Kwung's Holdings Limited
Kwung's Holdings Limited (1925.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (1925.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Household & Personal Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1925.HK | HK$1.24 | +0.81% | 502.3M | 3.88 | HK$0.32 | +7.26% |
| 2367.HK | HK$55.55 | -0.80% | 58.8B | 24.69 | HK$2.25 | +1.29% |
| 0973.HK | HK$33.80 | +0.30% | 49.9B | 61.45 | HK$0.55 | N/A |
| 2145.HK | HK$75.65 | +0.13% | 30.1B | 35.19 | HK$2.15 | +2.16% |
| 3331.HK | HK$23.45 | +0.00% | 28.2B | 111.67 | HK$0.21 | N/A |
| 1044.HK | HK$23.25 | -1.06% | 27B | 10.57 | HK$2.20 | +6.55% |
| 6993.HK | HK$3.78 | -0.26% | 21.9B | -27.00 | -HK$0.14 | +2.65% |
| 6601.HK | HK$2.65 | -3.28% | 3.5B | 15.59 | HK$0.17 | +5.01% |
| 0273.HK | HK$0.03 | +3.03% | 1.5B | -1.70 | -HK$0.02 | N/A |
| 0399.HK | HK$0.53 | -15.87% | 1.1B | -53.00 | -HK$0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
1925.HK vs 2367.HK Comparison August 2025
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 502.3M. In comparison, 2367.HK has a market cap of 58.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.24, while 2367.HK trades at HK$55.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.88, whereas 2367.HK's P/E ratio is 24.69. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 2367.HK's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is less volatile compared to 2367.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.Check 2367.HK's competition here
1925.HK vs 0973.HK Comparison August 2025
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 502.3M. In comparison, 0973.HK has a market cap of 49.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.24, while 0973.HK trades at HK$33.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.88, whereas 0973.HK's P/E ratio is 61.45. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0973.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is more volatile compared to 0973.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.Check 0973.HK's competition here
1925.HK vs 2145.HK Comparison August 2025
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 502.3M. In comparison, 2145.HK has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.24, while 2145.HK trades at HK$75.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.88, whereas 2145.HK's P/E ratio is 35.19. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 2145.HK's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is less volatile compared to 2145.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.Check 2145.HK's competition here
1925.HK vs 3331.HK Comparison August 2025
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 502.3M. In comparison, 3331.HK has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.24, while 3331.HK trades at HK$23.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.88, whereas 3331.HK's P/E ratio is 111.67. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 3331.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is less volatile compared to 3331.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.Check 3331.HK's competition here
1925.HK vs 1044.HK Comparison August 2025
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 502.3M. In comparison, 1044.HK has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.24, while 1044.HK trades at HK$23.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.88, whereas 1044.HK's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 1044.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is less volatile compared to 1044.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.Check 1044.HK's competition here
1925.HK vs 6993.HK Comparison August 2025
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 502.3M. In comparison, 6993.HK has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.24, while 6993.HK trades at HK$3.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.88, whereas 6993.HK's P/E ratio is -27.00. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 6993.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is less volatile compared to 6993.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.Check 6993.HK's competition here
1925.HK vs 6601.HK Comparison August 2025
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 502.3M. In comparison, 6601.HK has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.24, while 6601.HK trades at HK$2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.88, whereas 6601.HK's P/E ratio is 15.59. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 6601.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is less volatile compared to 6601.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.Check 6601.HK's competition here
1925.HK vs 0273.HK Comparison August 2025
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 502.3M. In comparison, 0273.HK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.24, while 0273.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.88, whereas 0273.HK's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0273.HK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is less volatile compared to 0273.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.Check 0273.HK's competition here
1925.HK vs 0399.HK Comparison August 2025
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 502.3M. In comparison, 0399.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.24, while 0399.HK trades at HK$0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.88, whereas 0399.HK's P/E ratio is -53.00. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0399.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is less volatile compared to 0399.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.Check 0399.HK's competition here
1925.HK vs 0157.HK Comparison August 2025
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 502.3M. In comparison, 0157.HK has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.24, while 0157.HK trades at HK$0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.88, whereas 0157.HK's P/E ratio is -10.20. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0157.HK's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is less volatile compared to 0157.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.Check 0157.HK's competition here
1925.HK vs 2138.HK Comparison August 2025
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 502.3M. In comparison, 2138.HK has a market cap of 770.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.24, while 2138.HK trades at HK$0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.88, whereas 2138.HK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 2138.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is less volatile compared to 2138.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.Check 2138.HK's competition here
1925.HK vs 3828.HK Comparison August 2025
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 502.3M. In comparison, 3828.HK has a market cap of 629.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.24, while 3828.HK trades at HK$0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.88, whereas 3828.HK's P/E ratio is 4.35. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 3828.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is less volatile compared to 3828.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.Check 3828.HK's competition here
1925.HK vs 3332.HK Comparison August 2025
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 502.3M. In comparison, 3332.HK has a market cap of 501.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.24, while 3332.HK trades at HK$0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.88, whereas 3332.HK's P/E ratio is 13.25. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 3332.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is less volatile compared to 3332.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.Check 3332.HK's competition here
1925.HK vs 2177.HK Comparison August 2025
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 502.3M. In comparison, 2177.HK has a market cap of 489.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.24, while 2177.HK trades at HK$2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.88, whereas 2177.HK's P/E ratio is 11.80. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 2177.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is less volatile compared to 2177.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.Check 2177.HK's competition here
1925.HK vs 2023.HK Comparison August 2025
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 502.3M. In comparison, 2023.HK has a market cap of 413.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.24, while 2023.HK trades at HK$0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.88, whereas 2023.HK's P/E ratio is 7.64. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 2023.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is less volatile compared to 2023.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.Check 2023.HK's competition here
1925.HK vs 0943.HK Comparison August 2025
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 502.3M. In comparison, 0943.HK has a market cap of 366.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.24, while 0943.HK trades at HK$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.88, whereas 0943.HK's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0943.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is less volatile compared to 0943.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.Check 0943.HK's competition here
1925.HK vs 1455.HK Comparison August 2025
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 502.3M. In comparison, 1455.HK has a market cap of 351.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.24, while 1455.HK trades at HK$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.88, whereas 1455.HK's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 1455.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is less volatile compared to 1455.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.Check 1455.HK's competition here
1925.HK vs 0464.HK Comparison August 2025
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 502.3M. In comparison, 0464.HK has a market cap of 338.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.24, while 0464.HK trades at HK$0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.88, whereas 0464.HK's P/E ratio is -5.89. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0464.HK's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is less volatile compared to 0464.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.Check 0464.HK's competition here
1925.HK vs 1962.HK Comparison August 2025
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 502.3M. In comparison, 1962.HK has a market cap of 314.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.24, while 1962.HK trades at HK$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.88, whereas 1962.HK's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 1962.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is less volatile compared to 1962.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.Check 1962.HK's competition here
1925.HK vs 8512.HK Comparison August 2025
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 502.3M. In comparison, 8512.HK has a market cap of 289.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.24, while 8512.HK trades at HK$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.88, whereas 8512.HK's P/E ratio is 1.75. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 8512.HK's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is less volatile compared to 8512.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.Check 8512.HK's competition here
1925.HK vs 2593.HK Comparison August 2025
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 502.3M. In comparison, 2593.HK has a market cap of 240M. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.24, while 2593.HK trades at HK$1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.88, whereas 2593.HK's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 2593.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is more volatile compared to 2593.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.Check 2593.HK's competition here
1925.HK vs 6893.HK Comparison August 2025
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 502.3M. In comparison, 6893.HK has a market cap of 191.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.24, while 6893.HK trades at HK$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.88, whereas 6893.HK's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 6893.HK's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is less volatile compared to 6893.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.Check 6893.HK's competition here
1925.HK vs 1338.HK Comparison August 2025
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 502.3M. In comparison, 1338.HK has a market cap of 167.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.24, while 1338.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.88, whereas 1338.HK's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 1338.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is less volatile compared to 1338.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.Check 1338.HK's competition here
1925.HK vs 1667.HK Comparison August 2025
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 502.3M. In comparison, 1667.HK has a market cap of 124.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.24, while 1667.HK trades at HK$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.88, whereas 1667.HK's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 1667.HK's ROE of -6.56%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is more volatile compared to 1667.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.Check 1667.HK's competition here
1925.HK vs 1323.HK Comparison August 2025
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 502.3M. In comparison, 1323.HK has a market cap of 124.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.24, while 1323.HK trades at HK$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.88, whereas 1323.HK's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 1323.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is less volatile compared to 1323.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.Check 1323.HK's competition here
1925.HK vs 8281.HK Comparison August 2025
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 502.3M. In comparison, 8281.HK has a market cap of 97M. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.24, while 8281.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.88, whereas 8281.HK's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 8281.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is less volatile compared to 8281.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.Check 8281.HK's competition here
1925.HK vs 8436.HK Comparison August 2025
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 502.3M. In comparison, 8436.HK has a market cap of 96.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.24, while 8436.HK trades at HK$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.88, whereas 8436.HK's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 8436.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is less volatile compared to 8436.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.Check 8436.HK's competition here
1925.HK vs 1173.HK Comparison August 2025
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 502.3M. In comparison, 1173.HK has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.24, while 1173.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.88, whereas 1173.HK's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 1173.HK's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is more volatile compared to 1173.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.Check 1173.HK's competition here
1925.HK vs 8176.HK Comparison August 2025
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 502.3M. In comparison, 8176.HK has a market cap of 62.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.24, while 8176.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.88, whereas 8176.HK's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 8176.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is less volatile compared to 8176.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.Check 8176.HK's competition here
1925.HK vs 1259.HK Comparison August 2025
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 502.3M. In comparison, 1259.HK has a market cap of 52.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.24, while 1259.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.88, whereas 1259.HK's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 1259.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is less volatile compared to 1259.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.Check 1259.HK's competition here
1925.HK vs 8451.HK Comparison August 2025
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 502.3M. In comparison, 8451.HK has a market cap of 48.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.24, while 8451.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.88, whereas 8451.HK's P/E ratio is 6.10. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 8451.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is more volatile compared to 8451.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.Check 8451.HK's competition here
1925.HK vs 8200.HK Comparison August 2025
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 502.3M. In comparison, 8200.HK has a market cap of 39.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.24, while 8200.HK trades at HK$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.88, whereas 8200.HK's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 8200.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is more volatile compared to 8200.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.Check 8200.HK's competition here