107.3B. In comparison, 0986.HK has a market cap of 84.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$11.25, while 0986.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.44, whereas 0986.HK's P/E ratio is 3.25. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0986.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is less volatile compared to 0986.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 0986.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 0513.HK Comparison April 2026
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 107.3B. In comparison, 0513.HK has a market cap of 82M. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$11.25, while 0513.HK trades at HK$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.44, whereas 0513.HK's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0513.HK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is more volatile compared to 0513.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 0513.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 0084.HK Comparison April 2026
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 107.3B. In comparison, 0084.HK has a market cap of 67.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$11.25, while 0084.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.44, whereas 0084.HK's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0084.HK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is less volatile compared to 0084.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 0084.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 8537.HK Comparison April 2026
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 107.3B. In comparison, 8537.HK has a market cap of 66M. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$11.25, while 8537.HK trades at HK$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.44, whereas 8537.HK's P/E ratio is 21.70. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 8537.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is less volatile compared to 8537.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 8537.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 0444.HK Comparison April 2026
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 107.3B. In comparison, 0444.HK has a market cap of 60.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$11.25, while 0444.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.44, whereas 0444.HK's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0444.HK's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is more volatile compared to 0444.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 0444.HK's competition here
1929.HK vs 8219.HK Comparison April 2026
1929.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1929.HK stands at 107.3B. In comparison, 8219.HK has a market cap of 45.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1929.HK is priced at HK$11.25, while 8219.HK trades at HK$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1929.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.44, whereas 8219.HK's P/E ratio is -4.62. In terms of profitability, 1929.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 8219.HK's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 1929.HK is less volatile compared to 8219.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1929.HK.Check 8219.HK's competition here