Dimensional Pac Basin Sm Comp SGD Acc

0P0001EF2T.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001EF2T.SI stands at 1.16B. In comparison, YF8.SI has a market cap of 2.45B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001EF2T.SI is priced at $24.83, while YF8.SI trades at $0.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0001EF2T.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YF8.SI's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, 0P0001EF2T.SI's ROE is +111.71%, compared to YF8.SI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001EF2T.SI is less volatile compared to YF8.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001EF2T.SI.

0P0001EF2T.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001EF2T.SI stands at 1.16B. In comparison, LG9.SI has a market cap of 1.81B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001EF2T.SI is priced at $24.83, while LG9.SI trades at $17.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0001EF2T.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LG9.SI's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, 0P0001EF2T.SI's ROE is +111.71%, compared to LG9.SI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001EF2T.SI is less volatile compared to LG9.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001EF2T.SI.

0P0001EF2T.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001EF2T.SI stands at 1.16B. In comparison, ES3.SI has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001EF2T.SI is priced at $24.83, while ES3.SI trades at $3.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0001EF2T.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ES3.SI's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, 0P0001EF2T.SI's ROE is +111.71%, compared to ES3.SI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001EF2T.SI is less volatile compared to ES3.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001EF2T.SI.

0P0001EF2T.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001EF2T.SI stands at 1.16B. In comparison, HKB.SI has a market cap of 1.43B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001EF2T.SI is priced at $24.83, while HKB.SI trades at $3.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0001EF2T.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKB.SI's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, 0P0001EF2T.SI's ROE is +111.71%, compared to HKB.SI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001EF2T.SI is less volatile compared to HKB.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001EF2T.SI.

0P0001EF2T.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001EF2T.SI stands at 1.16B. In comparison, CLR.SI has a market cap of 525.87M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001EF2T.SI is priced at $24.83, while CLR.SI trades at $0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0001EF2T.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLR.SI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001EF2T.SI's ROE is +111.71%, compared to CLR.SI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001EF2T.SI is less volatile compared to CLR.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001EF2T.SI.

0P0001EF2T.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001EF2T.SI stands at 1.16B. In comparison, CFA.SI has a market cap of 395.96M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001EF2T.SI is priced at $24.83, while CFA.SI trades at $0.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0001EF2T.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFA.SI's P/E ratio is 17.75. In terms of profitability, 0P0001EF2T.SI's ROE is +111.71%, compared to CFA.SI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001EF2T.SI is less volatile compared to CFA.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001EF2T.SI.

0P0001EF2T.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001EF2T.SI stands at 1.16B. In comparison, 0P0001518O.SI has a market cap of 243.12M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001EF2T.SI is priced at $24.83, while 0P0001518O.SI trades at $9.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0001EF2T.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001518O.SI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001EF2T.SI's ROE is +111.71%, compared to 0P0001518O.SI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001EF2T.SI and 0P0001518O.SI have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0P0001EF2T.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001EF2T.SI stands at 1.16B. In comparison, B73.SI has a market cap of 209.20M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001EF2T.SI is priced at $24.83, while B73.SI trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0001EF2T.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas B73.SI's P/E ratio is 6.45. In terms of profitability, 0P0001EF2T.SI's ROE is +111.71%, compared to B73.SI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001EF2T.SI is less volatile compared to B73.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001EF2T.SI.

0P0001EF2T.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001EF2T.SI stands at 1.16B. In comparison, O9A.SI has a market cap of 183.88M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001EF2T.SI is priced at $24.83, while O9A.SI trades at $1.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0001EF2T.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas O9A.SI's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, 0P0001EF2T.SI's ROE is +111.71%, compared to O9A.SI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001EF2T.SI is less volatile compared to O9A.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001EF2T.SI.

0P0001EF2T.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001EF2T.SI stands at 1.16B. In comparison, KV4.SI has a market cap of 110.46M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001EF2T.SI is priced at $24.83, while KV4.SI trades at $158.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0001EF2T.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KV4.SI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001EF2T.SI's ROE is +111.71%, compared to KV4.SI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001EF2T.SI is less volatile compared to KV4.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001EF2T.SI.

0P0001EF2T.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001EF2T.SI stands at 1.16B. In comparison, SRT.SI has a market cap of 87.05M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001EF2T.SI is priced at $24.83, while SRT.SI trades at $0.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0001EF2T.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRT.SI's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, 0P0001EF2T.SI's ROE is +111.71%, compared to SRT.SI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001EF2T.SI is less volatile compared to SRT.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001EF2T.SI.

0P0001EF2T.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001EF2T.SI stands at 1.16B. In comparison, KJ7.SI has a market cap of 37.91M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001EF2T.SI is priced at $24.83, while KJ7.SI trades at $13.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0001EF2T.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KJ7.SI's P/E ratio is 11.64. In terms of profitability, 0P0001EF2T.SI's ROE is +111.71%, compared to KJ7.SI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001EF2T.SI and KJ7.SI have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0P0001EF2T.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001EF2T.SI stands at 1.16B. In comparison, 0P0001LV1C.SI has a market cap of 870962.00. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001EF2T.SI is priced at $24.83, while 0P0001LV1C.SI trades at $6.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0001EF2T.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001LV1C.SI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001EF2T.SI's ROE is +111.71%, compared to 0P0001LV1C.SI's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001EF2T.SI and 0P0001LV1C.SI have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0P0001EF2T.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001EF2T.SI stands at 1.16B. In comparison, 0P00006FYT.SI has a market cap of 34536.00. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001EF2T.SI is priced at $24.83, while 0P00006FYT.SI trades at $3.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0001EF2T.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00006FYT.SI's P/E ratio is 24.06. In terms of profitability, 0P0001EF2T.SI's ROE is +111.71%, compared to 0P00006FYT.SI's ROE of -2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001EF2T.SI and 0P00006FYT.SI have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0P0001EF2T.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001EF2T.SI stands at 1.16B. In comparison, 0P0001AF7Z.SI comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001EF2T.SI is priced at $24.83, while 0P0001AF7Z.SI trades at $25.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0001EF2T.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001AF7Z.SI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001EF2T.SI's ROE is +111.71%, compared to 0P0001AF7Z.SI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001EF2T.SI and 0P0001AF7Z.SI have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0P0001EF2T.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001EF2T.SI stands at 1.16B. In comparison, 0P00009DRS.SI comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001EF2T.SI is priced at $24.83, while 0P00009DRS.SI trades at $20.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0001EF2T.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00009DRS.SI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001EF2T.SI's ROE is +111.71%, compared to 0P00009DRS.SI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001EF2T.SI and 0P00009DRS.SI have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0P0001EF2T.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001EF2T.SI stands at 1.16B. In comparison, 0P0001LKN0.SI comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001EF2T.SI is priced at $24.83, while 0P0001LKN0.SI trades at $125.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0001EF2T.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001LKN0.SI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001EF2T.SI's ROE is +111.71%, compared to 0P0001LKN0.SI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001EF2T.SI and 0P0001LKN0.SI have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0P0001EF2T.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001EF2T.SI stands at 1.16B. In comparison, 0P0001AF7U.SI comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001EF2T.SI is priced at $24.83, while 0P0001AF7U.SI trades at $36.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0001EF2T.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001AF7U.SI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001EF2T.SI's ROE is +111.71%, compared to 0P0001AF7U.SI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001EF2T.SI and 0P0001AF7U.SI have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0P0001EF2T.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001EF2T.SI stands at 1.16B. In comparison, 0P0001DIJX.SI comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001EF2T.SI is priced at $24.83, while 0P0001DIJX.SI trades at $2.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0001EF2T.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001DIJX.SI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001EF2T.SI's ROE is +111.71%, compared to 0P0001DIJX.SI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001EF2T.SI and 0P0001DIJX.SI have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0P0001EF2T.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001EF2T.SI stands at 1.16B. In comparison, 0P0000KYEE.SI comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001EF2T.SI is priced at $24.83, while 0P0000KYEE.SI trades at $18.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0001EF2T.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0000KYEE.SI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001EF2T.SI's ROE is +111.71%, compared to 0P0000KYEE.SI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001EF2T.SI and 0P0000KYEE.SI have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0P0001EF2T.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001EF2T.SI stands at 1.16B. In comparison, 0P0001DWI0.SI comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001EF2T.SI is priced at $24.83, while 0P0001DWI0.SI trades at $11.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0001EF2T.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001DWI0.SI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001EF2T.SI's ROE is +111.71%, compared to 0P0001DWI0.SI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001EF2T.SI and 0P0001DWI0.SI have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0P0001EF2T.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001EF2T.SI stands at 1.16B. In comparison, YLD.SI comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001EF2T.SI is priced at $24.83, while YLD.SI trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0001EF2T.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YLD.SI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001EF2T.SI's ROE is +111.71%, compared to YLD.SI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001EF2T.SI is less volatile compared to YLD.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001EF2T.SI.

0P0001EF2T.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001EF2T.SI stands at 1.16B. In comparison, 0P0001EQUE.SI comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001EF2T.SI is priced at $24.83, while 0P0001EQUE.SI trades at $21.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0001EF2T.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001EQUE.SI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001EF2T.SI's ROE is +111.71%, compared to 0P0001EQUE.SI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001EF2T.SI and 0P0001EQUE.SI have similar daily volatility (0.00).