HDFC Retirement Svgs Hybrid Equity Dir
HDFC Retirement Svgs Hybrid Equity Dir (0P00017K5W.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (0P00017K5W.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0P00017K5W.BO | ₹44.27 | -0.07% | 40B | 23.08 | ₹1.92 | N/A |
| JIOFIN.BO | ₹255.30 | -0.97% | 1.6T | 100.91 | ₹2.53 | +0.20% |
| JIOFIN.NS | ₹255.25 | -0.99% | 1.6T | 100.89 | ₹2.53 | +0.20% |
| BAJAJHLDNG.BO | ₹11,342.35 | -1.40% | 1.3T | 14.36 | ₹789.70 | +0.82% |
| BAJAJHLDNG.NS | ₹11,330.00 | -1.49% | 1.3T | 14.34 | ₹789.87 | +0.82% |
| NAM-INDIA.BO | ₹977.30 | -0.74% | 622.7B | 43.83 | ₹22.30 | +1.94% |
| NAM-INDIA.NS | ₹977.15 | -0.80% | 622.6B | 43.82 | ₹22.30 | +1.94% |
| UTINIFTETF.BO | ₹288.77 | +0.00% | 622.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| HDFCAMC.NS | ₹2,681.40 | -1.66% | 574.2B | 40.13 | ₹66.81 | +1.68% |
| HDFCAMC.BO | ₹2,671.40 | -2.04% | 571.8B | 39.99 | ₹66.81 | +1.68% |
Stock Comparison
0P00017K5W.BO vs JIOFIN.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, JIOFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while JIOFIN.BO trades at ₹255.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas JIOFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 100.91. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JIOFIN.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to JIOFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check JIOFIN.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs JIOFIN.NS Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, JIOFIN.NS has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while JIOFIN.NS trades at ₹255.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas JIOFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 100.89. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JIOFIN.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to JIOFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check JIOFIN.NS's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs BAJAJHLDNG.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, BAJAJHLDNG.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while BAJAJHLDNG.BO trades at ₹11,342.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas BAJAJHLDNG.BO's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BAJAJHLDNG.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to BAJAJHLDNG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check BAJAJHLDNG.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs BAJAJHLDNG.NS Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, BAJAJHLDNG.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while BAJAJHLDNG.NS trades at ₹11,330.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas BAJAJHLDNG.NS's P/E ratio is 14.34. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BAJAJHLDNG.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to BAJAJHLDNG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check BAJAJHLDNG.NS's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs NAM-INDIA.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, NAM-INDIA.BO has a market cap of 622.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while NAM-INDIA.BO trades at ₹977.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas NAM-INDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 43.83. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NAM-INDIA.BO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to NAM-INDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check NAM-INDIA.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs NAM-INDIA.NS Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, NAM-INDIA.NS has a market cap of 622.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while NAM-INDIA.NS trades at ₹977.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas NAM-INDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 43.82. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NAM-INDIA.NS's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to NAM-INDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check NAM-INDIA.NS's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs UTINIFTETF.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, UTINIFTETF.BO has a market cap of 622.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while UTINIFTETF.BO trades at ₹288.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas UTINIFTETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UTINIFTETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to UTINIFTETF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check UTINIFTETF.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs HDFCAMC.NS Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, HDFCAMC.NS has a market cap of 574.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while HDFCAMC.NS trades at ₹2,681.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas HDFCAMC.NS's P/E ratio is 40.13. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HDFCAMC.NS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to HDFCAMC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check HDFCAMC.NS's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs HDFCAMC.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, HDFCAMC.BO has a market cap of 571.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while HDFCAMC.BO trades at ₹2,671.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas HDFCAMC.BO's P/E ratio is 39.99. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HDFCAMC.BO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to HDFCAMC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check HDFCAMC.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs UTISENSETF.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, UTISENSETF.BO has a market cap of 478.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while UTISENSETF.BO trades at ₹942.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas UTISENSETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UTISENSETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to UTISENSETF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check UTISENSETF.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs UTISENSETF.NS Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, UTISENSETF.NS has a market cap of 476.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while UTISENSETF.NS trades at ₹939.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas UTISENSETF.NS's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UTISENSETF.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to UTISENSETF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check UTISENSETF.NS's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs CPSEETF.NS Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, CPSEETF.NS has a market cap of 466.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while CPSEETF.NS trades at ₹102.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas CPSEETF.NS's P/E ratio is 16.74. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CPSEETF.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to CPSEETF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check CPSEETF.NS's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs CPSEETF.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, CPSEETF.BO has a market cap of 465.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while CPSEETF.BO trades at ₹102.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas CPSEETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CPSEETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to CPSEETF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check CPSEETF.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs 360ONE.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, 360ONE.BO has a market cap of 452B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while 360ONE.BO trades at ₹1,114.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 360ONE.BO's P/E ratio is 39.14. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 360ONE.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to 360ONE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check 360ONE.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs 360ONE.NS Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, 360ONE.NS has a market cap of 451.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while 360ONE.NS trades at ₹1,113.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 360ONE.NS's P/E ratio is 39.05. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 360ONE.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to 360ONE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check 360ONE.NS's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs ABSLAMC.NS Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, ABSLAMC.NS has a market cap of 267.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while ABSLAMC.NS trades at ₹927.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas ABSLAMC.NS's P/E ratio is 26.37. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ABSLAMC.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to ABSLAMC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check ABSLAMC.NS's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs ABSLAMC.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, ABSLAMC.BO has a market cap of 267.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while ABSLAMC.BO trades at ₹926.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas ABSLAMC.BO's P/E ratio is 26.40. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ABSLAMC.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to ABSLAMC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check ABSLAMC.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs ANANDRATHI.NS Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, ANANDRATHI.NS has a market cap of 253.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while ANANDRATHI.NS trades at ₹3,056.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas ANANDRATHI.NS's P/E ratio is 69.20. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ANANDRATHI.NS's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to ANANDRATHI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check ANANDRATHI.NS's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs ANANDRATHI.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, ANANDRATHI.BO has a market cap of 253.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while ANANDRATHI.BO trades at ₹3,055.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas ANANDRATHI.BO's P/E ratio is 69.22. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ANANDRATHI.BO's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to ANANDRATHI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check ANANDRATHI.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs NIFTYBEES.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, NIFTYBEES.BO has a market cap of 243.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while NIFTYBEES.BO trades at ₹287.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas NIFTYBEES.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NIFTYBEES.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to NIFTYBEES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check NIFTYBEES.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs NIFTYBEES.NS Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, NIFTYBEES.NS has a market cap of 243.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while NIFTYBEES.NS trades at ₹287.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas NIFTYBEES.NS's P/E ratio is 23.46. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NIFTYBEES.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to NIFTYBEES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check NIFTYBEES.NS's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs NUVAMA.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, NUVAMA.BO has a market cap of 232.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while NUVAMA.BO trades at ₹1,275.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas NUVAMA.BO's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NUVAMA.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to NUVAMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check NUVAMA.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs NUVAMA.NS Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, NUVAMA.NS has a market cap of 232.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while NUVAMA.NS trades at ₹1,275.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas NUVAMA.NS's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NUVAMA.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to NUVAMA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check NUVAMA.NS's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs NIFTYIETF.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, NIFTYIETF.BO has a market cap of 230.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while NIFTYIETF.BO trades at ₹286.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas NIFTYIETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NIFTYIETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to NIFTYIETF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check NIFTYIETF.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs NIFTYIETF.NS Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, NIFTYIETF.NS has a market cap of 229.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while NIFTYIETF.NS trades at ₹286.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas NIFTYIETF.NS's P/E ratio is 23.47. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NIFTYIETF.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to NIFTYIETF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check NIFTYIETF.NS's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs GOLDBEES.NS Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, GOLDBEES.NS has a market cap of 216.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while GOLDBEES.NS trades at ₹131.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas GOLDBEES.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GOLDBEES.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to GOLDBEES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check GOLDBEES.NS's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs NSDL.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, NSDL.BO has a market cap of 183B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while NSDL.BO trades at ₹915.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas NSDL.BO's P/E ratio is 49.06. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NSDL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to NSDL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check NSDL.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs IDFC.NS Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, IDFC.NS has a market cap of 174B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while IDFC.NS trades at ₹108.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas IDFC.NS's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IDFC.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to IDFC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check IDFC.NS's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs IDFC.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, IDFC.BO has a market cap of 172.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while IDFC.BO trades at ₹108.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas IDFC.BO's P/E ratio is 19.93. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IDFC.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to IDFC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check IDFC.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs SENSEXIETF.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, SENSEXIETF.BO has a market cap of 136.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while SENSEXIETF.BO trades at ₹942.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas SENSEXIETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SENSEXIETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to SENSEXIETF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check SENSEXIETF.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs UTIAMC.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, UTIAMC.BO has a market cap of 135.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while UTIAMC.BO trades at ₹1,052.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas UTIAMC.BO's P/E ratio is 24.29. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UTIAMC.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to UTIAMC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check UTIAMC.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs UTIAMC.NS Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, UTIAMC.NS has a market cap of 135.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while UTIAMC.NS trades at ₹1,051.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas UTIAMC.NS's P/E ratio is 24.27. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UTIAMC.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to UTIAMC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check UTIAMC.NS's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs LIQUIDBEES.NS Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, LIQUIDBEES.NS has a market cap of 109.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while LIQUIDBEES.NS trades at ₹1,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas LIQUIDBEES.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LIQUIDBEES.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to LIQUIDBEES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check LIQUIDBEES.NS's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs PRUDENT.NS Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, PRUDENT.NS has a market cap of 105.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while PRUDENT.NS trades at ₹2,539.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas PRUDENT.NS's P/E ratio is 48.91. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PRUDENT.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to PRUDENT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check PRUDENT.NS's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs PRUDENT.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, PRUDENT.BO has a market cap of 105B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while PRUDENT.BO trades at ₹2,536.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas PRUDENT.BO's P/E ratio is 48.92. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PRUDENT.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to PRUDENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check PRUDENT.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs TSFINV.NS Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, TSFINV.NS has a market cap of 88.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while TSFINV.NS trades at ₹402.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas TSFINV.NS's P/E ratio is 19.10. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TSFINV.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to TSFINV.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check TSFINV.NS's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs BANKBEES.NS Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, BANKBEES.NS has a market cap of 79.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while BANKBEES.NS trades at ₹629.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas BANKBEES.NS's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BANKBEES.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to BANKBEES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check BANKBEES.NS's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs BANKBEES.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, BANKBEES.BO has a market cap of 79.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while BANKBEES.BO trades at ₹630.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas BANKBEES.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BANKBEES.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to BANKBEES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check BANKBEES.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs INDUSINVIT.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, INDUSINVIT.BO has a market cap of 55.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while INDUSINVIT.BO trades at ₹125.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas INDUSINVIT.BO's P/E ratio is 13.10. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to INDUSINVIT.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to INDUSINVIT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check INDUSINVIT.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs JUNIORBEES.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, JUNIORBEES.BO has a market cap of 54.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while JUNIORBEES.BO trades at ₹750.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas JUNIORBEES.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JUNIORBEES.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to JUNIORBEES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check JUNIORBEES.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs JUNIORBEES.NS Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, JUNIORBEES.NS has a market cap of 54.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while JUNIORBEES.NS trades at ₹750.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas JUNIORBEES.NS's P/E ratio is 20.86. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JUNIORBEES.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to JUNIORBEES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check JUNIORBEES.NS's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs SENSEXBEES.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, SENSEXBEES.BO has a market cap of 52.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while SENSEXBEES.BO trades at ₹939.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas SENSEXBEES.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SENSEXBEES.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to SENSEXBEES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check SENSEXBEES.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs BHINVIT.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, BHINVIT.BO has a market cap of 49.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while BHINVIT.BO trades at ₹112.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas BHINVIT.BO's P/E ratio is 21.63. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BHINVIT.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to BHINVIT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check BHINVIT.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs PILANIINVS.NS Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, PILANIINVS.NS has a market cap of 49.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while PILANIINVS.NS trades at ₹4,497.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas PILANIINVS.NS's P/E ratio is 4889.02. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PILANIINVS.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to PILANIINVS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check PILANIINVS.NS's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs PILANIINVS.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, PILANIINVS.BO has a market cap of 49.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while PILANIINVS.BO trades at ₹4,487.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas PILANIINVS.BO's P/E ratio is 172.61. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PILANIINVS.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to PILANIINVS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check PILANIINVS.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs LOWVOLIETF.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, LOWVOLIETF.BO has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while LOWVOLIETF.BO trades at ₹22.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas LOWVOLIETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LOWVOLIETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to LOWVOLIETF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check LOWVOLIETF.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs BANKIETF.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, BANKIETF.BO has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while BANKIETF.BO trades at ₹62.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas BANKIETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BANKIETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to BANKIETF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check BANKIETF.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs PSUBNKBEES.NS Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, PSUBNKBEES.NS has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while PSUBNKBEES.NS trades at ₹109.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas PSUBNKBEES.NS's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PSUBNKBEES.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to PSUBNKBEES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check PSUBNKBEES.NS's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs PSUBNKBEES.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, PSUBNKBEES.BO has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while PSUBNKBEES.BO trades at ₹109.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas PSUBNKBEES.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PSUBNKBEES.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to PSUBNKBEES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check PSUBNKBEES.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs NSIL.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, NSIL.BO has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while NSIL.BO trades at ₹5,916.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas NSIL.BO's P/E ratio is 134.46. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NSIL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to NSIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check NSIL.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs NSIL.NS Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, NSIL.NS has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while NSIL.NS trades at ₹5,911.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas NSIL.NS's P/E ratio is 133.96. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NSIL.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to NSIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check NSIL.NS's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs PVTBANIETF.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, PVTBANIETF.BO has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while PVTBANIETF.BO trades at ₹29.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas PVTBANIETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PVTBANIETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to PVTBANIETF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check PVTBANIETF.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs SETFNIF50.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, SETFNIF50.BO has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while SETFNIF50.BO trades at ₹272.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas SETFNIF50.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SETFNIF50.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to SETFNIF50.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check SETFNIF50.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs SETFNIF50.NS Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, SETFNIF50.NS has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while SETFNIF50.NS trades at ₹272.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas SETFNIF50.NS's P/E ratio is 23.51. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SETFNIF50.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to SETFNIF50.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check SETFNIF50.NS's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs GOLDSHARE.NS Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, GOLDSHARE.NS has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while GOLDSHARE.NS trades at ₹114.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas GOLDSHARE.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GOLDSHARE.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to GOLDSHARE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check GOLDSHARE.NS's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs UTINEXT50.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, UTINEXT50.BO has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while UTINEXT50.BO trades at ₹73.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas UTINEXT50.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UTINEXT50.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to UTINEXT50.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check UTINEXT50.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs KICL.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, KICL.BO has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while KICL.BO trades at ₹4,898.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas KICL.BO's P/E ratio is 49.67. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KICL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to KICL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check KICL.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs KICL.NS Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, KICL.NS has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while KICL.NS trades at ₹4,890.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas KICL.NS's P/E ratio is 49.39. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KICL.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to KICL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check KICL.NS's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs LTGILTBEES.NS Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, LTGILTBEES.NS has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while LTGILTBEES.NS trades at ₹29.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas LTGILTBEES.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LTGILTBEES.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to LTGILTBEES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check LTGILTBEES.NS's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs ALPL30IETF.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, ALPL30IETF.BO has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while ALPL30IETF.BO trades at ₹28.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas ALPL30IETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALPL30IETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to ALPL30IETF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check ALPL30IETF.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs BFINVEST.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, BFINVEST.BO has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while BFINVEST.BO trades at ₹395.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas BFINVEST.BO's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BFINVEST.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to BFINVEST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check BFINVEST.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs BFINVEST.NS Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, BFINVEST.NS has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while BFINVEST.NS trades at ₹394.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas BFINVEST.NS's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BFINVEST.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to BFINVEST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check BFINVEST.NS's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs MID150BEES.NS Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, MID150BEES.NS has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while MID150BEES.NS trades at ₹225.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas MID150BEES.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MID150BEES.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to MID150BEES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check MID150BEES.NS's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs JINDALPHOT.NS Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, JINDALPHOT.NS has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while JINDALPHOT.NS trades at ₹1,322.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas JINDALPHOT.NS's P/E ratio is 112.53. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JINDALPHOT.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to JINDALPHOT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check JINDALPHOT.NS's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs JINDALPHOT.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, JINDALPHOT.BO has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while JINDALPHOT.BO trades at ₹1,318.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas JINDALPHOT.BO's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JINDALPHOT.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to JINDALPHOT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check JINDALPHOT.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs JPOLYINVST.NS Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, JPOLYINVST.NS has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while JPOLYINVST.NS trades at ₹1,277.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas JPOLYINVST.NS's P/E ratio is 1.51. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JPOLYINVST.NS's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to JPOLYINVST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check JPOLYINVST.NS's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs JPOLYINVST.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, JPOLYINVST.BO has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while JPOLYINVST.BO trades at ₹1,274.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas JPOLYINVST.BO's P/E ratio is 1.51. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JPOLYINVST.BO's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to JPOLYINVST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check JPOLYINVST.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs NEXT50IETF.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, NEXT50IETF.BO has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while NEXT50IETF.BO trades at ₹73.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas NEXT50IETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NEXT50IETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to NEXT50IETF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check NEXT50IETF.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs OSWALGREEN.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, OSWALGREEN.BO has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while OSWALGREEN.BO trades at ₹27.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas OSWALGREEN.BO's P/E ratio is 80.76. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OSWALGREEN.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to OSWALGREEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check OSWALGREEN.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs OSWALGREEN.NS Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, OSWALGREEN.NS has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while OSWALGREEN.NS trades at ₹27.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas OSWALGREEN.NS's P/E ratio is 80.50. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OSWALGREEN.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to OSWALGREEN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check OSWALGREEN.NS's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs EBIX.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, EBIX.BO has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while EBIX.BO trades at ₹30.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas EBIX.BO's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EBIX.BO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to EBIX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check EBIX.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs HNGSNGBEES.NS Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, HNGSNGBEES.NS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while HNGSNGBEES.NS trades at ₹538.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas HNGSNGBEES.NS's P/E ratio is 15.68. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HNGSNGBEES.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to HNGSNGBEES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check HNGSNGBEES.NS's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs BINDALAGRO.NS Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, BINDALAGRO.NS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while BINDALAGRO.NS trades at ₹22.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas BINDALAGRO.NS's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BINDALAGRO.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to BINDALAGRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check BINDALAGRO.NS's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs SILINV.NS Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, SILINV.NS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while SILINV.NS trades at ₹433.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas SILINV.NS's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SILINV.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to SILINV.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check SILINV.NS's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs SILINV.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, SILINV.BO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while SILINV.BO trades at ₹430.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas SILINV.BO's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SILINV.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to SILINV.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check SILINV.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs MIDCAPIETF.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, MIDCAPIETF.BO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while MIDCAPIETF.BO trades at ₹22.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas MIDCAPIETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MIDCAPIETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to MIDCAPIETF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check MIDCAPIETF.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs FMCGIETF.NS Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, FMCGIETF.NS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while FMCGIETF.NS trades at ₹55.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas FMCGIETF.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FMCGIETF.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to FMCGIETF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check FMCGIETF.NS's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs FMCGIETF.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, FMCGIETF.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while FMCGIETF.BO trades at ₹55.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas FMCGIETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FMCGIETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to FMCGIETF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check FMCGIETF.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs MOM30IETF.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, MOM30IETF.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while MOM30IETF.BO trades at ₹32.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas MOM30IETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MOM30IETF.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to MOM30IETF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check MOM30IETF.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs ITIETF.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, ITIETF.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while ITIETF.BO trades at ₹33.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas ITIETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ITIETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to ITIETF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check ITIETF.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs BSE500IETF.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, BSE500IETF.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while BSE500IETF.BO trades at ₹39.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas BSE500IETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BSE500IETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to BSE500IETF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check BSE500IETF.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs 0P00005WLX.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, 0P00005WLX.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while 0P00005WLX.BO trades at ₹240.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 0P00005WLX.BO's P/E ratio is 23.62. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0P00005WLX.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO and 0P00005WLX.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0P00005WLX.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs ICICIB22.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, ICICIB22.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while ICICIB22.BO trades at ₹127.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas ICICIB22.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ICICIB22.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to ICICIB22.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check ICICIB22.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs ICICIB22.NS Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, ICICIB22.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while ICICIB22.NS trades at ₹127.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas ICICIB22.NS's P/E ratio is 14.74. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ICICIB22.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to ICICIB22.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check ICICIB22.NS's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs NIF100BEES.NS Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, NIF100BEES.NS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while NIF100BEES.NS trades at ₹275.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas NIF100BEES.NS's P/E ratio is 23.01. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NIF100BEES.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to NIF100BEES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check NIF100BEES.NS's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs NIF100BEES.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, NIF100BEES.BO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while NIF100BEES.BO trades at ₹275.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas NIF100BEES.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NIF100BEES.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to NIF100BEES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check NIF100BEES.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs TIMESGTY.NS Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, TIMESGTY.NS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while TIMESGTY.NS trades at ₹286.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas TIMESGTY.NS's P/E ratio is 110.08. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TIMESGTY.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO and TIMESGTY.NS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TIMESGTY.NS's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs TIMESGTY.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, TIMESGTY.BO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while TIMESGTY.BO trades at ₹283.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas TIMESGTY.BO's P/E ratio is 109.56. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TIMESGTY.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to TIMESGTY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check TIMESGTY.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs TEAMGTY.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, TEAMGTY.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while TEAMGTY.BO trades at ₹274.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas TEAMGTY.BO's P/E ratio is 97.16. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TEAMGTY.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to TEAMGTY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check TEAMGTY.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs TEAMGTY.NS Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, TEAMGTY.NS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while TEAMGTY.NS trades at ₹269.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas TEAMGTY.NS's P/E ratio is 96.00. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TEAMGTY.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to TEAMGTY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check TEAMGTY.NS's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs NV20IETF.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, NV20IETF.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while NV20IETF.BO trades at ₹14.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas NV20IETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NV20IETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to NV20IETF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check NV20IETF.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs HEALTHIETF.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, HEALTHIETF.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while HEALTHIETF.BO trades at ₹150.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas HEALTHIETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HEALTHIETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to HEALTHIETF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check HEALTHIETF.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs AUTOIETF.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, AUTOIETF.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while AUTOIETF.BO trades at ₹28.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas AUTOIETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AUTOIETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to AUTOIETF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check AUTOIETF.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs MON100.NS Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, MON100.NS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while MON100.NS trades at ₹228.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas MON100.NS's P/E ratio is 33.11. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MON100.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to MON100.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check MON100.NS's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs INFRAIETF.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, INFRAIETF.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while INFRAIETF.BO trades at ₹99.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas INFRAIETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to INFRAIETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to INFRAIETF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check INFRAIETF.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs FINIETF.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, FINIETF.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while FINIETF.BO trades at ₹32.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas FINIETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FINIETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to FINIETF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check FINIETF.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs PSUBNKIETF.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, PSUBNKIETF.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while PSUBNKIETF.BO trades at ₹100.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas PSUBNKIETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PSUBNKIETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to PSUBNKIETF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check PSUBNKIETF.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs QUAL30IETF.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, QUAL30IETF.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while QUAL30IETF.BO trades at ₹21.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas QUAL30IETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to QUAL30IETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to QUAL30IETF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check QUAL30IETF.BO's competition here
0P00017K5W.BO vs NIF100IETF.BO Comparison February 2026
0P00017K5W.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00017K5W.BO stands at 40B. In comparison, NIF100IETF.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00017K5W.BO is priced at ₹44.27, while NIF100IETF.BO trades at ₹29.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00017K5W.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas NIF100IETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NIF100IETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00017K5W.BO is less volatile compared to NIF100IETF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00017K5W.BO.Check NIF100IETF.BO's competition here