Shanghai Dazhong Public Utilities(Group) Co.,Ltd. (HKSE: 1635.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See 1635.HK's competitors and their performance on the HKSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Gas Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for 1635.HK and its HKSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1635.HK | HK$2.32 | -5.69% | 13.6B | 13.90 | HK$0.17 | +2.48% |
| 0003.HK | HK$6.98 | +0.00% | 130.2B | 22.73 | HK$0.31 | +5.01% |
| 2688.HK | HK$43.78 | -1.88% | 48.7B | 7.47 | HK$5.86 | +6.85% |
| 0392.HK | HK$30.98 | -2.09% | 39B | 7.02 | HK$4.41 | +5.23% |
| 1193.HK | HK$16.00 | -1.60% | 36.1B | 10.39 | HK$1.54 | +5.94% |
| 0384.HK | HK$5.88 | -1.01% | 32B | 11.53 | HK$0.51 | +8.50% |
| 0956.HK | HK$3.15 | -3.08% | 22.1B | 7.88 | HK$0.40 | +7.30% |
| 1083.HK | HK$3.38 | -1.17% | 12.8B | 7.95 | HK$0.42 | +4.14% |
| 3633.HK | HK$2.54 | +0.00% | 7B | 48.49 | HK$0.05 | +1.18% |
| 1600.HK | HK$2.74 | +0.37% | 2.6B | 8.53 | HK$0.32 | +4.16% |
Stock Comparison
The Hong Kong and China Gas Company Limited (HKSE: 0003.HK)
1635.HK vs 0003.HK Comparison July 2026
Shanghai Dazhong Public Utilities(Group) Co.,Ltd. (HKSE: 1635.HK) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 13.6B. In comparison, 0003.HK has a market cap of 130.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at HK$2.32 on the HKSE, while 0003.HK trades at HK$6.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas 0003.HK's P/E ratio is 22.73. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0003.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK is more volatile compared to 0003.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1635.HK.Check 0003.HK's competition here
ENN Energy Holdings Limited (HKSE: 2688.HK)
1635.HK vs 2688.HK Comparison July 2026
Shanghai Dazhong Public Utilities(Group) Co.,Ltd. (HKSE: 1635.HK) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 13.6B. In comparison, 2688.HK has a market cap of 48.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at HK$2.32 on the HKSE, while 2688.HK trades at HK$43.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas 2688.HK's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 2688.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK is more volatile compared to 2688.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1635.HK.Check 2688.HK's competition here
Beijing Enterprises Holdings Ltd. (HKSE: 0392.HK)
1635.HK vs 0392.HK Comparison July 2026
Shanghai Dazhong Public Utilities(Group) Co.,Ltd. (HKSE: 1635.HK) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 13.6B. In comparison, 0392.HK has a market cap of 39B. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at HK$2.32 on the HKSE, while 0392.HK trades at HK$30.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas 0392.HK's P/E ratio is 7.02. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0392.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK is more volatile compared to 0392.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1635.HK.Check 0392.HK's competition here
China Resources Gas Group Limited (HKSE: 1193.HK)
1635.HK vs 1193.HK Comparison July 2026
Shanghai Dazhong Public Utilities(Group) Co.,Ltd. (HKSE: 1635.HK) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 13.6B. In comparison, 1193.HK has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at HK$2.32 on the HKSE, while 1193.HK trades at HK$16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas 1193.HK's P/E ratio is 10.39. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1193.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK is more volatile compared to 1193.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1635.HK.Check 1193.HK's competition here
China Gas Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0384.HK)
1635.HK vs 0384.HK Comparison July 2026
Shanghai Dazhong Public Utilities(Group) Co.,Ltd. (HKSE: 1635.HK) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 13.6B. In comparison, 0384.HK has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at HK$2.32 on the HKSE, while 0384.HK trades at HK$5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas 0384.HK's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0384.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK is more volatile compared to 0384.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1635.HK.Check 0384.HK's competition here
China Suntien Green Energy Corporation Limited (HKSE: 0956.HK)
1635.HK vs 0956.HK Comparison July 2026
Shanghai Dazhong Public Utilities(Group) Co.,Ltd. (HKSE: 1635.HK) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 13.6B. In comparison, 0956.HK has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at HK$2.32 on the HKSE, while 0956.HK trades at HK$3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas 0956.HK's P/E ratio is 7.88. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0956.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK is more volatile compared to 0956.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1635.HK.Check 0956.HK's competition here
Towngas Smart Energy Company Limited (HKSE: 1083.HK)
1635.HK vs 1083.HK Comparison July 2026
Shanghai Dazhong Public Utilities(Group) Co.,Ltd. (HKSE: 1635.HK) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 13.6B. In comparison, 1083.HK has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at HK$2.32 on the HKSE, while 1083.HK trades at HK$3.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas 1083.HK's P/E ratio is 7.95. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1083.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK is more volatile compared to 1083.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1635.HK.Check 1083.HK's competition here
Zhongyu Energy Holdings Limited (HKSE: 3633.HK)
1635.HK vs 3633.HK Comparison July 2026
Shanghai Dazhong Public Utilities(Group) Co.,Ltd. (HKSE: 1635.HK) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 13.6B. In comparison, 3633.HK has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at HK$2.32 on the HKSE, while 3633.HK trades at HK$2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas 3633.HK's P/E ratio is 48.49. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 3633.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK is more volatile compared to 3633.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1635.HK.Check 3633.HK's competition here
Tian Lun Gas Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1600.HK)
1635.HK vs 1600.HK Comparison July 2026
Shanghai Dazhong Public Utilities(Group) Co.,Ltd. (HKSE: 1635.HK) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 13.6B. In comparison, 1600.HK has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at HK$2.32 on the HKSE, while 1600.HK trades at HK$2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas 1600.HK's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1600.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK is more volatile compared to 1600.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1635.HK.Check 1600.HK's competition here
China HK Power Smart Energy Group Limited (HKSE: 0931.HK)
1635.HK vs 0931.HK Comparison July 2026
Shanghai Dazhong Public Utilities(Group) Co.,Ltd. (HKSE: 1635.HK) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 13.6B. In comparison, 0931.HK has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at HK$2.32 on the HKSE, while 0931.HK trades at HK$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas 0931.HK's P/E ratio is -11.17. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0931.HK's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK is more volatile compared to 0931.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1635.HK.Check 0931.HK's competition here
Binhai Investment Company Limited (HKSE: 2886.HK)
1635.HK vs 2886.HK Comparison July 2026
Shanghai Dazhong Public Utilities(Group) Co.,Ltd. (HKSE: 1635.HK) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 13.6B. In comparison, 2886.HK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at HK$2.32 on the HKSE, while 2886.HK trades at HK$1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas 2886.HK's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 2886.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK is more volatile compared to 2886.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1635.HK.Check 2886.HK's competition here
China Gas Industry Investment Holdings Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 1940.HK)
1635.HK vs 1940.HK Comparison July 2026
Shanghai Dazhong Public Utilities(Group) Co.,Ltd. (HKSE: 1635.HK) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 13.6B. In comparison, 1940.HK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at HK$2.32 on the HKSE, while 1940.HK trades at HK$1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas 1940.HK's P/E ratio is 7.93. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1940.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK is less volatile compared to 1940.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1635.HK.Check 1940.HK's competition here
JiaXing Gas Group Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 9908.HK)
1635.HK vs 9908.HK Comparison July 2026
Shanghai Dazhong Public Utilities(Group) Co.,Ltd. (HKSE: 1635.HK) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 13.6B. In comparison, 9908.HK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at HK$2.32 on the HKSE, while 9908.HK trades at HK$8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas 9908.HK's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 9908.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK is more volatile compared to 9908.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1635.HK.Check 9908.HK's competition here
Beijing Gas Blue Sky Holdings Limited (HKSE: 6828.HK)
1635.HK vs 6828.HK Comparison July 2026
Shanghai Dazhong Public Utilities(Group) Co.,Ltd. (HKSE: 1635.HK) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 13.6B. In comparison, 6828.HK has a market cap of 704.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at HK$2.32 on the HKSE, while 6828.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas 6828.HK's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 6828.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK is less volatile compared to 6828.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1635.HK.Check 6828.HK's competition here
Tianjin Jinran Public Utilities Company Limited (HKSE: 1265.HK)
1635.HK vs 1265.HK Comparison July 2026
Shanghai Dazhong Public Utilities(Group) Co.,Ltd. (HKSE: 1635.HK) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 13.6B. In comparison, 1265.HK has a market cap of 275.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at HK$2.32 on the HKSE, while 1265.HK trades at HK$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas 1265.HK's P/E ratio is -5.59. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1265.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK is more volatile compared to 1265.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1635.HK.Check 1265.HK's competition here
Huzhou Gas Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 6661.HK)
1635.HK vs 6661.HK Comparison July 2026
Shanghai Dazhong Public Utilities(Group) Co.,Ltd. (HKSE: 1635.HK) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 13.6B. In comparison, 6661.HK has a market cap of 262.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at HK$2.32 on the HKSE, while 6661.HK trades at HK$4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas 6661.HK's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 6661.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK is more volatile compared to 6661.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1635.HK.Check 6661.HK's competition here
Chinese People Holdings Company Limited (HKSE: 0681.HK)
1635.HK vs 0681.HK Comparison July 2026
Shanghai Dazhong Public Utilities(Group) Co.,Ltd. (HKSE: 1635.HK) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 13.6B. In comparison, 0681.HK has a market cap of 259.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at HK$2.32 on the HKSE, while 0681.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas 0681.HK's P/E ratio is 6.42. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0681.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK is more volatile compared to 0681.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1635.HK.Check 0681.HK's competition here
JY Gas Ltd. (HKSE: 1407.HK)
1635.HK vs 1407.HK Comparison July 2026
Shanghai Dazhong Public Utilities(Group) Co.,Ltd. (HKSE: 1635.HK) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 13.6B. In comparison, 1407.HK has a market cap of 250.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at HK$2.32 on the HKSE, while 1407.HK trades at HK$0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas 1407.HK's P/E ratio is 8.14. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1407.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK is more volatile compared to 1407.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1635.HK.Check 1407.HK's competition here
Sino Gas Holdings Group Limited (HKSE: 1759.HK)
1635.HK vs 1759.HK Comparison July 2026
Shanghai Dazhong Public Utilities(Group) Co.,Ltd. (HKSE: 1635.HK) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 13.6B. In comparison, 1759.HK has a market cap of 164.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at HK$2.32 on the HKSE, while 1759.HK trades at HK$0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas 1759.HK's P/E ratio is -12.45. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1759.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK is more volatile compared to 1759.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1635.HK.Check 1759.HK's competition here
TL Natural Gas Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8536.HK)
1635.HK vs 8536.HK Comparison July 2026
Shanghai Dazhong Public Utilities(Group) Co.,Ltd. (HKSE: 1635.HK) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 13.6B. In comparison, 8536.HK has a market cap of 36.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at HK$2.32 on the HKSE, while 8536.HK trades at HK$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas 8536.HK's P/E ratio is -3.69. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 8536.HK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK is more volatile compared to 8536.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1635.HK.Check 8536.HK's competition here
Suchuang Gas Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1430.HK)
1635.HK vs 1430.HK Comparison July 2026
Shanghai Dazhong Public Utilities(Group) Co.,Ltd. (HKSE: 1635.HK) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 13.6B. In comparison, 1430.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at HK$2.32 on the HKSE, while 1430.HK trades at HK$2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas 1430.HK's P/E ratio is 20.19. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1430.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK is more volatile compared to 1430.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1635.HK.Check 1430.HK's competition here