Southeast Asia Properties & Finance Limited (HKSE: 0252.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See 0252.HK's competitors and their performance on the HKSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaging & Containers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for 0252.HK and its HKSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0252.HK | HK$1.62 | -4.71% | 365.2M | -15.82 | -HK$0.10 | +1.85% |
| 1626.HK | HK$20.38 | +19.74% | 10.7B | 201.10 | HK$0.09 | N/A |
| 0906.HK | HK$7.13 | +0.00% | 7.9B | 16.20 | HK$0.44 | N/A |
| 0468.HK | HK$2.50 | -0.79% | 3.5B | 16.21 | HK$0.15 | +0.48% |
| 0716.HK | HK$0.45 | +0.00% | 1.1B | 4.00 | HK$0.11 | +11.11% |
| 2603.HK | HK$12.44 | +2.39% | 945.2M | 15.48 | HK$0.79 | N/A |
| 1820.HK | HK$2.75 | +0.00% | 826.7M | -39.81 | -HK$0.07 | +2.91% |
| 6898.HK | HK$0.71 | -9.55% | 741.1M | 122.27 | HK$0.01 | +0.45% |
| 1332.HK | HK$0.16 | +3.33% | 420.8M | -4.78 | -HK$0.03 | N/A |
| 1335.HK | HK$0.12 | +14.85% | 270.2M | -3.70 | -HK$0.03 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
Jia Yao Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1626.HK)
0252.HK vs 1626.HK Comparison August 2026
Southeast Asia Properties & Finance Limited (HKSE: 0252.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0252.HK stands at 365.2M. In comparison, 1626.HK has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0252.HK is priced at HK$1.62 on the HKSE, while 1626.HK trades at HK$20.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0252.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -15.82, whereas 1626.HK's P/E ratio is 201.10. In terms of profitability, 0252.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 1626.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0252.HK is less volatile compared to 1626.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0252.HK.Check 1626.HK's competition here
CPMC Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0906.HK)
0252.HK vs 0906.HK Comparison August 2026
Southeast Asia Properties & Finance Limited (HKSE: 0252.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0252.HK stands at 365.2M. In comparison, 0906.HK has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0252.HK is priced at HK$1.62 on the HKSE, while 0906.HK trades at HK$7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0252.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -15.82, whereas 0906.HK's P/E ratio is 16.20. In terms of profitability, 0252.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 0906.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0252.HK is more volatile compared to 0906.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0252.HK.Check 0906.HK's competition here
Greatview Aseptic Packaging Company Limited (HKSE: 0468.HK)
0252.HK vs 0468.HK Comparison August 2026
Southeast Asia Properties & Finance Limited (HKSE: 0252.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0252.HK stands at 365.2M. In comparison, 0468.HK has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0252.HK is priced at HK$1.62 on the HKSE, while 0468.HK trades at HK$2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0252.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -15.82, whereas 0468.HK's P/E ratio is 16.21. In terms of profitability, 0252.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 0468.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0252.HK is less volatile compared to 0468.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0252.HK.Check 0468.HK's competition here
Singamas Container Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0716.HK)
0252.HK vs 0716.HK Comparison August 2026
Southeast Asia Properties & Finance Limited (HKSE: 0252.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0252.HK stands at 365.2M. In comparison, 0716.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0252.HK is priced at HK$1.62 on the HKSE, while 0716.HK trades at HK$0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0252.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -15.82, whereas 0716.HK's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, 0252.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 0716.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0252.HK is less volatile compared to 0716.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0252.HK.Check 0716.HK's competition here
Xiamen Jihong Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2603.HK)
0252.HK vs 2603.HK Comparison August 2026
Southeast Asia Properties & Finance Limited (HKSE: 0252.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0252.HK stands at 365.2M. In comparison, 2603.HK has a market cap of 945.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0252.HK is priced at HK$1.62 on the HKSE, while 2603.HK trades at HK$12.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0252.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -15.82, whereas 2603.HK's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, 0252.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 2603.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0252.HK is less volatile compared to 2603.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0252.HK.Check 2603.HK's competition here
Pacific Millennium Packaging Group Corporation (HKSE: 1820.HK)
0252.HK vs 1820.HK Comparison August 2026
Southeast Asia Properties & Finance Limited (HKSE: 0252.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0252.HK stands at 365.2M. In comparison, 1820.HK has a market cap of 826.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0252.HK is priced at HK$1.62 on the HKSE, while 1820.HK trades at HK$2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0252.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -15.82, whereas 1820.HK's P/E ratio is -39.81. In terms of profitability, 0252.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 1820.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0252.HK is more volatile compared to 1820.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0252.HK.Check 1820.HK's competition here
China Aluminum Cans Holdings Limited (HKSE: 6898.HK)
0252.HK vs 6898.HK Comparison August 2026
Southeast Asia Properties & Finance Limited (HKSE: 0252.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0252.HK stands at 365.2M. In comparison, 6898.HK has a market cap of 741.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0252.HK is priced at HK$1.62 on the HKSE, while 6898.HK trades at HK$0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0252.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -15.82, whereas 6898.HK's P/E ratio is 122.27. In terms of profitability, 0252.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 6898.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 0252.HK is less volatile compared to 6898.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0252.HK.Check 6898.HK's competition here
Touyun Biotech Group Limited (HKSE: 1332.HK)
0252.HK vs 1332.HK Comparison August 2026
Southeast Asia Properties & Finance Limited (HKSE: 0252.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0252.HK stands at 365.2M. In comparison, 1332.HK has a market cap of 420.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0252.HK is priced at HK$1.62 on the HKSE, while 1332.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0252.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -15.82, whereas 1332.HK's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, 0252.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 1332.HK's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, 0252.HK is less volatile compared to 1332.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0252.HK.Check 1332.HK's competition here
Sheen Tai Holdings Group Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 1335.HK)
0252.HK vs 1335.HK Comparison August 2026
Southeast Asia Properties & Finance Limited (HKSE: 0252.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0252.HK stands at 365.2M. In comparison, 1335.HK has a market cap of 270.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0252.HK is priced at HK$1.62 on the HKSE, while 1335.HK trades at HK$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0252.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -15.82, whereas 1335.HK's P/E ratio is -3.70. In terms of profitability, 0252.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 1335.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0252.HK is less volatile compared to 1335.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0252.HK.Check 1335.HK's competition here
Litu Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1008.HK)
0252.HK vs 1008.HK Comparison August 2026
Southeast Asia Properties & Finance Limited (HKSE: 0252.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0252.HK stands at 365.2M. In comparison, 1008.HK has a market cap of 257.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0252.HK is priced at HK$1.62 on the HKSE, while 1008.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0252.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -15.82, whereas 1008.HK's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, 0252.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 1008.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0252.HK is less volatile compared to 1008.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0252.HK.Check 1008.HK's competition here
MS Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1451.HK)
0252.HK vs 1451.HK Comparison August 2026
Southeast Asia Properties & Finance Limited (HKSE: 0252.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0252.HK stands at 365.2M. In comparison, 1451.HK has a market cap of 255.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0252.HK is priced at HK$1.62 on the HKSE, while 1451.HK trades at HK$1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0252.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -15.82, whereas 1451.HK's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, 0252.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 1451.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0252.HK is less volatile compared to 1451.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0252.HK.Check 1451.HK's competition here
Hop Fung Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 2320.HK)
0252.HK vs 2320.HK Comparison August 2026
Southeast Asia Properties & Finance Limited (HKSE: 0252.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0252.HK stands at 365.2M. In comparison, 2320.HK has a market cap of 200.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0252.HK is priced at HK$1.62 on the HKSE, while 2320.HK trades at HK$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0252.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -15.82, whereas 2320.HK's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, 0252.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 2320.HK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0252.HK is more volatile compared to 2320.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0252.HK.Check 2320.HK's competition here
Huaxi Holdings Company Limited (HKSE: 1689.HK)
0252.HK vs 1689.HK Comparison August 2026
Southeast Asia Properties & Finance Limited (HKSE: 0252.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0252.HK stands at 365.2M. In comparison, 1689.HK has a market cap of 199.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0252.HK is priced at HK$1.62 on the HKSE, while 1689.HK trades at HK$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0252.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -15.82, whereas 1689.HK's P/E ratio is -5.16. In terms of profitability, 0252.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 1689.HK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 0252.HK is less volatile compared to 1689.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0252.HK.Check 1689.HK's competition here
Zhengye International Holdings Company Limited (HKSE: 3363.HK)
0252.HK vs 3363.HK Comparison August 2026
Southeast Asia Properties & Finance Limited (HKSE: 0252.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0252.HK stands at 365.2M. In comparison, 3363.HK has a market cap of 185M. Regarding current trading prices, 0252.HK is priced at HK$1.62 on the HKSE, while 3363.HK trades at HK$0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0252.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -15.82, whereas 3363.HK's P/E ratio is 4.76. In terms of profitability, 0252.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 3363.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0252.HK is more volatile compared to 3363.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0252.HK.Check 3363.HK's competition here
Teamway International Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1239.HK)
0252.HK vs 1239.HK Comparison August 2026
Southeast Asia Properties & Finance Limited (HKSE: 0252.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0252.HK stands at 365.2M. In comparison, 1239.HK has a market cap of 130.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0252.HK is priced at HK$1.62 on the HKSE, while 1239.HK trades at HK$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0252.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -15.82, whereas 1239.HK's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, 0252.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 1239.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0252.HK is more volatile compared to 1239.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0252.HK.Check 1239.HK's competition here
Come Sure Group (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0794.HK)
0252.HK vs 0794.HK Comparison August 2026
Southeast Asia Properties & Finance Limited (HKSE: 0252.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0252.HK stands at 365.2M. In comparison, 0794.HK has a market cap of 112.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0252.HK is priced at HK$1.62 on the HKSE, while 0794.HK trades at HK$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0252.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -15.82, whereas 0794.HK's P/E ratio is -8.07. In terms of profitability, 0252.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 0794.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0252.HK is more volatile compared to 0794.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0252.HK.Check 0794.HK's competition here
Yik Wo International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8659.HK)
0252.HK vs 8659.HK Comparison August 2026
Southeast Asia Properties & Finance Limited (HKSE: 0252.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0252.HK stands at 365.2M. In comparison, 8659.HK has a market cap of 102.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0252.HK is priced at HK$1.62 on the HKSE, while 8659.HK trades at HK$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0252.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -15.82, whereas 8659.HK's P/E ratio is 3.16. In terms of profitability, 0252.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 8659.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0252.HK is less volatile compared to 8659.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0252.HK.Check 8659.HK's competition here
Starlite Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0403.HK)
0252.HK vs 0403.HK Comparison August 2026
Southeast Asia Properties & Finance Limited (HKSE: 0252.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0252.HK stands at 365.2M. In comparison, 0403.HK has a market cap of 101.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0252.HK is priced at HK$1.62 on the HKSE, while 0403.HK trades at HK$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0252.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -15.82, whereas 0403.HK's P/E ratio is 5.72. In terms of profitability, 0252.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 0403.HK's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 0252.HK is less volatile compared to 0403.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0252.HK.Check 0403.HK's competition here
Linocraft Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8383.HK)
0252.HK vs 8383.HK Comparison August 2026
Southeast Asia Properties & Finance Limited (HKSE: 0252.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0252.HK stands at 365.2M. In comparison, 8383.HK has a market cap of 44.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0252.HK is priced at HK$1.62 on the HKSE, while 8383.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0252.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -15.82, whereas 8383.HK's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, 0252.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 8383.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0252.HK is less volatile compared to 8383.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0252.HK.Check 8383.HK's competition here
Mobile Internet (China) Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1439.HK)
0252.HK vs 1439.HK Comparison August 2026
Southeast Asia Properties & Finance Limited (HKSE: 0252.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0252.HK stands at 365.2M. In comparison, 1439.HK has a market cap of 33.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0252.HK is priced at HK$1.62 on the HKSE, while 1439.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0252.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -15.82, whereas 1439.HK's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, 0252.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 1439.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0252.HK is less volatile compared to 1439.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0252.HK.Check 1439.HK's competition here
Hong Kong Entertainment International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8291.HK)
0252.HK vs 8291.HK Comparison August 2026
Southeast Asia Properties & Finance Limited (HKSE: 0252.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0252.HK stands at 365.2M. In comparison, 8291.HK has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0252.HK is priced at HK$1.62 on the HKSE, while 8291.HK trades at HK$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0252.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -15.82, whereas 8291.HK's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, 0252.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 8291.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0252.HK is less volatile compared to 8291.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0252.HK.Check 8291.HK's competition here
Sun Cheong Creative Development Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1781.HK)
0252.HK vs 1781.HK Comparison August 2026
Southeast Asia Properties & Finance Limited (HKSE: 0252.HK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0252.HK stands at 365.2M. In comparison, 1781.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0252.HK is priced at HK$1.62 on the HKSE, while 1781.HK trades at HK$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0252.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -15.82, whereas 1781.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0252.HK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 1781.HK's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, 0252.HK is less volatile compared to 1781.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0252.HK.Check 1781.HK's competition here