Yamada Holdings Co., Ltd.
Yamada Holdings Co., Ltd. (YMDAF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (YMDAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YMDAF | $3.16 | +0.00% | 2.1B | 12.15 | $0.26 | +2.74% |
| BABAF | $18.68 | -10.28% | 368.8B | 20.54 | $0.94 | +1.20% |
| MPNGF | $10.30 | -3.92% | 67.7B | 15.81 | $0.68 | N/A |
| MPNGY | $20.89 | -0.33% | 64.6B | 15.72 | $1.36 | N/A |
| NCLTY | $10.62 | +1.34% | 59.4B | 22.87 | $0.46 | +0.89% |
| ANCTF | $61.37 | +0.66% | 58.5B | 22.50 | $2.75 | +0.94% |
| JDCMF | $14.15 | +0.00% | 41.4B | 7.95 | $1.78 | +3.53% |
| XXLLY | $739.00 | +0.00% | 23.4B | -100.00 | -$7.39 | +0.12% |
| YAHOY | $4.85 | +0.83% | 16.7B | 12.61 | $0.38 | +2.04% |
| HKTGF | $287.34 | +0.00% | 12.6B | 13.83 | $20.77 | +1.69% |
Stock Comparison
YMDAF vs BABAF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BABAF has a market cap of 368.8B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while BABAF trades at $18.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas BABAF's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BABAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF is less volatile compared to BABAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMDAF.Check BABAF's competition here
YMDAF vs MPNGF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MPNGF has a market cap of 67.7B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while MPNGF trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas MPNGF's P/E ratio is 15.81. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MPNGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF is less volatile compared to MPNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMDAF.Check MPNGF's competition here
YMDAF vs MPNGY Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MPNGY has a market cap of 64.6B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while MPNGY trades at $20.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas MPNGY's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MPNGY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF is less volatile compared to MPNGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMDAF.Check MPNGY's competition here
YMDAF vs NCLTY Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NCLTY has a market cap of 59.4B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while NCLTY trades at $10.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas NCLTY's P/E ratio is 22.87. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NCLTY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF is less volatile compared to NCLTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMDAF.Check NCLTY's competition here
YMDAF vs ANCTF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ANCTF has a market cap of 58.5B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while ANCTF trades at $61.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas ANCTF's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ANCTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF is less volatile compared to ANCTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMDAF.Check ANCTF's competition here
YMDAF vs JDCMF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, JDCMF has a market cap of 41.4B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while JDCMF trades at $14.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas JDCMF's P/E ratio is 7.95. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JDCMF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and JDCMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JDCMF's competition here
YMDAF vs XXLLY Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, XXLLY has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while XXLLY trades at $739.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas XXLLY's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to XXLLY's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF is less volatile compared to XXLLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMDAF.Check XXLLY's competition here
YMDAF vs YAHOY Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, YAHOY has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while YAHOY trades at $4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas YAHOY's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to YAHOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF is less volatile compared to YAHOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMDAF.Check YAHOY's competition here
YMDAF vs HKTGF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HKTGF has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while HKTGF trades at $287.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas HKTGF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HKTGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and HKTGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HKTGF's competition here
YMDAF vs MTTRY Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MTTRY has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while MTTRY trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas MTTRY's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MTTRY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and MTTRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MTTRY's competition here
YMDAF vs NCLTF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NCLTF has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while NCLTF trades at $19.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas NCLTF's P/E ratio is 23.58. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NCLTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and NCLTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NCLTF's competition here
YMDAF vs RKUNF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, RKUNF has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while RKUNF trades at $5.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas RKUNF's P/E ratio is -10.09. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RKUNF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and RKUNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RKUNF's competition here
YMDAF vs RKUNY Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, RKUNY has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while RKUNY trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas RKUNY's P/E ratio is -9.93. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RKUNY's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF is less volatile compared to RKUNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMDAF.Check RKUNY's competition here
YMDAF vs DUFRY Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, DUFRY has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while DUFRY trades at $6.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas DUFRY's P/E ratio is 65.85. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DUFRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF is less volatile compared to DUFRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMDAF.Check DUFRY's competition here
YMDAF vs ALEGF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ALEGF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while ALEGF trades at $8.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas ALEGF's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ALEGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and ALEGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALEGF's competition here
YMDAF vs DFRYF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, DFRYF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while DFRYF trades at $61.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas DFRYF's P/E ratio is 59.92. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DFRYF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and DFRYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DFRYF's competition here
YMDAF vs SNROF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SNROF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while SNROF trades at $36.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas SNROF's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SNROF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and SNROF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SNROF's competition here
YMDAF vs ELPQF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ELPQF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while ELPQF trades at $5.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas ELPQF's P/E ratio is 7.28. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ELPQF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and ELPQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELPQF's competition here
YMDAF vs ZLDSF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ZLDSF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while ZLDSF trades at $30.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas ZLDSF's P/E ratio is 27.98. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ZLDSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and ZLDSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZLDSF's competition here
YMDAF vs DLVHF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, DLVHF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while DLVHF trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas DLVHF's P/E ratio is -11.46. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DLVHF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and DLVHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DLVHF's competition here
YMDAF vs PETRY Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PETRY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while PETRY trades at $6.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas PETRY's P/E ratio is 3.46. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PETRY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF is less volatile compared to PETRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMDAF.Check PETRY's competition here
YMDAF vs SATLF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SATLF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while SATLF trades at $8.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas SATLF's P/E ratio is 24.85. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SATLF's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and SATLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SATLF's competition here
YMDAF vs CDNAF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CDNAF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while CDNAF trades at $133.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas CDNAF's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CDNAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF is less volatile compared to CDNAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMDAF.Check CDNAF's competition here
YMDAF vs MONOF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MONOF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while MONOF trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas MONOF's P/E ratio is 32.56. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MONOF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF is less volatile compared to MONOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMDAF.Check MONOF's competition here
YMDAF vs DELHY Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, DELHY has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while DELHY trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas DELHY's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DELHY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF is less volatile compared to DELHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMDAF.Check DELHY's competition here
YMDAF vs MONOY Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MONOY has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while MONOY trades at $13.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas MONOY's P/E ratio is 30.95. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MONOY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF is less volatile compared to MONOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMDAF.Check MONOY's competition here
YMDAF vs JBHIF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, JBHIF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while JBHIF trades at $58.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas JBHIF's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JBHIF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF is less volatile compared to JBHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMDAF.Check JBHIF's competition here
YMDAF vs SRTTY Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SRTTY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while SRTTY trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas SRTTY's P/E ratio is 21.70. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SRTTY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF is less volatile compared to SRTTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMDAF.Check SRTTY's competition here
YMDAF vs CDNTF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CDNTF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while CDNTF trades at $157.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas CDNTF's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CDNTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and CDNTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CDNTF's competition here
YMDAF vs ZLNDY Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ZLNDY has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while ZLNDY trades at $12.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas ZLNDY's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ZLNDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF is less volatile compared to ZLNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMDAF.Check ZLNDY's competition here
YMDAF vs JDSPY Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, JDSPY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while JDSPY trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas JDSPY's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JDSPY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF is less volatile compared to JDSPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMDAF.Check JDSPY's competition here
YMDAF vs JDDSF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, JDDSF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while JDDSF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas JDDSF's P/E ratio is 7.69. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JDDSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF is less volatile compared to JDDSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMDAF.Check JDDSF's competition here
YMDAF vs TKAYF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, TKAYF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while TKAYF trades at $24.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas TKAYF's P/E ratio is -11.18. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TKAYF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF is less volatile compared to TKAYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMDAF.Check TKAYF's competition here
YMDAF vs JTKWY Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, JTKWY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while JTKWY trades at $4.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas JTKWY's P/E ratio is -9.91. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JTKWY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and JTKWY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JTKWY's competition here
YMDAF vs SDIPF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SDIPF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while SDIPF trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas SDIPF's P/E ratio is 7.01. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SDIPF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF is less volatile compared to SDIPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMDAF.Check SDIPF's competition here
YMDAF vs ZLPSF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ZLPSF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while ZLPSF trades at $536.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas ZLPSF's P/E ratio is -623.70. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ZLPSF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF is less volatile compared to ZLPSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMDAF.Check ZLPSF's competition here
YMDAF vs JUMSY Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, JUMSY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while JUMSY trades at $29.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas JUMSY's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JUMSY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and JUMSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JUMSY's competition here
YMDAF vs MCARY Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MCARY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while MCARY trades at $11.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas MCARY's P/E ratio is 20.18. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MCARY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and MCARY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MCARY's competition here
YMDAF vs JUMSF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, JUMSF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while JUMSF trades at $27.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas JUMSF's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JUMSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and JUMSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JUMSF's competition here
YMDAF vs DROOF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, DROOF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while DROOF trades at $2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas DROOF's P/E ratio is -244.25. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DROOF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and DROOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DROOF's competition here
YMDAF vs ZOPLY Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ZOPLY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while ZOPLY trades at $122.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas ZOPLY's P/E ratio is -210.38. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ZOPLY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and ZOPLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZOPLY's competition here
YMDAF vs HNORY Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HNORY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while HNORY trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas HNORY's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HNORY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF is less volatile compared to HNORY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMDAF.Check HNORY's competition here
YMDAF vs DNLMY Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, DNLMY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while DNLMY trades at $13.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas DNLMY's P/E ratio is 13.52. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DNLMY's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and DNLMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DNLMY's competition here
YMDAF vs MTAGF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MTAGF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while MTAGF trades at $5.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas MTAGF's P/E ratio is 557.00. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MTAGF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and MTAGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MTAGF's competition here
YMDAF vs MRCIF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MRCIF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while MRCIF trades at $15.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas MRCIF's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MRCIF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF is less volatile compared to MRCIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMDAF.Check MRCIF's competition here
YMDAF vs DSITF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, DSITF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while DSITF trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas DSITF's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DSITF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and DSITF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DSITF's competition here
YMDAF vs GPGNF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GPGNF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while GPGNF trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas GPGNF's P/E ratio is 16.30. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GPGNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and GPGNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GPGNF's competition here
YMDAF vs MGLUY Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MGLUY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while MGLUY trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas MGLUY's P/E ratio is 22.11. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MGLUY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and MGLUY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MGLUY's competition here
YMDAF vs BTOOY Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BTOOY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while BTOOY trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas BTOOY's P/E ratio is -23.63. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BTOOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and BTOOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BTOOY's competition here
YMDAF vs FHNGY Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, FHNGY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while FHNGY trades at $4.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas FHNGY's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FHNGY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF is less volatile compared to FHNGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMDAF.Check FHNGY's competition here
YMDAF vs MIZUF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MIZUF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while MIZUF trades at $19.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas MIZUF's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MIZUF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF is less volatile compared to MIZUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMDAF.Check MIZUF's competition here
YMDAF vs LEFUF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, LEFUF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while LEFUF trades at $20.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas LEFUF's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LEFUF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF is less volatile compared to LEFUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMDAF.Check LEFUF's competition here
YMDAF vs PAHGF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PAHGF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while PAHGF trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas PAHGF's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PAHGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF is less volatile compared to PAHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMDAF.Check PAHGF's competition here
YMDAF vs WHTPF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, WHTPF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while WHTPF trades at $8.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas WHTPF's P/E ratio is -27.18. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WHTPF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF is less volatile compared to WHTPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMDAF.Check WHTPF's competition here
YMDAF vs MKRMF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MKRMF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while MKRMF trades at $235.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas MKRMF's P/E ratio is -136.63. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MKRMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and MKRMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MKRMF's competition here
YMDAF vs GRUPF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GRUPF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while GRUPF trades at $66.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas GRUPF's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GRUPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and GRUPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GRUPF's competition here
YMDAF vs FNXTF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, FNXTF has a market cap of 995.1M. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while FNXTF trades at $74.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas FNXTF's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FNXTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF is less volatile compared to FNXTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMDAF.Check FNXTF's competition here
YMDAF vs SCCAF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SCCAF has a market cap of 875M. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while SCCAF trades at $25.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas SCCAF's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SCCAF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and SCCAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SCCAF's competition here
YMDAF vs DTCB Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, DTCB has a market cap of 849.2M. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while DTCB trades at $13.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas DTCB's P/E ratio is -6.34. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DTCB's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF is less volatile compared to DTCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMDAF.Check DTCB's competition here
YMDAF vs HWGC Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HWGC has a market cap of 596.2M. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while HWGC trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas HWGC's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HWGC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and HWGC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HWGC's competition here
YMDAF vs THGPF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, THGPF has a market cap of 594.7M. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while THGPF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas THGPF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to THGPF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and THGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check THGPF's competition here
YMDAF vs BHOOY Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BHOOY has a market cap of 466.7M. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while BHOOY trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas BHOOY's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BHOOY's ROE of -102.24%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF is less volatile compared to BHOOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMDAF.Check BHOOY's competition here
YMDAF vs ASOMY Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ASOMY has a market cap of 445.5M. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while ASOMY trades at $3.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas ASOMY's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ASOMY's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and ASOMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ASOMY's competition here
YMDAF vs ASOMF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ASOMF has a market cap of 441.9M. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while ASOMF trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas ASOMF's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ASOMF's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and ASOMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ASOMF's competition here
YMDAF vs KTYCF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, KTYCF has a market cap of 424.6M. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while KTYCF trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas KTYCF's P/E ratio is 110.08. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KTYCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF is less volatile compared to KTYCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMDAF.Check KTYCF's competition here
YMDAF vs HLFDY Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HLFDY has a market cap of 420.5M. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while HLFDY trades at $3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas HLFDY's P/E ratio is -9.19. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HLFDY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and HLFDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HLFDY's competition here
YMDAF vs BHHOF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BHHOF has a market cap of 415.5M. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while BHHOF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas BHHOF's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BHHOF's ROE of -100.84%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF is less volatile compared to BHHOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMDAF.Check BHHOF's competition here
YMDAF vs HLFDF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HLFDF has a market cap of 403.1M. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while HLFDF trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas HLFDF's P/E ratio is -8.81. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HLFDF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and HLFDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HLFDF's competition here
YMDAF vs SSILF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SSILF has a market cap of 370.5M. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while SSILF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas SSILF's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SSILF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and SSILF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SSILF's competition here
YMDAF vs THGHY Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, THGHY has a market cap of 356.3M. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while THGHY trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas THGHY's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to THGHY's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and THGHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check THGHY's competition here
YMDAF vs CRFCF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CRFCF has a market cap of 317.6M. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while CRFCF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas CRFCF's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CRFCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF is less volatile compared to CRFCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMDAF.Check CRFCF's competition here
YMDAF vs NBRNF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NBRNF has a market cap of 251.3M. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while NBRNF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas NBRNF's P/E ratio is 53.84. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NBRNF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF is less volatile compared to NBRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMDAF.Check NBRNF's competition here
YMDAF vs HMAGF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HMAGF has a market cap of 246.4M. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while HMAGF trades at $7.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas HMAGF's P/E ratio is -4.68. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HMAGF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and HMAGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HMAGF's competition here
YMDAF vs SAXJY Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SAXJY has a market cap of 218.7M. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while SAXJY trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas SAXJY's P/E ratio is 20.14. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SAXJY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF is less volatile compared to SAXJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMDAF.Check SAXJY's competition here
YMDAF vs KGGNF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, KGGNF has a market cap of 211.4M. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while KGGNF trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas KGGNF's P/E ratio is -7.71. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KGGNF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF is less volatile compared to KGGNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMDAF.Check KGGNF's competition here
YMDAF vs BJURF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BJURF has a market cap of 193M. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while BJURF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas BJURF's P/E ratio is -9.97. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BJURF's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF is less volatile compared to BJURF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMDAF.Check BJURF's competition here
YMDAF vs BNNNF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BNNNF has a market cap of 174.1M. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while BNNNF trades at $13.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas BNNNF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BNNNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF is less volatile compared to BNNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMDAF.Check BNNNF's competition here
YMDAF vs WCRS Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, WCRS has a market cap of 155.7M. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while WCRS trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas WCRS's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WCRS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and WCRS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WCRS's competition here
YMDAF vs HKTVY Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HKTVY has a market cap of 138.5M. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while HKTVY trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas HKTVY's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HKTVY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and HKTVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HKTVY's competition here
YMDAF vs RDBBY Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, RDBBY has a market cap of 129.2M. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while RDBBY trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas RDBBY's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RDBBY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF is less volatile compared to RDBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMDAF.Check RDBBY's competition here
YMDAF vs AHAHF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, AHAHF has a market cap of 116.1M. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while AHAHF trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas AHAHF's P/E ratio is -160.00. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AHAHF's ROE of +5.53%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF is less volatile compared to AHAHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMDAF.Check AHAHF's competition here
YMDAF vs GMELF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GMELF has a market cap of 113.6M. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while GMELF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas GMELF's P/E ratio is 0.25. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GMELF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF is less volatile compared to GMELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMDAF.Check GMELF's competition here
YMDAF vs YUMSF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, YUMSF has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while YUMSF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas YUMSF's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to YUMSF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and YUMSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YUMSF's competition here
YMDAF vs IGDFF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, IGDFF has a market cap of 81M. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while IGDFF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas IGDFF's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IGDFF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF is less volatile compared to IGDFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMDAF.Check IGDFF's competition here
YMDAF vs RDBBF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, RDBBF has a market cap of 74.6M. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while RDBBF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas RDBBF's P/E ratio is 25.69. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RDBBF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and RDBBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RDBBF's competition here
YMDAF vs MHCRF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MHCRF has a market cap of 64.4M. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while MHCRF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas MHCRF's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MHCRF's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and MHCRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MHCRF's competition here
YMDAF vs SPGZ Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SPGZ has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while SPGZ trades at $21,500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas SPGZ's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SPGZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. YMDAF has daily volatility of 0.00 and SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A.Check SPGZ's competition here
YMDAF vs ADBGF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ADBGF has a market cap of 61.1M. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while ADBGF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas ADBGF's P/E ratio is 65.00. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ADBGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and ADBGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADBGF's competition here
YMDAF vs ACEHF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ACEHF has a market cap of 60M. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while ACEHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas ACEHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ACEHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF is less volatile compared to ACEHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMDAF.Check ACEHF's competition here
YMDAF vs PXHI Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PXHI has a market cap of 58.3M. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while PXHI trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas PXHI's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PXHI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF is less volatile compared to PXHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMDAF.Check PXHI's competition here
YMDAF vs IDGBF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, IDGBF has a market cap of 50.4M. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while IDGBF trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas IDGBF's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IDGBF's ROE of -12.64%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and IDGBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IDGBF's competition here
YMDAF vs ARTZF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ARTZF has a market cap of 41.4M. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while ARTZF trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas ARTZF's P/E ratio is -48.33. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ARTZF's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and ARTZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARTZF's competition here
YMDAF vs GLHD Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GLHD has a market cap of 39.4M. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while GLHD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas GLHD's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GLHD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF is less volatile compared to GLHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMDAF.Check GLHD's competition here
YMDAF vs CNVAF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CNVAF has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while CNVAF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas CNVAF's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CNVAF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and CNVAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNVAF's competition here
YMDAF vs TWRKF Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, TWRKF has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while TWRKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas TWRKF's P/E ratio is 0.13. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TWRKF's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and TWRKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TWRKF's competition here
YMDAF vs FDIT Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, FDIT has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while FDIT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas FDIT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FDIT's ROE of +6.00%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and FDIT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FDIT's competition here
YMDAF vs RLAB Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, RLAB has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while RLAB trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas RLAB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RLAB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF is less volatile compared to RLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YMDAF.Check RLAB's competition here
YMDAF vs WINH Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, WINH has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while WINH trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas WINH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WINH's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and WINH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WINH's competition here
YMDAF vs BWTL Comparison February 2026
YMDAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YMDAF stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BWTL has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, YMDAF is priced at $3.16, while BWTL trades at $3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YMDAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.15, whereas BWTL's P/E ratio is -21.61. In terms of profitability, YMDAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BWTL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, YMDAF and BWTL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BWTL's competition here