Shanghai Dazhong Public Utilities(Group) Co.,Ltd.
Shanghai Dazhong Public Utilities(Group) Co.,Ltd. (1635.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (1635.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Gas Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1635.HK | HK$3.11 | +0.65% | 18B | 19.25 | HK$0.16 | +1.28% |
| 0003.HK | HK$7.29 | +0.14% | 136.2B | 24.33 | HK$0.30 | +4.79% |
| 2688.HK | HK$62.70 | -0.08% | 68.9B | 10.18 | HK$6.09 | +4.84% |
| 1193.HK | HK$18.98 | +0.96% | 43.6B | 12.23 | HK$1.55 | +5.28% |
| 0384.HK | HK$7.35 | +1.52% | 40B | 14.13 | HK$0.52 | +6.80% |
| 1083.HK | HK$3.58 | +0.85% | 13.1B | 8.52 | HK$0.42 | +6.70% |
| 3633.HK | HK$2.75 | +0.36% | 7.5B | 30.44 | HK$0.09 | +0.73% |
| 1600.HK | HK$2.81 | -1.06% | 2.7B | 56.80 | HK$0.05 | +5.53% |
| 1940.HK | HK$1.58 | +17.91% | 1.9B | 10.53 | HK$0.15 | N/A |
| 2886.HK | HK$1.22 | +0.00% | 1.7B | 7.18 | HK$0.17 | +6.23% |
Stock Comparison
1635.HK vs 0003.HK Comparison April 2026
1635.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 18B. In comparison, 0003.HK has a market cap of 136.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at HK$3.11, while 0003.HK trades at HK$7.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.25, whereas 0003.HK's P/E ratio is 24.33. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0003.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK is more volatile compared to 0003.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1635.HK.Check 0003.HK's competition here
1635.HK vs 2688.HK Comparison April 2026
1635.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 18B. In comparison, 2688.HK has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at HK$3.11, while 2688.HK trades at HK$62.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.25, whereas 2688.HK's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 2688.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK is less volatile compared to 2688.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1635.HK.Check 2688.HK's competition here
1635.HK vs 1193.HK Comparison April 2026
1635.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 18B. In comparison, 1193.HK has a market cap of 43.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at HK$3.11, while 1193.HK trades at HK$18.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.25, whereas 1193.HK's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1193.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK is less volatile compared to 1193.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1635.HK.Check 1193.HK's competition here
1635.HK vs 0384.HK Comparison April 2026
1635.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 18B. In comparison, 0384.HK has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at HK$3.11, while 0384.HK trades at HK$7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.25, whereas 0384.HK's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0384.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK is less volatile compared to 0384.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1635.HK.Check 0384.HK's competition here
1635.HK vs 1083.HK Comparison April 2026
1635.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 18B. In comparison, 1083.HK has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at HK$3.11, while 1083.HK trades at HK$3.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.25, whereas 1083.HK's P/E ratio is 8.52. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1083.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK is more volatile compared to 1083.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1635.HK.Check 1083.HK's competition here
1635.HK vs 3633.HK Comparison April 2026
1635.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 18B. In comparison, 3633.HK has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at HK$3.11, while 3633.HK trades at HK$2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.25, whereas 3633.HK's P/E ratio is 30.44. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 3633.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK is more volatile compared to 3633.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1635.HK.Check 3633.HK's competition here
1635.HK vs 1600.HK Comparison April 2026
1635.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 18B. In comparison, 1600.HK has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at HK$3.11, while 1600.HK trades at HK$2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.25, whereas 1600.HK's P/E ratio is 56.80. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1600.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK is more volatile compared to 1600.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1635.HK.Check 1600.HK's competition here
1635.HK vs 1940.HK Comparison April 2026
1635.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 18B. In comparison, 1940.HK has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at HK$3.11, while 1940.HK trades at HK$1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.25, whereas 1940.HK's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1940.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK is less volatile compared to 1940.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1635.HK.Check 1940.HK's competition here
1635.HK vs 2886.HK Comparison April 2026
1635.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 18B. In comparison, 2886.HK has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at HK$3.11, while 2886.HK trades at HK$1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.25, whereas 2886.HK's P/E ratio is 7.18. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 2886.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK is less volatile compared to 2886.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1635.HK.Check 2886.HK's competition here
1635.HK vs 9908.HK Comparison April 2026
1635.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 18B. In comparison, 9908.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at HK$3.11, while 9908.HK trades at HK$8.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.25, whereas 9908.HK's P/E ratio is 6.62. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 9908.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK is less volatile compared to 9908.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1635.HK.Check 9908.HK's competition here
1635.HK vs 6828.HK Comparison April 2026
1635.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 18B. In comparison, 6828.HK has a market cap of 886.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at HK$3.11, while 6828.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.25, whereas 6828.HK's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 6828.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK is more volatile compared to 6828.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1635.HK.Check 6828.HK's competition here
1635.HK vs 1265.HK Comparison April 2026
1635.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 18B. In comparison, 1265.HK has a market cap of 336.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at HK$3.11, while 1265.HK trades at HK$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.25, whereas 1265.HK's P/E ratio is -6.10. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1265.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK is less volatile compared to 1265.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1635.HK.Check 1265.HK's competition here
1635.HK vs 1407.HK Comparison April 2026
1635.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 18B. In comparison, 1407.HK has a market cap of 259.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at HK$3.11, while 1407.HK trades at HK$0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.25, whereas 1407.HK's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1407.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK is more volatile compared to 1407.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1635.HK.Check 1407.HK's competition here
1635.HK vs 0681.HK Comparison April 2026
1635.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 18B. In comparison, 0681.HK has a market cap of 232.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at HK$3.11, while 0681.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.25, whereas 0681.HK's P/E ratio is 2.60. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 0681.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK is more volatile compared to 0681.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1635.HK.Check 0681.HK's competition here
1635.HK vs 1430.HK Comparison April 2026
1635.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 18B. In comparison, 1430.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at HK$3.11, while 1430.HK trades at HK$2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.25, whereas 1430.HK's P/E ratio is 20.19. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 1430.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK is more volatile compared to 1430.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1635.HK.Check 1430.HK's competition here