Tian Lun Gas Holdings Limited
Tian Lun Gas Holdings Limited 1600.HK Peers
See (1600.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Gas Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1600.HK | $2.67 | +1.14% | 2.59B | 7.85 | $0.34 | +5.90% |
| 0003.HK | $7.06 | -0.14% | 131.74B | 23.53 | $0.30 | +4.96% |
| 2688.HK | $63.05 | +0.96% | 70.06B | 11.06 | $5.70 | +4.69% |
| 1193.HK | $22.65 | +1.34% | 51.42B | 12.58 | $1.80 | +5.55% |
| 0384.HK | $7.17 | +0.28% | 39.06B | 12.36 | $0.58 | +6.97% |
| 1083.HK | $3.51 | +0.86% | 12.22B | 8.16 | $0.43 | +4.56% |
| 3633.HK | $4.21 | -0.24% | 11.67B | 84.20 | $0.05 | N/A |
| 1635.HK | $2.06 | +2.49% | 11.30B | 14.71 | $0.14 | +2.02% |
| 2886.HK | $1.03 | -0.97% | 1.42B | 6.87 | $0.15 | +7.38% |
| 9908.HK | $7.60 | -3.92% | 1.05B | 5.24 | $1.45 | +8.00% |
Stock Comparison
1600.HK vs 0003.HK Comparison
1600.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1600.HK stands at 2.59B. In comparison, 0003.HK has a market cap of 131.74B. Regarding current trading prices, 1600.HK is priced at $2.67, while 0003.HK trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1600.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas 0003.HK's P/E ratio is 23.53. In terms of profitability, 1600.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0003.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1600.HK is more volatile compared to 0003.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1600.HK.
1600.HK vs 2688.HK Comparison
1600.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1600.HK stands at 2.59B. In comparison, 2688.HK has a market cap of 70.06B. Regarding current trading prices, 1600.HK is priced at $2.67, while 2688.HK trades at $63.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1600.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas 2688.HK's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, 1600.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 2688.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1600.HK is more volatile compared to 2688.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1600.HK.
1600.HK vs 1193.HK Comparison
1600.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1600.HK stands at 2.59B. In comparison, 1193.HK has a market cap of 51.42B. Regarding current trading prices, 1600.HK is priced at $2.67, while 1193.HK trades at $22.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1600.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas 1193.HK's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, 1600.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1193.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1600.HK is more volatile compared to 1193.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1600.HK.
1600.HK vs 0384.HK Comparison
1600.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1600.HK stands at 2.59B. In comparison, 0384.HK has a market cap of 39.06B. Regarding current trading prices, 1600.HK is priced at $2.67, while 0384.HK trades at $7.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1600.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas 0384.HK's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, 1600.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0384.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1600.HK is more volatile compared to 0384.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1600.HK.
1600.HK vs 1083.HK Comparison
1600.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1600.HK stands at 2.59B. In comparison, 1083.HK has a market cap of 12.22B. Regarding current trading prices, 1600.HK is priced at $2.67, while 1083.HK trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1600.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas 1083.HK's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, 1600.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1083.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1600.HK is more volatile compared to 1083.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1600.HK.
1600.HK vs 3633.HK Comparison
1600.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1600.HK stands at 2.59B. In comparison, 3633.HK has a market cap of 11.67B. Regarding current trading prices, 1600.HK is priced at $2.67, while 3633.HK trades at $4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1600.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas 3633.HK's P/E ratio is 84.20. In terms of profitability, 1600.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 3633.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1600.HK is more volatile compared to 3633.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1600.HK.
1600.HK vs 1635.HK Comparison
1600.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1600.HK stands at 2.59B. In comparison, 1635.HK has a market cap of 11.30B. Regarding current trading prices, 1600.HK is priced at $2.67, while 1635.HK trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1600.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas 1635.HK's P/E ratio is 14.71. In terms of profitability, 1600.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1635.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1600.HK is less volatile compared to 1635.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1600.HK.
1600.HK vs 2886.HK Comparison
1600.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1600.HK stands at 2.59B. In comparison, 2886.HK has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, 1600.HK is priced at $2.67, while 2886.HK trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1600.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas 2886.HK's P/E ratio is 6.87. In terms of profitability, 1600.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 2886.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1600.HK is more volatile compared to 2886.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1600.HK.
1600.HK vs 9908.HK Comparison
1600.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1600.HK stands at 2.59B. In comparison, 9908.HK has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, 1600.HK is priced at $2.67, while 9908.HK trades at $7.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1600.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas 9908.HK's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, 1600.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 9908.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1600.HK is less volatile compared to 9908.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1600.HK.
1600.HK vs 6828.HK Comparison
1600.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1600.HK stands at 2.59B. In comparison, 6828.HK has a market cap of 841.24M. Regarding current trading prices, 1600.HK is priced at $2.67, while 6828.HK trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1600.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas 6828.HK's P/E ratio is 3.70. In terms of profitability, 1600.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 6828.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1600.HK is less volatile compared to 6828.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1600.HK.
1600.HK vs 1940.HK Comparison
1600.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1600.HK stands at 2.59B. In comparison, 1940.HK has a market cap of 600.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 1600.HK is priced at $2.67, while 1940.HK trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1600.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas 1940.HK's P/E ratio is 3.85. In terms of profitability, 1600.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1940.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1600.HK is less volatile compared to 1940.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1600.HK.
1600.HK vs 1265.HK Comparison
1600.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1600.HK stands at 2.59B. In comparison, 1265.HK has a market cap of 321.88M. Regarding current trading prices, 1600.HK is priced at $2.67, while 1265.HK trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1600.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas 1265.HK's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, 1600.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1265.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1600.HK is more volatile compared to 1265.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1600.HK.
1600.HK vs 0681.HK Comparison
1600.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1600.HK stands at 2.59B. In comparison, 0681.HK has a market cap of 196.56M. Regarding current trading prices, 1600.HK is priced at $2.67, while 0681.HK trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1600.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas 0681.HK's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, 1600.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0681.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1600.HK is less volatile compared to 0681.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1600.HK.
1600.HK vs 1407.HK Comparison
1600.HK plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1600.HK stands at 2.59B. In comparison, 1407.HK has a market cap of 167.20M. Regarding current trading prices, 1600.HK is priced at $2.67, while 1407.HK trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1600.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas 1407.HK's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, 1600.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1407.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1600.HK is less volatile compared to 1407.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1600.HK.