Yellow Pages Limited
Yellow Pages Limited (YLWWF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (YLWWF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Publishing Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YLWWF | $0.56 | +0.00% | 0 | 0.27 | $2.09 | N/A |
| IDWM | $40.00 | +0.00% | 98.2B | -0.97 | -$41.14 | N/A |
| RLXXF | $47.60 | -2.16% | 83.7B | 32.94 | $1.39 | +1.87% |
| IFJPY | $24.42 | -0.53% | 16.1B | 162.73 | $0.15 | +2.22% |
| IFPJF | $12.21 | +2.88% | 15.8B | 174.46 | $0.07 | +2.27% |
| PSORF | $14.84 | +3.41% | 10.1B | 16.86 | $0.88 | +2.17% |
| SBSNY | $40.84 | +0.68% | 9.4B | 13.39 | $3.05 | +3.01% |
| SBBTF | $32.99 | +0.00% | 7.6B | 10.82 | $3.05 | +3.10% |
| SBSNF | $27.37 | +0.00% | 6.3B | 26.57 | $1.03 | +3.74% |
| KDKWF | $24.00 | +0.00% | 3.5B | 66.67 | $0.36 | +0.85% |
Stock Comparison
YLWWF vs IDWM Comparison August 2025
YLWWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWWF stands at 0. In comparison, IDWM has a market cap of 98.2B. Regarding current trading prices, YLWWF is priced at $0.56, while IDWM trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.27, whereas IDWM's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, YLWWF's ROE is N/A, compared to IDWM's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWWF is less volatile compared to IDWM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YLWWF.Check IDWM's competition here
YLWWF vs RLXXF Comparison August 2025
YLWWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWWF stands at 0. In comparison, RLXXF has a market cap of 83.7B. Regarding current trading prices, YLWWF is priced at $0.56, while RLXXF trades at $47.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.27, whereas RLXXF's P/E ratio is 32.94. In terms of profitability, YLWWF's ROE is N/A, compared to RLXXF's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWWF is less volatile compared to RLXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YLWWF.Check RLXXF's competition here
YLWWF vs IFJPY Comparison August 2025
YLWWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWWF stands at 0. In comparison, IFJPY has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, YLWWF is priced at $0.56, while IFJPY trades at $24.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.27, whereas IFJPY's P/E ratio is 162.73. In terms of profitability, YLWWF's ROE is N/A, compared to IFJPY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWWF is less volatile compared to IFJPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YLWWF.Check IFJPY's competition here
YLWWF vs IFPJF Comparison August 2025
YLWWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWWF stands at 0. In comparison, IFPJF has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, YLWWF is priced at $0.56, while IFPJF trades at $12.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.27, whereas IFPJF's P/E ratio is 174.46. In terms of profitability, YLWWF's ROE is N/A, compared to IFPJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWWF is less volatile compared to IFPJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YLWWF.Check IFPJF's competition here
YLWWF vs PSORF Comparison August 2025
YLWWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWWF stands at 0. In comparison, PSORF has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, YLWWF is priced at $0.56, while PSORF trades at $14.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.27, whereas PSORF's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, YLWWF's ROE is N/A, compared to PSORF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWWF is less volatile compared to PSORF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YLWWF.Check PSORF's competition here
YLWWF vs SBSNY Comparison August 2025
YLWWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWWF stands at 0. In comparison, SBSNY has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, YLWWF is priced at $0.56, while SBSNY trades at $40.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.27, whereas SBSNY's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, YLWWF's ROE is N/A, compared to SBSNY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWWF is less volatile compared to SBSNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YLWWF.Check SBSNY's competition here
YLWWF vs SBBTF Comparison August 2025
YLWWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWWF stands at 0. In comparison, SBBTF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, YLWWF is priced at $0.56, while SBBTF trades at $32.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.27, whereas SBBTF's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, YLWWF's ROE is N/A, compared to SBBTF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWWF and SBBTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SBBTF's competition here
YLWWF vs SBSNF Comparison August 2025
YLWWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWWF stands at 0. In comparison, SBSNF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, YLWWF is priced at $0.56, while SBSNF trades at $27.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.27, whereas SBSNF's P/E ratio is 26.57. In terms of profitability, YLWWF's ROE is N/A, compared to SBSNF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWWF is less volatile compared to SBSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YLWWF.Check SBSNF's competition here
YLWWF vs KDKWF Comparison August 2025
YLWWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWWF stands at 0. In comparison, KDKWF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, YLWWF is priced at $0.56, while KDKWF trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.27, whereas KDKWF's P/E ratio is 66.67. In terms of profitability, YLWWF's ROE is N/A, compared to KDKWF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWWF and KDKWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KDKWF's competition here
YLWWF vs SHXWF Comparison August 2025
YLWWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWWF stands at 0. In comparison, SHXWF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, YLWWF is priced at $0.56, while SHXWF trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.27, whereas SHXWF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, YLWWF's ROE is N/A, compared to SHXWF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWWF and SHXWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHXWF's competition here
YLWWF vs CNGO Comparison August 2025
YLWWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWWF stands at 0. In comparison, CNGO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, YLWWF is priced at $0.56, while CNGO trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.27, whereas CNGO's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, YLWWF's ROE is N/A, compared to CNGO's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWWF is less volatile compared to CNGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YLWWF.Check CNGO's competition here
YLWWF vs FRNWF Comparison August 2025
YLWWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWWF stands at 0. In comparison, FRNWF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, YLWWF is priced at $0.56, while FRNWF trades at $9.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.27, whereas FRNWF's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, YLWWF's ROE is N/A, compared to FRNWF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWWF is less volatile compared to FRNWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YLWWF.Check FRNWF's competition here
YLWWF vs RZSMF Comparison August 2025
YLWWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWWF stands at 0. In comparison, RZSMF has a market cap of 569.1M. Regarding current trading prices, YLWWF is priced at $0.56, while RZSMF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.27, whereas RZSMF's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, YLWWF's ROE is N/A, compared to RZSMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWWF is less volatile compared to RZSMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YLWWF.Check RZSMF's competition here
YLWWF vs MDDCF Comparison August 2025
YLWWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWWF stands at 0. In comparison, MDDCF has a market cap of 562.4M. Regarding current trading prices, YLWWF is priced at $0.56, while MDDCF trades at $37.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.27, whereas MDDCF's P/E ratio is 48.74. In terms of profitability, YLWWF's ROE is N/A, compared to MDDCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWWF and MDDCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MDDCF's competition here
YLWWF vs GPOPF Comparison August 2025
YLWWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWWF stands at 0. In comparison, GPOPF has a market cap of 454.2M. Regarding current trading prices, YLWWF is priced at $0.56, while GPOPF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.27, whereas GPOPF's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, YLWWF's ROE is N/A, compared to GPOPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWWF and GPOPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GPOPF's competition here
YLWWF vs STRYF Comparison August 2025
YLWWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWWF stands at 0. In comparison, STRYF has a market cap of 438.3M. Regarding current trading prices, YLWWF is priced at $0.56, while STRYF trades at $5.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.27, whereas STRYF's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, YLWWF's ROE is N/A, compared to STRYF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWWF is less volatile compared to STRYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YLWWF.Check STRYF's competition here
YLWWF vs TOCOF Comparison August 2025
YLWWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWWF stands at 0. In comparison, TOCOF has a market cap of 291.9M. Regarding current trading prices, YLWWF is priced at $0.56, while TOCOF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.27, whereas TOCOF's P/E ratio is -7.38. In terms of profitability, YLWWF's ROE is N/A, compared to TOCOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWWF and TOCOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TOCOF's competition here
YLWWF vs GWOX Comparison August 2025
YLWWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWWF stands at 0. In comparison, GWOX has a market cap of 186.4M. Regarding current trading prices, YLWWF is priced at $0.56, while GWOX trades at $400.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.27, whereas GWOX's P/E ratio is 6.01. In terms of profitability, YLWWF's ROE is N/A, compared to GWOX's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWWF is less volatile compared to GWOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YLWWF.Check GWOX's competition here
YLWWF vs PCDAF Comparison August 2025
YLWWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWWF stands at 0. In comparison, PCDAF has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, YLWWF is priced at $0.56, while PCDAF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.27, whereas PCDAF's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, YLWWF's ROE is N/A, compared to PCDAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWWF is less volatile compared to PCDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YLWWF.Check PCDAF's competition here
YLWWF vs YLWDF Comparison August 2025
YLWWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWWF stands at 0. In comparison, YLWDF has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, YLWWF is priced at $0.56, while YLWDF trades at $8.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.27, whereas YLWDF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, YLWWF's ROE is N/A, compared to YLWDF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWWF and YLWDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YLWDF's competition here
YLWWF vs CMTX Comparison August 2025
YLWWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWWF stands at 0. In comparison, CMTX has a market cap of 82.1M. Regarding current trading prices, YLWWF is priced at $0.56, while CMTX trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.27, whereas CMTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YLWWF's ROE is N/A, compared to CMTX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWWF is less volatile compared to CMTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YLWWF.Check CMTX's competition here
YLWWF vs SMWPY Comparison August 2025
YLWWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWWF stands at 0. In comparison, SMWPY has a market cap of 49.5M. Regarding current trading prices, YLWWF is priced at $0.56, while SMWPY trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.27, whereas SMWPY's P/E ratio is 1.71. In terms of profitability, YLWWF's ROE is N/A, compared to SMWPY's ROE of -2.97%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWWF is less volatile compared to SMWPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YLWWF.Check SMWPY's competition here
YLWWF vs HKGEF Comparison August 2025
YLWWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWWF stands at 0. In comparison, HKGEF has a market cap of 43.2M. Regarding current trading prices, YLWWF is priced at $0.56, while HKGEF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.27, whereas HKGEF's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, YLWWF's ROE is N/A, compared to HKGEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWWF is less volatile compared to HKGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YLWWF.Check HKGEF's competition here
YLWWF vs STAOF Comparison August 2025
YLWWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWWF stands at 0. In comparison, STAOF has a market cap of 30.8M. Regarding current trading prices, YLWWF is priced at $0.56, while STAOF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.27, whereas STAOF's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, YLWWF's ROE is N/A, compared to STAOF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWWF and STAOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STAOF's competition here
YLWWF vs GLMFF Comparison August 2025
YLWWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWWF stands at 0. In comparison, GLMFF has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, YLWWF is priced at $0.56, while GLMFF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.27, whereas GLMFF's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, YLWWF's ROE is N/A, compared to GLMFF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWWF and GLMFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GLMFF's competition here
YLWWF vs SADL Comparison August 2025
YLWWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWWF stands at 0. In comparison, SADL has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, YLWWF is priced at $0.56, while SADL trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.27, whereas SADL's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, YLWWF's ROE is N/A, compared to SADL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, YLWWF is less volatile compared to SADL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YLWWF.Check SADL's competition here
YLWWF vs XLMDF Comparison August 2025
YLWWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWWF stands at 0. In comparison, XLMDF has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, YLWWF is priced at $0.56, while XLMDF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.27, whereas XLMDF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, YLWWF's ROE is N/A, compared to XLMDF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWWF and XLMDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XLMDF's competition here
YLWWF vs DTRL Comparison August 2025
YLWWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWWF stands at 0. In comparison, DTRL has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, YLWWF is priced at $0.56, while DTRL trades at $291.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.27, whereas DTRL's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, YLWWF's ROE is N/A, compared to DTRL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWWF and DTRL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DTRL's competition here
YLWWF vs FPNUF Comparison August 2025
YLWWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWWF stands at 0. In comparison, FPNUF has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, YLWWF is priced at $0.56, while FPNUF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.27, whereas FPNUF's P/E ratio is 2.11. In terms of profitability, YLWWF's ROE is N/A, compared to FPNUF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWWF is less volatile compared to FPNUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YLWWF.Check FPNUF's competition here
YLWWF vs FMPR Comparison August 2025
YLWWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWWF stands at 0. In comparison, FMPR has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, YLWWF is priced at $0.56, while FMPR trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.27, whereas FMPR's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, YLWWF's ROE is N/A, compared to FMPR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWWF is less volatile compared to FMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YLWWF.Check FMPR's competition here
YLWWF vs LEBGF Comparison August 2025
YLWWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWWF stands at 0. In comparison, LEBGF has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, YLWWF is priced at $0.56, while LEBGF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.27, whereas LEBGF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, YLWWF's ROE is N/A, compared to LEBGF's ROE of +17.64%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWWF is less volatile compared to LEBGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YLWWF.Check LEBGF's competition here
YLWWF vs PEDH Comparison August 2025
YLWWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWWF stands at 0. In comparison, PEDH has a market cap of 44.7K. Regarding current trading prices, YLWWF is priced at $0.56, while PEDH trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.27, whereas PEDH's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, YLWWF's ROE is N/A, compared to PEDH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, YLWWF is less volatile compared to PEDH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YLWWF.Check PEDH's competition here
YLWWF vs PDOS Comparison August 2025
YLWWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWWF stands at 0. In comparison, PDOS has a market cap of 32.1K. Regarding current trading prices, YLWWF is priced at $0.56, while PDOS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.27, whereas PDOS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YLWWF's ROE is N/A, compared to PDOS's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWWF is less volatile compared to PDOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YLWWF.Check PDOS's competition here
YLWWF vs ACNI Comparison August 2025
YLWWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWWF stands at 0. In comparison, ACNI has a market cap of 29.2K. Regarding current trading prices, YLWWF is priced at $0.56, while ACNI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.27, whereas ACNI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, YLWWF's ROE is N/A, compared to ACNI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWWF is less volatile compared to ACNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YLWWF.Check ACNI's competition here
YLWWF vs BKMP Comparison August 2025
YLWWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWWF stands at 0. In comparison, BKMP has a market cap of 12.1K. Regarding current trading prices, YLWWF is priced at $0.56, while BKMP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.27, whereas BKMP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YLWWF's ROE is N/A, compared to BKMP's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWWF and BKMP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BKMP's competition here
YLWWF vs DIGI Comparison August 2025
YLWWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWWF stands at 0. In comparison, DIGI has a market cap of 7.1K. Regarding current trading prices, YLWWF is priced at $0.56, while DIGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.27, whereas DIGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YLWWF's ROE is N/A, compared to DIGI's ROE of +1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWWF and DIGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DIGI's competition here
YLWWF vs HRDIL Comparison August 2025
YLWWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWWF stands at 0. In comparison, HRDIL has a market cap of 4.1K. Regarding current trading prices, YLWWF is priced at $0.56, while HRDIL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.27, whereas HRDIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YLWWF's ROE is N/A, compared to HRDIL's ROE of +13.60%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWWF and HRDIL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HRDIL's competition here
YLWWF vs HRDI Comparison August 2025
YLWWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWWF stands at 0. In comparison, HRDI has a market cap of 4.1K. Regarding current trading prices, YLWWF is priced at $0.56, while HRDI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.27, whereas HRDI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YLWWF's ROE is N/A, compared to HRDI's ROE of +13.60%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWWF and HRDI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HRDI's competition here
YLWWF vs MAHI Comparison August 2025
YLWWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWWF stands at 0. In comparison, MAHI has a market cap of 324. Regarding current trading prices, YLWWF is priced at $0.56, while MAHI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.27, whereas MAHI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, YLWWF's ROE is N/A, compared to MAHI's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWWF and MAHI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MAHI's competition here
YLWWF vs SALN Comparison August 2025
YLWWF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWWF stands at 0. In comparison, SALN has a market cap of 99. Regarding current trading prices, YLWWF is priced at $0.56, while SALN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.27, whereas SALN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YLWWF's ROE is N/A, compared to SALN's ROE of +2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWWF is less volatile compared to SALN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YLWWF.Check SALN's competition here