Tencent Music Entertainment Group
Tencent Music Entertainment Group (1698.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (1698.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Internet Content & Information Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1698.HK | HK$36.54 | +0.05% | 113.1B | 8.87 | HK$4.05 | +2.62% |
| 0700.HK | HK$477.40 | -0.25% | 4.3T | 17.09 | HK$27.73 | +0.95% |
| 80700.HK | HK$415.80 | -0.53% | 3.8T | N/A | N/A | +0.95% |
| 9888.HK | HK$119.80 | -4.69% | 335.6B | 72.96 | HK$1.69 | N/A |
| 89888.HK | HK$104.90 | -4.46% | 292.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 1024.HK | HK$43.06 | -1.33% | 181B | 8.72 | HK$4.85 | +1.09% |
| 0772.HK | HK$25.08 | -0.87% | 25.1B | -28.25 | -HK$0.87 | N/A |
| 1357.HK | HK$4.25 | -0.47% | 18.9B | 24.29 | HK$0.17 | +2.43% |
| 2518.HK | HK$36.26 | +0.00% | 16.8B | 10.79 | HK$3.36 | +9.64% |
| 9898.HK | HK$64.60 | -1.60% | 15.5B | 4.88 | HK$13.32 | +7.35% |
Stock Comparison
1698.HK vs 0700.HK Comparison April 2026
1698.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1698.HK stands at 113.1B. In comparison, 0700.HK has a market cap of 4.3T. Regarding current trading prices, 1698.HK is priced at HK$36.54, while 0700.HK trades at HK$477.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1698.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas 0700.HK's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, 1698.HK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0700.HK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 1698.HK is more volatile compared to 0700.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1698.HK.Check 0700.HK's competition here
1698.HK vs 80700.HK Comparison April 2026
1698.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1698.HK stands at 113.1B. In comparison, 80700.HK has a market cap of 3.8T. Regarding current trading prices, 1698.HK is priced at HK$36.54, while 80700.HK trades at HK$415.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1698.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas 80700.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1698.HK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 80700.HK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 1698.HK is more volatile compared to 80700.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1698.HK.Check 80700.HK's competition here
1698.HK vs 9888.HK Comparison April 2026
1698.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1698.HK stands at 113.1B. In comparison, 9888.HK has a market cap of 335.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1698.HK is priced at HK$36.54, while 9888.HK trades at HK$119.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1698.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas 9888.HK's P/E ratio is 72.96. In terms of profitability, 1698.HK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 9888.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1698.HK is less volatile compared to 9888.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1698.HK.Check 9888.HK's competition here
1698.HK vs 89888.HK Comparison April 2026
1698.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1698.HK stands at 113.1B. In comparison, 89888.HK has a market cap of 292.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1698.HK is priced at HK$36.54, while 89888.HK trades at HK$104.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1698.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas 89888.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1698.HK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 89888.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1698.HK is less volatile compared to 89888.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1698.HK.Check 89888.HK's competition here
1698.HK vs 1024.HK Comparison April 2026
1698.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1698.HK stands at 113.1B. In comparison, 1024.HK has a market cap of 181B. Regarding current trading prices, 1698.HK is priced at HK$36.54, while 1024.HK trades at HK$43.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1698.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas 1024.HK's P/E ratio is 8.72. In terms of profitability, 1698.HK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 1024.HK's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 1698.HK is less volatile compared to 1024.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1698.HK.Check 1024.HK's competition here
1698.HK vs 0772.HK Comparison April 2026
1698.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1698.HK stands at 113.1B. In comparison, 0772.HK has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1698.HK is priced at HK$36.54, while 0772.HK trades at HK$25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1698.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas 0772.HK's P/E ratio is -28.25. In terms of profitability, 1698.HK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0772.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1698.HK is less volatile compared to 0772.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1698.HK.Check 0772.HK's competition here
1698.HK vs 1357.HK Comparison April 2026
1698.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1698.HK stands at 113.1B. In comparison, 1357.HK has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1698.HK is priced at HK$36.54, while 1357.HK trades at HK$4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1698.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas 1357.HK's P/E ratio is 24.29. In terms of profitability, 1698.HK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 1357.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1698.HK is less volatile compared to 1357.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1698.HK.Check 1357.HK's competition here
1698.HK vs 2518.HK Comparison April 2026
1698.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1698.HK stands at 113.1B. In comparison, 2518.HK has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1698.HK is priced at HK$36.54, while 2518.HK trades at HK$36.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1698.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas 2518.HK's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, 1698.HK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 2518.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1698.HK is more volatile compared to 2518.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1698.HK.Check 2518.HK's competition here
1698.HK vs 9898.HK Comparison April 2026
1698.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1698.HK stands at 113.1B. In comparison, 9898.HK has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1698.HK is priced at HK$36.54, while 9898.HK trades at HK$64.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1698.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas 9898.HK's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, 1698.HK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 9898.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1698.HK is more volatile compared to 9898.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1698.HK.Check 9898.HK's competition here
1698.HK vs 1896.HK Comparison April 2026
1698.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1698.HK stands at 113.1B. In comparison, 1896.HK has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1698.HK is priced at HK$36.54, while 1896.HK trades at HK$5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1698.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas 1896.HK's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, 1698.HK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 1896.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1698.HK is less volatile compared to 1896.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1698.HK.Check 1896.HK's competition here
1698.HK vs 2390.HK Comparison April 2026
1698.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1698.HK stands at 113.1B. In comparison, 2390.HK has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1698.HK is priced at HK$36.54, while 2390.HK trades at HK$8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1698.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas 2390.HK's P/E ratio is -9.21. In terms of profitability, 1698.HK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 2390.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1698.HK is less volatile compared to 2390.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1698.HK.Check 2390.HK's competition here
1698.HK vs 3700.HK Comparison April 2026
1698.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1698.HK stands at 113.1B. In comparison, 3700.HK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1698.HK is priced at HK$36.54, while 3700.HK trades at HK$0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1698.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas 3700.HK's P/E ratio is 4.47. In terms of profitability, 1698.HK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 3700.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1698.HK is more volatile compared to 3700.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1698.HK.Check 3700.HK's competition here
1698.HK vs 2008.HK Comparison April 2026
1698.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1698.HK stands at 113.1B. In comparison, 2008.HK has a market cap of 858.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1698.HK is priced at HK$36.54, while 2008.HK trades at HK$1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1698.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas 2008.HK's P/E ratio is -3.82. In terms of profitability, 1698.HK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 2008.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1698.HK is less volatile compared to 2008.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1698.HK.Check 2008.HK's competition here
1698.HK vs 1980.HK Comparison April 2026
1698.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1698.HK stands at 113.1B. In comparison, 1980.HK has a market cap of 743.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1698.HK is priced at HK$36.54, while 1980.HK trades at HK$0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1698.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas 1980.HK's P/E ratio is -67.00. In terms of profitability, 1698.HK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 1980.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1698.HK is less volatile compared to 1980.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1698.HK.Check 1980.HK's competition here
1698.HK vs 1761.HK Comparison April 2026
1698.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1698.HK stands at 113.1B. In comparison, 1761.HK has a market cap of 440.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1698.HK is priced at HK$36.54, while 1761.HK trades at HK$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1698.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas 1761.HK's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, 1698.HK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 1761.HK's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 1698.HK is less volatile compared to 1761.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1698.HK.Check 1761.HK's competition here
1698.HK vs 0543.HK Comparison April 2026
1698.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1698.HK stands at 113.1B. In comparison, 0543.HK has a market cap of 374.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1698.HK is priced at HK$36.54, while 0543.HK trades at HK$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1698.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas 0543.HK's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, 1698.HK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0543.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1698.HK is less volatile compared to 0543.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1698.HK.Check 0543.HK's competition here
1698.HK vs 0150.HK Comparison April 2026
1698.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1698.HK stands at 113.1B. In comparison, 0150.HK has a market cap of 354.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1698.HK is priced at HK$36.54, while 0150.HK trades at HK$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1698.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas 0150.HK's P/E ratio is -8.75. In terms of profitability, 1698.HK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0150.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1698.HK is more volatile compared to 0150.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1698.HK.Check 0150.HK's competition here
1698.HK vs 1739.HK Comparison April 2026
1698.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1698.HK stands at 113.1B. In comparison, 1739.HK has a market cap of 256.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1698.HK is priced at HK$36.54, while 1739.HK trades at HK$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1698.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas 1739.HK's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, 1698.HK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 1739.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1698.HK is less volatile compared to 1739.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1698.HK.Check 1739.HK's competition here
1698.HK vs 3601.HK Comparison April 2026
1698.HK plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1698.HK stands at 113.1B. In comparison, 3601.HK has a market cap of 217.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1698.HK is priced at HK$36.54, while 3601.HK trades at HK$0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1698.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas 3601.HK's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, 1698.HK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 3601.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1698.HK is less volatile compared to 3601.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1698.HK.Check 3601.HK's competition here