Kwung's Holdings Limited
Kwung's Holdings Limited 1925.HK Peers
See (1925.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Household & Personal Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1925.HK | HK$1.29 | +3.20% | 522.5M | 4.03 | HK$0.32 | +6.98% |
| 2367.HK | HK$55.45 | +2.21% | 61.1B | 25.64 | HK$2.25 | +2.26% |
| 0973.HK | HK$33.80 | +0.30% | 49.9B | 61.45 | HK$0.55 | N/A |
| 2145.HK | HK$80.00 | +0.00% | 32.6B | 38.14 | HK$2.15 | +1.99% |
| 3331.HK | HK$23.45 | +0.00% | 28.2B | 111.67 | HK$0.21 | N/A |
| 1044.HK | HK$22.80 | +1.79% | 26.2B | 10.25 | HK$2.20 | +6.75% |
| 6993.HK | HK$4.09 | -2.15% | 23.8B | -29.36 | -HK$0.14 | +2.43% |
| 6601.HK | HK$2.73 | -0.73% | 3.7B | 16.47 | HK$0.17 | +4.74% |
| 0273.HK | HK$0.03 | +3.03% | 1.5B | -1.70 | -HK$0.02 | N/A |
| 0157.HK | HK$0.55 | +1.85% | 1.1B | -11.00 | -HK$0.05 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
1925.HK vs 2367.HK Comparison
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 522.5M. In comparison, 2367.HK has a market cap of 61.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.29, while 2367.HK trades at HK$55.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.03, whereas 2367.HK's P/E ratio is 25.64. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 2367.HK's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is less volatile compared to 2367.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.
1925.HK vs 0973.HK Comparison
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 522.5M. In comparison, 0973.HK has a market cap of 49.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.29, while 0973.HK trades at HK$33.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.03, whereas 0973.HK's P/E ratio is 61.45. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0973.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is more volatile compared to 0973.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.
1925.HK vs 2145.HK Comparison
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 522.5M. In comparison, 2145.HK has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.29, while 2145.HK trades at HK$80.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.03, whereas 2145.HK's P/E ratio is 38.14. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 2145.HK's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is less volatile compared to 2145.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.
1925.HK vs 3331.HK Comparison
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 522.5M. In comparison, 3331.HK has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.29, while 3331.HK trades at HK$23.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.03, whereas 3331.HK's P/E ratio is 111.67. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 3331.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is more volatile compared to 3331.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.
1925.HK vs 1044.HK Comparison
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 522.5M. In comparison, 1044.HK has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.29, while 1044.HK trades at HK$22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.03, whereas 1044.HK's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 1044.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is more volatile compared to 1044.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.
1925.HK vs 6993.HK Comparison
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 522.5M. In comparison, 6993.HK has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.29, while 6993.HK trades at HK$4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.03, whereas 6993.HK's P/E ratio is -29.36. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 6993.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is less volatile compared to 6993.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.
1925.HK vs 6601.HK Comparison
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 522.5M. In comparison, 6601.HK has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.29, while 6601.HK trades at HK$2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.03, whereas 6601.HK's P/E ratio is 16.47. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 6601.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is less volatile compared to 6601.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.
1925.HK vs 0273.HK Comparison
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 522.5M. In comparison, 0273.HK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.29, while 0273.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.03, whereas 0273.HK's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0273.HK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is less volatile compared to 0273.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.
1925.HK vs 0157.HK Comparison
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 522.5M. In comparison, 0157.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.29, while 0157.HK trades at HK$0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.03, whereas 0157.HK's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0157.HK's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is more volatile compared to 0157.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.
1925.HK vs 2138.HK Comparison
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 522.5M. In comparison, 2138.HK has a market cap of 699.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.29, while 2138.HK trades at HK$0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.03, whereas 2138.HK's P/E ratio is -4.21. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 2138.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is less volatile compared to 2138.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.
1925.HK vs 3828.HK Comparison
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 522.5M. In comparison, 3828.HK has a market cap of 586.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.29, while 3828.HK trades at HK$0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.03, whereas 3828.HK's P/E ratio is 4.05. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 3828.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is more volatile compared to 3828.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.
1925.HK vs 2177.HK Comparison
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 522.5M. In comparison, 2177.HK has a market cap of 514.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.29, while 2177.HK trades at HK$2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.03, whereas 2177.HK's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 2177.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is less volatile compared to 2177.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.
1925.HK vs 3332.HK Comparison
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 522.5M. In comparison, 3332.HK has a market cap of 440M. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.29, while 3332.HK trades at HK$0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.03, whereas 3332.HK's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 3332.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is more volatile compared to 3332.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.
1925.HK vs 2023.HK Comparison
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 522.5M. In comparison, 2023.HK has a market cap of 418M. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.29, while 2023.HK trades at HK$0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.03, whereas 2023.HK's P/E ratio is 7.73. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 2023.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is less volatile compared to 2023.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.
1925.HK vs 0399.HK Comparison
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 522.5M. In comparison, 0399.HK has a market cap of 380.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.29, while 0399.HK trades at HK$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.03, whereas 0399.HK's P/E ratio is -20.60. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0399.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is less volatile compared to 0399.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.
1925.HK vs 1962.HK Comparison
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 522.5M. In comparison, 1962.HK has a market cap of 318.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.29, while 1962.HK trades at HK$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.03, whereas 1962.HK's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 1962.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is less volatile compared to 1962.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.
1925.HK vs 0464.HK Comparison
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 522.5M. In comparison, 0464.HK has a market cap of 316.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.29, while 0464.HK trades at HK$0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.03, whereas 0464.HK's P/E ratio is -9.90. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0464.HK's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is less volatile compared to 0464.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.
1925.HK vs 1455.HK Comparison
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 522.5M. In comparison, 1455.HK has a market cap of 315.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.29, while 1455.HK trades at HK$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.03, whereas 1455.HK's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 1455.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is more volatile compared to 1455.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.
1925.HK vs 8512.HK Comparison
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 522.5M. In comparison, 8512.HK has a market cap of 280.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.29, while 8512.HK trades at HK$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.03, whereas 8512.HK's P/E ratio is 1.69. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 8512.HK's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is more volatile compared to 8512.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.
1925.HK vs 2593.HK Comparison
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 522.5M. In comparison, 2593.HK has a market cap of 249.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.29, while 2593.HK trades at HK$1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.03, whereas 2593.HK's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 2593.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is less volatile compared to 2593.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.
1925.HK vs 6893.HK Comparison
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 522.5M. In comparison, 6893.HK has a market cap of 194.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.29, while 6893.HK trades at HK$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.03, whereas 6893.HK's P/E ratio is -4.45. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 6893.HK's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is less volatile compared to 6893.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.
1925.HK vs 1338.HK Comparison
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 522.5M. In comparison, 1338.HK has a market cap of 164.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.29, while 1338.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.03, whereas 1338.HK's P/E ratio is 11.01. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 1338.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is less volatile compared to 1338.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.
1925.HK vs 0943.HK Comparison
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 522.5M. In comparison, 0943.HK has a market cap of 128.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.29, while 0943.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.03, whereas 0943.HK's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0943.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is more volatile compared to 0943.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.
1925.HK vs 1323.HK Comparison
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 522.5M. In comparison, 1323.HK has a market cap of 127M. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.29, while 1323.HK trades at HK$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.03, whereas 1323.HK's P/E ratio is -1.87. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 1323.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is less volatile compared to 1323.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.
1925.HK vs 1667.HK Comparison
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 522.5M. In comparison, 1667.HK has a market cap of 124.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.29, while 1667.HK trades at HK$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.03, whereas 1667.HK's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 1667.HK's ROE of -6.56%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is more volatile compared to 1667.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.
1925.HK vs 8436.HK Comparison
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 522.5M. In comparison, 8436.HK has a market cap of 88M. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.29, while 8436.HK trades at HK$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.03, whereas 8436.HK's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 8436.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is more volatile compared to 8436.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.
1925.HK vs 8281.HK Comparison
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 522.5M. In comparison, 8281.HK has a market cap of 61M. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.29, while 8281.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.03, whereas 8281.HK's P/E ratio is 6.10. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 8281.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is more volatile compared to 8281.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.
1925.HK vs 8176.HK Comparison
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 522.5M. In comparison, 8176.HK has a market cap of 60.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.29, while 8176.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.03, whereas 8176.HK's P/E ratio is -4.65. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 8176.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is more volatile compared to 8176.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.
1925.HK vs 1173.HK Comparison
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 522.5M. In comparison, 1173.HK has a market cap of 57.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.29, while 1173.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.03, whereas 1173.HK's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 1173.HK's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is more volatile compared to 1173.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.
1925.HK vs 8451.HK Comparison
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 522.5M. In comparison, 8451.HK has a market cap of 55.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.29, while 8451.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.03, whereas 8451.HK's P/E ratio is 6.90. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 8451.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is more volatile compared to 8451.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.
1925.HK vs 1259.HK Comparison
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 522.5M. In comparison, 1259.HK has a market cap of 50.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.29, while 1259.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.03, whereas 1259.HK's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 1259.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is less volatile compared to 1259.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.
1925.HK vs 8200.HK Comparison
1925.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1925.HK stands at 522.5M. In comparison, 8200.HK has a market cap of 37.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1925.HK is priced at HK$1.29, while 8200.HK trades at HK$0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1925.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.03, whereas 8200.HK's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, 1925.HK's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 8200.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1925.HK is more volatile compared to 8200.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1925.HK.