Zurich Insurance Group AG
Zurich Insurance Group AG ZFSVF Peers
See (ZFSVF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZFSVF | $722.40 | -1.29% | 102.8B | 17.99 | $40.16 | +4.70% |
| ALIZY | $40.40 | +0.47% | 1.6T | 14.18 | $2.85 | +4.24% |
| ALIZF | $415.40 | +3.24% | 160.3B | 14.56 | $28.54 | +4.25% |
| AXAHY | $48.50 | +0.08% | 105.5B | 13.14 | $3.69 | +4.41% |
| AXAHF | $47.84 | +4.00% | 104.1B | 13.00 | $3.68 | +4.46% |
| ZURVY | $35.24 | -0.77% | 101B | 17.53 | $2.01 | +4.79% |
| ARZGY | $18.40 | +1.49% | 55.6B | 13.33 | $1.38 | +4.46% |
| ARZGF | $35.00 | -0.03% | 52.6B | 12.64 | $2.77 | +4.60% |
| TNXXF | $131.57 | -0.75% | 34B | 14.95 | $8.80 | +2.33% |
| TLLXY | $65.58 | N/A | 33.9B | 14.90 | $4.40 | +2.29% |
Stock Comparison
ZFSVF vs ALIZY Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, ALIZY has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while ALIZY trades at $40.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas ALIZY's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ALIZY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is more volatile compared to ALIZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs ALIZF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, ALIZF has a market cap of 160.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while ALIZF trades at $415.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas ALIZF's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ALIZF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is more volatile compared to ALIZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs AXAHY Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, AXAHY has a market cap of 105.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while AXAHY trades at $48.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas AXAHY's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AXAHY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is more volatile compared to AXAHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs AXAHF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, AXAHF has a market cap of 104.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while AXAHF trades at $47.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas AXAHF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AXAHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is more volatile compared to AXAHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs ZURVY Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, ZURVY has a market cap of 101B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while ZURVY trades at $35.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas ZURVY's P/E ratio is 17.53. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ZURVY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is more volatile compared to ZURVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs ARZGY Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, ARZGY has a market cap of 55.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while ARZGY trades at $18.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas ARZGY's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ARZGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is more volatile compared to ARZGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs ARZGF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, ARZGF has a market cap of 52.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while ARZGF trades at $35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas ARZGF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ARZGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is more volatile compared to ARZGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs TNXXF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, TNXXF has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while TNXXF trades at $131.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas TNXXF's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TNXXF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is more volatile compared to TNXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs TLLXY Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, TLLXY has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while TLLXY trades at $65.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas TLLXY's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TLLXY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is more volatile compared to TLLXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs SZLMY Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, SZLMY has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while SZLMY trades at $50.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas SZLMY's P/E ratio is 19.79. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SZLMY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is more volatile compared to SZLMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs SAXPY Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, SAXPY has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while SAXPY trades at $21.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas SAXPY's P/E ratio is 22.70. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SAXPY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is more volatile compared to SAXPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs SAXPF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, SAXPF has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while SAXPF trades at $10.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas SAXPF's P/E ratio is 21.98. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SAXPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is less volatile compared to SAXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs SWSDF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, SWSDF has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while SWSDF trades at $974.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas SWSDF's P/E ratio is 19.20. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SWSDF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is more volatile compared to SWSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs AVVIY Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, AVVIY has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while AVVIY trades at $16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas AVVIY's P/E ratio is 26.68. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AVVIY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is more volatile compared to AVVIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs AIVAF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, AIVAF has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while AIVAF trades at $8.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas AIVAF's P/E ratio is 26.91. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AIVAF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is more volatile compared to AIVAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs NNGRY Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, NNGRY has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while NNGRY trades at $32.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas NNGRY's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NNGRY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is more volatile compared to NNGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs NNGPF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, NNGPF has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while NNGPF trades at $62.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas NNGPF's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NNGPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is more volatile compared to NNGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs UFGSY Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, UFGSY has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while UFGSY trades at $10.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas UFGSY's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to UFGSY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is more volatile compared to UFGSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs TGVSF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, TGVSF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while TGVSF trades at $22.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas TGVSF's P/E ratio is 20.75. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TGVSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is less volatile compared to TGVSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs GJNSY Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, GJNSY has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while GJNSY trades at $26.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas GJNSY's P/E ratio is 24.52. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GJNSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is less volatile compared to GJNSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs AGESY Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, AGESY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while AGESY trades at $66.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas AGESY's P/E ratio is 9.66. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AGESY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is more volatile compared to AGESY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs BBSEY Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, BBSEY has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while BBSEY trades at $6.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas BBSEY's P/E ratio is 8.35. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BBSEY's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is more volatile compared to BBSEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs AGESF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, AGESF has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while AGESF trades at $63.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas AGESF's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AGESF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is less volatile compared to AGESF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs AEGOF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, AEGOF has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while AEGOF trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas AEGOF's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AEGOF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is more volatile compared to AEGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs MPFRF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, MPFRF has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while MPFRF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas MPFRF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MPFRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is less volatile compared to MPFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs BLHEY Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, BLHEY has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while BLHEY trades at $23.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas BLHEY's P/E ratio is 22.44. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BLHEY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is more volatile compared to BLHEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs BLHEF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, BLHEF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while BLHEF trades at $227.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas BLHEF's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BLHEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is less volatile compared to BLHEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs IAFNF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, IAFNF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while IAFNF trades at $101.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas IAFNF's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to IAFNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is more volatile compared to IAFNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs GJNSF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, GJNSF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while GJNSF trades at $17.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas GJNSF's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GJNSF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is more volatile compared to GJNSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs HLVTY Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, HLVTY has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while HLVTY trades at $4.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas HLVTY's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HLVTY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is less volatile compared to HLVTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs UNPLF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, UNPLF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while UNPLF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas UNPLF's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to UNPLF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is more volatile compared to UNPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs SLFIF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, SLFIF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while SLFIF trades at $14.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas SLFIF's P/E ratio is 2.83. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SLFIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is more volatile compared to SLFIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs HELNF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, HELNF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while HELNF trades at $137.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas HELNF's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HELNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is more volatile compared to HELNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs SUNFF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, SUNFF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while SUNFF trades at $11.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas SUNFF's P/E ratio is 2.29. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SUNFF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is more volatile compared to SUNFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs RMRHF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, RMRHF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while RMRHF trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas RMRHF's P/E ratio is 23.38. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to RMRHF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is more volatile compared to RMRHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs FDIAY Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, FDIAY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while FDIAY trades at $9.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas FDIAY's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to FDIAY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is more volatile compared to FDIAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs MPFRY Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, MPFRY has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while MPFRY trades at $7.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas MPFRY's P/E ratio is 10.46. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MPFRY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is more volatile compared to MPFRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs TPDKY Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, TPDKY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while TPDKY trades at $5.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas TPDKY's P/E ratio is 29.75. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TPDKY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is more volatile compared to TPDKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs DIISF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, DIISF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while DIISF trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas DIISF's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to DIISF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is less volatile compared to DIISF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs TPDNF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, TPDNF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while TPDNF trades at $51.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas TPDNF's P/E ratio is 28.46. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TPDNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is less volatile compared to TPDNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs GIVPY Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, GIVPY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while GIVPY trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas GIVPY's P/E ratio is 2.11. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GIVPY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is more volatile compared to GIVPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs VNRGF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, VNRGF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while VNRGF trades at $26.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas VNRGF's P/E ratio is 3.70. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to VNRGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is more volatile compared to VNRGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs AFFT Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, AFFT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while AFFT trades at $15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas AFFT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AFFT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is more volatile compared to AFFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs AFFS Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, AFFS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while AFFS trades at $15.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas AFFS's P/E ratio is 15.92. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AFFS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is more volatile compared to AFFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs GCNJF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, GCNJF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while GCNJF trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas GCNJF's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GCNJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is more volatile compared to GCNJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs ABDBY Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, ABDBY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while ABDBY trades at $4.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas ABDBY's P/E ratio is -67.33. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ABDBY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is more volatile compared to ABDBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs GIVSY Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, GIVSY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while GIVSY trades at $20.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas GIVSY's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GIVSY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is less volatile compared to GIVSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs MNRHF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, MNRHF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while MNRHF trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas MNRHF's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MNRHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is more volatile compared to MNRHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs VNRFY Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, VNRFY has a market cap of 743.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while VNRFY trades at $5.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas VNRFY's P/E ratio is 6.38. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to VNRFY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is less volatile compared to VNRFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs AIFIF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, AIFIF has a market cap of 462.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while AIFIF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas AIFIF's P/E ratio is 4.83. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AIFIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is more volatile compared to AIFIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs SGPLF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, SGPLF has a market cap of 280.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while SGPLF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas SGPLF's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SGPLF's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is more volatile compared to SGPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs ERPRF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, ERPRF has a market cap of 163.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while ERPRF trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas ERPRF's P/E ratio is 7.54. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ERPRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is more volatile compared to ERPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs TSCHY Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, TSCHY has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while TSCHY trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas TSCHY's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TSCHY's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is more volatile compared to TSCHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs NDEV Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, NDEV has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while NDEV trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas NDEV's P/E ratio is 44.40. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NDEV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is less volatile compared to NDEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs CNCPF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, CNCPF has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while CNCPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas CNCPF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CNCPF's ROE of +2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is more volatile compared to CNCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs CWID Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 102.8B. In comparison, CWID has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $722.40, while CWID trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas CWID's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CWID's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is less volatile compared to CWID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.