Sinohope Technology Holdings Limited
Sinohope Technology Holdings Limited (1611.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (1611.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1611.HK | HK$2.71 | -7.19% | 1.5B | -135.50 | -HK$0.02 | N/A |
| 6030.HK | HK$28.26 | +1.44% | 418.8B | 11.21 | HK$2.52 | +2.25% |
| 2611.HK | HK$13.60 | +1.87% | 291.9B | 12.59 | HK$1.08 | +3.52% |
| 1776.HK | HK$17.88 | +2.17% | 181B | 8.09 | HK$2.21 | +3.10% |
| 3908.HK | HK$20.86 | +1.76% | 161.5B | 9.70 | HK$2.15 | +0.96% |
| 6099.HK | HK$13.83 | +0.95% | 154.6B | 8.92 | HK$1.55 | +3.96% |
| 6886.HK | HK$16.55 | +1.97% | 149.3B | 8.36 | HK$1.98 | +3.51% |
| 6806.HK | HK$2.87 | +1.77% | 132.3B | 6.52 | HK$0.44 | +3.14% |
| 6837.HK | HK$6.45 | -4.02% | 129.3B | -20.16 | -HK$0.32 | N/A |
| 3958.HK | HK$6.26 | +1.46% | 89.4B | 8.46 | HK$0.74 | +3.90% |
Stock Comparison
1611.HK vs 6030.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 6030.HK has a market cap of 418.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 6030.HK trades at HK$28.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 6030.HK's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 6030.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 6030.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 6030.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 2611.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 2611.HK has a market cap of 291.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 2611.HK trades at HK$13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 2611.HK's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 2611.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 2611.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 2611.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 1776.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 1776.HK has a market cap of 181B. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 1776.HK trades at HK$17.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 1776.HK's P/E ratio is 8.09. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 1776.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 1776.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 1776.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 3908.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 3908.HK has a market cap of 161.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 3908.HK trades at HK$20.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 3908.HK's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 3908.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 3908.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 3908.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 6099.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 6099.HK has a market cap of 154.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 6099.HK trades at HK$13.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 6099.HK's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 6099.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 6099.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 6099.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 6886.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 6886.HK has a market cap of 149.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 6886.HK trades at HK$16.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 6886.HK's P/E ratio is 8.36. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 6886.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 6886.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 6886.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 6806.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 6806.HK has a market cap of 132.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 6806.HK trades at HK$2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 6806.HK's P/E ratio is 6.52. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 6806.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 6806.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 6806.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 6837.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 6837.HK has a market cap of 129.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 6837.HK trades at HK$6.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 6837.HK's P/E ratio is -20.16. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 6837.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 6837.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 6837.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 3958.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 3958.HK has a market cap of 89.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 3958.HK trades at HK$6.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 3958.HK's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 3958.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 3958.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 3958.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 6066.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 6066.HK has a market cap of 86.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 6066.HK trades at HK$11.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 6066.HK's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 6066.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 6066.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 6066.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 6178.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 6178.HK has a market cap of 74B. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 6178.HK trades at HK$7.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 6178.HK's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 6178.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 6178.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 6178.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 1456.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 1456.HK has a market cap of 55B. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 1456.HK trades at HK$4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 1456.HK's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 1456.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 1456.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 1456.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 6881.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 6881.HK has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 6881.HK trades at HK$8.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 6881.HK's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 6881.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 6881.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 6881.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 1788.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 1788.HK has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 1788.HK trades at HK$2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 1788.HK's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 1788.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 1788.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 1788.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 1428.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 1428.HK has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 1428.HK trades at HK$12.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 1428.HK's P/E ratio is 34.81. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 1428.HK's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 1428.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 1428.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 1375.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 1375.HK has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 1375.HK trades at HK$1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 1375.HK's P/E ratio is 17.55. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 1375.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 1375.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 1375.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 0622.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 0622.HK has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 0622.HK trades at HK$2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 0622.HK's P/E ratio is 68.97. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0622.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 0622.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 0622.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 0665.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 0665.HK has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 0665.HK trades at HK$1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 0665.HK's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0665.HK's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 0665.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 0665.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 0863.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 0863.HK has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 0863.HK trades at HK$12.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 0863.HK's P/E ratio is -22.11. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0863.HK's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 0863.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 0863.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 0068.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 0068.HK has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 0068.HK trades at HK$23.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 0068.HK's P/E ratio is -86.21. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0068.HK's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is less volatile compared to 0068.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 0068.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 0412.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 0412.HK has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 0412.HK trades at HK$1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 0412.HK's P/E ratio is -12.30. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0412.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 0412.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 0412.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 1031.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 1031.HK has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 1031.HK trades at HK$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 1031.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 1031.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 1031.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 1031.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 1104.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 1104.HK has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 1104.HK trades at HK$2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 1104.HK's P/E ratio is 1.56. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 1104.HK's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is less volatile compared to 1104.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 1104.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 1476.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 1476.HK has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 1476.HK trades at HK$1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 1476.HK's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 1476.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 1476.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 1476.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 1469.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 1469.HK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 1469.HK trades at HK$0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 1469.HK's P/E ratio is 19.60. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 1469.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 1469.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 1469.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 1141.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 1141.HK has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 1141.HK trades at HK$2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 1141.HK's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 1141.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is less volatile compared to 1141.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 1141.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 0127.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 0127.HK has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 0127.HK trades at HK$1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 0127.HK's P/E ratio is -6.05. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0127.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 0127.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 0127.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 1911.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 1911.HK has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 1911.HK trades at HK$3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 1911.HK's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 1911.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 1911.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 1911.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 0064.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 0064.HK has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 0064.HK trades at HK$3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 0064.HK's P/E ratio is 31.20. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0064.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 0064.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 0064.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 0804.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 0804.HK has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 0804.HK trades at HK$3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 0804.HK's P/E ratio is -3.98. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0804.HK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 0804.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 0804.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 3938.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 3938.HK has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 3938.HK trades at HK$3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 3938.HK's P/E ratio is -90.25. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 3938.HK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 3938.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 3938.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 0218.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 0218.HK has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 0218.HK trades at HK$1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 0218.HK's P/E ratio is -27.75. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0218.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 0218.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 0218.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 0335.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 0335.HK has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 0335.HK trades at HK$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 0335.HK's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0335.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 0335.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 0335.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 0993.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 0993.HK has a market cap of 931.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 0993.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 0993.HK's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0993.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 0993.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 0993.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 8540.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 8540.HK has a market cap of 905.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 8540.HK trades at HK$4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 8540.HK's P/E ratio is 14.74. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 8540.HK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 8540.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 8540.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 3678.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 3678.HK has a market cap of 701.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 3678.HK trades at HK$2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 3678.HK's P/E ratio is 140.50. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 3678.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 3678.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 3678.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 2680.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 2680.HK has a market cap of 619.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 2680.HK trades at HK$10.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 2680.HK's P/E ratio is 114.67. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 2680.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is less volatile compared to 2680.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 2680.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 1461.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 1461.HK has a market cap of 611.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 1461.HK trades at HK$0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 1461.HK's P/E ratio is 15.25. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 1461.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 1461.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 1461.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 0717.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 0717.HK has a market cap of 593.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 0717.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 0717.HK's P/E ratio is 4.40. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0717.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 0717.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 0717.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 0329.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 0329.HK has a market cap of 532.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 0329.HK trades at HK$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 0329.HK's P/E ratio is -17.75. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0329.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is less volatile compared to 0329.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 0329.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 0235.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 0235.HK has a market cap of 530M. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 0235.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 0235.HK's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0235.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 0235.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 0235.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 0227.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 0227.HK has a market cap of 492.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 0227.HK trades at HK$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 0227.HK's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0227.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 0227.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 0227.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 0111.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 0111.HK has a market cap of 480.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 0111.HK trades at HK$0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 0111.HK's P/E ratio is 5.77. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0111.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 0111.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 0111.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 8365.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 8365.HK has a market cap of 361.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 8365.HK trades at HK$1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 8365.HK's P/E ratio is -3.64. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 8365.HK's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 8365.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 8365.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 2263.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 2263.HK has a market cap of 350M. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 2263.HK trades at HK$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 2263.HK's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 2263.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 2263.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 2263.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 8350.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 8350.HK has a market cap of 345.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 8350.HK trades at HK$0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 8350.HK's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 8350.HK's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 8350.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 8350.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 6877.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 6877.HK has a market cap of 276.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 6877.HK trades at HK$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 6877.HK's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 6877.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 6877.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 6877.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 1073.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 1073.HK has a market cap of 227.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 1073.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 1073.HK's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 1073.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 1073.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 1073.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 0510.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 0510.HK has a market cap of 211.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 0510.HK trades at HK$0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 0510.HK's P/E ratio is -5.44. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0510.HK's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 0510.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 0510.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 0211.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 0211.HK has a market cap of 190.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 0211.HK trades at HK$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 0211.HK's P/E ratio is -3.71. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0211.HK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 0211.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 0211.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 0188.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 0188.HK has a market cap of 186.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 0188.HK trades at HK$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 0188.HK's P/E ratio is -24.40. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0188.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 0188.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 0188.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 0223.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 0223.HK has a market cap of 180.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 0223.HK trades at HK$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 0223.HK's P/E ratio is -6.65. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0223.HK's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 0223.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 0223.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 0851.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 0851.HK has a market cap of 174.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 0851.HK trades at HK$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 0851.HK's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0851.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 0851.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 0851.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 0356.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 0356.HK has a market cap of 155.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 0356.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 0356.HK's P/E ratio is -5.70. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0356.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 0356.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 0356.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 8168.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 8168.HK has a market cap of 155.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 8168.HK trades at HK$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 8168.HK's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 8168.HK's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is less volatile compared to 8168.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 8168.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 8193.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 8193.HK has a market cap of 139.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 8193.HK trades at HK$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 8193.HK's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 8193.HK's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is less volatile compared to 8193.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 8193.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 1004.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 1004.HK has a market cap of 135.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 1004.HK trades at HK$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 1004.HK's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 1004.HK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 1004.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 1004.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 8295.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 8295.HK has a market cap of 133.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 8295.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 8295.HK's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 8295.HK's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is less volatile compared to 8295.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 8295.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 8439.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 8439.HK has a market cap of 126.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 8439.HK trades at HK$0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 8439.HK's P/E ratio is -86.00. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 8439.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 8439.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 8439.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 0572.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 0572.HK has a market cap of 120.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 0572.HK trades at HK$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 0572.HK's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0572.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 0572.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 0572.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 0988.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 0988.HK has a market cap of 119.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 0988.HK trades at HK$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 0988.HK's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0988.HK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 0988.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 0988.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 0139.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 0139.HK has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 0139.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 0139.HK's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0139.HK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 0139.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 0139.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 0812.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 0812.HK has a market cap of 109.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 0812.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 0812.HK's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0812.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is less volatile compared to 0812.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 0812.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 0619.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 0619.HK has a market cap of 103.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 0619.HK trades at HK$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 0619.HK's P/E ratio is -4.31. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0619.HK's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is less volatile compared to 0619.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 0619.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 8098.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 8098.HK has a market cap of 96.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 8098.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 8098.HK's P/E ratio is -4.40. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 8098.HK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 8098.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 8098.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 1191.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 1191.HK has a market cap of 89.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 1191.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 1191.HK's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 1191.HK's ROE of +2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is less volatile compared to 1191.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 1191.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 8072.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 8072.HK has a market cap of 79.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 8072.HK trades at HK$0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 8072.HK's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 8072.HK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 8072.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 8072.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 8123.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 8123.HK has a market cap of 77.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 8123.HK trades at HK$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 8123.HK's P/E ratio is -3.16. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 8123.HK's ROE of -6.79%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 8123.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 8123.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 0372.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 0372.HK has a market cap of 66.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 0372.HK trades at HK$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 0372.HK's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0372.HK's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 0372.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 0372.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 0821.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 0821.HK has a market cap of 63.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 0821.HK trades at HK$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 0821.HK's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0821.HK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 0821.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 0821.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 8221.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 8221.HK has a market cap of 55.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 8221.HK trades at HK$1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 8221.HK's P/E ratio is -7.80. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 8221.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is less volatile compared to 8221.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 8221.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 2324.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 2324.HK has a market cap of 54M. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 2324.HK trades at HK$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 2324.HK's P/E ratio is 0.48. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 2324.HK's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 2324.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 2324.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 8210.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 8210.HK has a market cap of 47.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 8210.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 8210.HK's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 8210.HK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is less volatile compared to 8210.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 8210.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 8340.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 8340.HK has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 8340.HK trades at HK$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 8340.HK's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 8340.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 8340.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 8340.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 8226.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 8226.HK has a market cap of 37.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 8226.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 8226.HK's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 8226.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 8226.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 8226.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 8333.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 8333.HK has a market cap of 36.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 8333.HK trades at HK$0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 8333.HK's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 8333.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 8333.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 8333.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 0428.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 0428.HK has a market cap of 32.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 0428.HK trades at HK$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 0428.HK's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0428.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 0428.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 0428.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 0299.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 0299.HK has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 0299.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 0299.HK's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0299.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 0299.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 0299.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 0263.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 0263.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 0263.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 0263.HK's P/E ratio is 0.06. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0263.HK's ROE of +3.79%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is less volatile compared to 0263.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 0263.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 0231.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 0231.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 0231.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 0231.HK's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0231.HK's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 0231.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 0231.HK's competition here
1611.HK vs 0281.HK Comparison April 2026
1611.HK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1611.HK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 0281.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1611.HK is priced at HK$2.71, while 0281.HK trades at HK$0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1611.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -135.50, whereas 0281.HK's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, 1611.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0281.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1611.HK is more volatile compared to 0281.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1611.HK.Check 0281.HK's competition here