Fairwood Holdings Limited
Fairwood Holdings Limited (0052.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (0052.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Restaurants Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0052.HK | HK$4.05 | -0.49% | 524.7M | 15.58 | HK$0.26 | +5.43% |
| 9987.HK | HK$385.80 | +0.73% | 136.2B | 19.62 | HK$19.66 | +2.05% |
| 6862.HK | HK$14.82 | +2.99% | 80.3B | 17.44 | HK$0.85 | +5.70% |
| 1364.HK | HK$28.70 | +0.91% | 68.3B | 23.52 | HK$1.22 | +3.24% |
| 0999.HK | HK$6.80 | -0.58% | 8B | 9.86 | HK$0.69 | N/A |
| 1405.HK | HK$50.40 | -2.51% | 6.6B | 42.35 | HK$1.19 | N/A |
| 9658.HK | HK$11.18 | -2.95% | 6.6B | 14.33 | HK$0.78 | N/A |
| 0341.HK | HK$4.31 | -1.37% | 2.5B | 18.74 | HK$0.23 | +8.12% |
| 9922.HK | HK$1.75 | +1.16% | 2.4B | 35.00 | HK$0.05 | +2.29% |
| 2217.HK | HK$1.57 | -0.63% | 2.1B | 26.17 | HK$0.06 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
0052.HK vs 9987.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 9987.HK has a market cap of 136.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 9987.HK trades at HK$385.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 9987.HK's P/E ratio is 19.62. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 9987.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is less volatile compared to 9987.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 9987.HK's competition here
0052.HK vs 6862.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 6862.HK has a market cap of 80.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 6862.HK trades at HK$14.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 6862.HK's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 6862.HK's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is less volatile compared to 6862.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 6862.HK's competition here
0052.HK vs 1364.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 1364.HK has a market cap of 68.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 1364.HK trades at HK$28.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 1364.HK's P/E ratio is 23.52. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1364.HK's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is less volatile compared to 1364.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 1364.HK's competition here
0052.HK vs 0999.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 0999.HK has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 0999.HK trades at HK$6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 0999.HK's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0999.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is less volatile compared to 0999.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 0999.HK's competition here
0052.HK vs 1405.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 1405.HK has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 1405.HK trades at HK$50.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 1405.HK's P/E ratio is 42.35. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1405.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is less volatile compared to 1405.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 1405.HK's competition here
0052.HK vs 9658.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 9658.HK has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 9658.HK trades at HK$11.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 9658.HK's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 9658.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is less volatile compared to 9658.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 9658.HK's competition here
0052.HK vs 0341.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 0341.HK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 0341.HK trades at HK$4.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 0341.HK's P/E ratio is 18.74. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0341.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is less volatile compared to 0341.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 0341.HK's competition here
0052.HK vs 9922.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 9922.HK has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 9922.HK trades at HK$1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 9922.HK's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 9922.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is less volatile compared to 9922.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 9922.HK's competition here
0052.HK vs 2217.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 2217.HK has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 2217.HK trades at HK$1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 2217.HK's P/E ratio is 26.17. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 2217.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is more volatile compared to 2217.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 2217.HK's competition here
0052.HK vs 2150.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 2150.HK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 2150.HK trades at HK$0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 2150.HK's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 2150.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is less volatile compared to 2150.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 2150.HK's competition here
0052.HK vs 1488.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 1488.HK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 1488.HK trades at HK$0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 1488.HK's P/E ratio is -4.88. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1488.HK's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is less volatile compared to 1488.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 1488.HK's competition here
0052.HK vs 0538.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 0538.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 0538.HK trades at HK$1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 0538.HK's P/E ratio is 101.00. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0538.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is less volatile compared to 0538.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 0538.HK's competition here
0052.HK vs 9869.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 9869.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 9869.HK trades at HK$0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 9869.HK's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 9869.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is less volatile compared to 9869.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 9869.HK's competition here
0052.HK vs 6811.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 6811.HK has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 6811.HK trades at HK$1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 6811.HK's P/E ratio is 9.82. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 6811.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is less volatile compared to 6811.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 6811.HK's competition here
0052.HK vs 0156.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 0156.HK has a market cap of 937.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 0156.HK trades at HK$1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 0156.HK's P/E ratio is 20.40. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0156.HK's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is less volatile compared to 0156.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 0156.HK's competition here
0052.HK vs 8371.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 8371.HK has a market cap of 702.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 8371.HK trades at HK$1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 8371.HK's P/E ratio is 6.81. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 8371.HK's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is less volatile compared to 8371.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 8371.HK's competition here
0052.HK vs 0520.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 0520.HK has a market cap of 457.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 0520.HK trades at HK$0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 0520.HK's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0520.HK's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is less volatile compared to 0520.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 0520.HK's competition here
0052.HK vs 0226.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 0226.HK has a market cap of 340.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 0226.HK trades at HK$0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 0226.HK's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0226.HK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is less volatile compared to 0226.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 0226.HK's competition here
0052.HK vs 2108.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 2108.HK has a market cap of 332M. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 2108.HK trades at HK$0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 2108.HK's P/E ratio is 5.93. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 2108.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is less volatile compared to 2108.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 2108.HK's competition here
0052.HK vs 0573.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 0573.HK has a market cap of 284M. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 0573.HK trades at HK$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 0573.HK's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0573.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is less volatile compared to 0573.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 0573.HK's competition here
0052.HK vs 1978.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 1978.HK has a market cap of 256M. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 1978.HK trades at HK$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 1978.HK's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1978.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is more volatile compared to 1978.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 1978.HK's competition here
0052.HK vs 1314.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 1314.HK has a market cap of 198.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 1314.HK trades at HK$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 1314.HK's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1314.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is more volatile compared to 1314.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 1314.HK's competition here
0052.HK vs 0126.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 0126.HK has a market cap of 185.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 0126.HK trades at HK$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 0126.HK's P/E ratio is -2.95. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0126.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is less volatile compared to 0126.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 0126.HK's competition here
0052.HK vs 1181.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 1181.HK has a market cap of 174.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 1181.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 1181.HK's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1181.HK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is less volatile compared to 1181.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 1181.HK's competition here
0052.HK vs 1869.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 1869.HK has a market cap of 149.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 1869.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 1869.HK's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1869.HK's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is more volatile compared to 1869.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 1869.HK's competition here
0052.HK vs 8213.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 8213.HK has a market cap of 138.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 8213.HK trades at HK$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 8213.HK's P/E ratio is -6.22. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 8213.HK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is less volatile compared to 8213.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 8213.HK's competition here
0052.HK vs 1843.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 1843.HK has a market cap of 114.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 1843.HK trades at HK$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 1843.HK's P/E ratio is -7.15. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1843.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is less volatile compared to 1843.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 1843.HK's competition here
0052.HK vs 8495.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 8495.HK has a market cap of 111.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 8495.HK trades at HK$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 8495.HK's P/E ratio is -17.79. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 8495.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is more volatile compared to 8495.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 8495.HK's competition here
0052.HK vs 1703.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 1703.HK has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 1703.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 1703.HK's P/E ratio is -9.20. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1703.HK's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is less volatile compared to 1703.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 1703.HK's competition here
0052.HK vs 8300.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 8300.HK has a market cap of 89.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 8300.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 8300.HK's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 8300.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is less volatile compared to 8300.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 8300.HK's competition here
0052.HK vs 8527.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 8527.HK has a market cap of 85.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 8527.HK trades at HK$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 8527.HK's P/E ratio is -5.70. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 8527.HK's ROE of +4.94%. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is less volatile compared to 8527.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 8527.HK's competition here
0052.HK vs 8232.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 8232.HK has a market cap of 79.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 8232.HK trades at HK$1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 8232.HK's P/E ratio is -8.94. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 8232.HK's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is more volatile compared to 8232.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 8232.HK's competition here
0052.HK vs 8120.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 8120.HK has a market cap of 78.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 8120.HK trades at HK$0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 8120.HK's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 8120.HK's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is less volatile compared to 8120.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 8120.HK's competition here
0052.HK vs 8428.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 8428.HK has a market cap of 76.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 8428.HK trades at HK$0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 8428.HK's P/E ratio is -2.72. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 8428.HK's ROE of -4.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is less volatile compared to 8428.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 8428.HK's competition here
0052.HK vs 8447.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 8447.HK has a market cap of 73M. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 8447.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 8447.HK's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 8447.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is more volatile compared to 8447.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 8447.HK's competition here
0052.HK vs 0703.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 0703.HK has a market cap of 70.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 0703.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 0703.HK's P/E ratio is 0.15. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0703.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is less volatile compared to 0703.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 0703.HK's competition here
0052.HK vs 3666.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 3666.HK has a market cap of 63.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 3666.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 3666.HK's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 3666.HK's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is less volatile compared to 3666.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 3666.HK's competition here
0052.HK vs 1443.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 1443.HK has a market cap of 63.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 1443.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 1443.HK's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1443.HK's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is less volatile compared to 1443.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 1443.HK's competition here
0052.HK vs 0657.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 0657.HK has a market cap of 52.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 0657.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 0657.HK's P/E ratio is -8.44. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0657.HK's ROE of +4.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is more volatile compared to 0657.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 0657.HK's competition here
0052.HK vs 8412.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 8412.HK has a market cap of 50.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 8412.HK trades at HK$0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 8412.HK's P/E ratio is -10.25. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 8412.HK's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is more volatile compared to 8412.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 8412.HK's competition here
0052.HK vs 8519.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 8519.HK has a market cap of 39.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 8519.HK trades at HK$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 8519.HK's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 8519.HK's ROE of -16.69%. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is less volatile compared to 8519.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 8519.HK's competition here
0052.HK vs 8432.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 8432.HK has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 8432.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 8432.HK's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 8432.HK's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is less volatile compared to 8432.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 8432.HK's competition here
0052.HK vs 8510.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 8510.HK has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 8510.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 8510.HK's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 8510.HK's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is more volatile compared to 8510.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 8510.HK's competition here
0052.HK vs 8367.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 8367.HK has a market cap of 31M. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 8367.HK trades at HK$0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 8367.HK's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 8367.HK's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is less volatile compared to 8367.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 8367.HK's competition here
0052.HK vs 8096.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 8096.HK has a market cap of 23.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 8096.HK trades at HK$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 8096.HK's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 8096.HK's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is more volatile compared to 8096.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 8096.HK's competition here
0052.HK vs 8056.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 8056.HK has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 8056.HK trades at HK$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 8056.HK's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 8056.HK's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is more volatile compared to 8056.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 8056.HK's competition here
0052.HK vs 1007.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 1007.HK has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 1007.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 1007.HK's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1007.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is less volatile compared to 1007.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 1007.HK's competition here
0052.HK vs 8475.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 8475.HK has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 8475.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 8475.HK's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 8475.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is less volatile compared to 8475.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 8475.HK's competition here
0052.HK vs 8493.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 8493.HK has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 8493.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 8493.HK's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 8493.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is less volatile compared to 8493.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 8493.HK's competition here
0052.HK vs 0047.HK Comparison April 2026
0052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0052.HK stands at 524.7M. In comparison, 0047.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0052.HK is priced at HK$4.05, while 0047.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas 0047.HK's P/E ratio is 6.61. In terms of profitability, 0052.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0047.HK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 0052.HK is less volatile compared to 0047.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0052.HK.Check 0047.HK's competition here