Jia Yao Holdings Limited
Jia Yao Holdings Limited 1626.HK Peers
See (1626.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaging & Containers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1626.HK | HK$2.93 | -0.34% | 1.8B | 293.00 | HK$0.01 | +10.24% |
| 0906.HK | HK$7.13 | +0.00% | 7.9B | 16.20 | HK$0.44 | N/A |
| 0468.HK | HK$2.50 | -0.79% | 3.5B | 11.90 | HK$0.21 | +4.00% |
| 0716.HK | HK$0.67 | +0.00% | 1.6B | 6.09 | HK$0.11 | +11.94% |
| 1820.HK | HK$4.00 | +2.30% | 1.2B | -57.14 | -HK$0.07 | +4.00% |
| 6898.HK | HK$0.63 | +5.00% | 650.5M | 34.00 | HK$0.02 | +0.89% |
| 1689.HK | HK$0.66 | +1.54% | 462.9M | -4.12 | -HK$0.16 | N/A |
| 1008.HK | HK$0.25 | +4.26% | 384.1M | 4.90 | HK$0.05 | +16.33% |
| 0252.HK | HK$1.70 | +0.00% | 383.2M | 21.25 | HK$0.08 | +1.76% |
| 1332.HK | HK$0.08 | -6.90% | 227.3M | -2.70 | -HK$0.03 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
1626.HK vs 0906.HK Comparison
1626.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1626.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0906.HK has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1626.HK is priced at HK$2.93, while 0906.HK trades at HK$7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1626.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 293.00, whereas 0906.HK's P/E ratio is 16.20. In terms of profitability, 1626.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0906.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1626.HK is more volatile compared to 0906.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1626.HK.
1626.HK vs 0468.HK Comparison
1626.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1626.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0468.HK has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1626.HK is priced at HK$2.93, while 0468.HK trades at HK$2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1626.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 293.00, whereas 0468.HK's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, 1626.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0468.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1626.HK is more volatile compared to 0468.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1626.HK.
1626.HK vs 0716.HK Comparison
1626.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1626.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0716.HK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1626.HK is priced at HK$2.93, while 0716.HK trades at HK$0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1626.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 293.00, whereas 0716.HK's P/E ratio is 6.09. In terms of profitability, 1626.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0716.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1626.HK is more volatile compared to 0716.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1626.HK.
1626.HK vs 1820.HK Comparison
1626.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1626.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 1820.HK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1626.HK is priced at HK$2.93, while 1820.HK trades at HK$4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1626.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 293.00, whereas 1820.HK's P/E ratio is -57.14. In terms of profitability, 1626.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 1820.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1626.HK is more volatile compared to 1820.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1626.HK.
1626.HK vs 6898.HK Comparison
1626.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1626.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 6898.HK has a market cap of 650.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1626.HK is priced at HK$2.93, while 6898.HK trades at HK$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1626.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 293.00, whereas 6898.HK's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, 1626.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 6898.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1626.HK is less volatile compared to 6898.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1626.HK.
1626.HK vs 1689.HK Comparison
1626.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1626.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 1689.HK has a market cap of 462.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1626.HK is priced at HK$2.93, while 1689.HK trades at HK$0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1626.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 293.00, whereas 1689.HK's P/E ratio is -4.12. In terms of profitability, 1626.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 1689.HK's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, 1626.HK is more volatile compared to 1689.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1626.HK.
1626.HK vs 1008.HK Comparison
1626.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1626.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 1008.HK has a market cap of 384.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1626.HK is priced at HK$2.93, while 1008.HK trades at HK$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1626.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 293.00, whereas 1008.HK's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, 1626.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 1008.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1626.HK is more volatile compared to 1008.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1626.HK.
1626.HK vs 0252.HK Comparison
1626.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1626.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0252.HK has a market cap of 383.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1626.HK is priced at HK$2.93, while 0252.HK trades at HK$1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1626.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 293.00, whereas 0252.HK's P/E ratio is 21.25. In terms of profitability, 1626.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0252.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1626.HK is more volatile compared to 0252.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1626.HK.
1626.HK vs 1332.HK Comparison
1626.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1626.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 1332.HK has a market cap of 227.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1626.HK is priced at HK$2.93, while 1332.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1626.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 293.00, whereas 1332.HK's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, 1626.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 1332.HK's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 1626.HK is more volatile compared to 1332.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1626.HK.
1626.HK vs 1451.HK Comparison
1626.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1626.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 1451.HK has a market cap of 194.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1626.HK is priced at HK$2.93, while 1451.HK trades at HK$0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1626.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 293.00, whereas 1451.HK's P/E ratio is 3.84. In terms of profitability, 1626.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 1451.HK's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 1626.HK is more volatile compared to 1451.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1626.HK.
1626.HK vs 8659.HK Comparison
1626.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1626.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 8659.HK has a market cap of 140M. Regarding current trading prices, 1626.HK is priced at HK$2.93, while 8659.HK trades at HK$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1626.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 293.00, whereas 8659.HK's P/E ratio is 4.68. In terms of profitability, 1626.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 8659.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1626.HK is less volatile compared to 8659.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1626.HK.
1626.HK vs 0403.HK Comparison
1626.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1626.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0403.HK has a market cap of 92.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1626.HK is priced at HK$2.93, while 0403.HK trades at HK$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1626.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 293.00, whereas 0403.HK's P/E ratio is 4.60. In terms of profitability, 1626.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0403.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1626.HK is more volatile compared to 0403.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1626.HK.
1626.HK vs 2320.HK Comparison
1626.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1626.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 2320.HK has a market cap of 77.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1626.HK is priced at HK$2.93, while 2320.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1626.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 293.00, whereas 2320.HK's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, 1626.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 2320.HK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1626.HK is more volatile compared to 2320.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1626.HK.
1626.HK vs 1629.HK Comparison
1626.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1626.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 1629.HK has a market cap of 69.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1626.HK is priced at HK$2.93, while 1629.HK trades at HK$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1626.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 293.00, whereas 1629.HK's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, 1626.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 1629.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1626.HK is less volatile compared to 1629.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1626.HK.
1626.HK vs 1239.HK Comparison
1626.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1626.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 1239.HK has a market cap of 63.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1626.HK is priced at HK$2.93, while 1239.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1626.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 293.00, whereas 1239.HK's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, 1626.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 1239.HK's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 1626.HK is more volatile compared to 1239.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1626.HK.
1626.HK vs 8383.HK Comparison
1626.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1626.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 8383.HK has a market cap of 44.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1626.HK is priced at HK$2.93, while 8383.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1626.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 293.00, whereas 8383.HK's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, 1626.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 8383.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1626.HK is less volatile compared to 8383.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1626.HK.
1626.HK vs 1439.HK Comparison
1626.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1626.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 1439.HK has a market cap of 33.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1626.HK is priced at HK$2.93, while 1439.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1626.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 293.00, whereas 1439.HK's P/E ratio is -1.99. In terms of profitability, 1626.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 1439.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1626.HK is less volatile compared to 1439.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1626.HK.
1626.HK vs 8291.HK Comparison
1626.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1626.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 8291.HK has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1626.HK is priced at HK$2.93, while 8291.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1626.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 293.00, whereas 8291.HK's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, 1626.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 8291.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1626.HK is more volatile compared to 8291.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1626.HK.
1626.HK vs 1781.HK Comparison
1626.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1626.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 1781.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1626.HK is priced at HK$2.93, while 1781.HK trades at HK$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1626.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 293.00, whereas 1781.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1626.HK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 1781.HK's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, 1626.HK is more volatile compared to 1781.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1626.HK.