Zoompass Holdings, Inc.
Zoompass Holdings, Inc. ZPAS Peers
See (ZPAS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZPAS | $0.00 | +0.00% | 11.1K | N/A | -$0.44 | N/A |
| ADYEY | $18.00 | -0.55% | 56.7B | 54.55 | $0.33 | N/A |
| ADYYF | $1,772.00 | N/A | 55.8B | 52.91 | $33.49 | N/A |
| BSQKZ | $58.50 | N/A | 36.1B | 14.20 | $4.12 | N/A |
| KAKZF | $97.10 | +4.97% | 20.7B | 10.86 | $8.94 | +4.34% |
| TOITF | $126.00 | +1.12% | 10.5B | 93.33 | $1.35 | N/A |
| TMICY | $73.64 | N/A | 9.9B | 43.06 | $1.71 | +1.29% |
| TMICF | $70.00 | N/A | 9.2B | 40.23 | $1.74 | +1.66% |
| NEXXY | $6.00 | N/A | 7.4B | 37.50 | $0.16 | +4.14% |
| NEXPF | $6.09 | -0.08% | 7.4B | 38.03 | $0.16 | +4.10% |
Stock Comparison
ZPAS vs ADYEY Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, ADYEY has a market cap of 56.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while ADYEY trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADYEY's P/E ratio is 54.55. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to ADYEY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to ADYEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs ADYYF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, ADYYF has a market cap of 55.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while ADYYF trades at $1,772.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADYYF's P/E ratio is 52.91. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to ADYYF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to ADYYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs BSQKZ Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, BSQKZ has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while BSQKZ trades at $58.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSQKZ's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to BSQKZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS and BSQKZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZPAS vs KAKZF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, KAKZF has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while KAKZF trades at $97.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KAKZF's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to KAKZF's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS and KAKZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZPAS vs TOITF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, TOITF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while TOITF trades at $126.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOITF's P/E ratio is 93.33. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to TOITF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to TOITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs TMICY Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, TMICY has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while TMICY trades at $73.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMICY's P/E ratio is 43.06. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to TMICY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to TMICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs TMICF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, TMICF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while TMICF trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMICF's P/E ratio is 40.23. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to TMICF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to TMICF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs NEXXY Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, NEXXY has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while NEXXY trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEXXY's P/E ratio is 37.50. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to NEXXY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS and NEXXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZPAS vs NEXPF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, NEXPF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while NEXPF trades at $6.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEXPF's P/E ratio is 38.03. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to NEXPF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to NEXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs DRKTY Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, DRKTY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while DRKTY trades at $7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRKTY's P/E ratio is 41.47. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to DRKTY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS and DRKTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZPAS vs GMYTF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, GMYTF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while GMYTF trades at $58.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMYTF's P/E ratio is 37.65. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to GMYTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to GMYTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs SWDAF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, SWDAF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while SWDAF trades at $38.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWDAF's P/E ratio is 153.80. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to SWDAF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to SWDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs STWRY Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, STWRY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while STWRY trades at $8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STWRY's P/E ratio is -210.25. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to STWRY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS and STWRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZPAS vs CIOXY Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, CIOXY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while CIOXY trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIOXY's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to CIOXY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to CIOXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs EXNWF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, EXNWF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while EXNWF trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXNWF's P/E ratio is 55.00. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to EXNWF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS and EXNWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZPAS vs OVHFF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, OVHFF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while OVHFF trades at $15.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OVHFF's P/E ratio is 168.00. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to OVHFF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to OVHFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs WWLNF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, WWLNF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while WWLNF trades at $7.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WWLNF's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to WWLNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to WWLNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs DRKTF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, DRKTF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while DRKTF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRKTF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to DRKTF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS and DRKTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZPAS vs WRDLY Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, WRDLY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while WRDLY trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRDLY's P/E ratio is -4.66. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to WRDLY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to WRDLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs SPNUF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, SPNUF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while SPNUF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPNUF's P/E ratio is 125.00. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to SPNUF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS and SPNUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZPAS vs SANP Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, SANP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while SANP trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SANP's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to SANP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to SANP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs MGPPF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, MGPPF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while MGPPF trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGPPF's P/E ratio is 233.33. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to MGPPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to MGPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs EXOD Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, EXOD has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while EXOD trades at $35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXOD's P/E ratio is 26.52. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to EXOD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to EXOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs PHPYF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, PHPYF has a market cap of 992.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while PHPYF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHPYF's P/E ratio is 41.00. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to PHPYF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS and PHPYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZPAS vs CPLFF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, CPLFF has a market cap of 700.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while CPLFF trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPLFF's P/E ratio is -49.44. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to CPLFF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS and CPLFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZPAS vs PRTHU Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, PRTHU has a market cap of 658.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while PRTHU trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRTHU's P/E ratio is -18.37. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to PRTHU's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to PRTHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs FNCHF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, FNCHF has a market cap of 592.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while FNCHF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNCHF's P/E ratio is -87.50. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to FNCHF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to FNCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs PYPTF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, PYPTF has a market cap of 557.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while PYPTF trades at $7.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PYPTF's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to PYPTF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to PYPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs DYNDF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, DYNDF has a market cap of 495.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while DYNDF trades at $7.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DYNDF's P/E ratio is -4.19. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to DYNDF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to DYNDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs YHEKF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, YHEKF has a market cap of 448.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while YHEKF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YHEKF's P/E ratio is 32.33. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to YHEKF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to YHEKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs TDCSF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, TDCSF has a market cap of 424.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while TDCSF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDCSF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to TDCSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to TDCSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs HISNF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, HISNF has a market cap of 415.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while HISNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HISNF's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to HISNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to HISNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs SPMYY Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, SPMYY has a market cap of 359.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while SPMYY trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPMYY's P/E ratio is 111.33. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to SPMYY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS and SPMYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZPAS vs NFONF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, NFONF has a market cap of 357.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while NFONF trades at $21.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NFONF's P/E ratio is -196.32. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to NFONF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS and NFONF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZPAS vs CORZQ Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, CORZQ has a market cap of 343.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while CORZQ trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORZQ's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to CORZQ's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to CORZQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs TYPMF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, TYPMF has a market cap of 283.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while TYPMF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TYPMF's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to TYPMF's ROE of +2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS and TYPMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZPAS vs SEEMF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, SEEMF has a market cap of 276.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while SEEMF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEEMF's P/E ratio is -5.65. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to SEEMF's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to SEEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs FFPP Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, FFPP has a market cap of 247.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while FFPP trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to FFPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to FFPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs FMZNF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, FMZNF has a market cap of 246.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while FMZNF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMZNF's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to FMZNF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to FMZNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs OTPMF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, OTPMF has a market cap of 243.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while OTPMF trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OTPMF's P/E ratio is 36.83. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to OTPMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS and OTPMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZPAS vs ABANF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, ABANF has a market cap of 240M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while ABANF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABANF's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to ABANF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to ABANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs SERKF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, SERKF has a market cap of 220.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while SERKF trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SERKF's P/E ratio is -16.45. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to SERKF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to SERKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs FSOYF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, FSOYF has a market cap of 170.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while FSOYF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSOYF's P/E ratio is -16.31. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to FSOYF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to FSOYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs GIVXF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, GIVXF has a market cap of 137.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while GIVXF trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIVXF's P/E ratio is -107.45. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to GIVXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS and GIVXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZPAS vs CGAAY Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, CGAAY has a market cap of 136.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while CGAAY trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGAAY's P/E ratio is 2.79. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to CGAAY's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS and CGAAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZPAS vs PYFRF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, PYFRF has a market cap of 133.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while PYFRF trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PYFRF's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to PYFRF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS and PYFRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZPAS vs WHEN Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, WHEN has a market cap of 110.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while WHEN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WHEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to WHEN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to WHEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs ERDLF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, ERDLF has a market cap of 109M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while ERDLF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERDLF's P/E ratio is -29.13. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to ERDLF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS and ERDLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZPAS vs FCLOF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, FCLOF has a market cap of 102.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while FCLOF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCLOF's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to FCLOF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS and FCLOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZPAS vs BGOPF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, BGOPF has a market cap of 96M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while BGOPF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGOPF's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to BGOPF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to BGOPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs HAIVF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, HAIVF has a market cap of 85.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while HAIVF trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAIVF's P/E ratio is 51.50. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to HAIVF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS and HAIVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZPAS vs VRSSF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, VRSSF has a market cap of 79.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while VRSSF trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRSSF's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to VRSSF's ROE of -3.89%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to VRSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs CORZR Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, CORZR has a market cap of 77.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while CORZR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORZR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to CORZR's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to CORZR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs CROTF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, CROTF has a market cap of 55.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while CROTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CROTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to CROTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS and CROTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZPAS vs DGGXF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, DGGXF has a market cap of 54.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while DGGXF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGGXF's P/E ratio is -4.51. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to DGGXF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to DGGXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs SKKY Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, SKKY has a market cap of 50M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while SKKY trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKKY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to SKKY's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to SKKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs QBITF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, QBITF has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while QBITF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QBITF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to QBITF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS and QBITF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZPAS vs NTTCF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, NTTCF has a market cap of 44.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while NTTCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTTCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to NTTCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to NTTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs NOWVF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, NOWVF has a market cap of 40.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while NOWVF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOWVF's P/E ratio is 21.28. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to NOWVF's ROE of -49.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to NOWVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs JGHG Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, JGHG has a market cap of 40M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while JGHG trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JGHG's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to JGHG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to JGHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs APGT Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, APGT has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while APGT trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APGT's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to APGT's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to APGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs ISDCF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, ISDCF has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while ISDCF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISDCF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to ISDCF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to ISDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs CLOQ Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, CLOQ has a market cap of 30.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while CLOQ trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLOQ's P/E ratio is -23.00. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to CLOQ's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to CLOQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs TFLM Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, TFLM has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while TFLM trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TFLM's P/E ratio is -200.00. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to TFLM's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to TFLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs POTTF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, POTTF has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while POTTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POTTF's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to POTTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS and POTTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZPAS vs CLPMF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, CLPMF has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while CLPMF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLPMF's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to CLPMF's ROE of +1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to CLPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs PLCKF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, PLCKF has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while PLCKF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLCKF's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to PLCKF's ROE of +5.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to PLCKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs CYBNY Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, CYBNY has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while CYBNY trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYBNY's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to CYBNY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS and CYBNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZPAS vs SDCH Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, SDCH has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while SDCH trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDCH's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to SDCH's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to SDCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs QFEEF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, QFEEF has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while QFEEF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QFEEF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to QFEEF's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS and QFEEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZPAS vs EPXGF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, EPXGF has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while EPXGF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPXGF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to EPXGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS and EPXGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZPAS vs DLTXF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, DLTXF has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while DLTXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLTXF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to DLTXF's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS and DLTXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZPAS vs DSAIF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, DSAIF has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while DSAIF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSAIF's P/E ratio is -6.80. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to DSAIF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS and DSAIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZPAS vs FOBIF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, FOBIF has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while FOBIF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOBIF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to FOBIF's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS and FOBIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZPAS vs IPNFF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, IPNFF has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while IPNFF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPNFF's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to IPNFF's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to IPNFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs SFIIF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, SFIIF has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while SFIIF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFIIF's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to SFIIF's ROE of -5.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to SFIIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs DVPNF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, DVPNF has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while DVPNF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DVPNF's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to DVPNF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS and DVPNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZPAS vs TGCB Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, TGCB has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while TGCB trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGCB's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to TGCB's ROE of +3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS and TGCB have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZPAS vs PKKFF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, PKKFF has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while PKKFF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PKKFF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to PKKFF's ROE of -2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to PKKFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs VENZF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, VENZF has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while VENZF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VENZF's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to VENZF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to VENZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs NBVAF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, NBVAF has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while NBVAF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NBVAF's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to NBVAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to NBVAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs OVTZ Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, OVTZ has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while OVTZ trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OVTZ's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to OVTZ's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to OVTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs SCYRF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, SCYRF has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while SCYRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCYRF's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to SCYRF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to SCYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs PKLBF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, PKLBF has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while PKLBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PKLBF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to PKLBF's ROE of -2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to PKLBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs ATCHW Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, ATCHW has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while ATCHW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATCHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to ATCHW's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS and ATCHW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZPAS vs MODGF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, MODGF has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while MODGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MODGF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to MODGF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS and MODGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZPAS vs RIHT Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, RIHT has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while RIHT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIHT's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to RIHT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to RIHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs KCRD Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, KCRD has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while KCRD trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KCRD's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to KCRD's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to KCRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs RKNEF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, RKNEF has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while RKNEF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RKNEF's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to RKNEF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to RKNEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs MBLMF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, MBLMF has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while MBLMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBLMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to MBLMF's ROE of +17.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS and MBLMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZPAS vs DRKOF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, DRKOF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while DRKOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRKOF's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to DRKOF's ROE of +5.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to DRKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs VISM Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, VISM has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while VISM trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VISM's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to VISM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to VISM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs TONR Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, TONR has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while TONR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TONR's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to TONR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS and TONR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZPAS vs RCWDF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, RCWDF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while RCWDF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCWDF's P/E ratio is 0.54. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to RCWDF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS and RCWDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZPAS vs INOTF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, INOTF has a market cap of 771K. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while INOTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INOTF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to INOTF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to INOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs INAR Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, INAR has a market cap of 769.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while INAR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INAR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to INAR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS and INAR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZPAS vs SLXXF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, SLXXF has a market cap of 760.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while SLXXF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLXXF's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to SLXXF's ROE of -7.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS is less volatile compared to SLXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZPAS.
ZPAS vs FSRDQ Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, FSRDQ has a market cap of 683.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while FSRDQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSRDQ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to FSRDQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS and FSRDQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZPAS vs FUAPF Comparison
ZPAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZPAS stands at 11.1K. In comparison, FUAPF has a market cap of 624.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ZPAS is priced at $0.00, while FUAPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZPAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUAPF's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, ZPAS's ROE is +10.30%, compared to FUAPF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ZPAS and FUAPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).