Zurich Insurance Group AG
Zurich Insurance Group AG ZFSVF Peers
See (ZFSVF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZFSVF | $690.00 | +0.71% | 98.2B | 17.18 | $40.17 | +4.99% |
| ALIZY | $40.30 | +0.36% | 1.6T | 13.95 | $2.89 | +4.23% |
| ALIZF | $405.55 | +2.04% | 156.5B | 14.02 | $28.92 | +4.22% |
| AXAHF | $48.86 | +0.70% | 106.3B | 12.99 | $3.76 | +4.99% |
| AXAHY | $48.57 | +1.09% | 105.7B | 12.92 | $3.76 | +5.02% |
| ZURVY | $34.77 | +1.19% | 98.9B | 17.30 | $2.01 | +4.89% |
| SAXPY | $21.55 | +0.87% | 58B | 22.45 | $0.96 | +3.57% |
| ARZGY | $17.63 | -0.23% | 53.3B | 12.59 | $1.40 | +4.59% |
| ARZGF | $35.19 | +0.00% | 52.9B | 12.57 | $2.80 | +4.57% |
| TLLXY | $64.04 | +0.00% | 33.1B | 14.23 | $4.50 | +2.35% |
Stock Comparison
ZFSVF vs ALIZY Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, ALIZY has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while ALIZY trades at $40.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas ALIZY's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ALIZY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is less volatile compared to ALIZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs ALIZF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, ALIZF has a market cap of 156.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while ALIZF trades at $405.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas ALIZF's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ALIZF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF and ALIZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZFSVF vs AXAHF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, AXAHF has a market cap of 106.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while AXAHF trades at $48.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas AXAHF's P/E ratio is 12.99. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AXAHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF and AXAHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZFSVF vs AXAHY Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, AXAHY has a market cap of 105.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while AXAHY trades at $48.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas AXAHY's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AXAHY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is less volatile compared to AXAHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs ZURVY Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, ZURVY has a market cap of 98.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while ZURVY trades at $34.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas ZURVY's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ZURVY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is less volatile compared to ZURVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs SAXPY Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, SAXPY has a market cap of 58B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while SAXPY trades at $21.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas SAXPY's P/E ratio is 22.45. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SAXPY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is less volatile compared to SAXPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs ARZGY Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, ARZGY has a market cap of 53.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while ARZGY trades at $17.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas ARZGY's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ARZGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is less volatile compared to ARZGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs ARZGF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, ARZGF has a market cap of 52.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while ARZGF trades at $35.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas ARZGF's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ARZGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is less volatile compared to ARZGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs TLLXY Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, TLLXY has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while TLLXY trades at $64.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas TLLXY's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TLLXY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF and TLLXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZFSVF vs TNXXF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, TNXXF has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while TNXXF trades at $128.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas TNXXF's P/E ratio is 14.35. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TNXXF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF and TNXXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZFSVF vs SZLMY Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, SZLMY has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while SZLMY trades at $50.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas SZLMY's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SZLMY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is less volatile compared to SZLMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs SWSDF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, SWSDF has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while SWSDF trades at $1,015.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas SWSDF's P/E ratio is 19.32. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SWSDF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is less volatile compared to SWSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs SAXPF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, SAXPF has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while SAXPF trades at $10.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas SAXPF's P/E ratio is 21.90. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SAXPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is less volatile compared to SAXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs AVVIY Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, AVVIY has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while AVVIY trades at $17.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas AVVIY's P/E ratio is 27.16. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AVVIY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is less volatile compared to AVVIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs AIVAF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, AIVAF has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while AIVAF trades at $8.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas AIVAF's P/E ratio is 26.06. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AIVAF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is less volatile compared to AIVAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs NNGPF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, NNGPF has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while NNGPF trades at $66.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas NNGPF's P/E ratio is 10.27. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NNGPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is less volatile compared to NNGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs NNGRY Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, NNGRY has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while NNGRY trades at $33.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas NNGRY's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NNGRY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is less volatile compared to NNGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs UFGSY Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, UFGSY has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while UFGSY trades at $9.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas UFGSY's P/E ratio is 11.37. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to UFGSY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is less volatile compared to UFGSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs TGVSF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, TGVSF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while TGVSF trades at $22.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas TGVSF's P/E ratio is 20.75. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TGVSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is less volatile compared to TGVSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs BBSEY Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, BBSEY has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while BBSEY trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas BBSEY's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BBSEY's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is less volatile compared to BBSEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs AGESY Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, AGESY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while AGESY trades at $67.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas AGESY's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AGESY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is less volatile compared to AGESY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs GJNSY Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, GJNSY has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while GJNSY trades at $25.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas GJNSY's P/E ratio is 23.11. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GJNSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF and GJNSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZFSVF vs AGESF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, AGESF has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while AGESF trades at $65.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas AGESF's P/E ratio is 9.21. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AGESF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is less volatile compared to AGESF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs AEGOF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, AEGOF has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while AEGOF trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas AEGOF's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AEGOF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF and AEGOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZFSVF vs MPFRF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, MPFRF has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while MPFRF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas MPFRF's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MPFRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is less volatile compared to MPFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs BLHEY Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, BLHEY has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while BLHEY trades at $23.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas BLHEY's P/E ratio is 22.44. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BLHEY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is less volatile compared to BLHEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs BLHEF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, BLHEF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while BLHEF trades at $227.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas BLHEF's P/E ratio is 22.03. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BLHEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is less volatile compared to BLHEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs IAFNF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, IAFNF has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while IAFNF trades at $108.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas IAFNF's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to IAFNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF and IAFNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZFSVF vs GJNSF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, GJNSF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while GJNSF trades at $17.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas GJNSF's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GJNSF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is less volatile compared to GJNSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs HLVTY Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, HLVTY has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while HLVTY trades at $4.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas HLVTY's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HLVTY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is less volatile compared to HLVTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs UNPLF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, UNPLF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while UNPLF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas UNPLF's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to UNPLF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF and UNPLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZFSVF vs SLFIF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, SLFIF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while SLFIF trades at $14.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas SLFIF's P/E ratio is 2.83. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SLFIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is less volatile compared to SLFIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs HELNF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, HELNF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while HELNF trades at $137.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas HELNF's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HELNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF and HELNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZFSVF vs RMRHF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, RMRHF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while RMRHF trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas RMRHF's P/E ratio is 23.38. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to RMRHF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF and RMRHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZFSVF vs SUNFF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, SUNFF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while SUNFF trades at $11.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas SUNFF's P/E ratio is 2.33. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SUNFF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is less volatile compared to SUNFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs FDIAY Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, FDIAY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while FDIAY trades at $9.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas FDIAY's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to FDIAY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF and FDIAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZFSVF vs MPFRY Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, MPFRY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while MPFRY trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas MPFRY's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MPFRY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is less volatile compared to MPFRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs DIISF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, DIISF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while DIISF trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas DIISF's P/E ratio is 27.80. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to DIISF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is less volatile compared to DIISF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs TPDKY Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, TPDKY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while TPDKY trades at $5.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas TPDKY's P/E ratio is 29.75. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TPDKY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF and TPDKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZFSVF vs TPDNF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, TPDNF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while TPDNF trades at $51.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas TPDNF's P/E ratio is 28.46. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TPDNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is less volatile compared to TPDNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs GIVPY Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, GIVPY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while GIVPY trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas GIVPY's P/E ratio is 2.02. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GIVPY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is less volatile compared to GIVPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs VNRGF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, VNRGF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while VNRGF trades at $26.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas VNRGF's P/E ratio is 3.70. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to VNRGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF and VNRGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZFSVF vs AFFS Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, AFFS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while AFFS trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas AFFS's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AFFS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF and AFFS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZFSVF vs AFFT Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, AFFT has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while AFFT trades at $16.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas AFFT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AFFT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is less volatile compared to AFFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs GCNJF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, GCNJF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while GCNJF trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas GCNJF's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GCNJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF and GCNJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZFSVF vs ABDBY Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, ABDBY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while ABDBY trades at $4.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas ABDBY's P/E ratio is -67.33. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ABDBY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF and ABDBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZFSVF vs GIVSY Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, GIVSY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while GIVSY trades at $20.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas GIVSY's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GIVSY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is less volatile compared to GIVSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs MNRHF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, MNRHF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while MNRHF trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas MNRHF's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MNRHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF and MNRHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZFSVF vs AIFIF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, AIFIF has a market cap of 462.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while AIFIF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas AIFIF's P/E ratio is 4.83. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AIFIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF and AIFIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZFSVF vs SGPLF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, SGPLF has a market cap of 284.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while SGPLF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas SGPLF's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SGPLF's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF and SGPLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZFSVF vs VNRFY Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, VNRFY has a market cap of 261.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while VNRFY trades at $10.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas VNRFY's P/E ratio is 8.70. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to VNRFY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is less volatile compared to VNRFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs ERPRF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, ERPRF has a market cap of 163.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while ERPRF trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas ERPRF's P/E ratio is 7.54. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ERPRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF and ERPRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZFSVF vs TSCHY Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, TSCHY has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while TSCHY trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas TSCHY's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TSCHY's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF and TSCHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZFSVF vs NDEV Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, NDEV has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while NDEV trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas NDEV's P/E ratio is 43.74. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NDEV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is less volatile compared to NDEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.
ZFSVF vs CNCPF Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, CNCPF has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while CNCPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas CNCPF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CNCPF's ROE of +2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF and CNCPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ZFSVF vs CWID Comparison
ZFSVF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFSVF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, CWID has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZFSVF is priced at $690.00, while CWID trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFSVF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.18, whereas CWID's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZFSVF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CWID's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZFSVF is less volatile compared to CWID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFSVF.