Qeeka Home (Cayman) Inc.
Qeeka Home (Cayman) Inc. (1739.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (1739.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Internet Content & Information Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1739.HK | HK$0.19 | -16.59% | 214.6M | -1.59 | -HK$0.12 | +5.76% |
| 0700.HK | HK$550.00 | +0.18% | 5T | 24.55 | HK$22.40 | +0.84% |
| 1024.HK | HK$77.00 | +0.00% | 303.1B | 19.63 | HK$3.80 | N/A |
| 9888.HK | HK$86.10 | +1.77% | 238.3B | 8.61 | HK$9.93 | N/A |
| 1357.HK | HK$11.81 | -2.24% | 53B | 58.00 | HK$0.20 | +1.42% |
| 0772.HK | HK$30.90 | -1.44% | 31.5B | -134.35 | -HK$0.23 | N/A |
| 2518.HK | HK$53.55 | +4.90% | 24.2B | 14.34 | HK$3.56 | +6.56% |
| 9898.HK | HK$76.60 | -0.65% | 19.3B | 6.99 | HK$10.83 | +8.50% |
| 1896.HK | HK$7.99 | +2.57% | 8.8B | 42.78 | HK$0.18 | +4.16% |
| 2390.HK | HK$11.29 | -0.09% | 2.7B | -124.00 | -HK$0.09 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
1739.HK vs 0700.HK Comparison August 2025
1739.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1739.HK stands at 214.6M. In comparison, 0700.HK has a market cap of 5T. Regarding current trading prices, 1739.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 0700.HK trades at HK$550.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1739.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.59, whereas 0700.HK's P/E ratio is 24.55. In terms of profitability, 1739.HK's ROE is -0.14%, compared to 0700.HK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 1739.HK is more volatile compared to 0700.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1739.HK.Check 0700.HK's competition here
1739.HK vs 1024.HK Comparison August 2025
1739.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1739.HK stands at 214.6M. In comparison, 1024.HK has a market cap of 303.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1739.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 1024.HK trades at HK$77.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1739.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.59, whereas 1024.HK's P/E ratio is 19.63. In terms of profitability, 1739.HK's ROE is -0.14%, compared to 1024.HK's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 1739.HK is more volatile compared to 1024.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1739.HK.Check 1024.HK's competition here
1739.HK vs 9888.HK Comparison August 2025
1739.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1739.HK stands at 214.6M. In comparison, 9888.HK has a market cap of 238.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1739.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 9888.HK trades at HK$86.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1739.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.59, whereas 9888.HK's P/E ratio is 8.61. In terms of profitability, 1739.HK's ROE is -0.14%, compared to 9888.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1739.HK is more volatile compared to 9888.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1739.HK.Check 9888.HK's competition here
1739.HK vs 1357.HK Comparison August 2025
1739.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1739.HK stands at 214.6M. In comparison, 1357.HK has a market cap of 53B. Regarding current trading prices, 1739.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 1357.HK trades at HK$11.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1739.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.59, whereas 1357.HK's P/E ratio is 58.00. In terms of profitability, 1739.HK's ROE is -0.14%, compared to 1357.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1739.HK is more volatile compared to 1357.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1739.HK.Check 1357.HK's competition here
1739.HK vs 0772.HK Comparison August 2025
1739.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1739.HK stands at 214.6M. In comparison, 0772.HK has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1739.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 0772.HK trades at HK$30.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1739.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.59, whereas 0772.HK's P/E ratio is -134.35. In terms of profitability, 1739.HK's ROE is -0.14%, compared to 0772.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1739.HK is more volatile compared to 0772.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1739.HK.Check 0772.HK's competition here
1739.HK vs 2518.HK Comparison August 2025
1739.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1739.HK stands at 214.6M. In comparison, 2518.HK has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1739.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 2518.HK trades at HK$53.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1739.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.59, whereas 2518.HK's P/E ratio is 14.34. In terms of profitability, 1739.HK's ROE is -0.14%, compared to 2518.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1739.HK is more volatile compared to 2518.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1739.HK.Check 2518.HK's competition here
1739.HK vs 9898.HK Comparison August 2025
1739.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1739.HK stands at 214.6M. In comparison, 9898.HK has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1739.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 9898.HK trades at HK$76.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1739.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.59, whereas 9898.HK's P/E ratio is 6.99. In terms of profitability, 1739.HK's ROE is -0.14%, compared to 9898.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1739.HK is more volatile compared to 9898.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1739.HK.Check 9898.HK's competition here
1739.HK vs 1896.HK Comparison August 2025
1739.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1739.HK stands at 214.6M. In comparison, 1896.HK has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1739.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 1896.HK trades at HK$7.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1739.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.59, whereas 1896.HK's P/E ratio is 42.78. In terms of profitability, 1739.HK's ROE is -0.14%, compared to 1896.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1739.HK is more volatile compared to 1896.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1739.HK.Check 1896.HK's competition here
1739.HK vs 2390.HK Comparison August 2025
1739.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1739.HK stands at 214.6M. In comparison, 2390.HK has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1739.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 2390.HK trades at HK$11.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1739.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.59, whereas 2390.HK's P/E ratio is -124.00. In terms of profitability, 1739.HK's ROE is -0.14%, compared to 2390.HK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1739.HK is more volatile compared to 2390.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1739.HK.Check 2390.HK's competition here
1739.HK vs 3700.HK Comparison August 2025
1739.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1739.HK stands at 214.6M. In comparison, 3700.HK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1739.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 3700.HK trades at HK$1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1739.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.59, whereas 3700.HK's P/E ratio is 11.64. In terms of profitability, 1739.HK's ROE is -0.14%, compared to 3700.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1739.HK is more volatile compared to 3700.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1739.HK.Check 3700.HK's competition here
1739.HK vs 1980.HK Comparison August 2025
1739.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1739.HK stands at 214.6M. In comparison, 1980.HK has a market cap of 748.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1739.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 1980.HK trades at HK$0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1739.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.59, whereas 1980.HK's P/E ratio is 34.50. In terms of profitability, 1739.HK's ROE is -0.14%, compared to 1980.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1739.HK is more volatile compared to 1980.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1739.HK.Check 1980.HK's competition here
1739.HK vs 2008.HK Comparison August 2025
1739.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1739.HK stands at 214.6M. In comparison, 2008.HK has a market cap of 744.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1739.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 2008.HK trades at HK$1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1739.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.59, whereas 2008.HK's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, 1739.HK's ROE is -0.14%, compared to 2008.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1739.HK is more volatile compared to 2008.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1739.HK.Check 2008.HK's competition here
1739.HK vs 1761.HK Comparison August 2025
1739.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1739.HK stands at 214.6M. In comparison, 1761.HK has a market cap of 440.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1739.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 1761.HK trades at HK$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1739.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.59, whereas 1761.HK's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, 1739.HK's ROE is -0.14%, compared to 1761.HK's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 1739.HK is more volatile compared to 1761.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1739.HK.Check 1761.HK's competition here
1739.HK vs 0543.HK Comparison August 2025
1739.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1739.HK stands at 214.6M. In comparison, 0543.HK has a market cap of 424.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1739.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 0543.HK trades at HK$0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1739.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.59, whereas 0543.HK's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, 1739.HK's ROE is -0.14%, compared to 0543.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1739.HK is more volatile compared to 0543.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1739.HK.Check 0543.HK's competition here
1739.HK vs 0150.HK Comparison August 2025
1739.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1739.HK stands at 214.6M. In comparison, 0150.HK has a market cap of 315.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1739.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 0150.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1739.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.59, whereas 0150.HK's P/E ratio is -15.40. In terms of profitability, 1739.HK's ROE is -0.14%, compared to 0150.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1739.HK is more volatile compared to 0150.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1739.HK.Check 0150.HK's competition here
1739.HK vs 3601.HK Comparison August 2025
1739.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1739.HK stands at 214.6M. In comparison, 3601.HK has a market cap of 269M. Regarding current trading prices, 1739.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 3601.HK trades at HK$1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1739.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.59, whereas 3601.HK's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, 1739.HK's ROE is -0.14%, compared to 3601.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1739.HK is more volatile compared to 3601.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1739.HK.Check 3601.HK's competition here