Otec Corporation (1736.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (1736.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1736.T | ¥2,298.00 | +2.13% | 35.3B | 9.73 | ¥233.95 | +3.60% |
| 7011.T | ¥3,611.00 | -2.38% | 12.2T | 34.69 | ¥104.60 | +0.69% |
| 6954.T | ¥6,907.00 | -3.10% | 6.6T | 39.96 | ¥178.20 | +1.50% |
| 6273.T | ¥60,990.00 | -1.96% | 3.9T | 23.64 | ¥2,643.03 | +1.60% |
| 6594.T | ¥2,631.00 | +1.00% | 3.1T | 25.51 | ¥104.98 | +1.49% |
| 7013.T | ¥2,467.50 | -1.50% | 2.6T | 16.18 | ¥151.87 | +0.81% |
| 6361.T | ¥5,304.00 | +5.45% | 2.4T | 31.93 | ¥165.99 | +1.11% |
| 6383.T | ¥6,482.00 | -1.56% | 2.4T | 32.46 | ¥202.33 | +1.19% |
| 7012.T | ¥2,917.00 | +5.92% | 2.3T | 21.59 | ¥129.45 | +1.22% |
| 5333.T | ¥6,131.00 | +0.64% | 1.7T | 29.76 | ¥205.91 | +1.31% |
Stock Comparison
1736.T vs 7011.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 7011.T has a market cap of 12.2T. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 7011.T trades at ¥3,611.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 7011.T's P/E ratio is 34.69. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 7011.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 7011.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 7011.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6954.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6954.T has a market cap of 6.6T. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6954.T trades at ¥6,907.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6954.T's P/E ratio is 39.96. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6954.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6954.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6954.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6273.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6273.T has a market cap of 3.9T. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6273.T trades at ¥60,990.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6273.T's P/E ratio is 23.64. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6273.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6273.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6273.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6594.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6594.T has a market cap of 3.1T. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6594.T trades at ¥2,631.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6594.T's P/E ratio is 25.51. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6594.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6594.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6594.T's competition here
1736.T vs 7013.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 7013.T has a market cap of 2.6T. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 7013.T trades at ¥2,467.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 7013.T's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 7013.T's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 7013.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 7013.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6361.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6361.T has a market cap of 2.4T. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6361.T trades at ¥5,304.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6361.T's P/E ratio is 31.93. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6361.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6361.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6361.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6383.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6383.T has a market cap of 2.4T. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6383.T trades at ¥6,482.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6383.T's P/E ratio is 32.46. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6383.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6383.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6383.T's competition here
1736.T vs 7012.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 7012.T has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 7012.T trades at ¥2,917.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 7012.T's P/E ratio is 21.59. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 7012.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 7012.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 7012.T's competition here
1736.T vs 5333.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 5333.T has a market cap of 1.7T. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 5333.T trades at ¥6,131.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 5333.T's P/E ratio is 29.76. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 5333.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 5333.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 5333.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6841.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6841.T has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6841.T trades at ¥4,839.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6841.T's P/E ratio is 21.64. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6841.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6841.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6841.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6113.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6113.T has a market cap of 888.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6113.T trades at ¥2,847.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6113.T's P/E ratio is 29.56. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6113.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6113.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6113.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6481.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6481.T has a market cap of 805.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6481.T trades at ¥7,085.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6481.T's P/E ratio is 80.05. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6481.T's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6481.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6481.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6845.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6845.T has a market cap of 786.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6845.T trades at ¥1,534.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6845.T's P/E ratio is 18.52. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6845.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6845.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6845.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6465.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6465.T has a market cap of 703.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6465.T trades at ¥5,219.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6465.T's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6465.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6465.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6465.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6324.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6324.T has a market cap of 665.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6324.T trades at ¥6,550.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6324.T's P/E ratio is 409.20. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6324.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6324.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6324.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6134.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6134.T has a market cap of 650.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6134.T trades at ¥7,389.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6134.T's P/E ratio is 41.39. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6134.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6134.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6134.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6302.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6302.T has a market cap of 599.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6302.T trades at ¥4,922.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6302.T's P/E ratio is 19.51. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6302.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6302.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6302.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6268.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6268.T has a market cap of 569.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6268.T trades at ¥4,684.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6268.T's P/E ratio is 39.21. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6268.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6268.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6268.T's competition here
1736.T vs 5631.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 5631.T has a market cap of 536.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 5631.T trades at ¥7,261.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 5631.T's P/E ratio is 27.89. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 5631.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 5631.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 5631.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6406.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6406.T has a market cap of 443.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6406.T trades at ¥5,680.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6406.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6406.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is more volatile compared to 6406.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6406.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6508.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6508.T has a market cap of 423.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6508.T trades at ¥9,140.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6508.T's P/E ratio is 17.93. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6508.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6508.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6508.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6407.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6407.T has a market cap of 407.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6407.T trades at ¥6,130.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6407.T's P/E ratio is 29.98. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6407.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6407.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6407.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6507.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6507.T has a market cap of 393.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6507.T trades at ¥13,640.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6507.T's P/E ratio is 27.14. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6507.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6507.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6507.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6622.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6622.T has a market cap of 363.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6622.T trades at ¥15,160.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6622.T's P/E ratio is 26.06. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6622.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6622.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6622.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6005.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6005.T has a market cap of 358.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6005.T trades at ¥3,110.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6005.T's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6005.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6005.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6005.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6135.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6135.T has a market cap of 349B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6135.T trades at ¥14,800.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6135.T's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6135.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6135.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6135.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6925.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6925.T has a market cap of 322.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6925.T trades at ¥4,005.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6925.T's P/E ratio is 42.59. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6925.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6925.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6925.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6371.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6371.T has a market cap of 270B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6371.T trades at ¥2,582.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6371.T's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6371.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6371.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6371.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6103.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6103.T has a market cap of 238.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6103.T trades at ¥4,100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6103.T's P/E ratio is 19.33. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6103.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6103.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6103.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6376.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6376.T has a market cap of 223.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6376.T trades at ¥3,595.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6376.T's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6376.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6376.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6376.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6457.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6457.T has a market cap of 205B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6457.T trades at ¥3,970.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6457.T's P/E ratio is 14.34. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6457.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6457.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6457.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6490.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6490.T has a market cap of 203.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6490.T trades at ¥8,730.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6490.T's P/E ratio is 22.94. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6490.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6490.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6490.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6498.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6498.T has a market cap of 189.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6498.T trades at ¥2,238.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6498.T's P/E ratio is 16.56. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6498.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6498.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6498.T's competition here
1736.T vs 3433.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 3433.T has a market cap of 179.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 3433.T trades at ¥3,030.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 3433.T's P/E ratio is 20.12. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 3433.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 3433.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 3433.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6254.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6254.T has a market cap of 158.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6254.T trades at ¥4,210.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6254.T's P/E ratio is 42.07. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6254.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6254.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6254.T's competition here
1736.T vs 5186.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 5186.T has a market cap of 156.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 5186.T trades at ¥5,820.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 5186.T's P/E ratio is 37.66. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 5186.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 5186.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 5186.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6235.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6235.T has a market cap of 150B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6235.T trades at ¥3,605.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6235.T's P/E ratio is 51.54. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6235.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6235.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6235.T's competition here
1736.T vs 8051.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 8051.T has a market cap of 148.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 8051.T trades at ¥1,740.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 8051.T's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 8051.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 8051.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 8051.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6250.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6250.T has a market cap of 146.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6250.T trades at ¥3,650.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6250.T's P/E ratio is 10.16. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6250.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6250.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6250.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6486.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6486.T has a market cap of 135.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6486.T trades at ¥2,948.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6486.T's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6486.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6486.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6486.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6420.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6420.T has a market cap of 135.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6420.T trades at ¥3,395.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6420.T's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6420.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6420.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6420.T's competition here
1736.T vs 7995.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 7995.T has a market cap of 134.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 7995.T trades at ¥7,540.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 7995.T's P/E ratio is 26.26. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 7995.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 7995.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 7995.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6284.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6284.T has a market cap of 132.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6284.T trades at ¥8,970.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6284.T's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6284.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6284.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6284.T's competition here
1736.T vs 8074.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 8074.T has a market cap of 112.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 8074.T trades at ¥5,380.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 8074.T's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 8074.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 8074.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 8074.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6340.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6340.T has a market cap of 110.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6340.T trades at ¥4,005.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6340.T's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6340.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6340.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6340.T's competition here
1736.T vs 5192.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 5192.T has a market cap of 109.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 5192.T trades at ¥3,925.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 5192.T's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 5192.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 5192.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 5192.T's competition here
1736.T vs 7718.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 7718.T has a market cap of 105.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 7718.T trades at ¥2,202.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 7718.T's P/E ratio is 26.44. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 7718.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is more volatile compared to 7718.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 7718.T's competition here
1736.T vs 1975.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 1975.T has a market cap of 102.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 1975.T trades at ¥3,950.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 1975.T's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1975.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 1975.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 1975.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6351.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6351.T has a market cap of 99.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6351.T trades at ¥2,106.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6351.T's P/E ratio is 19.33. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6351.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6351.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6351.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6455.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6455.T has a market cap of 99.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6455.T trades at ¥2,423.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6455.T's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6455.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6455.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6455.T's competition here
1736.T vs 8059.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 8059.T has a market cap of 95.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 8059.T trades at ¥2,981.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 8059.T's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 8059.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 8059.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 8059.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6104.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6104.T has a market cap of 93.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6104.T trades at ¥3,890.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6104.T's P/E ratio is 91.47. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6104.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6104.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6104.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6652.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6652.T has a market cap of 93.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6652.T trades at ¥3,145.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6652.T's P/E ratio is 24.06. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6652.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6652.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6652.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6143.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6143.T has a market cap of 91.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6143.T trades at ¥1,833.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6143.T's P/E ratio is 21.97. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6143.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6143.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6143.T's competition here
1736.T vs 5195.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 5195.T has a market cap of 90.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 5195.T trades at ¥2,248.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 5195.T's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 5195.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 5195.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 5195.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6258.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6258.T has a market cap of 83.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6258.T trades at ¥2,721.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6258.T's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6258.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6258.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6258.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6459.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6459.T has a market cap of 82.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6459.T trades at ¥1,674.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6459.T's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6459.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6459.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6459.T's competition here
1736.T vs 7279.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 7279.T has a market cap of 80.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 7279.T trades at ¥2,128.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 7279.T's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 7279.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 7279.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 7279.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6349.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6349.T has a market cap of 76.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6349.T trades at ¥1,438.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6349.T's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6349.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is more volatile compared to 6349.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6349.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6277.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6277.T has a market cap of 73.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6277.T trades at ¥5,010.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6277.T's P/E ratio is 24.34. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6277.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6277.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6277.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6517.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6517.T has a market cap of 71B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6517.T trades at ¥3,500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6517.T's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6517.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6517.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6517.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6023.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6023.T has a market cap of 67.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6023.T trades at ¥2,647.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6023.T's P/E ratio is 11.41. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6023.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6023.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6023.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6363.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6363.T has a market cap of 67.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6363.T trades at ¥2,621.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6363.T's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6363.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6363.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6363.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6237.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6237.T has a market cap of 66.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6237.T trades at ¥2,977.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6237.T's P/E ratio is 13.74. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6237.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6237.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6237.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6381.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6381.T has a market cap of 64B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6381.T trades at ¥1,628.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6381.T's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6381.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6381.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6381.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6016.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6016.T has a market cap of 62.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6016.T trades at ¥7,380.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6016.T's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6016.T's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6016.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6016.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6339.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6339.T has a market cap of 61.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6339.T trades at ¥1,171.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6339.T's P/E ratio is -3.77. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6339.T's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6339.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6339.T's competition here
1736.T vs 5982.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 5982.T has a market cap of 60.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 5982.T trades at ¥3,805.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 5982.T's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 5982.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 5982.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 5982.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6118.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6118.T has a market cap of 59.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6118.T trades at ¥1,102.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6118.T's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6118.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6118.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6118.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6264.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6264.T has a market cap of 54.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6264.T trades at ¥1,941.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6264.T's P/E ratio is 33.24. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6264.T's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6264.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6264.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6145.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6145.T has a market cap of 52.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6145.T trades at ¥3,135.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6145.T's P/E ratio is 15.36. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6145.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6145.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6145.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6309.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6309.T has a market cap of 51.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6309.T trades at ¥1,773.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6309.T's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6309.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6309.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6309.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6364.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6364.T has a market cap of 46B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6364.T trades at ¥1,711.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6364.T's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6364.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6364.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6364.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6937.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6937.T has a market cap of 45.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6937.T trades at ¥1,393.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6937.T's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6937.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is more volatile compared to 6937.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6937.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6357.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6357.T has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6357.T trades at ¥2,473.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6357.T's P/E ratio is 9.07. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6357.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6357.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6357.T's competition here
1736.T vs 7102.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 7102.T has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 7102.T trades at ¥3,135.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 7102.T's P/E ratio is 3.88. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 7102.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 7102.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 7102.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6333.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6333.T has a market cap of 44.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6333.T trades at ¥2,948.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6333.T's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6333.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6333.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6333.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6223.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6223.T has a market cap of 44B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6223.T trades at ¥2,181.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6223.T's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6223.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6223.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6223.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6247.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6247.T has a market cap of 43.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6247.T trades at ¥1,638.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6247.T's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6247.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6247.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6247.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6411.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6411.T has a market cap of 39.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6411.T trades at ¥7,860.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6411.T's P/E ratio is 20.92. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6411.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is more volatile compared to 6411.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6411.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6144.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6144.T has a market cap of 39.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6144.T trades at ¥2,667.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6144.T's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6144.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is more volatile compared to 6144.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6144.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6272.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6272.T has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6272.T trades at ¥1,432.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6272.T's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6272.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6272.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6272.T's competition here
1736.T vs 7438.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 7438.T has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 7438.T trades at ¥1,460.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 7438.T's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 7438.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 7438.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 7438.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6240.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6240.T has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6240.T trades at ¥525.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6240.T's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6240.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6240.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6240.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6369.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6369.T has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6369.T trades at ¥2,122.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6369.T's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6369.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6369.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6369.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6125.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6125.T has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6125.T trades at ¥4,865.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6125.T's P/E ratio is 28.56. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6125.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6125.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6125.T's competition here
1736.T vs 5981.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 5981.T has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 5981.T trades at ¥2,053.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 5981.T's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 5981.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 5981.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 5981.T's competition here
1736.T vs 9906.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 9906.T has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 9906.T trades at ¥3,650.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 9906.T's P/E ratio is 6.23. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 9906.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T and 9906.T have similar daily volatility (0.96).Check 9906.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6222.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6222.T has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6222.T trades at ¥883.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6222.T's P/E ratio is 35.29. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6222.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6222.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6222.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6137.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6137.T has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6137.T trades at ¥1,416.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6137.T's P/E ratio is 8.70. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6137.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6137.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6137.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6151.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6151.T has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6151.T trades at ¥1,612.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6151.T's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6151.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6151.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6151.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6327.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6327.T has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6327.T trades at ¥3,145.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6327.T's P/E ratio is 58.88. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6327.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6327.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6327.T's competition here
1736.T vs 1964.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 1964.T has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 1964.T trades at ¥3,925.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 1964.T's P/E ratio is 6.24. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1964.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 1964.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 1964.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6245.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6245.T has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6245.T trades at ¥1,816.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6245.T's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6245.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6245.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6245.T's competition here
1736.T vs 7525.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 7525.T has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 7525.T trades at ¥3,395.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 7525.T's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 7525.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is more volatile compared to 7525.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 7525.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6469.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6469.T has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6469.T trades at ¥2,423.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6469.T's P/E ratio is 32.45. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6469.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6469.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6469.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6648.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6648.T has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6648.T trades at ¥1,594.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6648.T's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6648.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is less volatile compared to 6648.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6648.T's competition here
1736.T vs 7317.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 7317.T has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 7317.T trades at ¥1,108.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 7317.T's P/E ratio is 15.42. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 7317.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is more volatile compared to 7317.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 7317.T's competition here
1736.T vs 6279.T Comparison June 2026
1736.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1736.T stands at 35.3B. In comparison, 6279.T has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1736.T is priced at ¥2,298.00, while 6279.T trades at ¥881.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1736.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas 6279.T's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, 1736.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6279.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1736.T is more volatile compared to 6279.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1736.T.Check 6279.T's competition here