Nakabohtec Corrosion Protecting Co.,Ltd.
Nakabohtec Corrosion Protecting Co.,Ltd. (1787.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (1787.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1787.T | ¥5,130.00 | -0.39% | 12.6B | 12.08 | ¥425.39 | +6.52% |
| 3449.T | ¥7,330.00 | +12.25% | 130.8B | 42.00 | ¥169.78 | +0.97% |
| 5757.T | ¥4,610.00 | -0.43% | 38.2B | 10.71 | ¥431.98 | +1.95% |
| 7637.T | ¥3,460.00 | +4.06% | 37.6B | 17.52 | ¥189.19 | +2.59% |
| 7414.T | ¥1,330.00 | +0.30% | 32.2B | -14.72 | -¥89.51 | +5.24% |
| 5999.T | ¥2,976.00 | +0.00% | 32.1B | 0.00 | ¥479,780,384.00 | N/A |
| 5644.T | ¥7,590.00 | -0.13% | 21.8B | 11.89 | ¥639.16 | +1.97% |
| 5922.T | ¥18,060.00 | -1.47% | 21.3B | 8.57 | ¥2,129.95 | +3.51% |
| 5852.T | ¥695.00 | +7.92% | 17B | 9.08 | ¥75.09 | +6.16% |
| 6319.T | ¥402.00 | +0.00% | 14.8B | 154.02 | ¥2.61 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
1787.T vs 3449.T Comparison May 2026
1787.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1787.T stands at 12.6B. In comparison, 3449.T has a market cap of 130.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1787.T is priced at ¥5,130.00, while 3449.T trades at ¥7,330.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1787.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas 3449.T's P/E ratio is 42.00. In terms of profitability, 1787.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 3449.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1787.T is less volatile compared to 3449.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1787.T.Check 3449.T's competition here
1787.T vs 5757.T Comparison May 2026
1787.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1787.T stands at 12.6B. In comparison, 5757.T has a market cap of 38.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1787.T is priced at ¥5,130.00, while 5757.T trades at ¥4,610.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1787.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas 5757.T's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, 1787.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 5757.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1787.T is less volatile compared to 5757.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1787.T.Check 5757.T's competition here
1787.T vs 7637.T Comparison May 2026
1787.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1787.T stands at 12.6B. In comparison, 7637.T has a market cap of 37.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1787.T is priced at ¥5,130.00, while 7637.T trades at ¥3,460.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1787.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas 7637.T's P/E ratio is 17.52. In terms of profitability, 1787.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 7637.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1787.T is less volatile compared to 7637.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1787.T.Check 7637.T's competition here
1787.T vs 7414.T Comparison May 2026
1787.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1787.T stands at 12.6B. In comparison, 7414.T has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1787.T is priced at ¥5,130.00, while 7414.T trades at ¥1,330.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1787.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas 7414.T's P/E ratio is -14.72. In terms of profitability, 1787.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 7414.T's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1787.T is less volatile compared to 7414.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1787.T.Check 7414.T's competition here
1787.T vs 5999.T Comparison May 2026
1787.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1787.T stands at 12.6B. In comparison, 5999.T has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1787.T is priced at ¥5,130.00, while 5999.T trades at ¥2,976.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1787.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas 5999.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 1787.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 5999.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 1787.T is more volatile compared to 5999.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1787.T.Check 5999.T's competition here
1787.T vs 5644.T Comparison May 2026
1787.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1787.T stands at 12.6B. In comparison, 5644.T has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1787.T is priced at ¥5,130.00, while 5644.T trades at ¥7,590.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1787.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas 5644.T's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, 1787.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 5644.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1787.T and 5644.T have similar daily volatility (0.39).Check 5644.T's competition here
1787.T vs 5922.T Comparison May 2026
1787.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1787.T stands at 12.6B. In comparison, 5922.T has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1787.T is priced at ¥5,130.00, while 5922.T trades at ¥18,060.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1787.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas 5922.T's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, 1787.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 5922.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1787.T is less volatile compared to 5922.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1787.T.Check 5922.T's competition here
1787.T vs 5852.T Comparison May 2026
1787.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1787.T stands at 12.6B. In comparison, 5852.T has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, 1787.T is priced at ¥5,130.00, while 5852.T trades at ¥695.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1787.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas 5852.T's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, 1787.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 5852.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1787.T is less volatile compared to 5852.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1787.T.Check 5852.T's competition here
1787.T vs 6319.T Comparison May 2026
1787.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1787.T stands at 12.6B. In comparison, 6319.T has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1787.T is priced at ¥5,130.00, while 6319.T trades at ¥402.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1787.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas 6319.T's P/E ratio is 154.02. In terms of profitability, 1787.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 6319.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1787.T is more volatile compared to 6319.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1787.T.Check 6319.T's competition here
1787.T vs 3441.T Comparison May 2026
1787.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1787.T stands at 12.6B. In comparison, 3441.T has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1787.T is priced at ¥5,130.00, while 3441.T trades at ¥2,631.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1787.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas 3441.T's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, 1787.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 3441.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1787.T is less volatile compared to 3441.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1787.T.Check 3441.T's competition here
1787.T vs 3435.T Comparison May 2026
1787.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1787.T stands at 12.6B. In comparison, 3435.T has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1787.T is priced at ¥5,130.00, while 3435.T trades at ¥1,360.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1787.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas 3435.T's P/E ratio is 6.61. In terms of profitability, 1787.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 3435.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1787.T is less volatile compared to 3435.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1787.T.Check 3435.T's competition here
1787.T vs 2962.T Comparison May 2026
1787.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1787.T stands at 12.6B. In comparison, 2962.T has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1787.T is priced at ¥5,130.00, while 2962.T trades at ¥1,077.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1787.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas 2962.T's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, 1787.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 2962.T's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 1787.T is less volatile compared to 2962.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1787.T.Check 2962.T's competition here
1787.T vs 6998.T Comparison May 2026
1787.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1787.T stands at 12.6B. In comparison, 6998.T has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1787.T is priced at ¥5,130.00, while 6998.T trades at ¥2,181.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1787.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas 6998.T's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, 1787.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 6998.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1787.T is less volatile compared to 6998.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1787.T.Check 6998.T's competition here
1787.T vs 6433.T Comparison May 2026
1787.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1787.T stands at 12.6B. In comparison, 6433.T has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1787.T is priced at ¥5,130.00, while 6433.T trades at ¥1,520.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1787.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas 6433.T's P/E ratio is -26.70. In terms of profitability, 1787.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 6433.T's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 1787.T is less volatile compared to 6433.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1787.T.Check 6433.T's competition here
1787.T vs 6497.T Comparison May 2026
1787.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1787.T stands at 12.6B. In comparison, 6497.T has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1787.T is priced at ¥5,130.00, while 6497.T trades at ¥1,303.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1787.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas 6497.T's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, 1787.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 6497.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1787.T is less volatile compared to 6497.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1787.T.Check 6497.T's competition here
1787.T vs 3440.T Comparison May 2026
1787.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1787.T stands at 12.6B. In comparison, 3440.T has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1787.T is priced at ¥5,130.00, while 3440.T trades at ¥930.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1787.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas 3440.T's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, 1787.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 3440.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1787.T is less volatile compared to 3440.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1787.T.Check 3440.T's competition here
1787.T vs 5994.T Comparison May 2026
1787.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1787.T stands at 12.6B. In comparison, 5994.T has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1787.T is priced at ¥5,130.00, while 5994.T trades at ¥1,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1787.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas 5994.T's P/E ratio is 2.30. In terms of profitability, 1787.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 5994.T's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1787.T is less volatile compared to 5994.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1787.T.Check 5994.T's competition here
1787.T vs 5603.T Comparison May 2026
1787.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1787.T stands at 12.6B. In comparison, 5603.T has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1787.T is priced at ¥5,130.00, while 5603.T trades at ¥1,235.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1787.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas 5603.T's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, 1787.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 5603.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1787.T is less volatile compared to 5603.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1787.T.Check 5603.T's competition here
1787.T vs 3024.T Comparison May 2026
1787.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1787.T stands at 12.6B. In comparison, 3024.T has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1787.T is priced at ¥5,130.00, while 3024.T trades at ¥1,008.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1787.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas 3024.T's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, 1787.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 3024.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1787.T is less volatile compared to 3024.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1787.T.Check 3024.T's competition here
1787.T vs 5987.T Comparison May 2026
1787.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1787.T stands at 12.6B. In comparison, 5987.T has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1787.T is priced at ¥5,130.00, while 5987.T trades at ¥1,956.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1787.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas 5987.T's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, 1787.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 5987.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1787.T is more volatile compared to 5987.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1787.T.Check 5987.T's competition here
1787.T vs 6138.T Comparison May 2026
1787.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1787.T stands at 12.6B. In comparison, 6138.T has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1787.T is priced at ¥5,130.00, while 6138.T trades at ¥1,146.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1787.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas 6138.T's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, 1787.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 6138.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1787.T is less volatile compared to 6138.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1787.T.Check 6138.T's competition here
1787.T vs 6150.T Comparison May 2026
1787.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1787.T stands at 12.6B. In comparison, 6150.T has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1787.T is priced at ¥5,130.00, while 6150.T trades at ¥3,125.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1787.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas 6150.T's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, 1787.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 6150.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1787.T is less volatile compared to 6150.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1787.T.Check 6150.T's competition here
1787.T vs 5858.T Comparison May 2026
1787.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1787.T stands at 12.6B. In comparison, 5858.T has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1787.T is priced at ¥5,130.00, while 5858.T trades at ¥1,184.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1787.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas 5858.T's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, 1787.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 5858.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1787.T is less volatile compared to 5858.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1787.T.Check 5858.T's competition here
1787.T vs 6362.T Comparison May 2026
1787.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1787.T stands at 12.6B. In comparison, 6362.T has a market cap of 33.3K. Regarding current trading prices, 1787.T is priced at ¥5,130.00, while 6362.T trades at ¥8,330.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1787.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas 6362.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 1787.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 6362.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1787.T is more volatile compared to 6362.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1787.T.Check 6362.T's competition here