REPT BATTERO Energy Co Ltd
REPT BATTERO Energy Co Ltd 0666.HK Peers
See (0666.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0666.HK | $11.28 | -2.42% | 25.55B | -20.51 | -$0.55 | N/A |
| 3606.HK | $53.85 | +0.28% | 154.53B | 15.93 | $3.38 | +5.78% |
| 0564.HK | $13.74 | +1.48% | 28.28B | 5.68 | $2.42 | +7.28% |
| 0425.HK | $20.60 | +4.36% | 23.43B | 9.45 | $2.18 | N/A |
| 1316.HK | $6.28 | +9.79% | 15.76B | 31.40 | $0.20 | +0.37% |
| 9690.HK | $18.68 | +0.76% | 14.02B | 28.74 | $0.65 | N/A |
| 0179.HK | $15.00 | +2.32% | 13.81B | 7.50 | $2.00 | +4.07% |
| 1057.HK | $4.24 | +2.17% | 9.42B | 19.27 | $0.22 | +1.16% |
| 0819.HK | $6.25 | -1.26% | 7.04B | 5.73 | $1.09 | +6.88% |
| 1809.HK | $8.19 | N/A | 5.22B | 3.67 | $2.23 | +5.07% |
Stock Comparison
0666.HK vs 3606.HK Comparison
0666.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0666.HK stands at 25.55B. In comparison, 3606.HK has a market cap of 154.53B. Regarding current trading prices, 0666.HK is priced at $11.28, while 3606.HK trades at $53.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0666.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.51, whereas 3606.HK's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, 0666.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 3606.HK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 0666.HK is more volatile compared to 3606.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0666.HK.
0666.HK vs 0564.HK Comparison
0666.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0666.HK stands at 25.55B. In comparison, 0564.HK has a market cap of 28.28B. Regarding current trading prices, 0666.HK is priced at $11.28, while 0564.HK trades at $13.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0666.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.51, whereas 0564.HK's P/E ratio is 5.68. In terms of profitability, 0666.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 0564.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 0666.HK is more volatile compared to 0564.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0666.HK.
0666.HK vs 0425.HK Comparison
0666.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0666.HK stands at 25.55B. In comparison, 0425.HK has a market cap of 23.43B. Regarding current trading prices, 0666.HK is priced at $11.28, while 0425.HK trades at $20.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0666.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.51, whereas 0425.HK's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, 0666.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 0425.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0666.HK is more volatile compared to 0425.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0666.HK.
0666.HK vs 1316.HK Comparison
0666.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0666.HK stands at 25.55B. In comparison, 1316.HK has a market cap of 15.76B. Regarding current trading prices, 0666.HK is priced at $11.28, while 1316.HK trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0666.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.51, whereas 1316.HK's P/E ratio is 31.40. In terms of profitability, 0666.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 1316.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0666.HK is less volatile compared to 1316.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0666.HK.
0666.HK vs 9690.HK Comparison
0666.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0666.HK stands at 25.55B. In comparison, 9690.HK has a market cap of 14.02B. Regarding current trading prices, 0666.HK is priced at $11.28, while 9690.HK trades at $18.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0666.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.51, whereas 9690.HK's P/E ratio is 28.74. In terms of profitability, 0666.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 9690.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0666.HK is more volatile compared to 9690.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0666.HK.
0666.HK vs 0179.HK Comparison
0666.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0666.HK stands at 25.55B. In comparison, 0179.HK has a market cap of 13.81B. Regarding current trading prices, 0666.HK is priced at $11.28, while 0179.HK trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0666.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.51, whereas 0179.HK's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, 0666.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 0179.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0666.HK is more volatile compared to 0179.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0666.HK.
0666.HK vs 1057.HK Comparison
0666.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0666.HK stands at 25.55B. In comparison, 1057.HK has a market cap of 9.42B. Regarding current trading prices, 0666.HK is priced at $11.28, while 1057.HK trades at $4.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0666.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.51, whereas 1057.HK's P/E ratio is 19.27. In terms of profitability, 0666.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 1057.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0666.HK is more volatile compared to 1057.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0666.HK.
0666.HK vs 0819.HK Comparison
0666.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0666.HK stands at 25.55B. In comparison, 0819.HK has a market cap of 7.04B. Regarding current trading prices, 0666.HK is priced at $11.28, while 0819.HK trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0666.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.51, whereas 0819.HK's P/E ratio is 5.73. In terms of profitability, 0666.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 0819.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0666.HK is more volatile compared to 0819.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0666.HK.
0666.HK vs 1809.HK Comparison
0666.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0666.HK stands at 25.55B. In comparison, 1809.HK has a market cap of 5.22B. Regarding current trading prices, 0666.HK is priced at $11.28, while 1809.HK trades at $8.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0666.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.51, whereas 1809.HK's P/E ratio is 3.67. In terms of profitability, 0666.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 1809.HK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 0666.HK is more volatile compared to 1809.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0666.HK.
0666.HK vs 2488.HK Comparison
0666.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0666.HK stands at 25.55B. In comparison, 2488.HK has a market cap of 5.02B. Regarding current trading prices, 0666.HK is priced at $11.28, while 2488.HK trades at $12.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0666.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.51, whereas 2488.HK's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, 0666.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 2488.HK's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 0666.HK is more volatile compared to 2488.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0666.HK.
0666.HK vs 2531.HK Comparison
0666.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0666.HK stands at 25.55B. In comparison, 2531.HK has a market cap of 4.47B. Regarding current trading prices, 0666.HK is priced at $11.28, while 2531.HK trades at $12.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0666.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.51, whereas 2531.HK's P/E ratio is 87.14. In terms of profitability, 0666.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 2531.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0666.HK is more volatile compared to 2531.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0666.HK.
0666.HK vs 1274.HK Comparison
0666.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0666.HK stands at 25.55B. In comparison, 1274.HK has a market cap of 3.94B. Regarding current trading prices, 0666.HK is priced at $11.28, while 1274.HK trades at $15.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0666.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.51, whereas 1274.HK's P/E ratio is -11.33. In terms of profitability, 0666.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 1274.HK's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 0666.HK is more volatile compared to 1274.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0666.HK.
0666.HK vs 1571.HK Comparison
0666.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0666.HK stands at 25.55B. In comparison, 1571.HK has a market cap of 3.72B. Regarding current trading prices, 0666.HK is priced at $11.28, while 1571.HK trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0666.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.51, whereas 1571.HK's P/E ratio is 6.08. In terms of profitability, 0666.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 1571.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0666.HK is more volatile compared to 1571.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0666.HK.
0666.HK vs 1899.HK Comparison
0666.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0666.HK stands at 25.55B. In comparison, 1899.HK has a market cap of 2.21B. Regarding current trading prices, 0666.HK is priced at $11.28, while 1899.HK trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0666.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.51, whereas 1899.HK's P/E ratio is 7.73. In terms of profitability, 0666.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 1899.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0666.HK is more volatile compared to 1899.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0666.HK.
0666.HK vs 2025.HK Comparison
0666.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0666.HK stands at 25.55B. In comparison, 2025.HK has a market cap of 2.21B. Regarding current trading prices, 0666.HK is priced at $11.28, while 2025.HK trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0666.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.51, whereas 2025.HK's P/E ratio is 92.00. In terms of profitability, 0666.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 2025.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0666.HK is less volatile compared to 2025.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0666.HK.
0666.HK vs 1760.HK Comparison
0666.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0666.HK stands at 25.55B. In comparison, 1760.HK has a market cap of 1.58B. Regarding current trading prices, 0666.HK is priced at $11.28, while 1760.HK trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0666.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.51, whereas 1760.HK's P/E ratio is 6.90. In terms of profitability, 0666.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 1760.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0666.HK is less volatile compared to 1760.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0666.HK.
0666.HK vs 0305.HK Comparison
0666.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0666.HK stands at 25.55B. In comparison, 0305.HK has a market cap of 1.48B. Regarding current trading prices, 0666.HK is priced at $11.28, while 0305.HK trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0666.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.51, whereas 0305.HK's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, 0666.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 0305.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0666.HK is more volatile compared to 0305.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0666.HK.
0666.HK vs 0951.HK Comparison
0666.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0666.HK stands at 25.55B. In comparison, 0951.HK has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, 0666.HK is priced at $11.28, while 0951.HK trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0666.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.51, whereas 0951.HK's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, 0666.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 0951.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0666.HK is more volatile compared to 0951.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0666.HK.
0666.HK vs 0360.HK Comparison
0666.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0666.HK stands at 25.55B. In comparison, 0360.HK has a market cap of 757.55M. Regarding current trading prices, 0666.HK is priced at $11.28, while 0360.HK trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0666.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.51, whereas 0360.HK's P/E ratio is -4.40. In terms of profitability, 0666.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 0360.HK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0666.HK is more volatile compared to 0360.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0666.HK.
0666.HK vs 6830.HK Comparison
0666.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0666.HK stands at 25.55B. In comparison, 6830.HK has a market cap of 415.76M. Regarding current trading prices, 0666.HK is priced at $11.28, while 6830.HK trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0666.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.51, whereas 6830.HK's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, 0666.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 6830.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0666.HK is more volatile compared to 6830.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0666.HK.
0666.HK vs 8418.HK Comparison
0666.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0666.HK stands at 25.55B. In comparison, 8418.HK has a market cap of 361.25M. Regarding current trading prices, 0666.HK is priced at $11.28, while 8418.HK trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0666.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.51, whereas 8418.HK's P/E ratio is -42.50. In terms of profitability, 0666.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 8418.HK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 0666.HK is less volatile compared to 8418.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0666.HK.
0666.HK vs 0096.HK Comparison
0666.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0666.HK stands at 25.55B. In comparison, 0096.HK has a market cap of 350.10M. Regarding current trading prices, 0666.HK is priced at $11.28, while 0096.HK trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0666.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.51, whereas 0096.HK's P/E ratio is 3.67. In terms of profitability, 0666.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 0096.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0666.HK is more volatile compared to 0096.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0666.HK.
0666.HK vs 6162.HK Comparison
0666.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0666.HK stands at 25.55B. In comparison, 6162.HK has a market cap of 274.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 0666.HK is priced at $11.28, while 6162.HK trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0666.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.51, whereas 6162.HK's P/E ratio is 65.77. In terms of profitability, 0666.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 6162.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0666.HK is more volatile compared to 6162.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0666.HK.
0666.HK vs 2339.HK Comparison
0666.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0666.HK stands at 25.55B. In comparison, 2339.HK has a market cap of 258.45M. Regarding current trading prices, 0666.HK is priced at $11.28, while 2339.HK trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0666.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.51, whereas 2339.HK's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, 0666.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 2339.HK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 0666.HK is more volatile compared to 2339.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0666.HK.
0666.HK vs 1188.HK Comparison
0666.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0666.HK stands at 25.55B. In comparison, 1188.HK has a market cap of 244.23M. Regarding current trading prices, 0666.HK is priced at $11.28, while 1188.HK trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0666.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.51, whereas 1188.HK's P/E ratio is -10.91. In terms of profitability, 0666.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 1188.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0666.HK is less volatile compared to 1188.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0666.HK.
0666.HK vs 1930.HK Comparison
0666.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0666.HK stands at 25.55B. In comparison, 1930.HK has a market cap of 244.15M. Regarding current trading prices, 0666.HK is priced at $11.28, while 1930.HK trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0666.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.51, whereas 1930.HK's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, 0666.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 1930.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0666.HK is less volatile compared to 1930.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0666.HK.
0666.HK vs 1148.HK Comparison
0666.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0666.HK stands at 25.55B. In comparison, 1148.HK has a market cap of 239.77M. Regarding current trading prices, 0666.HK is priced at $11.28, while 1148.HK trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0666.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.51, whereas 1148.HK's P/E ratio is 6.23. In terms of profitability, 0666.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 1148.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0666.HK is less volatile compared to 1148.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0666.HK.
0666.HK vs 8135.HK Comparison
0666.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0666.HK stands at 25.55B. In comparison, 8135.HK has a market cap of 187.20M. Regarding current trading prices, 0666.HK is priced at $11.28, while 8135.HK trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0666.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.51, whereas 8135.HK's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, 0666.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 8135.HK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0666.HK is less volatile compared to 8135.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0666.HK.
0666.HK vs 0872.HK Comparison
0666.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0666.HK stands at 25.55B. In comparison, 0872.HK has a market cap of 123.82M. Regarding current trading prices, 0666.HK is priced at $11.28, while 0872.HK trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0666.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.51, whereas 0872.HK's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, 0666.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 0872.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0666.HK is more volatile compared to 0872.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0666.HK.
0666.HK vs 1991.HK Comparison
0666.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0666.HK stands at 25.55B. In comparison, 1991.HK has a market cap of 118.21M. Regarding current trading prices, 0666.HK is priced at $11.28, while 1991.HK trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0666.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.51, whereas 1991.HK's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, 0666.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 1991.HK's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 0666.HK is more volatile compared to 1991.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0666.HK.
0666.HK vs 1241.HK Comparison
0666.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0666.HK stands at 25.55B. In comparison, 1241.HK has a market cap of 83.85M. Regarding current trading prices, 0666.HK is priced at $11.28, while 1241.HK trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0666.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.51, whereas 1241.HK's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, 0666.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 1241.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0666.HK is more volatile compared to 1241.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0666.HK.
0666.HK vs 6163.HK Comparison
0666.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0666.HK stands at 25.55B. In comparison, 6163.HK has a market cap of 55.27M. Regarding current trading prices, 0666.HK is priced at $11.28, while 6163.HK trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0666.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.51, whereas 6163.HK's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, 0666.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 6163.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0666.HK is less volatile compared to 6163.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0666.HK.
0666.HK vs 0479.HK Comparison
0666.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0666.HK stands at 25.55B. In comparison, 0479.HK has a market cap of 52.02M. Regarding current trading prices, 0666.HK is priced at $11.28, while 0479.HK trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0666.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.51, whereas 0479.HK's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, 0666.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 0479.HK's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, 0666.HK is more volatile compared to 0479.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0666.HK.
0666.HK vs 1269.HK Comparison
0666.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0666.HK stands at 25.55B. In comparison, 1269.HK has a market cap of 49.90M. Regarding current trading prices, 0666.HK is priced at $11.28, while 1269.HK trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0666.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.51, whereas 1269.HK's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, 0666.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 1269.HK's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 0666.HK is less volatile compared to 1269.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0666.HK.
0666.HK vs 6928.HK Comparison
0666.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0666.HK stands at 25.55B. In comparison, 6928.HK has a market cap of 39.60M. Regarding current trading prices, 0666.HK is priced at $11.28, while 6928.HK trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0666.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.51, whereas 6928.HK's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, 0666.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 6928.HK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 0666.HK is more volatile compared to 6928.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0666.HK.
0666.HK vs 8283.HK Comparison
0666.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0666.HK stands at 25.55B. In comparison, 8283.HK has a market cap of 19.44M. Regarding current trading prices, 0666.HK is priced at $11.28, while 8283.HK trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0666.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.51, whereas 8283.HK's P/E ratio is 1.84. In terms of profitability, 0666.HK's ROE is -0.11%, compared to 8283.HK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 0666.HK is more volatile compared to 8283.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0666.HK.