Miricor Enterprises Holdings Limited (1827.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

1827.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1827.HK stands at 364M. In comparison, 8603.HK has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1827.HK is priced at HK$0.91, while 8603.HK trades at HK$11.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1827.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 30.33, whereas 8603.HK's P/E ratio is 157.14. In terms of profitability, 1827.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8603.HK's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, 1827.HK is less volatile compared to 8603.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1827.HK.Check 8603.HK's competition here

1827.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1827.HK stands at 364M. In comparison, 1448.HK has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1827.HK is priced at HK$0.91, while 1448.HK trades at HK$2.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1827.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 30.33, whereas 1448.HK's P/E ratio is -26.40. In terms of profitability, 1827.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1448.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1827.HK is less volatile compared to 1448.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1827.HK.Check 1448.HK's competition here

1827.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1827.HK stands at 364M. In comparison, 2521.HK has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1827.HK is priced at HK$0.91, while 2521.HK trades at HK$0.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1827.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 30.33, whereas 2521.HK's P/E ratio is 47.00. In terms of profitability, 1827.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2521.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1827.HK is less volatile compared to 2521.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1827.HK.Check 2521.HK's competition here

1827.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1827.HK stands at 364M. In comparison, 1830.HK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1827.HK is priced at HK$0.91, while 1830.HK trades at HK$1.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1827.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 30.33, whereas 1830.HK's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, 1827.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1830.HK's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 1827.HK is less volatile compared to 1830.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1827.HK.Check 1830.HK's competition here

1827.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1827.HK stands at 364M. In comparison, 1027.HK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1827.HK is priced at HK$0.91, while 1027.HK trades at HK$2.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1827.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 30.33, whereas 1027.HK's P/E ratio is -95.33. In terms of profitability, 1827.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1027.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1827.HK and 1027.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 1027.HK's competition here

1827.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1827.HK stands at 364M. In comparison, 1161.HK has a market cap of 803.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1827.HK is priced at HK$0.91, while 1161.HK trades at HK$1.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1827.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 30.33, whereas 1161.HK's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, 1827.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1161.HK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 1827.HK is less volatile compared to 1161.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1827.HK.Check 1161.HK's competition here

1827.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1827.HK stands at 364M. In comparison, 6966.HK has a market cap of 475M. Regarding current trading prices, 1827.HK is priced at HK$0.91, while 6966.HK trades at HK$0.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1827.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 30.33, whereas 6966.HK's P/E ratio is -47.50. In terms of profitability, 1827.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 6966.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1827.HK is less volatile compared to 6966.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1827.HK.Check 6966.HK's competition here

1827.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1827.HK stands at 364M. In comparison, 3997.HK has a market cap of 378.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1827.HK is priced at HK$0.91, while 3997.HK trades at HK$2.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1827.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 30.33, whereas 3997.HK's P/E ratio is -24.58. In terms of profitability, 1827.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 3997.HK's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 1827.HK is less volatile compared to 3997.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1827.HK.Check 3997.HK's competition here

1827.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1827.HK stands at 364M. In comparison, 0922.HK has a market cap of 244.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1827.HK is priced at HK$0.91, while 0922.HK trades at HK$0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1827.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 30.33, whereas 0922.HK's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, 1827.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0922.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1827.HK is less volatile compared to 0922.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1827.HK.Check 0922.HK's competition here

1827.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1827.HK stands at 364M. In comparison, 8483.HK has a market cap of 108M. Regarding current trading prices, 1827.HK is priced at HK$0.91, while 8483.HK trades at HK$0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1827.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 30.33, whereas 8483.HK's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, 1827.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8483.HK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 1827.HK is less volatile compared to 8483.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1827.HK.Check 8483.HK's competition here

1827.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1827.HK stands at 364M. In comparison, 0919.HK has a market cap of 86.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1827.HK is priced at HK$0.91, while 0919.HK trades at HK$0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1827.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 30.33, whereas 0919.HK's P/E ratio is 4.80. In terms of profitability, 1827.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0919.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1827.HK and 0919.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0919.HK's competition here

1827.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1827.HK stands at 364M. In comparison, 8296.HK has a market cap of 26.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1827.HK is priced at HK$0.91, while 8296.HK trades at HK$0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1827.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 30.33, whereas 8296.HK's P/E ratio is -3.56. In terms of profitability, 1827.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8296.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1827.HK and 8296.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 8296.HK's competition here

1827.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1827.HK stands at 364M. In comparison, 0079.HK has a market cap of 26.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1827.HK is priced at HK$0.91, while 0079.HK trades at HK$0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1827.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 30.33, whereas 0079.HK's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, 1827.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0079.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1827.HK is less volatile compared to 0079.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1827.HK.Check 0079.HK's competition here