Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See 0387.HK's competitors and their performance on the HKSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for 0387.HK and its HKSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0387.HK | HK$0.79 | +0.00% | 181.8M | 11.29 | HK$0.07 | +20.25% |
| 2050.HK | HK$26.40 | -0.53% | 152.6B | 24.29 | HK$1.13 | +1.65% |
| 2727.HK | HK$2.96 | -2.63% | 104.3B | 13.24 | HK$0.23 | +0.53% |
| 1072.HK | HK$21.52 | -2.89% | 78.6B | 16.58 | HK$1.37 | +2.67% |
| 1157.HK | HK$7.05 | +0.43% | 74.2B | 9.40 | HK$0.76 | +6.27% |
| 0470.HK | HK$31.36 | +2.48% | 70.5B | 54.75 | HK$0.57 | +1.05% |
| 2208.HK | HK$9.43 | -4.17% | 41.3B | 12.38 | HK$0.80 | +2.32% |
| 1133.HK | HK$16.06 | -4.46% | 39.6B | 13.44 | HK$1.32 | +2.30% |
| 9880.HK | HK$79.65 | -1.97% | 36.3B | -49.32 | -HK$1.70 | N/A |
| 1882.HK | HK$19.62 | -1.16% | 32B | 8.78 | HK$2.28 | +4.00% |
Stock Comparison
Zhejiang Sanhua Intelligent Controls Co. Ltd (HKSE: 2050.HK)
0387.HK vs 2050.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 2050.HK has a market cap of 152.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 2050.HK trades at HK$26.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 2050.HK's P/E ratio is 24.29. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 2050.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 2050.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 2050.HK's competition here
Shanghai Electric Group Company Limited (HKSE: 2727.HK)
0387.HK vs 2727.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 2727.HK has a market cap of 104.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 2727.HK trades at HK$2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 2727.HK's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 2727.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 2727.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 2727.HK's competition here
Dongfang Electric Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1072.HK)
0387.HK vs 1072.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 1072.HK has a market cap of 78.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 1072.HK trades at HK$21.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 1072.HK's P/E ratio is 16.58. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 1072.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 1072.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 1072.HK's competition here
Zoomlion Heavy Industry Science and Technology Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1157.HK)
0387.HK vs 1157.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 1157.HK has a market cap of 74.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 1157.HK trades at HK$7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 1157.HK's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 1157.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 1157.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 1157.HK's competition here
WUXI Lead (HKSE: 0470.HK)
0387.HK vs 0470.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 0470.HK has a market cap of 70.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 0470.HK trades at HK$31.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 0470.HK's P/E ratio is 54.75. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0470.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 0470.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 0470.HK's competition here
Goldwind Science&Technology Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2208.HK)
0387.HK vs 2208.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 2208.HK has a market cap of 41.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 2208.HK trades at HK$9.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 2208.HK's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 2208.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 2208.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 2208.HK's competition here
Harbin Electric Company Limited (HKSE: 1133.HK)
0387.HK vs 1133.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 1133.HK has a market cap of 39.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 1133.HK trades at HK$16.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 1133.HK's P/E ratio is 13.44. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 1133.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 1133.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 1133.HK's competition here
UBTECH Robotics Corp Ltd (HKSE: 9880.HK)
0387.HK vs 9880.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 9880.HK has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 9880.HK trades at HK$79.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 9880.HK's P/E ratio is -49.32. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 9880.HK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 9880.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 9880.HK's competition here
Haitian International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1882.HK)
0387.HK vs 1882.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 1882.HK has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 1882.HK trades at HK$19.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 1882.HK's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 1882.HK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 1882.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 1882.HK's competition here
Sany Heavy Equipment International Holdings Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 0631.HK)
0387.HK vs 0631.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 0631.HK has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 0631.HK trades at HK$8.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 0631.HK's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0631.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 0631.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 0631.HK's competition here
Precision Tsugami (China) Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1651.HK)
0387.HK vs 1651.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 1651.HK has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 1651.HK trades at HK$50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 1651.HK's P/E ratio is 19.16. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 1651.HK's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 1651.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 1651.HK's competition here
Impro Precision Industries Limited (HKSE: 1286.HK)
0387.HK vs 1286.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 1286.HK has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 1286.HK trades at HK$8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 1286.HK's P/E ratio is 21.33. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 1286.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 1286.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 1286.HK's competition here
Rokae (Shandong) Robotics Group Inc. Class H (HKSE: 3752.HK)
0387.HK vs 3752.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 3752.HK has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 3752.HK trades at HK$65.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 3752.HK's P/E ratio is -91.25. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 3752.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 3752.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 3752.HK's competition here
CIMC Enric Holdings Limited (HKSE: 3899.HK)
0387.HK vs 3899.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 3899.HK has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 3899.HK trades at HK$7.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 3899.HK's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 3899.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 3899.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 3899.HK's competition here
Aux Electric Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2580.HK)
0387.HK vs 2580.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 2580.HK has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 2580.HK trades at HK$10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 2580.HK's P/E ratio is 5.66. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 2580.HK's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 2580.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 2580.HK's competition here
Zhejiang Galaxis Tech Grp Co (HKSE: 2729.HK)
0387.HK vs 2729.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 2729.HK has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 2729.HK trades at HK$35.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 2729.HK's P/E ratio is -75.53. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 2729.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 2729.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 2729.HK's competition here
Lonking Holdings Limited (HKSE: 3339.HK)
0387.HK vs 3339.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 3339.HK has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 3339.HK trades at HK$3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 3339.HK's P/E ratio is 9.84. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 3339.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 3339.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 3339.HK's competition here
Sany Heavy Industry Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 6031.HK)
0387.HK vs 6031.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 6031.HK has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 6031.HK trades at HK$18.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 6031.HK's P/E ratio is 39.58. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 6031.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 6031.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 6031.HK's competition here
Shenzhen Ldrobot Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1236.HK)
0387.HK vs 1236.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 1236.HK has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 1236.HK trades at HK$37.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 1236.HK's P/E ratio is -169.55. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 1236.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 1236.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 1236.HK's competition here
Dobot (HKSE: 2432.HK)
0387.HK vs 2432.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 2432.HK has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 2432.HK trades at HK$24.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 2432.HK's P/E ratio is -112.52. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 2432.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 2432.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 2432.HK's competition here
Chervon Holdings Limited (HKSE: 2285.HK)
0387.HK vs 2285.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 2285.HK has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 2285.HK trades at HK$19.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 2285.HK's P/E ratio is 25.84. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 2285.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 2285.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 2285.HK's competition here
Morimatsu International Holdings Company Limited (HKSE: 2155.HK)
0387.HK vs 2155.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 2155.HK has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 2155.HK trades at HK$7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 2155.HK's P/E ratio is 14.57. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 2155.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 2155.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 2155.HK's competition here
Beijing Yunji Technology Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2670.HK)
0387.HK vs 2670.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 2670.HK has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 2670.HK trades at HK$127.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 2670.HK's P/E ratio is -25.62. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 2670.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 2670.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 2670.HK's competition here
Chongqing Machinery & Electric Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2722.HK)
0387.HK vs 2722.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 2722.HK has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 2722.HK trades at HK$1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 2722.HK's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 2722.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 2722.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 2722.HK's competition here
Robotphoenix Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 6871.HK)
0387.HK vs 6871.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 6871.HK has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 6871.HK trades at HK$29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 6871.HK's P/E ratio is -40.33. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 6871.HK's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 6871.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 6871.HK's competition here
Shanghai Seer Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 6106.HK)
0387.HK vs 6106.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 6106.HK has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 6106.HK trades at HK$64.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 6106.HK's P/E ratio is -137.88. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 6106.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 6106.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 6106.HK's competition here
Shanghai Top Numerical Control Technology Co., Ltd. Class H (HKSE: 7688.HK)
0387.HK vs 7688.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 7688.HK has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 7688.HK trades at HK$16.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 7688.HK's P/E ratio is 1636.00. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7688.HK's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 7688.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 7688.HK's competition here
Zhejiang Laifual Drive Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 3952.HK)
0387.HK vs 3952.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 3952.HK has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 3952.HK trades at HK$57.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 3952.HK's P/E ratio is -28.73. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 3952.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 3952.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 3952.HK's competition here
Shenzhen Han's CNC Technology Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 3200.HK)
0387.HK vs 3200.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 3200.HK has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 3200.HK trades at HK$93.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 3200.HK's P/E ratio is 128.06. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 3200.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 3200.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 3200.HK's competition here
Guangdong Huayan Robotics Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1021.HK)
0387.HK vs 1021.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 1021.HK has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 1021.HK trades at HK$9.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 1021.HK's P/E ratio is -128.29. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 1021.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 1021.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 1021.HK's competition here
Beijing Jingcheng Machinery Electric Company Limited (HKSE: 0187.HK)
0387.HK vs 0187.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 0187.HK has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 0187.HK trades at HK$2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 0187.HK's P/E ratio is -344.48. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0187.HK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 0187.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 0187.HK's competition here
Guangdong Dtech Technology Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1377.HK)
0387.HK vs 1377.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 1377.HK has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 1377.HK trades at HK$348.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 1377.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 1377.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 1377.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 1377.HK's competition here
Breton Technology Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 1333.HK)
0387.HK vs 1333.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 1333.HK has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 1333.HK trades at HK$11.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 1333.HK's P/E ratio is -11.01. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 1333.HK's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 1333.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 1333.HK's competition here
Pentamaster International Limited (HKSE: 1665.HK)
0387.HK vs 1665.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 1665.HK has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 1665.HK trades at HK$0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 1665.HK's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 1665.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 1665.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 1665.HK's competition here
Asia Tele-Net and Technology Corporation Limited (HKSE: 0679.HK)
0387.HK vs 0679.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 0679.HK has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 0679.HK trades at HK$4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 0679.HK's P/E ratio is -77.41. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0679.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 0679.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 0679.HK's competition here
L.K. Technology Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0558.HK)
0387.HK vs 0558.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 0558.HK has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 0558.HK trades at HK$1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 0558.HK's P/E ratio is 53.02. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0558.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 0558.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 0558.HK's competition here
China High Speed Transmission Equipment Group Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 0658.HK)
0387.HK vs 0658.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 0658.HK has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 0658.HK trades at HK$1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 0658.HK's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0658.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 0658.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 0658.HK's competition here
Estun (HKSE: 2715.HK)
0387.HK vs 2715.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 2715.HK has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 2715.HK trades at HK$16.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 2715.HK's P/E ratio is 137.97. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 2715.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 2715.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 2715.HK's competition here
Haina Intelligent Equipment International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1645.HK)
0387.HK vs 1645.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 1645.HK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 1645.HK trades at HK$2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 1645.HK's P/E ratio is -36.46. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 1645.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 1645.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 1645.HK's competition here
China Nature Energy Technology Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1597.HK)
0387.HK vs 1597.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 1597.HK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 1597.HK trades at HK$5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 1597.HK's P/E ratio is -30.21. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 1597.HK's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 1597.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 1597.HK's competition here
CRCC High-Tech Equipment Corporation Limited (HKSE: 1786.HK)
0387.HK vs 1786.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 1786.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 1786.HK trades at HK$0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 1786.HK's P/E ratio is 6.99. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 1786.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is more volatile compared to 1786.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 1786.HK's competition here
Best Linking Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8617.HK)
0387.HK vs 8617.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 8617.HK has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 8617.HK trades at HK$2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 8617.HK's P/E ratio is 37.14. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 8617.HK's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 8617.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 8617.HK's competition here
Chen Hsong Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0057.HK)
0387.HK vs 0057.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 0057.HK has a market cap of 993.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 0057.HK trades at HK$1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 0057.HK's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0057.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 0057.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 0057.HK's competition here
Jiangsu Guofu Hydrogen Energy Equipment Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2582.HK)
0387.HK vs 2582.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 2582.HK has a market cap of 959.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 2582.HK trades at HK$8.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 2582.HK's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 2582.HK's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 2582.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 2582.HK's competition here
Lung Kee Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0255.HK)
0387.HK vs 0255.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 0255.HK has a market cap of 919.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 0255.HK trades at HK$1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 0255.HK's P/E ratio is -104.39. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0255.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 0255.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 0255.HK's competition here
China PengFei Group Limited (HKSE: 3348.HK)
0387.HK vs 3348.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 3348.HK has a market cap of 680M. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 3348.HK trades at HK$1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 3348.HK's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 3348.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is more volatile compared to 3348.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 3348.HK's competition here
Ruichang Intl (HKSE: 1334.HK)
0387.HK vs 1334.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 1334.HK has a market cap of 595M. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 1334.HK trades at HK$1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 1334.HK's P/E ratio is 119.00. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 1334.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 1334.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 1334.HK's competition here
Sino ICT Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0365.HK)
0387.HK vs 0365.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 0365.HK has a market cap of 567.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 0365.HK trades at HK$0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 0365.HK's P/E ratio is -7.64. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0365.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 0365.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 0365.HK's competition here
Best Linking Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 9882.HK)
0387.HK vs 9882.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 9882.HK has a market cap of 560M. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 9882.HK trades at HK$0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 9882.HK's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 9882.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is more volatile compared to 9882.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 9882.HK's competition here
Metasurface Technologies Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8637.HK)
0387.HK vs 8637.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 8637.HK has a market cap of 479.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 8637.HK trades at HK$3.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 8637.HK's P/E ratio is 0.75. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 8637.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is more volatile compared to 8637.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 8637.HK's competition here
Huazhang Technology Holding Limited (HKSE: 1673.HK)
0387.HK vs 1673.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 1673.HK has a market cap of 415M. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 1673.HK trades at HK$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 1673.HK's P/E ratio is -10.96. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 1673.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is more volatile compared to 1673.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 1673.HK's competition here
CHTC Fong's International Company Limited (HKSE: 0641.HK)
0387.HK vs 0641.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 0641.HK has a market cap of 407.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 0641.HK trades at HK$0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 0641.HK's P/E ratio is -3.44. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0641.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 0641.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 0641.HK's competition here
Kinergy Corporation Ltd. (HKSE: 3302.HK)
0387.HK vs 3302.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 3302.HK has a market cap of 308.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 3302.HK trades at HK$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 3302.HK's P/E ratio is -8.63. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 3302.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 3302.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 3302.HK's competition here
Wuxi Sunlit Science and Technology Company Limited (HKSE: 1289.HK)
0387.HK vs 1289.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 1289.HK has a market cap of 262.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 1289.HK trades at HK$2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 1289.HK's P/E ratio is 4.95. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 1289.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 1289.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 1289.HK's competition here
Fullshare Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0607.HK)
0387.HK vs 0607.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 0607.HK has a market cap of 229.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 0607.HK trades at HK$0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 0607.HK's P/E ratio is -2.04. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0607.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 0607.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 0607.HK's competition here
Cosmos Machinery Enterprises Limited (HKSE: 0118.HK)
0387.HK vs 0118.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 0118.HK has a market cap of 163.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 0118.HK trades at HK$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 0118.HK's P/E ratio is 30.69. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0118.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 0118.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 0118.HK's competition here
RENHENG Enterprise Holdings Limited (HKSE: 3628.HK)
0387.HK vs 3628.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 3628.HK has a market cap of 160.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 3628.HK trades at HK$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 3628.HK's P/E ratio is 22.86. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 3628.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 3628.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 3628.HK's competition here
Yuk Wing Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1536.HK)
0387.HK vs 1536.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 1536.HK has a market cap of 114M. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 1536.HK trades at HK$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 1536.HK's P/E ratio is -8.04. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 1536.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 1536.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 1536.HK's competition here
Shuanghua Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1241.HK)
0387.HK vs 1241.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 1241.HK has a market cap of 103.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 1241.HK trades at HK$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 1241.HK's P/E ratio is -5.74. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 1241.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 1241.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 1241.HK's competition here
China Ocean Industry Group Limited (HKSE: 0651.HK)
0387.HK vs 0651.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 0651.HK has a market cap of 51.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 0651.HK trades at HK$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 0651.HK's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 0651.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 0651.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 0651.HK's competition here
S&S Intervalue China Limited (HKSE: 8506.HK)
0387.HK vs 8506.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 8506.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 8506.HK trades at HK$1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 8506.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 8506.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 8506.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 8506.HK's competition here
Good Friend International Holdings Inc. (HKSE: 2398.HK)
0387.HK vs 2398.HK Comparison August 2026
Leeport (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0387.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0387.HK stands at 181.8M. In comparison, 2398.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0387.HK is priced at HK$0.79 on the HKSE, while 2398.HK trades at HK$1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0387.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas 2398.HK's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, 0387.HK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 2398.HK's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 0387.HK is less volatile compared to 2398.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0387.HK.Check 2398.HK's competition here