Qeeka Home (Cayman) Inc.
Qeeka Home (Cayman) Inc. (1739.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (1739.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Internet Content & Information Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1739.HK | HK$0.19 | +0.00% | 212.3M | -1.58 | -HK$0.12 | +5.82% |
| 0700.HK | HK$609.50 | -0.81% | 5.5T | 25.11 | HK$24.27 | +0.74% |
| 1024.HK | HK$79.10 | +0.44% | 340.7B | 19.73 | HK$4.01 | N/A |
| 9888.HK | HK$89.35 | -1.81% | 243B | 8.41 | HK$10.62 | N/A |
| 1357.HK | HK$11.47 | +7.90% | 52.4B | 52.14 | HK$0.22 | +1.43% |
| 0772.HK | HK$41.62 | +0.87% | 42.4B | 297.29 | HK$0.14 | N/A |
| 2518.HK | HK$56.95 | +0.71% | 27B | 17.05 | HK$3.34 | +5.88% |
| 9898.HK | HK$90.00 | -1.75% | 21.5B | 8.17 | HK$11.02 | +7.15% |
| 1896.HK | HK$8.21 | +1.73% | 9.5B | 102.63 | HK$0.08 | +3.90% |
| 2390.HK | HK$13.16 | +4.36% | 3.5B | -146.22 | -HK$0.09 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
1739.HK vs 0700.HK Comparison August 2025
1739.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1739.HK stands at 212.3M. In comparison, 0700.HK has a market cap of 5.5T. Regarding current trading prices, 1739.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 0700.HK trades at HK$609.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1739.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas 0700.HK's P/E ratio is 25.11. In terms of profitability, 1739.HK's ROE is -0.14%, compared to 0700.HK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 1739.HK is more volatile compared to 0700.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1739.HK.Check 0700.HK's competition here
1739.HK vs 1024.HK Comparison August 2025
1739.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1739.HK stands at 212.3M. In comparison, 1024.HK has a market cap of 340.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1739.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 1024.HK trades at HK$79.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1739.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas 1024.HK's P/E ratio is 19.73. In terms of profitability, 1739.HK's ROE is -0.14%, compared to 1024.HK's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 1739.HK is more volatile compared to 1024.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1739.HK.Check 1024.HK's competition here
1739.HK vs 9888.HK Comparison August 2025
1739.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1739.HK stands at 212.3M. In comparison, 9888.HK has a market cap of 243B. Regarding current trading prices, 1739.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 9888.HK trades at HK$89.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1739.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas 9888.HK's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, 1739.HK's ROE is -0.14%, compared to 9888.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1739.HK is more volatile compared to 9888.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1739.HK.Check 9888.HK's competition here
1739.HK vs 1357.HK Comparison August 2025
1739.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1739.HK stands at 212.3M. In comparison, 1357.HK has a market cap of 52.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1739.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 1357.HK trades at HK$11.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1739.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas 1357.HK's P/E ratio is 52.14. In terms of profitability, 1739.HK's ROE is -0.14%, compared to 1357.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1739.HK is less volatile compared to 1357.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1739.HK.Check 1357.HK's competition here
1739.HK vs 0772.HK Comparison August 2025
1739.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1739.HK stands at 212.3M. In comparison, 0772.HK has a market cap of 42.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1739.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 0772.HK trades at HK$41.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1739.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas 0772.HK's P/E ratio is 297.29. In terms of profitability, 1739.HK's ROE is -0.14%, compared to 0772.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1739.HK is more volatile compared to 0772.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1739.HK.Check 0772.HK's competition here
1739.HK vs 2518.HK Comparison August 2025
1739.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1739.HK stands at 212.3M. In comparison, 2518.HK has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, 1739.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 2518.HK trades at HK$56.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1739.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas 2518.HK's P/E ratio is 17.05. In terms of profitability, 1739.HK's ROE is -0.14%, compared to 2518.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1739.HK is more volatile compared to 2518.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1739.HK.Check 2518.HK's competition here
1739.HK vs 9898.HK Comparison August 2025
1739.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1739.HK stands at 212.3M. In comparison, 9898.HK has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1739.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 9898.HK trades at HK$90.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1739.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas 9898.HK's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, 1739.HK's ROE is -0.14%, compared to 9898.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1739.HK is more volatile compared to 9898.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1739.HK.Check 9898.HK's competition here
1739.HK vs 1896.HK Comparison August 2025
1739.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1739.HK stands at 212.3M. In comparison, 1896.HK has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1739.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 1896.HK trades at HK$8.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1739.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas 1896.HK's P/E ratio is 102.63. In terms of profitability, 1739.HK's ROE is -0.14%, compared to 1896.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1739.HK is more volatile compared to 1896.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1739.HK.Check 1896.HK's competition here
1739.HK vs 2390.HK Comparison August 2025
1739.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1739.HK stands at 212.3M. In comparison, 2390.HK has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1739.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 2390.HK trades at HK$13.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1739.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas 2390.HK's P/E ratio is -146.22. In terms of profitability, 1739.HK's ROE is -0.14%, compared to 2390.HK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1739.HK is more volatile compared to 2390.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1739.HK.Check 2390.HK's competition here
1739.HK vs 3700.HK Comparison August 2025
1739.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1739.HK stands at 212.3M. In comparison, 3700.HK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1739.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 3700.HK trades at HK$1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1739.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas 3700.HK's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, 1739.HK's ROE is -0.14%, compared to 3700.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1739.HK is less volatile compared to 3700.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1739.HK.Check 3700.HK's competition here
1739.HK vs 1980.HK Comparison August 2025
1739.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1739.HK stands at 212.3M. In comparison, 1980.HK has a market cap of 754.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1739.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 1980.HK trades at HK$0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1739.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas 1980.HK's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, 1739.HK's ROE is -0.14%, compared to 1980.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1739.HK is more volatile compared to 1980.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1739.HK.Check 1980.HK's competition here
1739.HK vs 2008.HK Comparison August 2025
1739.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1739.HK stands at 212.3M. In comparison, 2008.HK has a market cap of 744.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1739.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 2008.HK trades at HK$1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1739.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas 2008.HK's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, 1739.HK's ROE is -0.14%, compared to 2008.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1739.HK is more volatile compared to 2008.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1739.HK.Check 2008.HK's competition here
1739.HK vs 1761.HK Comparison August 2025
1739.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1739.HK stands at 212.3M. In comparison, 1761.HK has a market cap of 440.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1739.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 1761.HK trades at HK$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1739.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas 1761.HK's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, 1739.HK's ROE is -0.14%, compared to 1761.HK's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 1739.HK is more volatile compared to 1761.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1739.HK.Check 1761.HK's competition here
1739.HK vs 0543.HK Comparison August 2025
1739.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1739.HK stands at 212.3M. In comparison, 0543.HK has a market cap of 413.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1739.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 0543.HK trades at HK$0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1739.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas 0543.HK's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, 1739.HK's ROE is -0.14%, compared to 0543.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1739.HK is more volatile compared to 0543.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1739.HK.Check 0543.HK's competition here
1739.HK vs 0150.HK Comparison August 2025
1739.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1739.HK stands at 212.3M. In comparison, 0150.HK has a market cap of 337.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1739.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 0150.HK trades at HK$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1739.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas 0150.HK's P/E ratio is -16.50. In terms of profitability, 1739.HK's ROE is -0.14%, compared to 0150.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1739.HK is more volatile compared to 0150.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1739.HK.Check 0150.HK's competition here
1739.HK vs 3601.HK Comparison August 2025
1739.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1739.HK stands at 212.3M. In comparison, 3601.HK has a market cap of 290.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1739.HK is priced at HK$0.19, while 3601.HK trades at HK$1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1739.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas 3601.HK's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, 1739.HK's ROE is -0.14%, compared to 3601.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1739.HK is more volatile compared to 3601.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1739.HK.Check 3601.HK's competition here