Vanguard Japan Stock Index Fund Investor EUR Accumulation
Vanguard Japan Stock Index Fund Investor EUR Accumulation 0P00001QSE.F Peers
See (0P00001QSE.F) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0P00001QSE.F | €276.73 | -0.71% | 2.3T | 15.10 | €18.32 | N/A |
| 0P00000MO4.F | €353.40 | +0.02% | 3T | 16.69 | €21.18 | N/A |
| 0P00000W6B.F | €306.08 | +0.02% | 2.6T | 16.66 | €18.37 | N/A |
| BBN1.F | €144.42 | +0.92% | 174.9B | 50.85 | €2.84 | +2.39% |
| BLQA.DE | €845.50 | -0.62% | 125.2B | 23.42 | €36.10 | +0.60% |
| ZPDW.DE | €73.25 | -0.35% | 114B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SXR8.DE | €572.34 | -0.83% | 103B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| U1FB.DE | €23.78 | -0.52% | 100.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| EUNL.DE | €101.62 | -0.67% | 94.4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VUSA.DE | €101.73 | -0.77% | 62.7B | N/A | N/A | +1.10% |
Stock Comparison
0P00001QSE.F vs 0P00000MO4.F Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, 0P00000MO4.F has a market cap of 3T. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while 0P00000MO4.F trades at €353.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas 0P00000MO4.F's P/E ratio is 16.69. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0P00000MO4.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F and 0P00000MO4.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P00001QSE.F vs 0P00000W6B.F Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, 0P00000W6B.F has a market cap of 2.6T. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while 0P00000W6B.F trades at €306.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas 0P00000W6B.F's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0P00000W6B.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F and 0P00000W6B.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P00001QSE.F vs BBN1.F Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, BBN1.F has a market cap of 174.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while BBN1.F trades at €144.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas BBN1.F's P/E ratio is 50.85. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BBN1.F's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to BBN1.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs BLQA.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, BLQA.DE has a market cap of 125.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while BLQA.DE trades at €845.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas BLQA.DE's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BLQA.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to BLQA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs ZPDW.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, ZPDW.DE has a market cap of 114B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while ZPDW.DE trades at €73.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas ZPDW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ZPDW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to ZPDW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs SXR8.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, SXR8.DE has a market cap of 103B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while SXR8.DE trades at €572.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas SXR8.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SXR8.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to SXR8.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs U1FB.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, U1FB.DE has a market cap of 100.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while U1FB.DE trades at €23.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas U1FB.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to U1FB.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to U1FB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs EUNL.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, EUNL.DE has a market cap of 94.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while EUNL.DE trades at €101.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas EUNL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EUNL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to EUNL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs VUSA.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, VUSA.DE has a market cap of 62.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while VUSA.DE trades at €101.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas VUSA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VUSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to VUSA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs VUAA.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, VUAA.DE has a market cap of 62.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while VUAA.DE trades at €102.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas VUAA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VUAA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to VUAA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs SXRZ.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, SXRZ.DE has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while SXRZ.DE trades at €232.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas SXRZ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SXRZ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to SXRZ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs XJSE.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, XJSE.DE has a market cap of 38.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while XJSE.DE trades at €6.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas XJSE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to XJSE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to XJSE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs E500.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, E500.DE has a market cap of 37.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while E500.DE trades at €48.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas E500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to E500.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to E500.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs D500.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, D500.DE has a market cap of 37.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while D500.DE trades at €49.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas D500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to D500.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to D500.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs P500.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, P500.DE has a market cap of 37.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while P500.DE trades at €1,064.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas P500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to P500.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to P500.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs VGWL.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, VGWL.DE has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while VGWL.DE trades at €129.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas VGWL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VGWL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to VGWL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs VWCE.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, VWCE.DE has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while VWCE.DE trades at €131.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas VWCE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VWCE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to VWCE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs VGWL.F Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, VGWL.F has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while VGWL.F trades at €102.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas VGWL.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VGWL.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to VGWL.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs A4S.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, A4S.DE has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while A4S.DE trades at €275.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas A4S.DE's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to A4S.DE's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F and A4S.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P00001QSE.F vs SPPE.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, SPPE.DE has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while SPPE.DE trades at €15.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas SPPE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SPPE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to SPPE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs IE00B3YCGJ38.SG Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, IE00B3YCGJ38.SG has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while IE00B3YCGJ38.SG trades at €1,064.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas IE00B3YCGJ38.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IE00B3YCGJ38.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to IE00B3YCGJ38.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs AW1Q.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, AW1Q.DE has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while AW1Q.DE trades at €17.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas AW1Q.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AW1Q.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to AW1Q.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs SPY5.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, SPY5.DE has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while SPY5.DE trades at €536.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas SPY5.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SPY5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to SPY5.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs IBC3.F Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, IBC3.F has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while IBC3.F trades at €4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas IBC3.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IBC3.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to IBC3.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs IS3N.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, IS3N.DE has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while IS3N.DE trades at €34.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas IS3N.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IS3N.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to IS3N.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs IBC3.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, IBC3.DE has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while IBC3.DE trades at €4.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas IBC3.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IBC3.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to IBC3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs PPFB.SG Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, PPFB.SG has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while PPFB.SG trades at €56.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas PPFB.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PPFB.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to PPFB.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs LYP2.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, LYP2.DE has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while LYP2.DE trades at €311.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas LYP2.DE's P/E ratio is 27.15. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LYP2.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to LYP2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs TR1.DU Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, TR1.DU has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while TR1.DU trades at €89.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas TR1.DU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TR1.DU's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F and TR1.DU have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P00001QSE.F vs 6TVM.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, 6TVM.DE has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while 6TVM.DE trades at €55.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas 6TVM.DE's P/E ratio is 27.23. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 6TVM.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to 6TVM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs LYPS.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, LYPS.DE has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while LYPS.DE trades at €55.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas LYPS.DE's P/E ratio is 26.77. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LYPS.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to LYPS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs XDWD.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, XDWD.DE has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while XDWD.DE trades at €111.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas XDWD.DE's P/E ratio is 22.21. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to XDWD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to XDWD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs XDWL.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, XDWL.DE has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while XDWL.DE trades at €93.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas XDWL.DE's P/E ratio is 22.13. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to XDWL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to XDWL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs IUSA.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, IUSA.DE has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while IUSA.DE trades at €53.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas IUSA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IUSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to IUSA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs SXRV.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, SXRV.DE has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while SXRV.DE trades at €1,125.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas SXRV.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SXRV.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to SXRV.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs IUSZ.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, IUSZ.DE has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while IUSZ.DE trades at €10.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas IUSZ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IUSZ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to IUSZ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs EQQQ.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, EQQQ.DE has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while EQQQ.DE trades at €480.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas EQQQ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EQQQ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to EQQQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs IUSQ.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, IUSQ.DE has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while IUSQ.DE trades at €84.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas IUSQ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IUSQ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to IUSQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs JUHE.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, JUHE.DE has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while JUHE.DE trades at €50.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas JUHE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JUHE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to JUHE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs SPPW.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, SPPW.DE has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while SPPW.DE trades at €37.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas SPPW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SPPW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to SPPW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs SGAS.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, SGAS.DE has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while SGAS.DE trades at €11.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas SGAS.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SGAS.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to SGAS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs EUN5.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, EUN5.DE has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while EUN5.DE trades at €120.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas EUN5.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EUN5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to EUN5.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs JRUD.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, JRUD.DE has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while JRUD.DE trades at €49.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas JRUD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JRUD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to JRUD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs JREU.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, JREU.DE has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while JREU.DE trades at €53.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas JREU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JREU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to JREU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs EUNK.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, EUNK.DE has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while EUNK.DE trades at €85.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas EUNK.DE's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EUNK.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to EUNK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs OM3L.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, OM3L.DE has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while OM3L.DE trades at €9.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas OM3L.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OM3L.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to OM3L.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs XD9E.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, XD9E.DE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while XD9E.DE trades at €127.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas XD9E.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to XD9E.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to XD9E.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs XD9U.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, XD9U.DE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while XD9U.DE trades at €157.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas XD9U.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to XD9U.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to XD9U.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs DWS.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, DWS.DE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while DWS.DE trades at €48.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas DWS.DE's P/E ratio is 13.94. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DWS.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to DWS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs XD9D.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, XD9D.DE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while XD9D.DE trades at €20.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas XD9D.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to XD9D.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to XD9D.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs QDVE.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, QDVE.DE has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while QDVE.DE trades at €31.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas QDVE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to QDVE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to QDVE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs EGV2.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, EGV2.DE has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while EGV2.DE trades at €102.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas EGV2.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EGV2.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to EGV2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs XDEE.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, XDEE.DE has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while XDEE.DE trades at €10.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas XDEE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to XDEE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to XDEE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs XDEW.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, XDEW.DE has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while XDEW.DE trades at €86.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas XDEW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to XDEW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to XDEW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs IE00B4X9L533.SG Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, IE00B4X9L533.SG has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while IE00B4X9L533.SG trades at €34.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas IE00B4X9L533.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IE00B4X9L533.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to IE00B4X9L533.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs H4ZJ.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, H4ZJ.DE has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while H4ZJ.DE trades at €34.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas H4ZJ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to H4ZJ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to H4ZJ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs XS5E.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, XS5E.DE has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while XS5E.DE trades at €9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas XS5E.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to XS5E.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to XS5E.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs LYYA.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, LYYA.DE has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while LYYA.DE trades at €346.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas LYYA.DE's P/E ratio is 23.34. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LYYA.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to LYYA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs STXH.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, STXH.DE has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while STXH.DE trades at €141.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas STXH.DE's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to STXH.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to STXH.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs D5BM.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, D5BM.DE has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while D5BM.DE trades at €107.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas D5BM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to D5BM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to D5BM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs IQQY.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, IQQY.DE has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while IQQY.DE trades at €34.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas IQQY.DE's P/E ratio is 17.74. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IQQY.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to IQQY.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs EXIC.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, EXIC.DE has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while EXIC.DE trades at €7.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas EXIC.DE's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EXIC.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to EXIC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs LYP6.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, LYP6.DE has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while LYP6.DE trades at €260.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas LYP6.DE's P/E ratio is 17.37. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LYP6.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to LYP6.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs EXS1.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, EXS1.DE has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while EXS1.DE trades at €199.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas EXS1.DE's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EXS1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to EXS1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs 0P00000SUJ.F Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, 0P00000SUJ.F has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while 0P00000SUJ.F trades at €65.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas 0P00000SUJ.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F and 0P00000SUJ.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P00001QSE.F vs IE00BMTX1Y45.SG Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, IE00BMTX1Y45.SG has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while IE00BMTX1Y45.SG trades at €8.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas IE00BMTX1Y45.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IE00BMTX1Y45.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to IE00BMTX1Y45.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs EXW1.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, EXW1.DE has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while EXW1.DE trades at €53.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas EXW1.DE's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EXW1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to EXW1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs XWEH.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, XWEH.DE has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while XWEH.DE trades at €43.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas XWEH.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to XWEH.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to XWEH.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs EXIE.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, EXIE.DE has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while EXIE.DE trades at €6.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas EXIE.DE's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EXIE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to EXIE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs DBXW.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, DBXW.DE has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while DBXW.DE trades at €109.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas DBXW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DBXW.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to DBXW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs EXSA.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, EXSA.DE has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while EXSA.DE trades at €54.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas EXSA.DE's P/E ratio is 17.26. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EXSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to EXSA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs VGVF.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, VGVF.DE has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while VGVF.DE trades at €104.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas VGVF.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VGVF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to VGVF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs IQQW.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, IQQW.DE has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while IQQW.DE trades at €73.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas IQQW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IQQW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to IQQW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs VGVE.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, VGVE.DE has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while VGVE.DE trades at €100.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas VGVE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VGVE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to VGVE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs XZMU.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, XZMU.DE has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while XZMU.DE trades at €58.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas XZMU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to XZMU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to XZMU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs DBXE.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, DBXE.DE has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while DBXE.DE trades at €57.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas DBXE.DE's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DBXE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to DBXE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs EDMU.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, EDMU.DE has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while EDMU.DE trades at €9.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas EDMU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EDMU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to EDMU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs VGWD.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, VGWD.DE has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while VGWD.DE trades at €64.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas VGWD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VGWD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to VGWD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs LCUW.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, LCUW.DE has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while LCUW.DE trades at €19.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas LCUW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LCUW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to LCUW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs IE00B5KQNG97.SG Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, IE00B5KQNG97.SG has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while IE00B5KQNG97.SG trades at €54.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas IE00B5KQNG97.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IE00B5KQNG97.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to IE00B5KQNG97.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs H4ZF.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, H4ZF.DE has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while H4ZF.DE trades at €54.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas H4ZF.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to H4ZF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to H4ZF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs EXIC.F Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, EXIC.F has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while EXIC.F trades at €4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas EXIC.F's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EXIC.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to EXIC.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs 2B7K.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, 2B7K.DE has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while 2B7K.DE trades at €11.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas 2B7K.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 2B7K.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to 2B7K.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs SPP1.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, SPP1.DE has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while SPP1.DE trades at €21.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas SPP1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SPP1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to SPP1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs DECR.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, DECR.DE has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while DECR.DE trades at €47.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas DECR.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DECR.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to DECR.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs TCC4.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, TCC4.DE has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while TCC4.DE trades at €225.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas TCC4.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TCC4.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to TCC4.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs DBXD.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, DBXD.DE has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while DBXD.DE trades at €225.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas DBXD.DE's P/E ratio is 18.98. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DBXD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to DBXD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs XMME.F Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, XMME.F has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while XMME.F trades at €46.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas XMME.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to XMME.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to XMME.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs XZW0.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, XZW0.DE has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while XZW0.DE trades at €40.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas XZW0.DE's P/E ratio is 23.55. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to XZW0.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to XZW0.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs DBXU.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, DBXU.DE has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while DBXU.DE trades at €173.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas DBXU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DBXU.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to DBXU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs IBCF.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, IBCF.DE has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while IBCF.DE trades at €131.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas IBCF.DE's P/E ratio is 27.52. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IBCF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to IBCF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs H1D5.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, H1D5.DE has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while H1D5.DE trades at €150.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas H1D5.DE's P/E ratio is 27.15. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to H1D5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to H1D5.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs AUM5.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, AUM5.DE has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while AUM5.DE trades at €106.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas AUM5.DE's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AUM5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to AUM5.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs AEMD.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, AEMD.DE has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while AEMD.DE trades at €53.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas AEMD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AEMD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to AEMD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs XMME.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, XMME.DE has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while XMME.DE trades at €57.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas XMME.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to XMME.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to XMME.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs XIEE.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, XIEE.DE has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while XIEE.DE trades at €77.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas XIEE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to XIEE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to XIEE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs AMEW.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, AMEW.DE has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while AMEW.DE trades at €554.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas AMEW.DE's P/E ratio is 23.33. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AMEW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to AMEW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs SPYY.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, SPYY.DE has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while SPYY.DE trades at €223.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas SPYY.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SPYY.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to SPYY.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.
0P00001QSE.F vs SC0J.DE Comparison
0P00001QSE.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00001QSE.F stands at 2.3T. In comparison, SC0J.DE has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00001QSE.F is priced at €276.73, while SC0J.DE trades at €109.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00001QSE.F currently has a P/E ratio of 15.10, whereas SC0J.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00001QSE.F's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SC0J.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00001QSE.F is less volatile compared to SC0J.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00001QSE.F.