Zalando SE

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, BABAF has a market cap of 294.41B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while BABAF trades at $15.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas BABAF's P/E ratio is 16.53. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BABAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to BABAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, MPNGF has a market cap of 108.57B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while MPNGF trades at $17.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas MPNGF's P/E ratio is 22.78. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MPNGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to MPNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, MPNGY has a market cap of 107.28B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while MPNGY trades at $34.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas MPNGY's P/E ratio is 22.10. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MPNGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to MPNGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, XXLLY has a market cap of 52.08B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while XXLLY trades at $739.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas XXLLY's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to XXLLY's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to XXLLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, JDCMF has a market cap of 48.80B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while JDCMF trades at $17.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas JDCMF's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JDCMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to JDCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, ANCTF has a market cap of 46.58B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while ANCTF trades at $49.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas ANCTF's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ANCTF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to ANCTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, YAHOY has a market cap of 25.88B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while YAHOY trades at $7.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas YAHOY's P/E ratio is 24.72. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YAHOY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to YAHOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, RKUNY has a market cap of 11.94B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while RKUNY trades at $5.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas RKUNY's P/E ratio is -8.94. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RKUNY's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to RKUNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, NCLTY has a market cap of 11.67B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while NCLTY trades at $10.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas NCLTY's P/E ratio is 21.98. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NCLTY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to NCLTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, NCLTF has a market cap of 11.53B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while NCLTF trades at $102.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas NCLTF's P/E ratio is 21.85. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NCLTF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to NCLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, RKUNF has a market cap of 11.40B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while RKUNF trades at $5.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas RKUNF's P/E ratio is -8.52. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RKUNF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to RKUNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, SNROF has a market cap of 11.27B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while SNROF trades at $47.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas SNROF's P/E ratio is 41.30. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SNROF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to SNROF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, SRTTY has a market cap of 10.24B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while SRTTY trades at $11.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas SRTTY's P/E ratio is 32.83. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SRTTY's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to SRTTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, MONOY has a market cap of 10.11B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while MONOY trades at $20.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas MONOY's P/E ratio is 53.53. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MONOY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to MONOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, HKTGF has a market cap of 9.44B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while HKTGF trades at $215.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas HKTGF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HKTGF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to HKTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, SATLF has a market cap of 9.41B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while SATLF trades at $10.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas SATLF's P/E ratio is 30.50. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SATLF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to SATLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, ZLDSF has a market cap of 8.28B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while ZLDSF trades at $31.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas ZLDSF's P/E ratio is 27.76. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZLDSF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to ZLDSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, DELHY has a market cap of 8.12B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while DELHY trades at $2.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas DELHY's P/E ratio is -2.98. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DELHY's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to DELHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, DUFRY has a market cap of 7.72B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while DUFRY trades at $5.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas DUFRY's P/E ratio is 66.50. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DUFRY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to DUFRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, DFRYF has a market cap of 7.61B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while DFRYF trades at $52.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas DFRYF's P/E ratio is 64.72. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DFRYF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to DFRYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, DLVHF has a market cap of 7.58B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while DLVHF trades at $25.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas DLVHF's P/E ratio is -2.77. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DLVHF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to DLVHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, PETRY has a market cap of 7.48B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while PETRY trades at $6.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas PETRY's P/E ratio is 3.46. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PETRY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to PETRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, MTTRY has a market cap of 7.35B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while MTTRY trades at $0.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas MTTRY's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MTTRY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to MTTRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, JBHIF has a market cap of 7.31B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while JBHIF trades at $66.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas JBHIF's P/E ratio is 24.84. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JBHIF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to JBHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, MONOF has a market cap of 7.04B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while MONOF trades at $14.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas MONOF's P/E ratio is 37.29. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MONOF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to MONOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, CDNAF has a market cap of 6.88B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while CDNAF trades at $121.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas CDNAF's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CDNAF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to CDNAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, ELPQF has a market cap of 6.72B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while ELPQF trades at $4.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas ELPQF's P/E ratio is 5.49. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ELPQF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to ELPQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, ALEGF has a market cap of 6.32B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while ALEGF trades at $6.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas ALEGF's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALEGF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to ALEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, JDDSF has a market cap of 6.06B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while JDDSF trades at $1.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas JDDSF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JDDSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to JDDSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, JDSPY has a market cap of 5.80B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while JDSPY trades at $1.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas JDSPY's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JDSPY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to JDSPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, CDNTF has a market cap of 5.15B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while CDNTF trades at $130.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas CDNTF's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CDNTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to CDNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, SAXJY has a market cap of 4.75B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while SAXJY trades at $1.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas SAXJY's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SAXJY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to SAXJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, JTKWY has a market cap of 4.33B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while JTKWY trades at $4.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas JTKWY's P/E ratio is -8.06. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JTKWY's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to JTKWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, TKAYF has a market cap of 4.32B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while TKAYF trades at $21.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas TKAYF's P/E ratio is -8.12. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TKAYF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to TKAYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, SDIPF has a market cap of 4.04B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while SDIPF trades at $9.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas SDIPF's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SDIPF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to SDIPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, ZLPSF has a market cap of 3.83B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while ZLPSF trades at $536.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas ZLPSF's P/E ratio is -623.70. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZLPSF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to ZLPSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, JUMSF has a market cap of 3.74B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while JUMSF trades at $27.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas JUMSF's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JUMSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to JUMSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, ZOPLY has a market cap of 3.51B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while ZOPLY trades at $122.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas ZOPLY's P/E ratio is -210.38. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZOPLY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to ZOPLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, DROOF has a market cap of 3.44B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while DROOF trades at $2.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas DROOF's P/E ratio is 59.25. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DROOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to DROOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, JUMSY has a market cap of 3.20B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while JUMSY trades at $23.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas JUMSY's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JUMSY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to JUMSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, DNLMY has a market cap of 3.14B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while DNLMY trades at $15.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas DNLMY's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DNLMY's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to DNLMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, HNORY has a market cap of 3.12B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while HNORY trades at $12.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas HNORY's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HNORY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to HNORY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, MRCIF has a market cap of 2.79B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while MRCIF trades at $17.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas MRCIF's P/E ratio is 25.37. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MRCIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to MRCIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, MCARY has a market cap of 2.67B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while MCARY trades at $8.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas MCARY's P/E ratio is 24.61. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MCARY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to MCARY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, FHNGY has a market cap of 2.37B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while FHNGY trades at $7.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas FHNGY's P/E ratio is 14.44. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FHNGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to FHNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, YMDAF has a market cap of 2.00B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while YMDAF trades at $2.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas YMDAF's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YMDAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to YMDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, GRUPF has a market cap of 1.92B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while GRUPF trades at $66.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas GRUPF's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GRUPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to GRUPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, DSITF has a market cap of 1.84B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while DSITF trades at $1.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas DSITF's P/E ratio is 24.14. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DSITF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to DSITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, PAHGF has a market cap of 1.67B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while PAHGF trades at $3.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas PAHGF's P/E ratio is 14.72. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PAHGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to PAHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, BTOOY has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while BTOOY trades at $3.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas BTOOY's P/E ratio is -23.63. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BTOOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to BTOOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, WHTPF has a market cap of 1.53B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while WHTPF trades at $12.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas WHTPF's P/E ratio is 200.67. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WHTPF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to WHTPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, MIZUF has a market cap of 1.46B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while MIZUF trades at $18.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas MIZUF's P/E ratio is 4.51. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MIZUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to MIZUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, GPGNF has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while GPGNF trades at $1.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas GPGNF's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GPGNF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to GPGNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, MTAGF has a market cap of 1.31B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while MTAGF trades at $2.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas MTAGF's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MTAGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to MTAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, LEFUF has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while LEFUF trades at $18.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas LEFUF's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LEFUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to LEFUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, MGLUY has a market cap of 1.15B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while MGLUY trades at $6.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas MGLUY's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MGLUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to MGLUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, MKRMF has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while MKRMF trades at $235.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas MKRMF's P/E ratio is -136.63. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MKRMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to MKRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, FNXTF has a market cap of 987.19M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while FNXTF trades at $74.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas FNXTF's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FNXTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to FNXTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, SCCAF has a market cap of 874.99M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while SCCAF trades at $25.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas SCCAF's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SCCAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to SCCAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, HWGC has a market cap of 596.23M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while HWGC trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas HWGC's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HWGC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to HWGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, THGHY has a market cap of 591.18M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while THGHY trades at $0.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas THGHY's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to THGHY's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to THGHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, THGPF has a market cap of 535.00M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while THGPF trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas THGPF's P/E ratio is -2.26. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to THGPF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to THGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, ASOMY has a market cap of 489.85M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while ASOMY trades at $4.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas ASOMY's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ASOMY's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to ASOMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, CRFCF has a market cap of 485.99M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while CRFCF trades at $1.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas CRFCF's P/E ratio is 7.72. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CRFCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to CRFCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, HLFDY has a market cap of 464.16M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while HLFDY trades at $4.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas HLFDY's P/E ratio is 14.17. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HLFDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to HLFDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, HLFDF has a market cap of 463.06M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while HLFDF trades at $2.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas HLFDF's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HLFDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to HLFDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, KGGNF has a market cap of 442.30M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while KGGNF trades at $4.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas KGGNF's P/E ratio is 111.25. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KGGNF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to KGGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, BHOOY has a market cap of 426.72M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while BHOOY trades at $6.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas BHOOY's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHOOY's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to BHOOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, ASOMF has a market cap of 420.72M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while ASOMF trades at $3.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas ASOMF's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ASOMF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to ASOMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, KTYCF has a market cap of 307.99M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while KTYCF trades at $9.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas KTYCF's P/E ratio is 96.30. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KTYCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to KTYCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, BHHOF has a market cap of 302.50M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while BHHOF trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas BHHOF's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHHOF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to BHHOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, SSILF has a market cap of 251.35M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while SSILF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas SSILF's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SSILF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to SSILF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, NBRNF has a market cap of 251.29M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while NBRNF trades at $0.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas NBRNF's P/E ratio is 53.84. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NBRNF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to NBRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, HMAGF has a market cap of 246.42M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while HMAGF trades at $7.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas HMAGF's P/E ratio is -4.68. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HMAGF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to HMAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, YUMSF has a market cap of 187.66M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while YUMSF trades at $1.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas YUMSF's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YUMSF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to YUMSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, ACEHF has a market cap of 171.20M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while ACEHF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas ACEHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ACEHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to ACEHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, HKTVY has a market cap of 165.20M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while HKTVY trades at $4.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas HKTVY's P/E ratio is -19.95. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HKTVY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to HKTVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, RDBBY has a market cap of 129.21M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while RDBBY trades at $4.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas RDBBY's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RDBBY's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to RDBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, BNNNF has a market cap of 118.58M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while BNNNF trades at $9.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas BNNNF's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BNNNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to BNNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, GMELF has a market cap of 118.28M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while GMELF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas GMELF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GMELF's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to GMELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, AHAHF has a market cap of 116.14M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while AHAHF trades at $3.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas AHAHF's P/E ratio is -160.00. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AHAHF's ROE of +5.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to AHAHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, WCRS has a market cap of 95.63M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while WCRS trades at $10.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas WCRS's P/E ratio is 3.96. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WCRS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to WCRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, IGDFF has a market cap of 74.91M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while IGDFF trades at $0.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas IGDFF's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IGDFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to IGDFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, BJURF has a market cap of 71.63M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while BJURF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas BJURF's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BJURF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to BJURF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, MHCRF has a market cap of 64.41M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while MHCRF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas MHCRF's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MHCRF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to MHCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, SPGZ has a market cap of 62.35M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while SPGZ trades at $21,500.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas SPGZ's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SPGZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ZLNDY has daily volatility of 0.17 and SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, ADBGF has a market cap of 61.07M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while ADBGF trades at $0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas ADBGF's P/E ratio is 65.00. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ADBGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to ADBGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, ALLGF has a market cap of 57.46M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while ALLGF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas ALLGF's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALLGF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to ALLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, IDGBF has a market cap of 50.35M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while IDGBF trades at $1.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas IDGBF's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IDGBF's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to IDGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, PXHI has a market cap of 47.86M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while PXHI trades at $1.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas PXHI's P/E ratio is -2.31. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PXHI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to PXHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, ARTZF has a market cap of 41.37M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while ARTZF trades at $7.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas ARTZF's P/E ratio is -48.33. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARTZF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to ARTZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, GLHD has a market cap of 39.42M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while GLHD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas GLHD's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GLHD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to GLHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, CNVAF has a market cap of 37.97M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while CNVAF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas CNVAF's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNVAF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to CNVAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, FDIT has a market cap of 30.13M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while FDIT trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas FDIT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FDIT's ROE of -4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to FDIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, RDBBF has a market cap of 28.35M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while RDBBF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas RDBBF's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RDBBF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to RDBBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, TWRKF has a market cap of 25.05M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while TWRKF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas TWRKF's P/E ratio is 0.13. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TWRKF's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to TWRKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, RLAB has a market cap of 19.91M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while RLAB trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas RLAB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RLAB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to RLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, BWTL has a market cap of 15.29M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while BWTL trades at $3.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas BWTL's P/E ratio is -22.94. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BWTL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to BWTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 8.93B. In comparison, AVDWF has a market cap of 9.19M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $17.23, while AVDWF trades at $0.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas AVDWF's P/E ratio is 38.50. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AVDWF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to AVDWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.