Qidian International Co., Ltd.
Qidian International Co., Ltd. 1280.HK Peers
See (1280.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1280.HK | HK$3.46 | -6.49% | 6.3B | -1.27 | -HK$2.75 | N/A |
| 9988.HK | HK$109.40 | -2.41% | 2.1T | 15.02 | HK$7.31 | +1.79% |
| 89988.HK | HK$99.65 | -2.59% | 1.9T | N/A | N/A | +1.79% |
| 3690.HK | HK$126.00 | -2.63% | 769.1B | 20.24 | HK$6.19 | N/A |
| 9618.HK | HK$128.00 | -1.77% | 359B | 7.94 | HK$16.11 | +23.84% |
| 1880.HK | HK$53.30 | +1.91% | 131.8B | 25.29 | HK$2.06 | +2.19% |
| 9896.HK | HK$35.45 | +1.58% | 44B | 16.56 | HK$2.15 | +3.29% |
| 2148.HK | HK$5.57 | +0.72% | 6.3B | 8.31 | HK$0.67 | +1.59% |
| 2411.HK | HK$1.86 | +8.77% | 3.1B | -6.29 | -HK$0.28 | +0.40% |
| 0370.HK | HK$1.39 | -2.80% | 3.1B | -25.00 | -HK$0.06 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
1280.HK vs 9988.HK Comparison
1280.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1280.HK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, 9988.HK has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, 1280.HK is priced at HK$3.46, while 9988.HK trades at HK$109.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1280.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas 9988.HK's P/E ratio is 15.02. In terms of profitability, 1280.HK's ROE is +63.51%, compared to 9988.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1280.HK is more volatile compared to 9988.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1280.HK.
1280.HK vs 89988.HK Comparison
1280.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1280.HK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, 89988.HK has a market cap of 1.9T. Regarding current trading prices, 1280.HK is priced at HK$3.46, while 89988.HK trades at HK$99.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1280.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas 89988.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1280.HK's ROE is +63.51%, compared to 89988.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1280.HK is more volatile compared to 89988.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1280.HK.
1280.HK vs 3690.HK Comparison
1280.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1280.HK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, 3690.HK has a market cap of 769.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1280.HK is priced at HK$3.46, while 3690.HK trades at HK$126.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1280.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas 3690.HK's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, 1280.HK's ROE is +63.51%, compared to 3690.HK's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 1280.HK is more volatile compared to 3690.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1280.HK.
1280.HK vs 9618.HK Comparison
1280.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1280.HK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, 9618.HK has a market cap of 359B. Regarding current trading prices, 1280.HK is priced at HK$3.46, while 9618.HK trades at HK$128.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1280.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas 9618.HK's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, 1280.HK's ROE is +63.51%, compared to 9618.HK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 1280.HK is more volatile compared to 9618.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1280.HK.
1280.HK vs 1880.HK Comparison
1280.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1280.HK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, 1880.HK has a market cap of 131.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1280.HK is priced at HK$3.46, while 1880.HK trades at HK$53.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1280.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas 1880.HK's P/E ratio is 25.29. In terms of profitability, 1280.HK's ROE is +63.51%, compared to 1880.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1280.HK is more volatile compared to 1880.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1280.HK.
1280.HK vs 9896.HK Comparison
1280.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1280.HK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, 9896.HK has a market cap of 44B. Regarding current trading prices, 1280.HK is priced at HK$3.46, while 9896.HK trades at HK$35.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1280.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas 9896.HK's P/E ratio is 16.56. In terms of profitability, 1280.HK's ROE is +63.51%, compared to 9896.HK's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 1280.HK is more volatile compared to 9896.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1280.HK.
1280.HK vs 2148.HK Comparison
1280.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1280.HK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, 2148.HK has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1280.HK is priced at HK$3.46, while 2148.HK trades at HK$5.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1280.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas 2148.HK's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, 1280.HK's ROE is +63.51%, compared to 2148.HK's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 1280.HK is more volatile compared to 2148.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1280.HK.
1280.HK vs 2411.HK Comparison
1280.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1280.HK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, 2411.HK has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1280.HK is priced at HK$3.46, while 2411.HK trades at HK$1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1280.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas 2411.HK's P/E ratio is -6.29. In terms of profitability, 1280.HK's ROE is +63.51%, compared to 2411.HK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1280.HK is less volatile compared to 2411.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1280.HK.
1280.HK vs 0370.HK Comparison
1280.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1280.HK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, 0370.HK has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1280.HK is priced at HK$3.46, while 0370.HK trades at HK$1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1280.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas 0370.HK's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, 1280.HK's ROE is +63.51%, compared to 0370.HK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1280.HK is less volatile compared to 0370.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1280.HK.
1280.HK vs 1939.HK Comparison
1280.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1280.HK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, 1939.HK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1280.HK is priced at HK$3.46, while 1939.HK trades at HK$4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1280.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas 1939.HK's P/E ratio is -82.50. In terms of profitability, 1280.HK's ROE is +63.51%, compared to 1939.HK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1280.HK is less volatile compared to 1939.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1280.HK.
1280.HK vs 2209.HK Comparison
1280.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1280.HK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, 2209.HK has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1280.HK is priced at HK$3.46, while 2209.HK trades at HK$5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1280.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas 2209.HK's P/E ratio is 14.58. In terms of profitability, 1280.HK's ROE is +63.51%, compared to 2209.HK's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, 1280.HK is less volatile compared to 2209.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1280.HK.
1280.HK vs 0178.HK Comparison
1280.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1280.HK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, 0178.HK has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1280.HK is priced at HK$3.46, while 0178.HK trades at HK$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1280.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas 0178.HK's P/E ratio is 18.67. In terms of profitability, 1280.HK's ROE is +63.51%, compared to 0178.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1280.HK is more volatile compared to 0178.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1280.HK.
1280.HK vs 2420.HK Comparison
1280.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1280.HK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, 2420.HK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1280.HK is priced at HK$3.46, while 2420.HK trades at HK$3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1280.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas 2420.HK's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, 1280.HK's ROE is +63.51%, compared to 2420.HK's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 1280.HK is more volatile compared to 2420.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1280.HK.
1280.HK vs 1137.HK Comparison
1280.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1280.HK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, 1137.HK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1280.HK is priced at HK$3.46, while 1137.HK trades at HK$1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1280.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas 1137.HK's P/E ratio is -19.75. In terms of profitability, 1280.HK's ROE is +63.51%, compared to 1137.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1280.HK is more volatile compared to 1137.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1280.HK.
1280.HK vs 9991.HK Comparison
1280.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1280.HK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, 9991.HK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1280.HK is priced at HK$3.46, while 9991.HK trades at HK$7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1280.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas 9991.HK's P/E ratio is -6.21. In terms of profitability, 1280.HK's ROE is +63.51%, compared to 9991.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1280.HK is more volatile compared to 9991.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1280.HK.
1280.HK vs 0493.HK Comparison
1280.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1280.HK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, 0493.HK has a market cap of 898.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1280.HK is priced at HK$3.46, while 0493.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1280.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas 0493.HK's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, 1280.HK's ROE is +63.51%, compared to 0493.HK's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, 1280.HK is less volatile compared to 0493.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1280.HK.
1280.HK vs 2101.HK Comparison
1280.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1280.HK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, 2101.HK has a market cap of 621.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1280.HK is priced at HK$3.46, while 2101.HK trades at HK$1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1280.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas 2101.HK's P/E ratio is 30.40. In terms of profitability, 1280.HK's ROE is +63.51%, compared to 2101.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1280.HK is less volatile compared to 2101.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1280.HK.
1280.HK vs 8395.HK Comparison
1280.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1280.HK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, 8395.HK has a market cap of 350.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1280.HK is priced at HK$3.46, while 8395.HK trades at HK$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1280.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas 8395.HK's P/E ratio is -22.10. In terms of profitability, 1280.HK's ROE is +63.51%, compared to 8395.HK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1280.HK is less volatile compared to 8395.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1280.HK.
1280.HK vs 2347.HK Comparison
1280.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1280.HK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, 2347.HK has a market cap of 339.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1280.HK is priced at HK$3.46, while 2347.HK trades at HK$0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1280.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas 2347.HK's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, 1280.HK's ROE is +63.51%, compared to 2347.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1280.HK is more volatile compared to 2347.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1280.HK.
1280.HK vs 1861.HK Comparison
1280.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1280.HK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, 1861.HK has a market cap of 259.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1280.HK is priced at HK$3.46, while 1861.HK trades at HK$1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1280.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas 1861.HK's P/E ratio is 7.40. In terms of profitability, 1280.HK's ROE is +63.51%, compared to 1861.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1280.HK is less volatile compared to 1861.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1280.HK.
1280.HK vs 6033.HK Comparison
1280.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1280.HK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, 6033.HK has a market cap of 258.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1280.HK is priced at HK$3.46, while 6033.HK trades at HK$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1280.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas 6033.HK's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, 1280.HK's ROE is +63.51%, compared to 6033.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1280.HK is more volatile compared to 6033.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1280.HK.
1280.HK vs 1020.HK Comparison
1280.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1280.HK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, 1020.HK has a market cap of 249M. Regarding current trading prices, 1280.HK is priced at HK$3.46, while 1020.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1280.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas 1020.HK's P/E ratio is -15.64. In terms of profitability, 1280.HK's ROE is +63.51%, compared to 1020.HK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1280.HK is more volatile compared to 1020.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1280.HK.
1280.HK vs 1759.HK Comparison
1280.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1280.HK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, 1759.HK has a market cap of 220.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1280.HK is priced at HK$3.46, while 1759.HK trades at HK$0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1280.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas 1759.HK's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, 1280.HK's ROE is +63.51%, compared to 1759.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1280.HK is less volatile compared to 1759.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1280.HK.
1280.HK vs 6188.HK Comparison
1280.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1280.HK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, 6188.HK has a market cap of 219.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1280.HK is priced at HK$3.46, while 6188.HK trades at HK$0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1280.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas 6188.HK's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, 1280.HK's ROE is +63.51%, compared to 6188.HK's ROE of +2.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1280.HK is less volatile compared to 6188.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1280.HK.
1280.HK vs 0104.HK Comparison
1280.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1280.HK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, 0104.HK has a market cap of 190.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1280.HK is priced at HK$3.46, while 0104.HK trades at HK$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1280.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas 0104.HK's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, 1280.HK's ROE is +63.51%, compared to 0104.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1280.HK is more volatile compared to 0104.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1280.HK.
1280.HK vs 1572.HK Comparison
1280.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1280.HK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, 1572.HK has a market cap of 153.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1280.HK is priced at HK$3.46, while 1572.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1280.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas 1572.HK's P/E ratio is 9.10. In terms of profitability, 1280.HK's ROE is +63.51%, compared to 1572.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1280.HK is less volatile compared to 1572.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1280.HK.
1280.HK vs 0620.HK Comparison
1280.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1280.HK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, 0620.HK has a market cap of 153.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1280.HK is priced at HK$3.46, while 0620.HK trades at HK$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1280.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas 0620.HK's P/E ratio is -5.75. In terms of profitability, 1280.HK's ROE is +63.51%, compared to 0620.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1280.HK is less volatile compared to 0620.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1280.HK.
1280.HK vs 1545.HK Comparison
1280.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1280.HK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, 1545.HK has a market cap of 146M. Regarding current trading prices, 1280.HK is priced at HK$3.46, while 1545.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1280.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas 1545.HK's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, 1280.HK's ROE is +63.51%, compared to 1545.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1280.HK is more volatile compared to 1545.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1280.HK.
1280.HK vs 8473.HK Comparison
1280.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1280.HK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, 8473.HK has a market cap of 145.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1280.HK is priced at HK$3.46, while 8473.HK trades at HK$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1280.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas 8473.HK's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, 1280.HK's ROE is +63.51%, compared to 8473.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1280.HK is more volatile compared to 8473.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1280.HK.
1280.HK vs 0915.HK Comparison
1280.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1280.HK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, 0915.HK has a market cap of 140.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1280.HK is priced at HK$3.46, while 0915.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1280.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas 0915.HK's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, 1280.HK's ROE is +63.51%, compared to 0915.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1280.HK is less volatile compared to 0915.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1280.HK.
1280.HK vs 0814.HK Comparison
1280.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1280.HK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, 0814.HK has a market cap of 105.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1280.HK is priced at HK$3.46, while 0814.HK trades at HK$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1280.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas 0814.HK's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, 1280.HK's ROE is +63.51%, compared to 0814.HK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1280.HK is less volatile compared to 0814.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1280.HK.
1280.HK vs 1039.HK Comparison
1280.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1280.HK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, 1039.HK has a market cap of 70.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1280.HK is priced at HK$3.46, while 1039.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1280.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas 1039.HK's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, 1280.HK's ROE is +63.51%, compared to 1039.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1280.HK is less volatile compared to 1039.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1280.HK.
1280.HK vs 2122.HK Comparison
1280.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1280.HK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, 2122.HK has a market cap of 69.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1280.HK is priced at HK$3.46, while 2122.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1280.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas 2122.HK's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, 1280.HK's ROE is +63.51%, compared to 2122.HK's ROE of +6.62%. Regarding short-term risk, 1280.HK is less volatile compared to 2122.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1280.HK.
1280.HK vs 6880.HK Comparison
1280.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1280.HK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, 6880.HK has a market cap of 58.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1280.HK is priced at HK$3.46, while 6880.HK trades at HK$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1280.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas 6880.HK's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, 1280.HK's ROE is +63.51%, compared to 6880.HK's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, 1280.HK is less volatile compared to 6880.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1280.HK.
1280.HK vs 8536.HK Comparison
1280.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1280.HK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, 8536.HK has a market cap of 57.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1280.HK is priced at HK$3.46, while 8536.HK trades at HK$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1280.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas 8536.HK's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, 1280.HK's ROE is +63.51%, compared to 8536.HK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1280.HK is less volatile compared to 8536.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1280.HK.
1280.HK vs 1711.HK Comparison
1280.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1280.HK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, 1711.HK has a market cap of 50.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1280.HK is priced at HK$3.46, while 1711.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1280.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas 1711.HK's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, 1280.HK's ROE is +63.51%, compared to 1711.HK's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, 1280.HK is more volatile compared to 1711.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1280.HK.
1280.HK vs 0653.HK Comparison
1280.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1280.HK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, 0653.HK has a market cap of 44.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1280.HK is priced at HK$3.46, while 0653.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1280.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas 0653.HK's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, 1280.HK's ROE is +63.51%, compared to 0653.HK's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, 1280.HK is more volatile compared to 0653.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1280.HK.
1280.HK vs 0395.HK Comparison
1280.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1280.HK stands at 6.3B. In comparison, 0395.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1280.HK is priced at HK$3.46, while 0395.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1280.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.27, whereas 0395.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 1280.HK's ROE is +63.51%, compared to 0395.HK's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, 1280.HK is less volatile compared to 0395.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1280.HK.