Zalando SE

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, BABAF has a market cap of 288.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while BABAF trades at $15.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas BABAF's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BABAF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to BABAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check BABAF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, MPNGY has a market cap of 94.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while MPNGY trades at $31.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas MPNGY's P/E ratio is 19.66. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MPNGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to MPNGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check MPNGY's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, MPNGF has a market cap of 93.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while MPNGF trades at $15.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas MPNGF's P/E ratio is 19.52. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MPNGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to MPNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check MPNGF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, ANCTF has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while ANCTF trades at $50.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas ANCTF's P/E ratio is 18.70. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ANCTF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to ANCTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check ANCTF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, JDCMF has a market cap of 40.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while JDCMF trades at $18.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas JDCMF's P/E ratio is 6.84. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JDCMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to JDCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check JDCMF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, XXLLY has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while XXLLY trades at $739.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas XXLLY's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to XXLLY's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to XXLLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check XXLLY's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, YAHOY has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while YAHOY trades at $6.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas YAHOY's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YAHOY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to YAHOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check YAHOY's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, SNROF has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while SNROF trades at $44.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas SNROF's P/E ratio is 48.71. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SNROF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to SNROF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check SNROF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, RKUNY has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while RKUNY trades at $5.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas RKUNY's P/E ratio is -8.80. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RKUNY's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to RKUNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check RKUNY's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, RKUNF has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while RKUNF trades at $5.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas RKUNF's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RKUNF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to RKUNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check RKUNF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, MTTRY has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while MTTRY trades at $0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas MTTRY's P/E ratio is -49.50. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MTTRY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to MTTRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check MTTRY's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, NCLTY has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while NCLTY trades at $9.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas NCLTY's P/E ratio is -83.35. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NCLTY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to NCLTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check NCLTY's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, NCLTF has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while NCLTF trades at $90.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas NCLTF's P/E ratio is -79.30. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NCLTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to NCLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check NCLTF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, HKTGF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while HKTGF trades at $215.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas HKTGF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HKTGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to HKTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check HKTGF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, MONOY has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while MONOY trades at $18.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas MONOY's P/E ratio is 47.26. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MONOY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to MONOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check MONOY's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, SATLF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while SATLF trades at $10.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas SATLF's P/E ratio is 29.85. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SATLF's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to SATLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check SATLF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, DLVHF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while DLVHF trades at $29.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas DLVHF's P/E ratio is -8.08. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DLVHF's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to DLVHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check DLVHF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, SRTTY has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while SRTTY trades at $9.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas SRTTY's P/E ratio is 27.56. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SRTTY's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to SRTTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check SRTTY's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, DUFRY has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while DUFRY trades at $5.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas DUFRY's P/E ratio is 56.80. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DUFRY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to DUFRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check DUFRY's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, DFRYF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while DFRYF trades at $56.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas DFRYF's P/E ratio is 56.57. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DFRYF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to DFRYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check DFRYF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, JBHIF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while JBHIF trades at $74.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas JBHIF's P/E ratio is 26.91. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JBHIF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to JBHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check JBHIF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, ALEGF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while ALEGF trades at $7.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas ALEGF's P/E ratio is 27.32. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALEGF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to ALEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check ALEGF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, DELHY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while DELHY trades at $2.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas DELHY's P/E ratio is -7.42. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DELHY's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to DELHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check DELHY's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, ELPQF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while ELPQF trades at $5.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas ELPQF's P/E ratio is 6.34. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ELPQF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to ELPQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check ELPQF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, PETRY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while PETRY trades at $6.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas PETRY's P/E ratio is 3.46. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PETRY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to PETRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check PETRY's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, ZLDSF has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while ZLDSF trades at $27.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas ZLDSF's P/E ratio is 22.64. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZLDSF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to ZLDSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check ZLDSF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, MONOF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while MONOF trades at $14.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas MONOF's P/E ratio is 36.33. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MONOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to MONOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check MONOF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, CDNTF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while CDNTF trades at $193.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas CDNTF's P/E ratio is 18.15. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CDNTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to CDNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check CDNTF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, CDNAF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while CDNAF trades at $120.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas CDNAF's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CDNAF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to CDNAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check CDNAF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, JDSPY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while JDSPY trades at $1.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas JDSPY's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JDSPY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to JDSPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check JDSPY's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, JDDSF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while JDDSF trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas JDDSF's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JDDSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to JDDSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check JDDSF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, JUMSY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while JUMSY trades at $39.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas JUMSY's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JUMSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to JUMSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check JUMSY's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, JTKWY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while JTKWY trades at $4.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas JTKWY's P/E ratio is -10.57. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JTKWY's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to JTKWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check JTKWY's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, TKAYF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while TKAYF trades at $23.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas TKAYF's P/E ratio is -10.70. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TKAYF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to TKAYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check TKAYF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, SDIPF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while SDIPF trades at $9.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas SDIPF's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SDIPF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to SDIPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check SDIPF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, ZLPSF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while ZLPSF trades at $536.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas ZLPSF's P/E ratio is -623.70. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZLPSF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to ZLPSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check ZLPSF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, JUMSF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while JUMSF trades at $27.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas JUMSF's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JUMSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to JUMSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check JUMSF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, ZOPLY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while ZOPLY trades at $122.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas ZOPLY's P/E ratio is -210.38. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZOPLY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to ZOPLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check ZOPLY's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, DROOF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while DROOF trades at $2.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas DROOF's P/E ratio is -230.00. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DROOF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to DROOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check DROOF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, DNLMY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while DNLMY trades at $15.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas DNLMY's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DNLMY's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to DNLMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check DNLMY's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, HNORY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while HNORY trades at $12.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas HNORY's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HNORY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to HNORY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check HNORY's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, MRCIF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while MRCIF trades at $15.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas MRCIF's P/E ratio is 15.12. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MRCIF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to MRCIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check MRCIF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, MCARY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while MCARY trades at $7.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas MCARY's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MCARY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to MCARY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check MCARY's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, MTAGF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while MTAGF trades at $4.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas MTAGF's P/E ratio is 496.00. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MTAGF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to MTAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check MTAGF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, YMDAF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while YMDAF trades at $3.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas YMDAF's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YMDAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to YMDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check YMDAF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, FHNGY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while FHNGY trades at $6.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas FHNGY's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FHNGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to FHNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check FHNGY's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, WHTPF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while WHTPF trades at $14.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas WHTPF's P/E ratio is 235.67. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WHTPF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to WHTPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check WHTPF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, DSITF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while DSITF trades at $1.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas DSITF's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DSITF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to DSITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check DSITF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, BTOOY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while BTOOY trades at $3.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas BTOOY's P/E ratio is -23.63. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BTOOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to BTOOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check BTOOY's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, GPGNF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while GPGNF trades at $1.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas GPGNF's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GPGNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to GPGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check GPGNF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, LEFUF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while LEFUF trades at $21.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas LEFUF's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LEFUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to LEFUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check LEFUF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, MIZUF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while MIZUF trades at $18.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas MIZUF's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MIZUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to MIZUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check MIZUF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, PAHGF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while PAHGF trades at $2.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas PAHGF's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PAHGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to PAHGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check PAHGF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, MKRMF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while MKRMF trades at $235.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas MKRMF's P/E ratio is -136.63. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MKRMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to MKRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check MKRMF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, GRUPF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while GRUPF trades at $66.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas GRUPF's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GRUPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to GRUPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check GRUPF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, FNXTF has a market cap of 989M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while FNXTF trades at $74.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas FNXTF's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FNXTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to FNXTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check FNXTF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, MGLUY has a market cap of 877.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while MGLUY trades at $4.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas MGLUY's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MGLUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to MGLUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check MGLUY's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, SCCAF has a market cap of 875M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while SCCAF trades at $25.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas SCCAF's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SCCAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to SCCAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check SCCAF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, THGPF has a market cap of 651.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while THGPF trades at $0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas THGPF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to THGPF's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to THGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check THGPF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, HWGC has a market cap of 596.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while HWGC trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas HWGC's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HWGC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to HWGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check HWGC's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, THGHY has a market cap of 591.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while THGHY trades at $0.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas THGHY's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to THGHY's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to THGHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check THGHY's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, ACEHF has a market cap of 512.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while ACEHF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas ACEHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ACEHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to ACEHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check ACEHF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, ASOMY has a market cap of 492.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while ASOMY trades at $4.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas ASOMY's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ASOMY's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to ASOMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check ASOMY's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, ASOMF has a market cap of 485.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while ASOMF trades at $4.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas ASOMF's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ASOMF's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to ASOMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check ASOMF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, CRFCF has a market cap of 477.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while CRFCF trades at $1.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas CRFCF's P/E ratio is 7.56. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CRFCF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to CRFCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check CRFCF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, HLFDF has a market cap of 461.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while HLFDF trades at $2.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas HLFDF's P/E ratio is -10.10. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HLFDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to HLFDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check HLFDF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, KGGNF has a market cap of 442M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while KGGNF trades at $4.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas KGGNF's P/E ratio is 111.25. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KGGNF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to KGGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check KGGNF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, HLFDY has a market cap of 423.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while HLFDY trades at $3.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas HLFDY's P/E ratio is -9.29. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HLFDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to HLFDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check HLFDY's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, KTYCF has a market cap of 372.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while KTYCF trades at $11.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas KTYCF's P/E ratio is 145.55. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KTYCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to KTYCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check KTYCF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, SSILF has a market cap of 370.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while SSILF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas SSILF's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SSILF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to SSILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check SSILF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, BHHOF has a market cap of 274.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while BHHOF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas BHHOF's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHHOF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to BHHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check BHHOF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, NBRNF has a market cap of 251.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while NBRNF trades at $0.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas NBRNF's P/E ratio is 53.84. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NBRNF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to NBRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check NBRNF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, HMAGF has a market cap of 246.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while HMAGF trades at $7.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas HMAGF's P/E ratio is -4.68. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HMAGF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to HMAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check HMAGF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, BHOOY has a market cap of 242.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while BHOOY trades at $4.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas BHOOY's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHOOY's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to BHOOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check BHOOY's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, SAXJY has a market cap of 196.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while SAXJY trades at $1.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas SAXJY's P/E ratio is 21.17. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SAXJY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to SAXJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check SAXJY's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, HKTVY has a market cap of 163.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while HKTVY trades at $3.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas HKTVY's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HKTVY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to HKTVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check HKTVY's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, YUMSF has a market cap of 153M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while YUMSF trades at $1.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas YUMSF's P/E ratio is -11.42. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YUMSF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to YUMSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check YUMSF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, RDBBY has a market cap of 129.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while RDBBY trades at $4.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas RDBBY's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RDBBY's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to RDBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check RDBBY's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, BNNNF has a market cap of 118.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while BNNNF trades at $9.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas BNNNF's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BNNNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to BNNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check BNNNF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, AHAHF has a market cap of 116.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while AHAHF trades at $3.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas AHAHF's P/E ratio is -160.00. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AHAHF's ROE of +5.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to AHAHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check AHAHF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, GMELF has a market cap of 115.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while GMELF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas GMELF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GMELF's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to GMELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check GMELF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, WCRS has a market cap of 114.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while WCRS trades at $12.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas WCRS's P/E ratio is 3.96. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WCRS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to WCRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check WCRS's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, IGDFF has a market cap of 81.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while IGDFF trades at $0.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas IGDFF's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IGDFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to IGDFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check IGDFF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, MHCRF has a market cap of 64.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while MHCRF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas MHCRF's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MHCRF's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to MHCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check MHCRF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, PXHI has a market cap of 62.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while PXHI trades at $1.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas PXHI's P/E ratio is -3.02. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PXHI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to PXHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check PXHI's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, SPGZ has a market cap of 62.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while SPGZ trades at $21,500.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas SPGZ's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SPGZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ZLNDY has daily volatility of 1.03 and SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A.Check SPGZ's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, ADBGF has a market cap of 61.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while ADBGF trades at $0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas ADBGF's P/E ratio is 65.00. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ADBGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to ADBGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check ADBGF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, IDGBF has a market cap of 50.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while IDGBF trades at $1.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas IDGBF's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IDGBF's ROE of -12.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to IDGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check IDGBF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, RDBBF has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while RDBBF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas RDBBF's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RDBBF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to RDBBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check RDBBF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, TWRKF has a market cap of 43.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while TWRKF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas TWRKF's P/E ratio is 0.13. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TWRKF's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to TWRKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check TWRKF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, ARTZF has a market cap of 41.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while ARTZF trades at $7.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas ARTZF's P/E ratio is -48.33. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARTZF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to ARTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check ARTZF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, GLHD has a market cap of 39.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while GLHD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas GLHD's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GLHD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to GLHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check GLHD's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, CNVAF has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while CNVAF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas CNVAF's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNVAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to CNVAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check CNVAF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, FDIT has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while FDIT trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas FDIT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FDIT's ROE of -4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to FDIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check FDIT's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, SNHO has a market cap of 20.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while SNHO trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas SNHO's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SNHO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to SNHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check SNHO's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, BWTL has a market cap of 17.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while BWTL trades at $4.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas BWTL's P/E ratio is -21.25. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BWTL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to BWTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check BWTL's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, RLAB has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while RLAB trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas RLAB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RLAB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to RLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check RLAB's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, NEXCF has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while NEXCF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas NEXCF's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NEXCF's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is less volatile compared to NEXCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check NEXCF's competition here

ZLNDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZLNDY stands at 7B. In comparison, EMCMF has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, ZLNDY is priced at $13.62, while EMCMF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZLNDY currently has a P/E ratio of 22.10, whereas EMCMF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, ZLNDY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EMCMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZLNDY is more volatile compared to EMCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZLNDY.Check EMCMF's competition here