Chongqing Iron & Steel Company Limited
Chongqing Iron & Steel Company Limited 1053.HK Peers
See (1053.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Steel Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1053.HK | HK$1.72 | +91.11% | 23.5B | -4.78 | -HK$0.36 | N/A |
| 0323.HK | HK$2.02 | +3.59% | 26.9B | -3.16 | -HK$0.64 | N/A |
| 0347.HK | HK$1.86 | +12.73% | 26.1B | -2.66 | -HK$0.70 | N/A |
| 0990.HK | HK$0.74 | +8.82% | 10B | 37.00 | HK$0.02 | N/A |
| 0826.HK | HK$2.10 | +4.48% | 5.7B | 15.00 | HK$0.14 | +2.43% |
| 0581.HK | HK$1.46 | +11.45% | 5.4B | 36.50 | HK$0.04 | +0.68% |
| 3788.HK | HK$2.19 | -4.37% | 4.3B | 21.90 | HK$0.10 | +1.83% |
| 0103.HK | HK$0.50 | +6.38% | 1.4B | 25.00 | HK$0.02 | +2.00% |
| 1231.HK | HK$0.23 | +2.22% | 920M | 49.07 | HK$0.00 | N/A |
| 1090.HK | HK$0.63 | +0.00% | 791.9M | -1.75 | -HK$0.36 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
1053.HK vs 0323.HK Comparison
1053.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1053.HK stands at 23.5B. In comparison, 0323.HK has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1053.HK is priced at HK$1.72, while 0323.HK trades at HK$2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1053.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.78, whereas 0323.HK's P/E ratio is -3.16. In terms of profitability, 1053.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 0323.HK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1053.HK is more volatile compared to 0323.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1053.HK.
1053.HK vs 0347.HK Comparison
1053.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1053.HK stands at 23.5B. In comparison, 0347.HK has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1053.HK is priced at HK$1.72, while 0347.HK trades at HK$1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1053.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.78, whereas 0347.HK's P/E ratio is -2.66. In terms of profitability, 1053.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 0347.HK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1053.HK is more volatile compared to 0347.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1053.HK.
1053.HK vs 0990.HK Comparison
1053.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1053.HK stands at 23.5B. In comparison, 0990.HK has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, 1053.HK is priced at HK$1.72, while 0990.HK trades at HK$0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1053.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.78, whereas 0990.HK's P/E ratio is 37.00. In terms of profitability, 1053.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 0990.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1053.HK is more volatile compared to 0990.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1053.HK.
1053.HK vs 0826.HK Comparison
1053.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1053.HK stands at 23.5B. In comparison, 0826.HK has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1053.HK is priced at HK$1.72, while 0826.HK trades at HK$2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1053.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.78, whereas 0826.HK's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, 1053.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 0826.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1053.HK is more volatile compared to 0826.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1053.HK.
1053.HK vs 0581.HK Comparison
1053.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1053.HK stands at 23.5B. In comparison, 0581.HK has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1053.HK is priced at HK$1.72, while 0581.HK trades at HK$1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1053.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.78, whereas 0581.HK's P/E ratio is 36.50. In terms of profitability, 1053.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 0581.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1053.HK is more volatile compared to 0581.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1053.HK.
1053.HK vs 3788.HK Comparison
1053.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1053.HK stands at 23.5B. In comparison, 3788.HK has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1053.HK is priced at HK$1.72, while 3788.HK trades at HK$2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1053.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.78, whereas 3788.HK's P/E ratio is 21.90. In terms of profitability, 1053.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 3788.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1053.HK is more volatile compared to 3788.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1053.HK.
1053.HK vs 0103.HK Comparison
1053.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1053.HK stands at 23.5B. In comparison, 0103.HK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1053.HK is priced at HK$1.72, while 0103.HK trades at HK$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1053.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.78, whereas 0103.HK's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, 1053.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 0103.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 1053.HK is more volatile compared to 0103.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1053.HK.
1053.HK vs 1231.HK Comparison
1053.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1053.HK stands at 23.5B. In comparison, 1231.HK has a market cap of 920M. Regarding current trading prices, 1053.HK is priced at HK$1.72, while 1231.HK trades at HK$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1053.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.78, whereas 1231.HK's P/E ratio is 49.07. In terms of profitability, 1053.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 1231.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1053.HK is more volatile compared to 1231.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1053.HK.
1053.HK vs 1090.HK Comparison
1053.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1053.HK stands at 23.5B. In comparison, 1090.HK has a market cap of 791.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1053.HK is priced at HK$1.72, while 1090.HK trades at HK$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1053.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.78, whereas 1090.HK's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, 1053.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 1090.HK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1053.HK is more volatile compared to 1090.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1053.HK.
1053.HK vs 1203.HK Comparison
1053.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1053.HK stands at 23.5B. In comparison, 1203.HK has a market cap of 771.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1053.HK is priced at HK$1.72, while 1203.HK trades at HK$0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1053.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.78, whereas 1203.HK's P/E ratio is 5.31. In terms of profitability, 1053.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 1203.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1053.HK is more volatile compared to 1203.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1053.HK.
1053.HK vs 1116.HK Comparison
1053.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1053.HK stands at 23.5B. In comparison, 1116.HK has a market cap of 658.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1053.HK is priced at HK$1.72, while 1116.HK trades at HK$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1053.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.78, whereas 1116.HK's P/E ratio is -30.50. In terms of profitability, 1053.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 1116.HK's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 1053.HK is more volatile compared to 1116.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1053.HK.
1053.HK vs 0217.HK Comparison
1053.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1053.HK stands at 23.5B. In comparison, 0217.HK has a market cap of 648.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1053.HK is priced at HK$1.72, while 0217.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1053.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.78, whereas 0217.HK's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, 1053.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 0217.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 1053.HK is more volatile compared to 0217.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1053.HK.
1053.HK vs 1553.HK Comparison
1053.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1053.HK stands at 23.5B. In comparison, 1553.HK has a market cap of 607.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 1053.HK is priced at HK$1.72, while 1553.HK trades at HK$1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1053.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.78, whereas 1553.HK's P/E ratio is 3.89. In terms of profitability, 1053.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 1553.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1053.HK is more volatile compared to 1553.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1053.HK.
1053.HK vs 1118.HK Comparison
1053.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1053.HK stands at 23.5B. In comparison, 1118.HK has a market cap of 562.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1053.HK is priced at HK$1.72, while 1118.HK trades at HK$0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1053.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.78, whereas 1118.HK's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, 1053.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 1118.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1053.HK is more volatile compared to 1118.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1053.HK.
1053.HK vs 6890.HK Comparison
1053.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1053.HK stands at 23.5B. In comparison, 6890.HK has a market cap of 284.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 1053.HK is priced at HK$1.72, while 6890.HK trades at HK$0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1053.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.78, whereas 6890.HK's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, 1053.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 6890.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 1053.HK is more volatile compared to 6890.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1053.HK.
1053.HK vs 1938.HK Comparison
1053.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1053.HK stands at 23.5B. In comparison, 1938.HK has a market cap of 221.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 1053.HK is priced at HK$1.72, while 1938.HK trades at HK$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1053.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.78, whereas 1938.HK's P/E ratio is 0.95. In terms of profitability, 1053.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 1938.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1053.HK is more volatile compared to 1938.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1053.HK.
1053.HK vs 2459.HK Comparison
1053.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1053.HK stands at 23.5B. In comparison, 2459.HK has a market cap of 212M. Regarding current trading prices, 1053.HK is priced at HK$1.72, while 2459.HK trades at HK$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1053.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.78, whereas 2459.HK's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, 1053.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 2459.HK's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 1053.HK is more volatile compared to 2459.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1053.HK.
1053.HK vs 2738.HK Comparison
1053.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1053.HK stands at 23.5B. In comparison, 2738.HK has a market cap of 177M. Regarding current trading prices, 1053.HK is priced at HK$1.72, while 2738.HK trades at HK$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1053.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.78, whereas 2738.HK's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, 1053.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 2738.HK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1053.HK is more volatile compared to 2738.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1053.HK.
1053.HK vs 0893.HK Comparison
1053.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1053.HK stands at 23.5B. In comparison, 0893.HK has a market cap of 168.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1053.HK is priced at HK$1.72, while 0893.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1053.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.78, whereas 0893.HK's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, 1053.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 0893.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1053.HK is more volatile compared to 0893.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1053.HK.
1053.HK vs 8140.HK Comparison
1053.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1053.HK stands at 23.5B. In comparison, 8140.HK has a market cap of 103.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 1053.HK is priced at HK$1.72, while 8140.HK trades at HK$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1053.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.78, whereas 8140.HK's P/E ratio is 3.23. In terms of profitability, 1053.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 8140.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1053.HK is more volatile compared to 8140.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1053.HK.
1053.HK vs 2112.HK Comparison
1053.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1053.HK stands at 23.5B. In comparison, 2112.HK has a market cap of 85.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1053.HK is priced at HK$1.72, while 2112.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1053.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.78, whereas 2112.HK's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, 1053.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 2112.HK's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 1053.HK is more volatile compared to 2112.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1053.HK.
1053.HK vs 8402.HK Comparison
1053.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1053.HK stands at 23.5B. In comparison, 8402.HK has a market cap of 49M. Regarding current trading prices, 1053.HK is priced at HK$1.72, while 8402.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1053.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.78, whereas 8402.HK's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, 1053.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 8402.HK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1053.HK is more volatile compared to 8402.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1053.HK.
1053.HK vs 1894.HK Comparison
1053.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1053.HK stands at 23.5B. In comparison, 1894.HK has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 1053.HK is priced at HK$1.72, while 1894.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1053.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.78, whereas 1894.HK's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, 1053.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 1894.HK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1053.HK is more volatile compared to 1894.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1053.HK.
1053.HK vs 1266.HK Comparison
1053.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1053.HK stands at 23.5B. In comparison, 1266.HK has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 1053.HK is priced at HK$1.72, while 1266.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1053.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.78, whereas 1266.HK's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, 1053.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 1266.HK's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 1053.HK is more volatile compared to 1266.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1053.HK.
1053.HK vs 0803.HK Comparison
1053.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1053.HK stands at 23.5B. In comparison, 0803.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 1053.HK is priced at HK$1.72, while 0803.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1053.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -4.78, whereas 0803.HK's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, 1053.HK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to 0803.HK's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, 1053.HK is more volatile compared to 0803.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1053.HK.