Prinx Chengshan Holdings Limited
Prinx Chengshan Holdings Limited 1809.HK Peers
See (1809.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1809.HK | HK$7.61 | +0.79% | 4.9B | 3.38 | HK$2.25 | +8.54% |
| 3606.HK | HK$56.05 | -1.32% | 158.2B | 16.44 | HK$3.41 | +3.46% |
| 0564.HK | HK$14.86 | -1.33% | 30.6B | 6.09 | HK$2.44 | +8.22% |
| 0666.HK | HK$11.60 | -0.17% | 26.3B | -20.71 | -HK$0.56 | N/A |
| 0425.HK | HK$22.40 | +4.43% | 25.5B | 10.14 | HK$2.21 | +1.94% |
| 0179.HK | HK$21.60 | +6.14% | 19.9B | 9.77 | HK$2.21 | +2.82% |
| 9690.HK | HK$19.36 | -3.10% | 15.9B | 29.33 | HK$0.66 | N/A |
| 1316.HK | HK$5.70 | +4.01% | 14.3B | 28.50 | HK$0.20 | +1.19% |
| 1057.HK | HK$5.40 | +3.45% | 10B | 23.48 | HK$0.23 | +1.20% |
| 0819.HK | HK$6.29 | +0.00% | 7.1B | 5.72 | HK$1.10 | +2.70% |
Stock Comparison
1809.HK vs 3606.HK Comparison
1809.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1809.HK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, 3606.HK has a market cap of 158.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1809.HK is priced at HK$7.61, while 3606.HK trades at HK$56.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1809.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas 3606.HK's P/E ratio is 16.44. In terms of profitability, 1809.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 3606.HK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 1809.HK is less volatile compared to 3606.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1809.HK.
1809.HK vs 0564.HK Comparison
1809.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1809.HK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, 0564.HK has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1809.HK is priced at HK$7.61, while 0564.HK trades at HK$14.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1809.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas 0564.HK's P/E ratio is 6.09. In terms of profitability, 1809.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0564.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1809.HK is less volatile compared to 0564.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1809.HK.
1809.HK vs 0666.HK Comparison
1809.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1809.HK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, 0666.HK has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1809.HK is priced at HK$7.61, while 0666.HK trades at HK$11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1809.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas 0666.HK's P/E ratio is -20.71. In terms of profitability, 1809.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0666.HK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1809.HK is less volatile compared to 0666.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1809.HK.
1809.HK vs 0425.HK Comparison
1809.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1809.HK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, 0425.HK has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1809.HK is priced at HK$7.61, while 0425.HK trades at HK$22.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1809.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas 0425.HK's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, 1809.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0425.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1809.HK is less volatile compared to 0425.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1809.HK.
1809.HK vs 0179.HK Comparison
1809.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1809.HK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, 0179.HK has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1809.HK is priced at HK$7.61, while 0179.HK trades at HK$21.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1809.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas 0179.HK's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, 1809.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0179.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1809.HK is less volatile compared to 0179.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1809.HK.
1809.HK vs 9690.HK Comparison
1809.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1809.HK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, 9690.HK has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1809.HK is priced at HK$7.61, while 9690.HK trades at HK$19.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1809.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas 9690.HK's P/E ratio is 29.33. In terms of profitability, 1809.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 9690.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1809.HK is less volatile compared to 9690.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1809.HK.
1809.HK vs 1316.HK Comparison
1809.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1809.HK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, 1316.HK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1809.HK is priced at HK$7.61, while 1316.HK trades at HK$5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1809.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas 1316.HK's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, 1809.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 1316.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1809.HK is less volatile compared to 1316.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1809.HK.
1809.HK vs 1057.HK Comparison
1809.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1809.HK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, 1057.HK has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, 1809.HK is priced at HK$7.61, while 1057.HK trades at HK$5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1809.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas 1057.HK's P/E ratio is 23.48. In terms of profitability, 1809.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 1057.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1809.HK is less volatile compared to 1057.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1809.HK.
1809.HK vs 0819.HK Comparison
1809.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1809.HK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, 0819.HK has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1809.HK is priced at HK$7.61, while 0819.HK trades at HK$6.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1809.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas 0819.HK's P/E ratio is 5.72. In terms of profitability, 1809.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0819.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1809.HK is more volatile compared to 0819.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1809.HK.
1809.HK vs 2531.HK Comparison
1809.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1809.HK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, 2531.HK has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1809.HK is priced at HK$7.61, while 2531.HK trades at HK$16.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1809.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas 2531.HK's P/E ratio is 121.29. In terms of profitability, 1809.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 2531.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1809.HK is less volatile compared to 2531.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1809.HK.
1809.HK vs 2488.HK Comparison
1809.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1809.HK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, 2488.HK has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1809.HK is priced at HK$7.61, while 2488.HK trades at HK$12.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1809.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas 2488.HK's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, 1809.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 2488.HK's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 1809.HK is less volatile compared to 2488.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1809.HK.
1809.HK vs 1571.HK Comparison
1809.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1809.HK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, 1571.HK has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1809.HK is priced at HK$7.61, while 1571.HK trades at HK$3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1809.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas 1571.HK's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, 1809.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 1571.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 1809.HK is less volatile compared to 1571.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1809.HK.
1809.HK vs 1274.HK Comparison
1809.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1809.HK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, 1274.HK has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1809.HK is priced at HK$7.61, while 1274.HK trades at HK$13.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1809.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas 1274.HK's P/E ratio is -10.06. In terms of profitability, 1809.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 1274.HK's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 1809.HK is less volatile compared to 1274.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1809.HK.
1809.HK vs 2025.HK Comparison
1809.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1809.HK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, 2025.HK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1809.HK is priced at HK$7.61, while 2025.HK trades at HK$4.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1809.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas 2025.HK's P/E ratio is 134.67. In terms of profitability, 1809.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 2025.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1809.HK is less volatile compared to 2025.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1809.HK.
1809.HK vs 1899.HK Comparison
1809.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1809.HK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, 1899.HK has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1809.HK is priced at HK$7.61, while 1899.HK trades at HK$1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1809.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas 1899.HK's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, 1809.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 1899.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1809.HK is less volatile compared to 1899.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1809.HK.
1809.HK vs 1760.HK Comparison
1809.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1809.HK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, 1760.HK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1809.HK is priced at HK$7.61, while 1760.HK trades at HK$1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1809.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas 1760.HK's P/E ratio is 6.90. In terms of profitability, 1809.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 1760.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1809.HK is less volatile compared to 1760.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1809.HK.
1809.HK vs 0305.HK Comparison
1809.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1809.HK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, 0305.HK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1809.HK is priced at HK$7.61, while 0305.HK trades at HK$0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1809.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas 0305.HK's P/E ratio is 23.25. In terms of profitability, 1809.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0305.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1809.HK is less volatile compared to 0305.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1809.HK.
1809.HK vs 0951.HK Comparison
1809.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1809.HK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, 0951.HK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1809.HK is priced at HK$7.61, while 0951.HK trades at HK$1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1809.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas 0951.HK's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, 1809.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0951.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1809.HK is less volatile compared to 0951.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1809.HK.
1809.HK vs 0360.HK Comparison
1809.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1809.HK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, 0360.HK has a market cap of 981.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1809.HK is priced at HK$7.61, while 0360.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1809.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas 0360.HK's P/E ratio is -5.70. In terms of profitability, 1809.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0360.HK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1809.HK is less volatile compared to 0360.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1809.HK.
1809.HK vs 6830.HK Comparison
1809.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1809.HK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, 6830.HK has a market cap of 417.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1809.HK is priced at HK$7.61, while 6830.HK trades at HK$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1809.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas 6830.HK's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, 1809.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 6830.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1809.HK is less volatile compared to 6830.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1809.HK.
1809.HK vs 8418.HK Comparison
1809.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1809.HK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, 8418.HK has a market cap of 369.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1809.HK is priced at HK$7.61, while 8418.HK trades at HK$0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1809.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas 8418.HK's P/E ratio is -43.50. In terms of profitability, 1809.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 8418.HK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 1809.HK is less volatile compared to 8418.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1809.HK.
1809.HK vs 0096.HK Comparison
1809.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1809.HK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, 0096.HK has a market cap of 356.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1809.HK is priced at HK$7.61, while 0096.HK trades at HK$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1809.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas 0096.HK's P/E ratio is 3.73. In terms of profitability, 1809.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0096.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1809.HK is more volatile compared to 0096.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1809.HK.
1809.HK vs 2339.HK Comparison
1809.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1809.HK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, 2339.HK has a market cap of 305.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1809.HK is priced at HK$7.61, while 2339.HK trades at HK$0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1809.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas 2339.HK's P/E ratio is -1.69. In terms of profitability, 1809.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 2339.HK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1809.HK is more volatile compared to 2339.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1809.HK.
1809.HK vs 1148.HK Comparison
1809.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1809.HK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, 1148.HK has a market cap of 256.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1809.HK is priced at HK$7.61, while 1148.HK trades at HK$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1809.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas 1148.HK's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, 1809.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 1148.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1809.HK is less volatile compared to 1148.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1809.HK.
1809.HK vs 1930.HK Comparison
1809.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1809.HK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, 1930.HK has a market cap of 254M. Regarding current trading prices, 1809.HK is priced at HK$7.61, while 1930.HK trades at HK$0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1809.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas 1930.HK's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, 1809.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 1930.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1809.HK is less volatile compared to 1930.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1809.HK.
1809.HK vs 1188.HK Comparison
1809.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1809.HK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, 1188.HK has a market cap of 244.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1809.HK is priced at HK$7.61, while 1188.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1809.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas 1188.HK's P/E ratio is -10.91. In terms of profitability, 1809.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 1188.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1809.HK is less volatile compared to 1188.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1809.HK.
1809.HK vs 6162.HK Comparison
1809.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1809.HK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, 6162.HK has a market cap of 216M. Regarding current trading prices, 1809.HK is priced at HK$7.61, while 6162.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1809.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas 6162.HK's P/E ratio is 51.85. In terms of profitability, 1809.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 6162.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1809.HK is less volatile compared to 6162.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1809.HK.
1809.HK vs 8135.HK Comparison
1809.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1809.HK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, 8135.HK has a market cap of 187.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1809.HK is priced at HK$7.61, while 8135.HK trades at HK$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1809.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas 8135.HK's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, 1809.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 8135.HK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1809.HK is less volatile compared to 8135.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1809.HK.
1809.HK vs 6928.HK Comparison
1809.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1809.HK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, 6928.HK has a market cap of 180M. Regarding current trading prices, 1809.HK is priced at HK$7.61, while 6928.HK trades at HK$0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1809.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas 6928.HK's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, 1809.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 6928.HK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 1809.HK is less volatile compared to 6928.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1809.HK.
1809.HK vs 0872.HK Comparison
1809.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1809.HK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, 0872.HK has a market cap of 123.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1809.HK is priced at HK$7.61, while 0872.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1809.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas 0872.HK's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, 1809.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0872.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1809.HK is less volatile compared to 0872.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1809.HK.
1809.HK vs 1991.HK Comparison
1809.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1809.HK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, 1991.HK has a market cap of 94.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1809.HK is priced at HK$7.61, while 1991.HK trades at HK$0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1809.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas 1991.HK's P/E ratio is -13.20. In terms of profitability, 1809.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 1991.HK's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 1809.HK is less volatile compared to 1991.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1809.HK.
1809.HK vs 1241.HK Comparison
1809.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1809.HK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, 1241.HK has a market cap of 71.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1809.HK is priced at HK$7.61, while 1241.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1809.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas 1241.HK's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, 1809.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 1241.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1809.HK is less volatile compared to 1241.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1809.HK.
1809.HK vs 1269.HK Comparison
1809.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1809.HK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, 1269.HK has a market cap of 66.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1809.HK is priced at HK$7.61, while 1269.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1809.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas 1269.HK's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, 1809.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 1269.HK's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 1809.HK is less volatile compared to 1269.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1809.HK.
1809.HK vs 0479.HK Comparison
1809.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1809.HK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, 0479.HK has a market cap of 52M. Regarding current trading prices, 1809.HK is priced at HK$7.61, while 0479.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1809.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas 0479.HK's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, 1809.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0479.HK's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, 1809.HK is more volatile compared to 0479.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1809.HK.
1809.HK vs 6163.HK Comparison
1809.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1809.HK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, 6163.HK has a market cap of 51.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1809.HK is priced at HK$7.61, while 6163.HK trades at HK$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1809.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas 6163.HK's P/E ratio is -6.20. In terms of profitability, 1809.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 6163.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1809.HK is more volatile compared to 6163.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1809.HK.
1809.HK vs 8283.HK Comparison
1809.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1809.HK stands at 4.9B. In comparison, 8283.HK has a market cap of 36M. Regarding current trading prices, 1809.HK is priced at HK$7.61, while 8283.HK trades at HK$0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1809.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas 8283.HK's P/E ratio is 3.26. In terms of profitability, 1809.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 8283.HK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 1809.HK is less volatile compared to 8283.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1809.HK.