Hang Yick Holdings Company Limited
Hang Yick Holdings Company Limited (1894.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (1894.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Steel Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1894.HK | HK$0.03 | -3.33% | 26.7M | -0.97 | -HK$0.03 | N/A |
| 0347.HK | HK$2.38 | +7.69% | 26.3B | -3.14 | -HK$0.70 | N/A |
| 0323.HK | HK$2.68 | +22.37% | 26B | -3.95 | -HK$0.64 | N/A |
| 1053.HK | HK$1.48 | +2.78% | 14.7B | -4.11 | -HK$0.36 | N/A |
| 0990.HK | HK$0.88 | +2.33% | 12.7B | 44.50 | HK$0.02 | N/A |
| 0581.HK | HK$1.93 | +7.22% | 6.6B | 44.50 | HK$0.04 | +0.54% |
| 0826.HK | HK$2.02 | +0.50% | 5.5B | 14.36 | HK$0.14 | +2.53% |
| 3788.HK | HK$2.52 | +5.44% | 4.9B | 24.90 | HK$0.10 | +1.61% |
| 0103.HK | HK$0.58 | +0.00% | 1.6B | 29.00 | HK$0.02 | +2.95% |
| 0217.HK | HK$0.23 | -2.15% | 1.4B | 22.70 | HK$0.01 | +0.88% |
Stock Comparison
1894.HK vs 0347.HK Comparison August 2025
1894.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1894.HK stands at 26.7M. In comparison, 0347.HK has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1894.HK is priced at HK$0.03, while 0347.HK trades at HK$2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1894.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.97, whereas 0347.HK's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, 1894.HK's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 0347.HK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1894.HK is less volatile compared to 0347.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1894.HK.Check 0347.HK's competition here
1894.HK vs 0323.HK Comparison August 2025
1894.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1894.HK stands at 26.7M. In comparison, 0323.HK has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, 1894.HK is priced at HK$0.03, while 0323.HK trades at HK$2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1894.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.97, whereas 0323.HK's P/E ratio is -3.95. In terms of profitability, 1894.HK's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 0323.HK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1894.HK is less volatile compared to 0323.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1894.HK.Check 0323.HK's competition here
1894.HK vs 1053.HK Comparison August 2025
1894.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1894.HK stands at 26.7M. In comparison, 1053.HK has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1894.HK is priced at HK$0.03, while 1053.HK trades at HK$1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1894.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.97, whereas 1053.HK's P/E ratio is -4.11. In terms of profitability, 1894.HK's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 1053.HK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1894.HK is less volatile compared to 1053.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1894.HK.Check 1053.HK's competition here
1894.HK vs 0990.HK Comparison August 2025
1894.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1894.HK stands at 26.7M. In comparison, 0990.HK has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1894.HK is priced at HK$0.03, while 0990.HK trades at HK$0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1894.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.97, whereas 0990.HK's P/E ratio is 44.50. In terms of profitability, 1894.HK's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 0990.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1894.HK is less volatile compared to 0990.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1894.HK.Check 0990.HK's competition here
1894.HK vs 0581.HK Comparison August 2025
1894.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1894.HK stands at 26.7M. In comparison, 0581.HK has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1894.HK is priced at HK$0.03, while 0581.HK trades at HK$1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1894.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.97, whereas 0581.HK's P/E ratio is 44.50. In terms of profitability, 1894.HK's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 0581.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1894.HK is less volatile compared to 0581.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1894.HK.Check 0581.HK's competition here
1894.HK vs 0826.HK Comparison August 2025
1894.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1894.HK stands at 26.7M. In comparison, 0826.HK has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1894.HK is priced at HK$0.03, while 0826.HK trades at HK$2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1894.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.97, whereas 0826.HK's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, 1894.HK's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 0826.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1894.HK is less volatile compared to 0826.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1894.HK.Check 0826.HK's competition here
1894.HK vs 3788.HK Comparison August 2025
1894.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1894.HK stands at 26.7M. In comparison, 3788.HK has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1894.HK is priced at HK$0.03, while 3788.HK trades at HK$2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1894.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.97, whereas 3788.HK's P/E ratio is 24.90. In terms of profitability, 1894.HK's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 3788.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1894.HK is less volatile compared to 3788.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1894.HK.Check 3788.HK's competition here
1894.HK vs 0103.HK Comparison August 2025
1894.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1894.HK stands at 26.7M. In comparison, 0103.HK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1894.HK is priced at HK$0.03, while 0103.HK trades at HK$0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1894.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.97, whereas 0103.HK's P/E ratio is 29.00. In terms of profitability, 1894.HK's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 0103.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1894.HK is less volatile compared to 0103.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1894.HK.Check 0103.HK's competition here
1894.HK vs 0217.HK Comparison August 2025
1894.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1894.HK stands at 26.7M. In comparison, 0217.HK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1894.HK is priced at HK$0.03, while 0217.HK trades at HK$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1894.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.97, whereas 0217.HK's P/E ratio is 22.70. In terms of profitability, 1894.HK's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 0217.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1894.HK is less volatile compared to 0217.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1894.HK.Check 0217.HK's competition here
1894.HK vs 1090.HK Comparison August 2025
1894.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1894.HK stands at 26.7M. In comparison, 1090.HK has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1894.HK is priced at HK$0.03, while 1090.HK trades at HK$0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1894.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.97, whereas 1090.HK's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, 1894.HK's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 1090.HK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1894.HK is less volatile compared to 1090.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1894.HK.Check 1090.HK's competition here
1894.HK vs 1231.HK Comparison August 2025
1894.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1894.HK stands at 26.7M. In comparison, 1231.HK has a market cap of 896M. Regarding current trading prices, 1894.HK is priced at HK$0.03, while 1231.HK trades at HK$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1894.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.97, whereas 1231.HK's P/E ratio is 47.79. In terms of profitability, 1894.HK's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 1231.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1894.HK is less volatile compared to 1231.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1894.HK.Check 1231.HK's competition here
1894.HK vs 1203.HK Comparison August 2025
1894.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1894.HK stands at 26.7M. In comparison, 1203.HK has a market cap of 825.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1894.HK is priced at HK$0.03, while 1203.HK trades at HK$0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1894.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.97, whereas 1203.HK's P/E ratio is 5.69. In terms of profitability, 1894.HK's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 1203.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1894.HK is less volatile compared to 1203.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1894.HK.Check 1203.HK's competition here
1894.HK vs 1116.HK Comparison August 2025
1894.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1894.HK stands at 26.7M. In comparison, 1116.HK has a market cap of 679.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1894.HK is priced at HK$0.03, while 1116.HK trades at HK$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1894.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.97, whereas 1116.HK's P/E ratio is -31.50. In terms of profitability, 1894.HK's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 1116.HK's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 1894.HK is less volatile compared to 1116.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1894.HK.Check 1116.HK's competition here
1894.HK vs 1553.HK Comparison August 2025
1894.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1894.HK stands at 26.7M. In comparison, 1553.HK has a market cap of 607.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1894.HK is priced at HK$0.03, while 1553.HK trades at HK$1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1894.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.97, whereas 1553.HK's P/E ratio is 3.89. In terms of profitability, 1894.HK's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 1553.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1894.HK is less volatile compared to 1553.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1894.HK.Check 1553.HK's competition here
1894.HK vs 1118.HK Comparison August 2025
1894.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1894.HK stands at 26.7M. In comparison, 1118.HK has a market cap of 585.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1894.HK is priced at HK$0.03, while 1118.HK trades at HK$1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1894.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.97, whereas 1118.HK's P/E ratio is 3.78. In terms of profitability, 1894.HK's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 1118.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1894.HK and 1118.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 1118.HK's competition here
1894.HK vs 1938.HK Comparison August 2025
1894.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1894.HK stands at 26.7M. In comparison, 1938.HK has a market cap of 394.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1894.HK is priced at HK$0.03, while 1938.HK trades at HK$0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1894.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.97, whereas 1938.HK's P/E ratio is 1.70. In terms of profitability, 1894.HK's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 1938.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1894.HK is less volatile compared to 1938.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1894.HK.Check 1938.HK's competition here
1894.HK vs 6890.HK Comparison August 2025
1894.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1894.HK stands at 26.7M. In comparison, 6890.HK has a market cap of 272.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1894.HK is priced at HK$0.03, while 6890.HK trades at HK$0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1894.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.97, whereas 6890.HK's P/E ratio is 2.81. In terms of profitability, 1894.HK's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 6890.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1894.HK is less volatile compared to 6890.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1894.HK.Check 6890.HK's competition here
1894.HK vs 2459.HK Comparison August 2025
1894.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1894.HK stands at 26.7M. In comparison, 2459.HK has a market cap of 232.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1894.HK is priced at HK$0.03, while 2459.HK trades at HK$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1894.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.97, whereas 2459.HK's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, 1894.HK's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 2459.HK's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 1894.HK is less volatile compared to 2459.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1894.HK.Check 2459.HK's competition here
1894.HK vs 2738.HK Comparison August 2025
1894.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1894.HK stands at 26.7M. In comparison, 2738.HK has a market cap of 201M. Regarding current trading prices, 1894.HK is priced at HK$0.03, while 2738.HK trades at HK$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1894.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.97, whereas 2738.HK's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, 1894.HK's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 2738.HK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1894.HK is less volatile compared to 2738.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1894.HK.Check 2738.HK's competition here
1894.HK vs 0893.HK Comparison August 2025
1894.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1894.HK stands at 26.7M. In comparison, 0893.HK has a market cap of 179.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1894.HK is priced at HK$0.03, while 0893.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1894.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.97, whereas 0893.HK's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, 1894.HK's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 0893.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1894.HK is less volatile compared to 0893.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1894.HK.Check 0893.HK's competition here
1894.HK vs 8140.HK Comparison August 2025
1894.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1894.HK stands at 26.7M. In comparison, 8140.HK has a market cap of 108.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1894.HK is priced at HK$0.03, while 8140.HK trades at HK$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1894.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.97, whereas 8140.HK's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, 1894.HK's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 8140.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1894.HK is less volatile compared to 8140.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1894.HK.Check 8140.HK's competition here
1894.HK vs 2112.HK Comparison August 2025
1894.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1894.HK stands at 26.7M. In comparison, 2112.HK has a market cap of 91.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1894.HK is priced at HK$0.03, while 2112.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1894.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.97, whereas 2112.HK's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, 1894.HK's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 2112.HK's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 1894.HK is less volatile compared to 2112.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1894.HK.Check 2112.HK's competition here
1894.HK vs 8402.HK Comparison August 2025
1894.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1894.HK stands at 26.7M. In comparison, 8402.HK has a market cap of 61.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1894.HK is priced at HK$0.03, while 8402.HK trades at HK$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1894.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.97, whereas 8402.HK's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, 1894.HK's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 8402.HK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1894.HK is less volatile compared to 8402.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1894.HK.Check 8402.HK's competition here
1894.HK vs 1266.HK Comparison August 2025
1894.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1894.HK stands at 26.7M. In comparison, 1266.HK has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1894.HK is priced at HK$0.03, while 1266.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1894.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.97, whereas 1266.HK's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, 1894.HK's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 1266.HK's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 1894.HK is less volatile compared to 1266.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1894.HK.Check 1266.HK's competition here
1894.HK vs 0803.HK Comparison August 2025
1894.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1894.HK stands at 26.7M. In comparison, 0803.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1894.HK is priced at HK$0.03, while 0803.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1894.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.97, whereas 0803.HK's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, 1894.HK's ROE is -0.13%, compared to 0803.HK's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, 1894.HK is less volatile compared to 0803.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1894.HK.Check 0803.HK's competition here