Shanghai Dazhong Public Utilities(Group) Co.,Ltd.

1635.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 11.30B. In comparison, 0003.HK has a market cap of 131.74B. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at $2.06, while 0003.HK trades at $7.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.71, whereas 0003.HK's P/E ratio is 23.53. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0003.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK is more volatile compared to 0003.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1635.HK.

1635.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 11.30B. In comparison, 2688.HK has a market cap of 70.06B. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at $2.06, while 2688.HK trades at $63.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.71, whereas 2688.HK's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 2688.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK is more volatile compared to 2688.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1635.HK.

1635.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 11.30B. In comparison, 1193.HK has a market cap of 51.42B. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at $2.06, while 1193.HK trades at $22.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.71, whereas 1193.HK's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1193.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK is more volatile compared to 1193.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1635.HK.

1635.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 11.30B. In comparison, 0384.HK has a market cap of 39.06B. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at $2.06, while 0384.HK trades at $7.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.71, whereas 0384.HK's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0384.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK is more volatile compared to 0384.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1635.HK.

1635.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 11.30B. In comparison, 1083.HK has a market cap of 12.22B. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at $2.06, while 1083.HK trades at $3.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.71, whereas 1083.HK's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1083.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK is more volatile compared to 1083.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1635.HK.

1635.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 11.30B. In comparison, 3633.HK has a market cap of 11.67B. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at $2.06, while 3633.HK trades at $4.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.71, whereas 3633.HK's P/E ratio is 84.20. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 3633.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK is more volatile compared to 3633.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1635.HK.

1635.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 11.30B. In comparison, 1600.HK has a market cap of 2.59B. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at $2.06, while 1600.HK trades at $2.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.71, whereas 1600.HK's P/E ratio is 7.85. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1600.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK is more volatile compared to 1600.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1635.HK.

1635.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 11.30B. In comparison, 2886.HK has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at $2.06, while 2886.HK trades at $1.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.71, whereas 2886.HK's P/E ratio is 6.87. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 2886.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK is more volatile compared to 2886.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1635.HK.

1635.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 11.30B. In comparison, 9908.HK has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at $2.06, while 9908.HK trades at $7.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.71, whereas 9908.HK's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 9908.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK is more volatile compared to 9908.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1635.HK.

1635.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 11.30B. In comparison, 6828.HK has a market cap of 841.24M. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at $2.06, while 6828.HK trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.71, whereas 6828.HK's P/E ratio is 3.70. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 6828.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK is more volatile compared to 6828.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1635.HK.

1635.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 11.30B. In comparison, 1940.HK has a market cap of 600.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at $2.06, while 1940.HK trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.71, whereas 1940.HK's P/E ratio is 3.85. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1940.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK is more volatile compared to 1940.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1635.HK.

1635.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 11.30B. In comparison, 1265.HK has a market cap of 321.88M. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at $2.06, while 1265.HK trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.71, whereas 1265.HK's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1265.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK is more volatile compared to 1265.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1635.HK.

1635.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 11.30B. In comparison, 0681.HK has a market cap of 196.56M. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at $2.06, while 0681.HK trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.71, whereas 0681.HK's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0681.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK and 0681.HK have similar daily volatility (4.44).

1635.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 1635.HK stands at 11.30B. In comparison, 1407.HK has a market cap of 167.20M. Regarding current trading prices, 1635.HK is priced at $2.06, while 1407.HK trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

1635.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.71, whereas 1407.HK's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, 1635.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1407.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1635.HK is more volatile compared to 1407.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1635.HK.