Tian Lun Gas Holdings Limited
Tian Lun Gas Holdings Limited 1600.HK Peers
See (1600.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Gas Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1600.HK | HK$3.29 | +4.44% | 3.1B | 9.53 | HK$0.34 | +4.82% |
| 0003.HK | HK$6.66 | +1.06% | 124.3B | 22.20 | HK$0.30 | +5.26% |
| 2688.HK | HK$63.00 | +0.48% | 70B | 10.77 | HK$5.85 | +4.76% |
| 1193.HK | HK$20.45 | +0.00% | 45.5B | 11.14 | HK$1.80 | +4.65% |
| 0384.HK | HK$7.50 | +2.32% | 40.9B | 12.50 | HK$0.60 | +6.67% |
| 1083.HK | HK$3.98 | -0.50% | 13.7B | 9.16 | HK$0.43 | +4.77% |
| 3633.HK | HK$4.09 | +0.25% | 11.2B | 81.80 | HK$0.05 | +0.49% |
| 1635.HK | HK$2.21 | +4.74% | 11B | 14.07 | HK$0.15 | +1.78% |
| 2886.HK | HK$1.04 | +0.97% | 1.4B | 6.93 | HK$0.15 | +7.31% |
| 6828.HK | HK$0.05 | +8.16% | 1.2B | 5.30 | HK$0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
1600.HK vs 0003.HK Comparison
1600.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1600.HK stands at 3.1B. In comparison, 0003.HK has a market cap of 124.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1600.HK is priced at HK$3.29, while 0003.HK trades at HK$6.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1600.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas 0003.HK's P/E ratio is 22.20. In terms of profitability, 1600.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0003.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1600.HK is more volatile compared to 0003.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1600.HK.
1600.HK vs 2688.HK Comparison
1600.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1600.HK stands at 3.1B. In comparison, 2688.HK has a market cap of 70B. Regarding current trading prices, 1600.HK is priced at HK$3.29, while 2688.HK trades at HK$63.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1600.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas 2688.HK's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, 1600.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 2688.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1600.HK is more volatile compared to 2688.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1600.HK.
1600.HK vs 1193.HK Comparison
1600.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1600.HK stands at 3.1B. In comparison, 1193.HK has a market cap of 45.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1600.HK is priced at HK$3.29, while 1193.HK trades at HK$20.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1600.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas 1193.HK's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, 1600.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1193.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1600.HK is more volatile compared to 1193.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1600.HK.
1600.HK vs 0384.HK Comparison
1600.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1600.HK stands at 3.1B. In comparison, 0384.HK has a market cap of 40.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1600.HK is priced at HK$3.29, while 0384.HK trades at HK$7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1600.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas 0384.HK's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, 1600.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0384.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1600.HK is more volatile compared to 0384.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1600.HK.
1600.HK vs 1083.HK Comparison
1600.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1600.HK stands at 3.1B. In comparison, 1083.HK has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1600.HK is priced at HK$3.29, while 1083.HK trades at HK$3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1600.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas 1083.HK's P/E ratio is 9.16. In terms of profitability, 1600.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1083.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1600.HK is more volatile compared to 1083.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1600.HK.
1600.HK vs 3633.HK Comparison
1600.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1600.HK stands at 3.1B. In comparison, 3633.HK has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1600.HK is priced at HK$3.29, while 3633.HK trades at HK$4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1600.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas 3633.HK's P/E ratio is 81.80. In terms of profitability, 1600.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 3633.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1600.HK is more volatile compared to 3633.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1600.HK.
1600.HK vs 1635.HK Comparison
1600.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1600.HK stands at 3.1B. In comparison, 1635.HK has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, 1600.HK is priced at HK$3.29, while 1635.HK trades at HK$2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1600.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas 1635.HK's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, 1600.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1635.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1600.HK is less volatile compared to 1635.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1600.HK.
1600.HK vs 2886.HK Comparison
1600.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1600.HK stands at 3.1B. In comparison, 2886.HK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1600.HK is priced at HK$3.29, while 2886.HK trades at HK$1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1600.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas 2886.HK's P/E ratio is 6.93. In terms of profitability, 1600.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 2886.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1600.HK is more volatile compared to 2886.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1600.HK.
1600.HK vs 6828.HK Comparison
1600.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1600.HK stands at 3.1B. In comparison, 6828.HK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1600.HK is priced at HK$3.29, while 6828.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1600.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas 6828.HK's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, 1600.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 6828.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1600.HK is less volatile compared to 6828.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1600.HK.
1600.HK vs 9908.HK Comparison
1600.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1600.HK stands at 3.1B. In comparison, 9908.HK has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1600.HK is priced at HK$3.29, while 9908.HK trades at HK$7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1600.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas 9908.HK's P/E ratio is 5.07. In terms of profitability, 1600.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 9908.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1600.HK is more volatile compared to 9908.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1600.HK.
1600.HK vs 1940.HK Comparison
1600.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1600.HK stands at 3.1B. In comparison, 1940.HK has a market cap of 552M. Regarding current trading prices, 1600.HK is priced at HK$3.29, while 1940.HK trades at HK$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1600.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas 1940.HK's P/E ratio is 3.83. In terms of profitability, 1600.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1940.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1600.HK is more volatile compared to 1940.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1600.HK.
1600.HK vs 1265.HK Comparison
1600.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1600.HK stands at 3.1B. In comparison, 1265.HK has a market cap of 358.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1600.HK is priced at HK$3.29, while 1265.HK trades at HK$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1600.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas 1265.HK's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, 1600.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1265.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1600.HK is more volatile compared to 1265.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1600.HK.
1600.HK vs 0681.HK Comparison
1600.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1600.HK stands at 3.1B. In comparison, 0681.HK has a market cap of 250.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1600.HK is priced at HK$3.29, while 0681.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1600.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas 0681.HK's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, 1600.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0681.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1600.HK is more volatile compared to 0681.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1600.HK.
1600.HK vs 1407.HK Comparison
1600.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1600.HK stands at 3.1B. In comparison, 1407.HK has a market cap of 198M. Regarding current trading prices, 1600.HK is priced at HK$3.29, while 1407.HK trades at HK$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1600.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas 1407.HK's P/E ratio is 5.63. In terms of profitability, 1600.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1407.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1600.HK is more volatile compared to 1407.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1600.HK.
1600.HK vs 1430.HK Comparison
1600.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1600.HK stands at 3.1B. In comparison, 1430.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1600.HK is priced at HK$3.29, while 1430.HK trades at HK$2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1600.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas 1430.HK's P/E ratio is 20.19. In terms of profitability, 1600.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1430.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1600.HK is more volatile compared to 1430.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1600.HK.