Prada S.p.A.
Prada S.p.A. 1913.HK Peers
See (1913.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Luxury Goods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1913.HK | $54.60 | +4.20% | 139.71B | 19.02 | $2.87 | +2.62% |
| 6181.HK | $684.00 | +2.55% | 111.45B | 64.90 | $10.54 | N/A |
| 1929.HK | $10.78 | +3.45% | 107.67B | 23.96 | $0.45 | +4.64% |
| 0590.HK | $17.62 | +0.92% | 10.34B | 8.23 | $2.14 | +6.75% |
| 0116.HK | $7.54 | +1.07% | 5.07B | 6.61 | $1.14 | +7.29% |
| 0113.HK | $6.85 | +0.15% | 2.64B | 10.22 | $0.67 | +6.57% |
| 0256.HK | $0.49 | -1.02% | 2.11B | -8.08 | -$0.06 | N/A |
| 0887.HK | $0.27 | +9.31% | 1.96B | 6.75 | $0.04 | +2.41% |
| 1815.HK | $1.56 | +4.00% | 1.93B | 78.00 | $0.02 | N/A |
| 0398.HK | $3.56 | -0.28% | 1.73B | 7.42 | $0.48 | +6.91% |
Stock Comparison
1913.HK vs 6181.HK Comparison
1913.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1913.HK stands at 139.71B. In comparison, 6181.HK has a market cap of 111.45B. Regarding current trading prices, 1913.HK is priced at $54.60, while 6181.HK trades at $684.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1913.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.02, whereas 6181.HK's P/E ratio is 64.90. In terms of profitability, 1913.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6181.HK's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 1913.HK is less volatile compared to 6181.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1913.HK.
1913.HK vs 1929.HK Comparison
1913.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1913.HK stands at 139.71B. In comparison, 1929.HK has a market cap of 107.67B. Regarding current trading prices, 1913.HK is priced at $54.60, while 1929.HK trades at $10.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1913.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.02, whereas 1929.HK's P/E ratio is 23.96. In terms of profitability, 1913.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1929.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1913.HK is more volatile compared to 1929.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1913.HK.
1913.HK vs 0590.HK Comparison
1913.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1913.HK stands at 139.71B. In comparison, 0590.HK has a market cap of 10.34B. Regarding current trading prices, 1913.HK is priced at $54.60, while 0590.HK trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1913.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.02, whereas 0590.HK's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, 1913.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0590.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1913.HK is more volatile compared to 0590.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1913.HK.
1913.HK vs 0116.HK Comparison
1913.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1913.HK stands at 139.71B. In comparison, 0116.HK has a market cap of 5.07B. Regarding current trading prices, 1913.HK is priced at $54.60, while 0116.HK trades at $7.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1913.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.02, whereas 0116.HK's P/E ratio is 6.61. In terms of profitability, 1913.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0116.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1913.HK is more volatile compared to 0116.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1913.HK.
1913.HK vs 0113.HK Comparison
1913.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1913.HK stands at 139.71B. In comparison, 0113.HK has a market cap of 2.64B. Regarding current trading prices, 1913.HK is priced at $54.60, while 0113.HK trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1913.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.02, whereas 0113.HK's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, 1913.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0113.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1913.HK is more volatile compared to 0113.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1913.HK.
1913.HK vs 0256.HK Comparison
1913.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1913.HK stands at 139.71B. In comparison, 0256.HK has a market cap of 2.11B. Regarding current trading prices, 1913.HK is priced at $54.60, while 0256.HK trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1913.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.02, whereas 0256.HK's P/E ratio is -8.08. In terms of profitability, 1913.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0256.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1913.HK is more volatile compared to 0256.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1913.HK.
1913.HK vs 0887.HK Comparison
1913.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1913.HK stands at 139.71B. In comparison, 0887.HK has a market cap of 1.96B. Regarding current trading prices, 1913.HK is priced at $54.60, while 0887.HK trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1913.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.02, whereas 0887.HK's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, 1913.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0887.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1913.HK is less volatile compared to 0887.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1913.HK.
1913.HK vs 1815.HK Comparison
1913.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1913.HK stands at 139.71B. In comparison, 1815.HK has a market cap of 1.93B. Regarding current trading prices, 1913.HK is priced at $54.60, while 1815.HK trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1913.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.02, whereas 1815.HK's P/E ratio is 78.00. In terms of profitability, 1913.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1815.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1913.HK is less volatile compared to 1815.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1913.HK.
1913.HK vs 0398.HK Comparison
1913.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1913.HK stands at 139.71B. In comparison, 0398.HK has a market cap of 1.73B. Regarding current trading prices, 1913.HK is priced at $54.60, while 0398.HK trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1913.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.02, whereas 0398.HK's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, 1913.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0398.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1913.HK is more volatile compared to 0398.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1913.HK.
1913.HK vs 0860.HK Comparison
1913.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1913.HK stands at 139.71B. In comparison, 0860.HK has a market cap of 920.20M. Regarding current trading prices, 1913.HK is priced at $54.60, while 0860.HK trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1913.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.02, whereas 0860.HK's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, 1913.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0860.HK's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, 1913.HK is more volatile compared to 0860.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1913.HK.
1913.HK vs 1466.HK Comparison
1913.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1913.HK stands at 139.71B. In comparison, 1466.HK has a market cap of 525.23M. Regarding current trading prices, 1913.HK is priced at $54.60, while 1466.HK trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1913.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.02, whereas 1466.HK's P/E ratio is -34.00. In terms of profitability, 1913.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1466.HK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1913.HK is more volatile compared to 1466.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1913.HK.
1913.HK vs 1856.HK Comparison
1913.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1913.HK stands at 139.71B. In comparison, 1856.HK has a market cap of 507.96M. Regarding current trading prices, 1913.HK is priced at $54.60, while 1856.HK trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1913.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.02, whereas 1856.HK's P/E ratio is -10.07. In terms of profitability, 1913.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1856.HK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 1913.HK is less volatile compared to 1856.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1913.HK.
1913.HK vs 0789.HK Comparison
1913.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1913.HK stands at 139.71B. In comparison, 0789.HK has a market cap of 489.87M. Regarding current trading prices, 1913.HK is priced at $54.60, while 0789.HK trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1913.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.02, whereas 0789.HK's P/E ratio is 37.00. In terms of profitability, 1913.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0789.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1913.HK is more volatile compared to 0789.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1913.HK.
1913.HK vs 3389.HK Comparison
1913.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1913.HK stands at 139.71B. In comparison, 3389.HK has a market cap of 413.98M. Regarding current trading prices, 1913.HK is priced at $54.60, while 3389.HK trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1913.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.02, whereas 3389.HK's P/E ratio is -4.70. In terms of profitability, 1913.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3389.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1913.HK is more volatile compared to 3389.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1913.HK.
1913.HK vs 0213.HK Comparison
1913.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1913.HK stands at 139.71B. In comparison, 0213.HK has a market cap of 343.25M. Regarding current trading prices, 1913.HK is priced at $54.60, while 0213.HK trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1913.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.02, whereas 0213.HK's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, 1913.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0213.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1913.HK is more volatile compared to 0213.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1913.HK.
1913.HK vs 0280.HK Comparison
1913.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1913.HK stands at 139.71B. In comparison, 0280.HK has a market cap of 322.80M. Regarding current trading prices, 1913.HK is priced at $54.60, while 0280.HK trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1913.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.02, whereas 0280.HK's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, 1913.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0280.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1913.HK is more volatile compared to 0280.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1913.HK.
1913.HK vs 8026.HK Comparison
1913.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1913.HK stands at 139.71B. In comparison, 8026.HK has a market cap of 318.87M. Regarding current trading prices, 1913.HK is priced at $54.60, while 8026.HK trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1913.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.02, whereas 8026.HK's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, 1913.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8026.HK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1913.HK is more volatile compared to 8026.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1913.HK.
1913.HK vs 3326.HK Comparison
1913.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1913.HK stands at 139.71B. In comparison, 3326.HK has a market cap of 203.11M. Regarding current trading prices, 1913.HK is priced at $54.60, while 3326.HK trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1913.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.02, whereas 3326.HK's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, 1913.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3326.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1913.HK is more volatile compared to 3326.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1913.HK.
1913.HK vs 0986.HK Comparison
1913.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1913.HK stands at 139.71B. In comparison, 0986.HK has a market cap of 179.96M. Regarding current trading prices, 1913.HK is priced at $54.60, while 0986.HK trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1913.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.02, whereas 0986.HK's P/E ratio is -13.90. In terms of profitability, 1913.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0986.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1913.HK is less volatile compared to 0986.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1913.HK.
1913.HK vs 6838.HK Comparison
1913.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1913.HK stands at 139.71B. In comparison, 6838.HK has a market cap of 159.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 1913.HK is priced at $54.60, while 6838.HK trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1913.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.02, whereas 6838.HK's P/E ratio is -8.83. In terms of profitability, 1913.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6838.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1913.HK is more volatile compared to 6838.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1913.HK.
1913.HK vs 0417.HK Comparison
1913.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1913.HK stands at 139.71B. In comparison, 0417.HK has a market cap of 154.49M. Regarding current trading prices, 1913.HK is priced at $54.60, while 0417.HK trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1913.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.02, whereas 0417.HK's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, 1913.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0417.HK's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, 1913.HK is less volatile compared to 0417.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1913.HK.
1913.HK vs 0442.HK Comparison
1913.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1913.HK stands at 139.71B. In comparison, 0442.HK has a market cap of 134.71M. Regarding current trading prices, 1913.HK is priced at $54.60, while 0442.HK trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1913.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.02, whereas 0442.HK's P/E ratio is -11.14. In terms of profitability, 1913.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0442.HK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1913.HK is more volatile compared to 0442.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1913.HK.
1913.HK vs 2882.HK Comparison
1913.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1913.HK stands at 139.71B. In comparison, 2882.HK has a market cap of 130.79M. Regarding current trading prices, 1913.HK is priced at $54.60, while 2882.HK trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1913.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.02, whereas 2882.HK's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, 1913.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2882.HK's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 1913.HK is more volatile compared to 2882.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1913.HK.
1913.HK vs 1150.HK Comparison
1913.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1913.HK stands at 139.71B. In comparison, 1150.HK has a market cap of 100.41M. Regarding current trading prices, 1913.HK is priced at $54.60, while 1150.HK trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1913.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.02, whereas 1150.HK's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, 1913.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1150.HK's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, 1913.HK is more volatile compared to 1150.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1913.HK.
1913.HK vs 0513.HK Comparison
1913.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1913.HK stands at 139.71B. In comparison, 0513.HK has a market cap of 99.74M. Regarding current trading prices, 1913.HK is priced at $54.60, while 0513.HK trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1913.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.02, whereas 0513.HK's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, 1913.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0513.HK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1913.HK is more volatile compared to 0513.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1913.HK.
1913.HK vs 0125.HK Comparison
1913.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1913.HK stands at 139.71B. In comparison, 0125.HK has a market cap of 94.60M. Regarding current trading prices, 1913.HK is priced at $54.60, while 0125.HK trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1913.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.02, whereas 0125.HK's P/E ratio is -2.57. In terms of profitability, 1913.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0125.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1913.HK is more volatile compared to 0125.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1913.HK.
1913.HK vs 0084.HK Comparison
1913.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1913.HK stands at 139.71B. In comparison, 0084.HK has a market cap of 90.21M. Regarding current trading prices, 1913.HK is priced at $54.60, while 0084.HK trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1913.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.02, whereas 0084.HK's P/E ratio is 0.20. In terms of profitability, 1913.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0084.HK's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 1913.HK is less volatile compared to 0084.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1913.HK.
1913.HK vs 0444.HK Comparison
1913.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1913.HK stands at 139.71B. In comparison, 0444.HK has a market cap of 60.44M. Regarding current trading prices, 1913.HK is priced at $54.60, while 0444.HK trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1913.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.02, whereas 0444.HK's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, 1913.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0444.HK's ROE of +52.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 1913.HK is more volatile compared to 0444.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1913.HK.
1913.HK vs 8537.HK Comparison
1913.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1913.HK stands at 139.71B. In comparison, 8537.HK has a market cap of 41.40M. Regarding current trading prices, 1913.HK is priced at $54.60, while 8537.HK trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1913.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.02, whereas 8537.HK's P/E ratio is 0.92. In terms of profitability, 1913.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8537.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1913.HK is more volatile compared to 8537.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1913.HK.
1913.HK vs 1327.HK Comparison
1913.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1913.HK stands at 139.71B. In comparison, 1327.HK has a market cap of 38.82M. Regarding current trading prices, 1913.HK is priced at $54.60, while 1327.HK trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1913.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.02, whereas 1327.HK's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, 1913.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1327.HK's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, 1913.HK is more volatile compared to 1327.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1913.HK.
1913.HK vs 8219.HK Comparison
1913.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1913.HK stands at 139.71B. In comparison, 8219.HK has a market cap of 37.62M. Regarding current trading prices, 1913.HK is priced at $54.60, while 8219.HK trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1913.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.02, whereas 8219.HK's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, 1913.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8219.HK's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 1913.HK is more volatile compared to 8219.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1913.HK.
1913.HK vs 1470.HK Comparison
1913.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1913.HK stands at 139.71B. In comparison, 1470.HK has a market cap of 36.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 1913.HK is priced at $54.60, while 1470.HK trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1913.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.02, whereas 1470.HK's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, 1913.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1470.HK's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 1913.HK is less volatile compared to 1470.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1913.HK.