Zhejiang Shibao Company Limited
Zhejiang Shibao Company Limited 1057.HK Peers
See (1057.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1057.HK | HK$4.90 | -8.07% | 8.6B | 21.30 | HK$0.23 | +2.21% |
| 3606.HK | HK$57.05 | +1.51% | 160.5B | 16.78 | HK$3.40 | +3.11% |
| 0564.HK | HK$15.26 | +0.53% | 31.7B | 6.28 | HK$2.43 | +6.61% |
| 0666.HK | HK$10.98 | -0.90% | 25.5B | -19.96 | -HK$0.55 | N/A |
| 0425.HK | HK$20.05 | -1.23% | 22.8B | 9.11 | HK$2.20 | +2.17% |
| 0179.HK | HK$21.50 | -3.37% | 19.8B | 9.47 | HK$2.27 | +2.84% |
| 9690.HK | HK$19.58 | -0.31% | 13.9B | 30.12 | HK$0.65 | N/A |
| 1316.HK | HK$5.52 | -2.65% | 13.9B | 27.60 | HK$0.20 | +0.42% |
| 0819.HK | HK$6.12 | +0.49% | 6.9B | 5.56 | HK$1.10 | +8.98% |
| 1809.HK | HK$8.04 | -1.35% | 5.1B | 3.59 | HK$2.24 | +2.04% |
Stock Comparison
1057.HK vs 3606.HK Comparison
1057.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1057.HK stands at 8.6B. In comparison, 3606.HK has a market cap of 160.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1057.HK is priced at HK$4.90, while 3606.HK trades at HK$57.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1057.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.30, whereas 3606.HK's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, 1057.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3606.HK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 1057.HK is more volatile compared to 3606.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1057.HK.
1057.HK vs 0564.HK Comparison
1057.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1057.HK stands at 8.6B. In comparison, 0564.HK has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1057.HK is priced at HK$4.90, while 0564.HK trades at HK$15.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1057.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.30, whereas 0564.HK's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, 1057.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0564.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1057.HK is more volatile compared to 0564.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1057.HK.
1057.HK vs 0666.HK Comparison
1057.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1057.HK stands at 8.6B. In comparison, 0666.HK has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1057.HK is priced at HK$4.90, while 0666.HK trades at HK$10.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1057.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.30, whereas 0666.HK's P/E ratio is -19.96. In terms of profitability, 1057.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0666.HK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1057.HK is more volatile compared to 0666.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1057.HK.
1057.HK vs 0425.HK Comparison
1057.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1057.HK stands at 8.6B. In comparison, 0425.HK has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1057.HK is priced at HK$4.90, while 0425.HK trades at HK$20.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1057.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.30, whereas 0425.HK's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, 1057.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0425.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1057.HK is more volatile compared to 0425.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1057.HK.
1057.HK vs 0179.HK Comparison
1057.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1057.HK stands at 8.6B. In comparison, 0179.HK has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1057.HK is priced at HK$4.90, while 0179.HK trades at HK$21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1057.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.30, whereas 0179.HK's P/E ratio is 9.47. In terms of profitability, 1057.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0179.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1057.HK is more volatile compared to 0179.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1057.HK.
1057.HK vs 9690.HK Comparison
1057.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1057.HK stands at 8.6B. In comparison, 9690.HK has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1057.HK is priced at HK$4.90, while 9690.HK trades at HK$19.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1057.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.30, whereas 9690.HK's P/E ratio is 30.12. In terms of profitability, 1057.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9690.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1057.HK is more volatile compared to 9690.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1057.HK.
1057.HK vs 1316.HK Comparison
1057.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1057.HK stands at 8.6B. In comparison, 1316.HK has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1057.HK is priced at HK$4.90, while 1316.HK trades at HK$5.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1057.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.30, whereas 1316.HK's P/E ratio is 27.60. In terms of profitability, 1057.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1316.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1057.HK is more volatile compared to 1316.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1057.HK.
1057.HK vs 0819.HK Comparison
1057.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1057.HK stands at 8.6B. In comparison, 0819.HK has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1057.HK is priced at HK$4.90, while 0819.HK trades at HK$6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1057.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.30, whereas 0819.HK's P/E ratio is 5.56. In terms of profitability, 1057.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0819.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1057.HK is more volatile compared to 0819.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1057.HK.
1057.HK vs 1809.HK Comparison
1057.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1057.HK stands at 8.6B. In comparison, 1809.HK has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1057.HK is priced at HK$4.90, while 1809.HK trades at HK$8.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1057.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.30, whereas 1809.HK's P/E ratio is 3.59. In terms of profitability, 1057.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1809.HK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 1057.HK is more volatile compared to 1809.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1057.HK.
1057.HK vs 2488.HK Comparison
1057.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1057.HK stands at 8.6B. In comparison, 2488.HK has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1057.HK is priced at HK$4.90, while 2488.HK trades at HK$12.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1057.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.30, whereas 2488.HK's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, 1057.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2488.HK's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 1057.HK is more volatile compared to 2488.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1057.HK.
1057.HK vs 2531.HK Comparison
1057.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1057.HK stands at 8.6B. In comparison, 2531.HK has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1057.HK is priced at HK$4.90, while 2531.HK trades at HK$11.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1057.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.30, whereas 2531.HK's P/E ratio is 83.29. In terms of profitability, 1057.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2531.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1057.HK is more volatile compared to 2531.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1057.HK.
1057.HK vs 1571.HK Comparison
1057.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1057.HK stands at 8.6B. In comparison, 1571.HK has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1057.HK is priced at HK$4.90, while 1571.HK trades at HK$3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1057.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.30, whereas 1571.HK's P/E ratio is 5.92. In terms of profitability, 1057.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1571.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 1057.HK is more volatile compared to 1571.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1057.HK.
1057.HK vs 1274.HK Comparison
1057.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1057.HK stands at 8.6B. In comparison, 1274.HK has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1057.HK is priced at HK$4.90, while 1274.HK trades at HK$13.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1057.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.30, whereas 1274.HK's P/E ratio is -10.10. In terms of profitability, 1057.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1274.HK's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 1057.HK is more volatile compared to 1274.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1057.HK.
1057.HK vs 2025.HK Comparison
1057.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1057.HK stands at 8.6B. In comparison, 2025.HK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1057.HK is priced at HK$4.90, while 2025.HK trades at HK$3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1057.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.30, whereas 2025.HK's P/E ratio is 115.33. In terms of profitability, 1057.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2025.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1057.HK is less volatile compared to 2025.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1057.HK.
1057.HK vs 1899.HK Comparison
1057.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1057.HK stands at 8.6B. In comparison, 1899.HK has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1057.HK is priced at HK$4.90, while 1899.HK trades at HK$1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1057.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.30, whereas 1899.HK's P/E ratio is 7.73. In terms of profitability, 1057.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1899.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1057.HK is more volatile compared to 1899.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1057.HK.
1057.HK vs 1760.HK Comparison
1057.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1057.HK stands at 8.6B. In comparison, 1760.HK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1057.HK is priced at HK$4.90, while 1760.HK trades at HK$1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1057.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.30, whereas 1760.HK's P/E ratio is 6.95. In terms of profitability, 1057.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1760.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1057.HK is more volatile compared to 1760.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1057.HK.
1057.HK vs 0951.HK Comparison
1057.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1057.HK stands at 8.6B. In comparison, 0951.HK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1057.HK is priced at HK$4.90, while 0951.HK trades at HK$1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1057.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.30, whereas 0951.HK's P/E ratio is 4.82. In terms of profitability, 1057.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0951.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1057.HK is more volatile compared to 0951.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1057.HK.
1057.HK vs 0305.HK Comparison
1057.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1057.HK stands at 8.6B. In comparison, 0305.HK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1057.HK is priced at HK$4.90, while 0305.HK trades at HK$0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1057.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.30, whereas 0305.HK's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, 1057.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0305.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1057.HK is more volatile compared to 0305.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1057.HK.
1057.HK vs 0360.HK Comparison
1057.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1057.HK stands at 8.6B. In comparison, 0360.HK has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1057.HK is priced at HK$4.90, while 0360.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1057.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.30, whereas 0360.HK's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, 1057.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0360.HK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1057.HK is more volatile compared to 0360.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1057.HK.
1057.HK vs 6830.HK Comparison
1057.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1057.HK stands at 8.6B. In comparison, 6830.HK has a market cap of 422.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1057.HK is priced at HK$4.90, while 6830.HK trades at HK$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1057.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.30, whereas 6830.HK's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, 1057.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6830.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1057.HK is more volatile compared to 6830.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1057.HK.
1057.HK vs 0096.HK Comparison
1057.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1057.HK stands at 8.6B. In comparison, 0096.HK has a market cap of 350.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1057.HK is priced at HK$4.90, while 0096.HK trades at HK$0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1057.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.30, whereas 0096.HK's P/E ratio is 3.67. In terms of profitability, 1057.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0096.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1057.HK is more volatile compared to 0096.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1057.HK.
1057.HK vs 8418.HK Comparison
1057.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1057.HK stands at 8.6B. In comparison, 8418.HK has a market cap of 327.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1057.HK is priced at HK$4.90, while 8418.HK trades at HK$0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1057.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.30, whereas 8418.HK's P/E ratio is -38.50. In terms of profitability, 1057.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8418.HK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 1057.HK is more volatile compared to 8418.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1057.HK.
1057.HK vs 6162.HK Comparison
1057.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1057.HK stands at 8.6B. In comparison, 6162.HK has a market cap of 300M. Regarding current trading prices, 1057.HK is priced at HK$4.90, while 6162.HK trades at HK$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1057.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.30, whereas 6162.HK's P/E ratio is 72.01. In terms of profitability, 1057.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6162.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1057.HK is more volatile compared to 6162.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1057.HK.
1057.HK vs 2339.HK Comparison
1057.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1057.HK stands at 8.6B. In comparison, 2339.HK has a market cap of 267.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1057.HK is priced at HK$4.90, while 2339.HK trades at HK$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1057.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.30, whereas 2339.HK's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, 1057.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2339.HK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1057.HK is more volatile compared to 2339.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1057.HK.
1057.HK vs 1930.HK Comparison
1057.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1057.HK stands at 8.6B. In comparison, 1930.HK has a market cap of 263.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1057.HK is priced at HK$4.90, while 1930.HK trades at HK$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1057.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.30, whereas 1930.HK's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, 1057.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1930.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1057.HK is more volatile compared to 1930.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1057.HK.
1057.HK vs 1188.HK Comparison
1057.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1057.HK stands at 8.6B. In comparison, 1188.HK has a market cap of 244.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1057.HK is priced at HK$4.90, while 1188.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1057.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.30, whereas 1188.HK's P/E ratio is -10.91. In terms of profitability, 1057.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1188.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1057.HK is less volatile compared to 1188.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1057.HK.
1057.HK vs 1148.HK Comparison
1057.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1057.HK stands at 8.6B. In comparison, 1148.HK has a market cap of 237.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1057.HK is priced at HK$4.90, while 1148.HK trades at HK$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1057.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.30, whereas 1148.HK's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, 1057.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1148.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1057.HK is more volatile compared to 1148.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1057.HK.
1057.HK vs 8135.HK Comparison
1057.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1057.HK stands at 8.6B. In comparison, 8135.HK has a market cap of 187.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1057.HK is priced at HK$4.90, while 8135.HK trades at HK$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1057.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.30, whereas 8135.HK's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, 1057.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8135.HK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1057.HK is more volatile compared to 8135.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1057.HK.
1057.HK vs 0872.HK Comparison
1057.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1057.HK stands at 8.6B. In comparison, 0872.HK has a market cap of 123.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 1057.HK is priced at HK$4.90, while 0872.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1057.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.30, whereas 0872.HK's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, 1057.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0872.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 1057.HK is more volatile compared to 0872.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1057.HK.
1057.HK vs 6928.HK Comparison
1057.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1057.HK stands at 8.6B. In comparison, 6928.HK has a market cap of 95M. Regarding current trading prices, 1057.HK is priced at HK$4.90, while 6928.HK trades at HK$0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1057.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.30, whereas 6928.HK's P/E ratio is -5.27. In terms of profitability, 1057.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6928.HK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 1057.HK is more volatile compared to 6928.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1057.HK.
1057.HK vs 1269.HK Comparison
1057.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1057.HK stands at 8.6B. In comparison, 1269.HK has a market cap of 73.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1057.HK is priced at HK$4.90, while 1269.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1057.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.30, whereas 1269.HK's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, 1057.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1269.HK's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 1057.HK is more volatile compared to 1269.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1057.HK.
1057.HK vs 1241.HK Comparison
1057.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1057.HK stands at 8.6B. In comparison, 1241.HK has a market cap of 67.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 1057.HK is priced at HK$4.90, while 1241.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1057.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.30, whereas 1241.HK's P/E ratio is -3.47. In terms of profitability, 1057.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1241.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1057.HK is more volatile compared to 1241.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1057.HK.
1057.HK vs 6163.HK Comparison
1057.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1057.HK stands at 8.6B. In comparison, 6163.HK has a market cap of 55.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1057.HK is priced at HK$4.90, while 6163.HK trades at HK$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1057.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.30, whereas 6163.HK's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, 1057.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6163.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1057.HK is more volatile compared to 6163.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1057.HK.
1057.HK vs 0479.HK Comparison
1057.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1057.HK stands at 8.6B. In comparison, 0479.HK has a market cap of 52M. Regarding current trading prices, 1057.HK is priced at HK$4.90, while 0479.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1057.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.30, whereas 0479.HK's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, 1057.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0479.HK's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, 1057.HK is more volatile compared to 0479.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1057.HK.
1057.HK vs 8283.HK Comparison
1057.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1057.HK stands at 8.6B. In comparison, 8283.HK has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 1057.HK is priced at HK$4.90, while 8283.HK trades at HK$0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1057.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.30, whereas 8283.HK's P/E ratio is 1.91. In terms of profitability, 1057.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8283.HK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 1057.HK is more volatile compared to 8283.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1057.HK.
1057.HK vs 1991.HK Comparison
1057.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1057.HK stands at 8.6B. In comparison, 1991.HK has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1057.HK is priced at HK$4.90, while 1991.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1057.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.30, whereas 1991.HK's P/E ratio is -1.97. In terms of profitability, 1057.HK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 1991.HK's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 1057.HK is less volatile compared to 1991.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1057.HK.