Vanguard U.S. 500 Stock Index Fund EUR Acc
Vanguard U.S. 500 Stock Index Fund EUR Acc (0P00000SUJ.F) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (0P00000SUJ.F) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0P00000SUJ.F | €65.63 | +0.69% | 8.4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 0P00000MO4.F | €353.32 | +0.92% | 3T | 16.68 | €21.18 | N/A |
| 0P00000W6B.F | €306.01 | +0.92% | 2.6T | 16.66 | €18.37 | N/A |
| 0P00001QSE.F | €288.93 | +3.56% | 2.4T | 15.77 | €18.32 | N/A |
| BBN1.F | €151.96 | -0.46% | 183.8B | 54.08 | €2.81 | +2.27% |
| BLQA.DE | €845.50 | -0.62% | 125.2B | 23.42 | €36.10 | +0.60% |
| ZPDW.DE | €76.43 | -0.94% | 118.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IWLE.DE | €9.15 | -0.07% | 115.4B | N/A | N/A | +1.21% |
| SXR8.DE | €580.08 | +0.42% | 107.7B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| U1FB.DE | €24.73 | -0.90% | 104.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
0P00000SUJ.F vs 0P00000MO4.F Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, 0P00000MO4.F has a market cap of 3T. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while 0P00000MO4.F trades at €353.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00000MO4.F's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 0P00000MO4.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F and 0P00000MO4.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0P00000MO4.F's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs 0P00000W6B.F Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, 0P00000W6B.F has a market cap of 2.6T. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while 0P00000W6B.F trades at €306.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00000W6B.F's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 0P00000W6B.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F and 0P00000W6B.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0P00000W6B.F's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs 0P00001QSE.F Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, 0P00001QSE.F has a market cap of 2.4T. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while 0P00001QSE.F trades at €288.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00001QSE.F's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 0P00001QSE.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F and 0P00001QSE.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0P00001QSE.F's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs BBN1.F Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, BBN1.F has a market cap of 183.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while BBN1.F trades at €151.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBN1.F's P/E ratio is 54.08. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BBN1.F's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to BBN1.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check BBN1.F's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs BLQA.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, BLQA.DE has a market cap of 125.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while BLQA.DE trades at €845.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLQA.DE's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BLQA.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to BLQA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check BLQA.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs ZPDW.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, ZPDW.DE has a market cap of 118.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while ZPDW.DE trades at €76.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZPDW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ZPDW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to ZPDW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check ZPDW.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs IWLE.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, IWLE.DE has a market cap of 115.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while IWLE.DE trades at €9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWLE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IWLE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to IWLE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check IWLE.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs SXR8.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, SXR8.DE has a market cap of 107.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while SXR8.DE trades at €580.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXR8.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SXR8.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to SXR8.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check SXR8.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs U1FB.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, U1FB.DE has a market cap of 104.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while U1FB.DE trades at €24.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas U1FB.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to U1FB.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to U1FB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check U1FB.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs EUNL.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, EUNL.DE has a market cap of 98.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while EUNL.DE trades at €102.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EUNL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to EUNL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check EUNL.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs VUAA.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, VUAA.DE has a market cap of 71.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while VUAA.DE trades at €104.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUAA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VUAA.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to VUAA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check VUAA.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs VUSA.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, VUSA.DE has a market cap of 71.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while VUSA.DE trades at €103.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUSA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VUSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to VUSA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check VUSA.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs SXRZ.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, SXRZ.DE has a market cap of 49.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while SXRZ.DE trades at €241.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXRZ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SXRZ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to SXRZ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check SXRZ.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs P500.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, P500.DE has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while P500.DE trades at €1,079.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas P500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to P500.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to P500.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check P500.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs D500.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, D500.DE has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while D500.DE trades at €50.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas D500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to D500.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to D500.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check D500.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs E500.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, E500.DE has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while E500.DE trades at €49.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas E500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to E500.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to E500.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check E500.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs XJSE.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, XJSE.DE has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while XJSE.DE trades at €6.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XJSE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to XJSE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to XJSE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check XJSE.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs VGWL.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, VGWL.DE has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while VGWL.DE trades at €131.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGWL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VGWL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to VGWL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check VGWL.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs VWCE.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, VWCE.DE has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while VWCE.DE trades at €133.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWCE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VWCE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to VWCE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check VWCE.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs VGWL.F Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, VGWL.F has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while VGWL.F trades at €102.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGWL.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VGWL.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to VGWL.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check VGWL.F's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs A4S.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, A4S.DE has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while A4S.DE trades at €275.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas A4S.DE's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to A4S.DE's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F and A4S.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check A4S.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs SPPE.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, SPPE.DE has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while SPPE.DE trades at €15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPPE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SPPE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to SPPE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check SPPE.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs IE00B3YCGJ38.SG Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, IE00B3YCGJ38.SG has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while IE00B3YCGJ38.SG trades at €1,079.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00B3YCGJ38.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IE00B3YCGJ38.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to IE00B3YCGJ38.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check IE00B3YCGJ38.SG's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs AW1Q.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, AW1Q.DE has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while AW1Q.DE trades at €18.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AW1Q.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AW1Q.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F and AW1Q.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AW1Q.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs SPY5.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, SPY5.DE has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while SPY5.DE trades at €543.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPY5.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SPY5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to SPY5.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check SPY5.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs IBC3.F Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, IBC3.F has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while IBC3.F trades at €4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBC3.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IBC3.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to IBC3.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check IBC3.F's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs IS3N.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, IS3N.DE has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while IS3N.DE trades at €34.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IS3N.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IS3N.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to IS3N.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check IS3N.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs IBC3.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, IBC3.DE has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while IBC3.DE trades at €4.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBC3.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IBC3.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to IBC3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check IBC3.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs CBUC.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, CBUC.DE has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while CBUC.DE trades at €6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBUC.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CBUC.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to CBUC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check CBUC.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs NQSE.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, NQSE.DE has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while NQSE.DE trades at €13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NQSE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NQSE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to NQSE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check NQSE.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs TR1.DU Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, TR1.DU has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while TR1.DU trades at €90.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TR1.DU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TR1.DU's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to TR1.DU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check TR1.DU's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs PPFB.SG Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, PPFB.SG has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while PPFB.SG trades at €55.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPFB.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PPFB.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to PPFB.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check PPFB.SG's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs 6TVM.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, 6TVM.DE has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while 6TVM.DE trades at €55.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 6TVM.DE's P/E ratio is 27.59. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 6TVM.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to 6TVM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check 6TVM.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs LYP2.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, LYP2.DE has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while LYP2.DE trades at €314.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYP2.DE's P/E ratio is 27.48. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LYP2.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to LYP2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check LYP2.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs LYPS.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, LYPS.DE has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while LYPS.DE trades at €56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYPS.DE's P/E ratio is 27.14. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LYPS.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to LYPS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check LYPS.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs XDWD.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, XDWD.DE has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while XDWD.DE trades at €112.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDWD.DE's P/E ratio is 22.52. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to XDWD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to XDWD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check XDWD.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs XDWL.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, XDWL.DE has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while XDWL.DE trades at €94.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDWL.DE's P/E ratio is 22.44. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to XDWL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to XDWL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check XDWL.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs OM3L.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, OM3L.DE has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while OM3L.DE trades at €9.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OM3L.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to OM3L.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to OM3L.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check OM3L.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs EDMU.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, EDMU.DE has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while EDMU.DE trades at €9.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDMU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EDMU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to EDMU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check EDMU.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs SXRV.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, SXRV.DE has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while SXRV.DE trades at €1,136.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXRV.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SXRV.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to SXRV.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check SXRV.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs IUSA.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, IUSA.DE has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while IUSA.DE trades at €54.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IUSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to IUSA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check IUSA.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs IUSZ.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, IUSZ.DE has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while IUSZ.DE trades at €10.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSZ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IUSZ.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to IUSZ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check IUSZ.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs EUN5.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, EUN5.DE has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while EUN5.DE trades at €120.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUN5.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EUN5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to EUN5.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check EUN5.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs IUSQ.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, IUSQ.DE has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while IUSQ.DE trades at €85.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSQ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IUSQ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to IUSQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check IUSQ.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs EQQQ.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, EQQQ.DE has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while EQQQ.DE trades at €484.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQQQ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EQQQ.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to EQQQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check EQQQ.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs JUHE.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, JUHE.DE has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while JUHE.DE trades at €51.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JUHE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to JUHE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to JUHE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check JUHE.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs SGAS.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, SGAS.DE has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while SGAS.DE trades at €11.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGAS.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SGAS.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to SGAS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check SGAS.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs SLUS.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, SLUS.DE has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while SLUS.DE trades at €10.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLUS.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SLUS.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to SLUS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check SLUS.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs SPPW.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, SPPW.DE has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while SPPW.DE trades at €37.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPPW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SPPW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to SPPW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check SPPW.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs JREU.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, JREU.DE has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while JREU.DE trades at €54.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JREU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to JREU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to JREU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check JREU.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs JRUD.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, JRUD.DE has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while JRUD.DE trades at €50.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JRUD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to JRUD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to JRUD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check JRUD.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs DWS.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, DWS.DE has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while DWS.DE trades at €52.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DWS.DE's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DWS.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to DWS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check DWS.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs IQQY.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, IQQY.DE has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while IQQY.DE trades at €34.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQQY.DE's P/E ratio is 17.91. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IQQY.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to IQQY.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check IQQY.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs 2B7K.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, 2B7K.DE has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while 2B7K.DE trades at €11.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2B7K.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 2B7K.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to 2B7K.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check 2B7K.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs XD9U.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, XD9U.DE has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while XD9U.DE trades at €159.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XD9U.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to XD9U.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to XD9U.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check XD9U.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs XD9D.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, XD9D.DE has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while XD9D.DE trades at €21.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XD9D.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to XD9D.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to XD9D.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check XD9D.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs EUNK.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, EUNK.DE has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while EUNK.DE trades at €86.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNK.DE's P/E ratio is 17.91. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EUNK.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to EUNK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check EUNK.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs QDVE.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, QDVE.DE has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while QDVE.DE trades at €32.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QDVE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to QDVE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to QDVE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check QDVE.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs XD9E.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, XD9E.DE has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while XD9E.DE trades at €129.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XD9E.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to XD9E.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to XD9E.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check XD9E.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs IE00BMTX1Y45.SG Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, IE00BMTX1Y45.SG has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while IE00BMTX1Y45.SG trades at €9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00BMTX1Y45.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IE00BMTX1Y45.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to IE00BMTX1Y45.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check IE00BMTX1Y45.SG's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs EGV2.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, EGV2.DE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while EGV2.DE trades at €102.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGV2.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EGV2.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to EGV2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check EGV2.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs XDEW.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, XDEW.DE has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while XDEW.DE trades at €87.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to XDEW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to XDEW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check XDEW.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs XDEE.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, XDEE.DE has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while XDEE.DE trades at €10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to XDEE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to XDEE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check XDEE.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs IE00B4X9L533.SG Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, IE00B4X9L533.SG has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while IE00B4X9L533.SG trades at €35.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00B4X9L533.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IE00B4X9L533.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to IE00B4X9L533.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check IE00B4X9L533.SG's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs H4ZJ.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, H4ZJ.DE has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while H4ZJ.DE trades at €35.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H4ZJ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to H4ZJ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to H4ZJ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check H4ZJ.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs LYYA.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, LYYA.DE has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while LYYA.DE trades at €351.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYYA.DE's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LYYA.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to LYYA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check LYYA.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs STXH.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, STXH.DE has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while STXH.DE trades at €143.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STXH.DE's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to STXH.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to STXH.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check STXH.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs D5BM.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, D5BM.DE has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while D5BM.DE trades at €108.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas D5BM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to D5BM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to D5BM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check D5BM.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs XS5E.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, XS5E.DE has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while XS5E.DE trades at €9.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XS5E.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to XS5E.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to XS5E.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check XS5E.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs EXIC.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, EXIC.DE has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while EXIC.DE trades at €7.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXIC.DE's P/E ratio is 19.09. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EXIC.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to EXIC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check EXIC.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs EXS1.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, EXS1.DE has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while EXS1.DE trades at €200.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXS1.DE's P/E ratio is 19.09. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EXS1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to EXS1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check EXS1.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs LYP6.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, LYP6.DE has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while LYP6.DE trades at €263.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYP6.DE's P/E ratio is 17.54. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LYP6.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to LYP6.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check LYP6.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs 2B7J.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, 2B7J.DE has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while 2B7J.DE trades at €8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2B7J.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 2B7J.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to 2B7J.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check 2B7J.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs EXSA.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, EXSA.DE has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while EXSA.DE trades at €54.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXSA.DE's P/E ratio is 17.45. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EXSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to EXSA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check EXSA.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs EXIE.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, EXIE.DE has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while EXIE.DE trades at €6.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXIE.DE's P/E ratio is 17.63. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EXIE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to EXIE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check EXIE.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs VGVF.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, VGVF.DE has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while VGVF.DE trades at €105.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGVF.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VGVF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to VGVF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check VGVF.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs VGVE.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, VGVE.DE has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while VGVE.DE trades at €101.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGVE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VGVE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to VGVE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check VGVE.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs CBUE.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, CBUE.DE has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while CBUE.DE trades at €4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBUE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CBUE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to CBUE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check CBUE.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs EXW1.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, EXW1.DE has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while EXW1.DE trades at €54.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXW1.DE's P/E ratio is 17.04. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EXW1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to EXW1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check EXW1.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs DBXW.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, DBXW.DE has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while DBXW.DE trades at €110.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DBXW.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to DBXW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check DBXW.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs XWEH.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, XWEH.DE has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while XWEH.DE trades at €44.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XWEH.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to XWEH.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to XWEH.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check XWEH.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs EUNW.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, EUNW.DE has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while EUNW.DE trades at €94.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EUNW.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to EUNW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check EUNW.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs XZMU.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, XZMU.DE has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while XZMU.DE trades at €58.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XZMU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to XZMU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to XZMU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check XZMU.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs IQQW.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, IQQW.DE has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while IQQW.DE trades at €74.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQQW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IQQW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to IQQW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check IQQW.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs DBXE.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, DBXE.DE has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while DBXE.DE trades at €57.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXE.DE's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DBXE.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to DBXE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check DBXE.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs SXR7.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, SXR7.DE has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while SXR7.DE trades at €202.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXR7.DE's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SXR7.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to SXR7.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check SXR7.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs VGWD.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, VGWD.DE has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while VGWD.DE trades at €64.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGWD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VGWD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to VGWD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check VGWD.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs SPP1.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, SPP1.DE has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while SPP1.DE trades at €22.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPP1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SPP1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to SPP1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check SPP1.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs IE00B5KQNG97.SG Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, IE00B5KQNG97.SG has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while IE00B5KQNG97.SG trades at €54.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00B5KQNG97.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IE00B5KQNG97.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to IE00B5KQNG97.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check IE00B5KQNG97.SG's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs H4ZF.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, H4ZF.DE has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while H4ZF.DE trades at €54.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H4ZF.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to H4ZF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to H4ZF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check H4ZF.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs LCUW.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, LCUW.DE has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while LCUW.DE trades at €19.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCUW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LCUW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to LCUW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check LCUW.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs EXIC.F Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, EXIC.F has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while EXIC.F trades at €4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXIC.F's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EXIC.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to EXIC.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check EXIC.F's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs DBXD.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, DBXD.DE has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while DBXD.DE trades at €227.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXD.DE's P/E ratio is 19.11. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DBXD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to DBXD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check DBXD.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs XZW0.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, XZW0.DE has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while XZW0.DE trades at €40.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XZW0.DE's P/E ratio is 23.83. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to XZW0.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to XZW0.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check XZW0.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs XMME.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, XMME.DE has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while XMME.DE trades at €57.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMME.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to XMME.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to XMME.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check XMME.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs TCC4.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, TCC4.DE has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while TCC4.DE trades at €225.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCC4.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TCC4.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to TCC4.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check TCC4.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs DECR.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, DECR.DE has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while DECR.DE trades at €47.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DECR.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DECR.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to DECR.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check DECR.DE's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs XMME.F Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, XMME.F has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while XMME.F trades at €46.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMME.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to XMME.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to XMME.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check XMME.F's competition here
0P00000SUJ.F vs DBXU.DE Comparison July 2025
0P00000SUJ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00000SUJ.F stands at 8.4B. In comparison, DBXU.DE has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00000SUJ.F is priced at €65.63, while DBXU.DE trades at €173.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00000SUJ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DBXU.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00000SUJ.F is less volatile compared to DBXU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00000SUJ.F.Check DBXU.DE's competition here