Sands China Ltd.
Sands China Ltd. 1928.HK Peers
See (1928.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1928.HK | $15.14 | -2.20% | 122.53B | 14.99 | $1.01 | N/A |
| 0027.HK | $31.55 | -1.71% | 137.97B | 15.78 | $2.00 | +1.56% |
| 2282.HK | $11.06 | -0.18% | 41.99B | 9.14 | $1.21 | +5.38% |
| 1128.HK | $5.40 | -0.74% | 28.24B | 9.47 | $0.57 | +2.76% |
| 0880.HK | $2.30 | -1.71% | 16.33B | 4600.00 | $0.00 | N/A |
| 3918.HK | $3.56 | -0.84% | 15.75B | 18.74 | $0.19 | N/A |
| 0200.HK | $3.58 | -3.24% | 8.13B | -9.18 | -$0.39 | N/A |
| 2536.HK | $3.10 | +3.68% | 2.50B | 310.00 | $0.01 | N/A |
| 6889.HK | $3.45 | -0.29% | 2.40B | 12.32 | $0.28 | +7.26% |
| 8279.HK | $0.19 | +0.53% | 2.15B | 67.38 | $0.00 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
1928.HK vs 0027.HK Comparison
1928.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1928.HK stands at 122.53B. In comparison, 0027.HK has a market cap of 137.97B. Regarding current trading prices, 1928.HK is priced at $15.14, while 0027.HK trades at $31.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1928.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 0027.HK's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, 1928.HK's ROE is +1.36%, compared to 0027.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1928.HK is more volatile compared to 0027.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1928.HK.
1928.HK vs 2282.HK Comparison
1928.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1928.HK stands at 122.53B. In comparison, 2282.HK has a market cap of 41.99B. Regarding current trading prices, 1928.HK is priced at $15.14, while 2282.HK trades at $11.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1928.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 2282.HK's P/E ratio is 9.14. In terms of profitability, 1928.HK's ROE is +1.36%, compared to 2282.HK's ROE of +19.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 1928.HK is more volatile compared to 2282.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1928.HK.
1928.HK vs 1128.HK Comparison
1928.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1928.HK stands at 122.53B. In comparison, 1128.HK has a market cap of 28.24B. Regarding current trading prices, 1928.HK is priced at $15.14, while 1128.HK trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1928.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 1128.HK's P/E ratio is 9.47. In terms of profitability, 1928.HK's ROE is +1.36%, compared to 1128.HK's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 1928.HK is more volatile compared to 1128.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1928.HK.
1928.HK vs 0880.HK Comparison
1928.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1928.HK stands at 122.53B. In comparison, 0880.HK has a market cap of 16.33B. Regarding current trading prices, 1928.HK is priced at $15.14, while 0880.HK trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1928.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 0880.HK's P/E ratio is 4600.00. In terms of profitability, 1928.HK's ROE is +1.36%, compared to 0880.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1928.HK is less volatile compared to 0880.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1928.HK.
1928.HK vs 3918.HK Comparison
1928.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1928.HK stands at 122.53B. In comparison, 3918.HK has a market cap of 15.75B. Regarding current trading prices, 1928.HK is priced at $15.14, while 3918.HK trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1928.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 3918.HK's P/E ratio is 18.74. In terms of profitability, 1928.HK's ROE is +1.36%, compared to 3918.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1928.HK is more volatile compared to 3918.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1928.HK.
1928.HK vs 0200.HK Comparison
1928.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1928.HK stands at 122.53B. In comparison, 0200.HK has a market cap of 8.13B. Regarding current trading prices, 1928.HK is priced at $15.14, while 0200.HK trades at $3.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1928.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 0200.HK's P/E ratio is -9.18. In terms of profitability, 1928.HK's ROE is +1.36%, compared to 0200.HK's ROE of -4.52%. Regarding short-term risk, 1928.HK is less volatile compared to 0200.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1928.HK.
1928.HK vs 2536.HK Comparison
1928.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1928.HK stands at 122.53B. In comparison, 2536.HK has a market cap of 2.50B. Regarding current trading prices, 1928.HK is priced at $15.14, while 2536.HK trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1928.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 2536.HK's P/E ratio is 310.00. In terms of profitability, 1928.HK's ROE is +1.36%, compared to 2536.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1928.HK is less volatile compared to 2536.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1928.HK.
1928.HK vs 6889.HK Comparison
1928.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1928.HK stands at 122.53B. In comparison, 6889.HK has a market cap of 2.40B. Regarding current trading prices, 1928.HK is priced at $15.14, while 6889.HK trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1928.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 6889.HK's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, 1928.HK's ROE is +1.36%, compared to 6889.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1928.HK is more volatile compared to 6889.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1928.HK.
1928.HK vs 8279.HK Comparison
1928.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1928.HK stands at 122.53B. In comparison, 8279.HK has a market cap of 2.15B. Regarding current trading prices, 1928.HK is priced at $15.14, while 8279.HK trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1928.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 8279.HK's P/E ratio is 67.38. In terms of profitability, 1928.HK's ROE is +1.36%, compared to 8279.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1928.HK is less volatile compared to 8279.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1928.HK.
1928.HK vs 1180.HK Comparison
1928.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1928.HK stands at 122.53B. In comparison, 1180.HK has a market cap of 2.10B. Regarding current trading prices, 1928.HK is priced at $15.14, while 1180.HK trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1928.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 1180.HK's P/E ratio is 5.88. In terms of profitability, 1928.HK's ROE is +1.36%, compared to 1180.HK's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, 1928.HK is less volatile compared to 1180.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1928.HK.
1928.HK vs 1076.HK Comparison
1928.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1928.HK stands at 122.53B. In comparison, 1076.HK has a market cap of 681.55M. Regarding current trading prices, 1928.HK is priced at $15.14, while 1076.HK trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1928.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 1076.HK's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, 1928.HK's ROE is +1.36%, compared to 1076.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1928.HK is less volatile compared to 1076.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1928.HK.
1928.HK vs 1680.HK Comparison
1928.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1928.HK stands at 122.53B. In comparison, 1680.HK has a market cap of 626.32M. Regarding current trading prices, 1928.HK is priced at $15.14, while 1680.HK trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1928.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 1680.HK's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, 1928.HK's ROE is +1.36%, compared to 1680.HK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1928.HK is more volatile compared to 1680.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1928.HK.
1928.HK vs 0082.HK Comparison
1928.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1928.HK stands at 122.53B. In comparison, 0082.HK has a market cap of 407.35M. Regarding current trading prices, 1928.HK is priced at $15.14, while 0082.HK trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1928.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 0082.HK's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, 1928.HK's ROE is +1.36%, compared to 0082.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1928.HK is less volatile compared to 0082.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1928.HK.
1928.HK vs 0296.HK Comparison
1928.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1928.HK stands at 122.53B. In comparison, 0296.HK has a market cap of 356.55M. Regarding current trading prices, 1928.HK is priced at $15.14, while 0296.HK trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1928.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 0296.HK's P/E ratio is -2.73. In terms of profitability, 1928.HK's ROE is +1.36%, compared to 0296.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1928.HK is less volatile compared to 0296.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1928.HK.
1928.HK vs 0582.HK Comparison
1928.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1928.HK stands at 122.53B. In comparison, 0582.HK has a market cap of 255.60M. Regarding current trading prices, 1928.HK is priced at $15.14, while 0582.HK trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1928.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 0582.HK's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, 1928.HK's ROE is +1.36%, compared to 0582.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1928.HK is more volatile compared to 0582.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1928.HK.
1928.HK vs 1245.HK Comparison
1928.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1928.HK stands at 122.53B. In comparison, 1245.HK has a market cap of 227.21M. Regarding current trading prices, 1928.HK is priced at $15.14, while 1245.HK trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1928.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 1245.HK's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, 1928.HK's ROE is +1.36%, compared to 1245.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1928.HK is less volatile compared to 1245.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1928.HK.
1928.HK vs 0102.HK Comparison
1928.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1928.HK stands at 122.53B. In comparison, 0102.HK has a market cap of 211.94M. Regarding current trading prices, 1928.HK is priced at $15.14, while 0102.HK trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1928.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 0102.HK's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, 1928.HK's ROE is +1.36%, compared to 0102.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1928.HK is less volatile compared to 0102.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1928.HK.
1928.HK vs 8308.HK Comparison
1928.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1928.HK stands at 122.53B. In comparison, 8308.HK has a market cap of 99.66M. Regarding current trading prices, 1928.HK is priced at $15.14, while 8308.HK trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1928.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 8308.HK's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, 1928.HK's ROE is +1.36%, compared to 8308.HK's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 1928.HK is less volatile compared to 8308.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1928.HK.
1928.HK vs 0070.HK Comparison
1928.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1928.HK stands at 122.53B. In comparison, 0070.HK has a market cap of 91.12M. Regarding current trading prices, 1928.HK is priced at $15.14, while 0070.HK trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1928.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 0070.HK's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, 1928.HK's ROE is +1.36%, compared to 0070.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1928.HK is more volatile compared to 0070.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1928.HK.
1928.HK vs 1655.HK Comparison
1928.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1928.HK stands at 122.53B. In comparison, 1655.HK has a market cap of 71.40M. Regarding current trading prices, 1928.HK is priced at $15.14, while 1655.HK trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1928.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 1655.HK's P/E ratio is 0.92. In terms of profitability, 1928.HK's ROE is +1.36%, compared to 1655.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1928.HK is less volatile compared to 1655.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1928.HK.
1928.HK vs 0959.HK Comparison
1928.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1928.HK stands at 122.53B. In comparison, 0959.HK has a market cap of 63.48M. Regarding current trading prices, 1928.HK is priced at $15.14, while 0959.HK trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1928.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 0959.HK's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, 1928.HK's ROE is +1.36%, compared to 0959.HK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 1928.HK is less volatile compared to 0959.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1928.HK.
1928.HK vs 8400.HK Comparison
1928.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1928.HK stands at 122.53B. In comparison, 8400.HK has a market cap of 52.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 1928.HK is priced at $15.14, while 8400.HK trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1928.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 8400.HK's P/E ratio is 5.20. In terms of profitability, 1928.HK's ROE is +1.36%, compared to 8400.HK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 1928.HK is more volatile compared to 8400.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1928.HK.
1928.HK vs 1371.HK Comparison
1928.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1928.HK stands at 122.53B. In comparison, 1371.HK has a market cap of 28.88M. Regarding current trading prices, 1928.HK is priced at $15.14, while 1371.HK trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1928.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 1371.HK's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, 1928.HK's ROE is +1.36%, compared to 1371.HK's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, 1928.HK is less volatile compared to 1371.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1928.HK.
1928.HK vs 8052.HK Comparison
1928.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1928.HK stands at 122.53B. In comparison, 8052.HK has a market cap of 21.38M. Regarding current trading prices, 1928.HK is priced at $15.14, while 8052.HK trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1928.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas 8052.HK's P/E ratio is 0.56. In terms of profitability, 1928.HK's ROE is +1.36%, compared to 8052.HK's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, 1928.HK is less volatile compared to 8052.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1928.HK.