BMO Mid-Term US IG Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF
BMO Mid-Term US IG Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF ZMU.TO Peers
See (ZMU.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Bonds Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZMU.TO | CA$12.56 | -0.55% | 3.1B | N/A | N/A | +4.02% |
| ZAG.TO | CA$13.80 | -0.58% | 10.8B | N/A | N/A | +3.48% |
| VAB.TO | CA$22.98 | -0.54% | 5.5B | N/A | N/A | +3.29% |
| ZST.TO | CA$49.00 | -0.02% | 4.6B | N/A | N/A | +3.86% |
| ZFL.TO | CA$12.50 | -1.26% | 3.4B | N/A | N/A | +3.17% |
| HBB.TO | CA$49.20 | -0.57% | 3.4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ZIC.TO | CA$17.77 | -0.39% | 3.2B | N/A | N/A | +3.98% |
| NSCB.TO | CA$22.59 | -0.35% | 2.9B | N/A | N/A | +2.76% |
| FLCP.TO | CA$17.85 | -0.56% | 2.8B | 15.47 | CA$1.15 | +3.48% |
| ZCPB.TO | CA$28.04 | -0.50% | 2.6B | N/A | N/A | +2.85% |
Stock Comparison
ZMU.TO vs ZAG.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ZAG.TO has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while ZAG.TO trades at CA$13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZAG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZAG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is less volatile compared to ZAG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs VAB.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, VAB.TO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while VAB.TO trades at CA$22.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VAB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VAB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is less volatile compared to VAB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs ZST.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ZST.TO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while ZST.TO trades at CA$49.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZST.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZST.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to ZST.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs ZFL.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ZFL.TO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while ZFL.TO trades at CA$12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZFL.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZFL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is less volatile compared to ZFL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs HBB.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, HBB.TO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while HBB.TO trades at CA$49.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HBB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is less volatile compared to HBB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs ZIC.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ZIC.TO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while ZIC.TO trades at CA$17.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZIC.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZIC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to ZIC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs NSCB.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, NSCB.TO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while NSCB.TO trades at CA$22.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSCB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NSCB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is less volatile compared to NSCB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs FLCP.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, FLCP.TO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while FLCP.TO trades at CA$17.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLCP.TO's P/E ratio is 15.47. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLCP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is less volatile compared to FLCP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs ZCPB.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ZCPB.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while ZCPB.TO trades at CA$28.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZCPB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZCPB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to ZCPB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs XSB.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, XSB.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while XSB.TO trades at CA$26.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XSB.TO's P/E ratio is 19.64. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to XSB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs TDB.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, TDB.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while TDB.TO trades at CA$12.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TDB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is less volatile compared to TDB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs PCOR.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, PCOR.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while PCOR.TO trades at CA$18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCOR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PCOR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to PCOR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs ZCM.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ZCM.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while ZCM.TO trades at CA$15.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZCM.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZCM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is less volatile compared to ZCM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs NHYB.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, NHYB.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while NHYB.TO trades at CA$21.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHYB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NHYB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to NHYB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs CAGG.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CAGG.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while CAGG.TO trades at CA$44.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAGG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CAGG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to CAGG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs ZJK.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ZJK.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while ZJK.TO trades at CA$18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZJK.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZJK.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to ZJK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs FCGB.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, FCGB.TO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while FCGB.TO trades at CA$21.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is less volatile compared to FCGB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs VSC.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, VSC.TO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while VSC.TO trades at CA$24.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSC.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to VSC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs QBB.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, QBB.TO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while QBB.TO trades at CA$93.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QBB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QBB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to QBB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs ZHY.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ZHY.TO has a market cap of 970.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while ZHY.TO trades at CA$11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZHY.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZHY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to ZHY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs RQO.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, RQO.TO has a market cap of 913.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while RQO.TO trades at CA$18.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RQO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RQO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to RQO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs ZDB.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ZDB.TO has a market cap of 790.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while ZDB.TO trades at CA$15.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZDB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZDB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to ZDB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs RQP.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, RQP.TO has a market cap of 733.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while RQP.TO trades at CA$18.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RQP.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RQP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to RQP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs CBO.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CBO.TO has a market cap of 722.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while CBO.TO trades at CA$18.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to CBO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs CLG.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CLG.TO has a market cap of 699.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while CLG.TO trades at CA$17.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to CLG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs FGO.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, FGO.TO has a market cap of 610M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while FGO.TO trades at CA$9.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FGO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to FGO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs IGB.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, IGB.TO has a market cap of 609.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while IGB.TO trades at CA$18.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to IGB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs RQN.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, RQN.TO has a market cap of 575.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while RQN.TO trades at CA$20.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RQN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RQN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to RQN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs QUIG.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, QUIG.TO has a market cap of 514M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while QUIG.TO trades at CA$84.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QUIG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QUIG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to QUIG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs ZLC.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ZLC.TO has a market cap of 479.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while ZLC.TO trades at CA$15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZLC.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZLC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is less volatile compared to ZLC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs XQB.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, XQB.TO has a market cap of 467.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while XQB.TO trades at CA$18.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XQB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XQB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is less volatile compared to XQB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs ZFS.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ZFS.TO has a market cap of 455.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while ZFS.TO trades at CA$13.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZFS.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZFS.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to ZFS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs HFR.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, HFR.TO has a market cap of 443.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while HFR.TO trades at CA$10.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HFR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HFR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to HFR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs HTB.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, HTB.TO has a market cap of 434.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while HTB.TO trades at CA$57.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HTB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to HTB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs TCLB.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, TCLB.TO has a market cap of 418.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while TCLB.TO trades at CA$116.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCLB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TCLB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to TCLB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs VCB.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, VCB.TO has a market cap of 405.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while VCB.TO trades at CA$24.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to VCB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs ZMP.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ZMP.TO has a market cap of 393.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while ZMP.TO trades at CA$14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZMP.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZMP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to ZMP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs ZPS.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ZPS.TO has a market cap of 351.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while ZPS.TO trades at CA$12.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZPS.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZPS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to ZPS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs ZPL.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ZPL.TO has a market cap of 304.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while ZPL.TO trades at CA$12.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZPL.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZPL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is less volatile compared to ZPL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs TUHY.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, TUHY.TO has a market cap of 292.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while TUHY.TO trades at CA$20.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUHY.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TUHY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is less volatile compared to TUHY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs QEBH.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, QEBH.TO has a market cap of 261.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while QEBH.TO trades at CA$78.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QEBH.TO's P/E ratio is 3.55. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QEBH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to QEBH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs XRB.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, XRB.TO has a market cap of 254.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while XRB.TO trades at CA$22.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XRB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XRB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is less volatile compared to XRB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs XIG.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, XIG.TO has a market cap of 239.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while XIG.TO trades at CA$19.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XIG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XIG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to XIG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs TCSB.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, TCSB.TO has a market cap of 238.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while TCSB.TO trades at CA$14.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCSB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TCSB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to TCSB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs XHB.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, XHB.TO has a market cap of 214.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while XHB.TO trades at CA$19.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XHB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XHB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to XHB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs XSAB.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, XSAB.TO has a market cap of 185.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while XSAB.TO trades at CA$18.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XSAB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSAB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to XSAB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs ZCB.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ZCB.TO has a market cap of 154.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while ZCB.TO trades at CA$47.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZCB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZCB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is less volatile compared to ZCB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs RBO.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, RBO.TO has a market cap of 137.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while RBO.TO trades at CA$18.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RBO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to RBO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs ZSB.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ZSB.TO has a market cap of 132.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while ZSB.TO trades at CA$48.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZSB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZSB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to ZSB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs PTB.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, PTB.TO has a market cap of 121.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while PTB.TO trades at CA$19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PTB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is less volatile compared to PTB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs XSTB.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, XSTB.TO has a market cap of 119M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while XSTB.TO trades at CA$19.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XSTB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSTB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to XSTB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs RLB.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, RLB.TO has a market cap of 118.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while RLB.TO trades at CA$18.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RLB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RLB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to RLB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs VGV.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, VGV.TO has a market cap of 111.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while VGV.TO trades at CA$22.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to VGV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs DCG.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, DCG.TO has a market cap of 110.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while DCG.TO trades at CA$18.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DCG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to DCG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs HBND.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, HBND.TO has a market cap of 105.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while HBND.TO trades at CA$12.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBND.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HBND.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is less volatile compared to HBND.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs FLCI.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, FLCI.TO has a market cap of 99.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while FLCI.TO trades at CA$18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLCI.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLCI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to FLCI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs ONEB.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ONEB.TO has a market cap of 94M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while ONEB.TO trades at CA$49.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONEB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ONEB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to ONEB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs TULB.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, TULB.TO has a market cap of 79M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while TULB.TO trades at CA$107.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TULB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TULB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to TULB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs ZRR.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ZRR.TO has a market cap of 77.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while ZRR.TO trades at CA$14.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZRR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZRR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is less volatile compared to ZRR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs DXO.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, DXO.TO has a market cap of 76.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while DXO.TO trades at CA$19.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DXO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DXO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to DXO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs ESGB.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ESGB.TO has a market cap of 73.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while ESGB.TO trades at CA$27.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is less volatile compared to ESGB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs ICPB.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ICPB.TO has a market cap of 62.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while ICPB.TO trades at CA$9.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICPB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ICPB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to ICPB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs QHY.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, QHY.TO has a market cap of 60.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while QHY.TO trades at CA$82.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QHY.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QHY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to QHY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs ZMSB.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ZMSB.TO has a market cap of 56.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while ZMSB.TO trades at CA$29.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZMSB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZMSB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to ZMSB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs CXF.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CXF.TO has a market cap of 51M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while CXF.TO trades at CA$10.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CXF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CXF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to CXF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs DRCU.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, DRCU.TO has a market cap of 45.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while DRCU.TO trades at CA$18.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRCU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DRCU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to DRCU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs HAD.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, HAD.TO has a market cap of 44.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while HAD.TO trades at CA$9.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAD.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HAD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to HAD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs BXF.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, BXF.TO has a market cap of 43.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while BXF.TO trades at CA$10.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BXF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BXF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to BXF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs QSB.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, QSB.TO has a market cap of 40.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while QSB.TO trades at CA$99.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QSB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QSB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to QSB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs CMAR.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CMAR.TO has a market cap of 36.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while CMAR.TO trades at CA$18.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMAR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMAR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to CMAR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs FSB.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, FSB.TO has a market cap of 36.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while FSB.TO trades at CA$9.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to FSB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs QEBL.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, QEBL.TO has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while QEBL.TO trades at CA$77.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QEBL.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QEBL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to QEBL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs ZQB.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ZQB.TO has a market cap of 33.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while ZQB.TO trades at CA$29.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZQB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZQB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to ZQB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs XEB.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, XEB.TO has a market cap of 33.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while XEB.TO trades at CA$15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XEB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XEB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to XEB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs RQG.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, RQG.TO has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while RQG.TO trades at CA$18.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RQG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RQG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to RQG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs ESGF.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ESGF.TO has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while ESGF.TO trades at CA$24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESGF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESGF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to ESGF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs DCS.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, DCS.TO has a market cap of 19.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while DCS.TO trades at CA$19.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCS.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DCS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to DCS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs RQI.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, RQI.TO has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while RQI.TO trades at CA$19.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RQI.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RQI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to RQI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs RQH.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, RQH.TO has a market cap of 17.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while RQH.TO trades at CA$19.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RQH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RQH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to RQH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs FGB.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, FGB.TO has a market cap of 17.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while FGB.TO trades at CA$18.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to FGB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs TUSB.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, TUSB.TO has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while TUSB.TO trades at CA$14.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUSB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TUSB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to TUSB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs RPSB.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, RPSB.TO has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while RPSB.TO trades at CA$20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RPSB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RPSB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to RPSB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs HTH.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, HTH.TO has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while HTH.TO trades at CA$54.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HTH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to HTH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs DCC.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, DCC.TO has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while DCC.TO trades at CA$19.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCC.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DCC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to DCC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs HUIB.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, HUIB.TO has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while HUIB.TO trades at CA$19.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUIB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HUIB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to HUIB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs SFIX.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SFIX.TO has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while SFIX.TO trades at CA$20.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFIX.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SFIX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is less volatile compared to SFIX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs FLB.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, FLB.TO has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while FLB.TO trades at CA$20.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLB.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to FLB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs CORP.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CORP.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while CORP.TO trades at CA$20.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORP.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CORP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to CORP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs HMA.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, HMA.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while HMA.TO trades at CA$10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HMA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to HMA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.
ZMU.TO vs USB.TO Comparison
ZMU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMU.TO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, USB.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZMU.TO is priced at CA$12.56, while USB.TO trades at CA$21.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMU.TO is more volatile compared to USB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMU.TO.