Yellow Pages Limited
Yellow Pages Limited YLWDF Peers
See (YLWDF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Publishing Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YLWDF | $8.88 | +10.04% | 122.12M | 6.78 | $1.31 | +7.29% |
| RLXXF | $53.06 | -3.94% | 97.72B | 38.73 | $1.37 | +1.56% |
| IFJPY | $21.36 | -1.22% | 13.97B | 36.20 | $0.59 | +2.21% |
| IFPJF | $10.63 | +4.62% | 13.91B | 35.43 | $0.30 | +1.67% |
| PSORF | $15.20 | N/A | 10.32B | 18.10 | $0.84 | +2.04% |
| SBBTF | $32.75 | N/A | 7.72B | 32.75 | $1.00 | +24.93% |
| SBSNY | $33.47 | -6.85% | 7.31B | 33.47 | $1.00 | +24.51% |
| SBSNF | $27.37 | N/A | 6.17B | 27.37 | $1.00 | +30.61% |
| KDKWF | $27.29 | +20.33% | 4.00B | 43.32 | $0.63 | +0.73% |
| SHXWF | $1.08 | N/A | 1.72B | 6.00 | $0.18 | +7.70% |
Stock Comparison
YLWDF vs RLXXF Comparison
YLWDF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWDF stands at 122.12M. In comparison, RLXXF has a market cap of 97.72B. Regarding current trading prices, YLWDF is priced at $8.88, while RLXXF trades at $53.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas RLXXF's P/E ratio is 38.73. In terms of profitability, YLWDF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to RLXXF's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWDF is less volatile compared to RLXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YLWDF.
YLWDF vs IFJPY Comparison
YLWDF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWDF stands at 122.12M. In comparison, IFJPY has a market cap of 13.97B. Regarding current trading prices, YLWDF is priced at $8.88, while IFJPY trades at $21.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas IFJPY's P/E ratio is 36.20. In terms of profitability, YLWDF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to IFJPY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWDF is less volatile compared to IFJPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YLWDF.
YLWDF vs IFPJF Comparison
YLWDF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWDF stands at 122.12M. In comparison, IFPJF has a market cap of 13.91B. Regarding current trading prices, YLWDF is priced at $8.88, while IFPJF trades at $10.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas IFPJF's P/E ratio is 35.43. In terms of profitability, YLWDF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to IFPJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWDF is less volatile compared to IFPJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YLWDF.
YLWDF vs PSORF Comparison
YLWDF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWDF stands at 122.12M. In comparison, PSORF has a market cap of 10.32B. Regarding current trading prices, YLWDF is priced at $8.88, while PSORF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas PSORF's P/E ratio is 18.10. In terms of profitability, YLWDF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to PSORF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWDF and PSORF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
YLWDF vs SBBTF Comparison
YLWDF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWDF stands at 122.12M. In comparison, SBBTF has a market cap of 7.72B. Regarding current trading prices, YLWDF is priced at $8.88, while SBBTF trades at $32.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas SBBTF's P/E ratio is 32.75. In terms of profitability, YLWDF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to SBBTF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWDF is less volatile compared to SBBTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YLWDF.
YLWDF vs SBSNY Comparison
YLWDF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWDF stands at 122.12M. In comparison, SBSNY has a market cap of 7.31B. Regarding current trading prices, YLWDF is priced at $8.88, while SBSNY trades at $33.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas SBSNY's P/E ratio is 33.47. In terms of profitability, YLWDF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to SBSNY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWDF is less volatile compared to SBSNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YLWDF.
YLWDF vs SBSNF Comparison
YLWDF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWDF stands at 122.12M. In comparison, SBSNF has a market cap of 6.17B. Regarding current trading prices, YLWDF is priced at $8.88, while SBSNF trades at $27.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas SBSNF's P/E ratio is 27.37. In terms of profitability, YLWDF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to SBSNF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWDF is less volatile compared to SBSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YLWDF.
YLWDF vs KDKWF Comparison
YLWDF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWDF stands at 122.12M. In comparison, KDKWF has a market cap of 4.00B. Regarding current trading prices, YLWDF is priced at $8.88, while KDKWF trades at $27.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas KDKWF's P/E ratio is 43.32. In terms of profitability, YLWDF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to KDKWF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWDF is less volatile compared to KDKWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YLWDF.
YLWDF vs SHXWF Comparison
YLWDF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWDF stands at 122.12M. In comparison, SHXWF has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, YLWDF is priced at $8.88, while SHXWF trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas SHXWF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, YLWDF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to SHXWF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWDF and SHXWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
YLWDF vs CNGO Comparison
YLWDF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWDF stands at 122.12M. In comparison, CNGO has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, YLWDF is priced at $8.88, while CNGO trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas CNGO's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, YLWDF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to CNGO's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWDF is less volatile compared to CNGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YLWDF.
YLWDF vs SMWPY Comparison
YLWDF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWDF stands at 122.12M. In comparison, SMWPY has a market cap of 989.66M. Regarding current trading prices, YLWDF is priced at $8.88, while SMWPY trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas SMWPY's P/E ratio is 1.71. In terms of profitability, YLWDF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to SMWPY's ROE of -2.97%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWDF is less volatile compared to SMWPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YLWDF.
YLWDF vs FRNWF Comparison
YLWDF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWDF stands at 122.12M. In comparison, FRNWF has a market cap of 969.84M. Regarding current trading prices, YLWDF is priced at $8.88, while FRNWF trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas FRNWF's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, YLWDF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to FRNWF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWDF is less volatile compared to FRNWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YLWDF.
YLWDF vs RZSMF Comparison
YLWDF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWDF stands at 122.12M. In comparison, RZSMF has a market cap of 646.73M. Regarding current trading prices, YLWDF is priced at $8.88, while RZSMF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas RZSMF's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, YLWDF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to RZSMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWDF and RZSMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
YLWDF vs MDDCF Comparison
YLWDF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWDF stands at 122.12M. In comparison, MDDCF has a market cap of 561.23M. Regarding current trading prices, YLWDF is priced at $8.88, while MDDCF trades at $37.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas MDDCF's P/E ratio is 48.74. In terms of profitability, YLWDF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to MDDCF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWDF and MDDCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
YLWDF vs GPOPF Comparison
YLWDF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWDF stands at 122.12M. In comparison, GPOPF has a market cap of 454.18M. Regarding current trading prices, YLWDF is priced at $8.88, while GPOPF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas GPOPF's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, YLWDF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to GPOPF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWDF and GPOPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
YLWDF vs STRYF Comparison
YLWDF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWDF stands at 122.12M. In comparison, STRYF has a market cap of 437.77M. Regarding current trading prices, YLWDF is priced at $8.88, while STRYF trades at $5.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas STRYF's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, YLWDF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to STRYF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWDF is less volatile compared to STRYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YLWDF.
YLWDF vs TOCOF Comparison
YLWDF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWDF stands at 122.12M. In comparison, TOCOF has a market cap of 291.91M. Regarding current trading prices, YLWDF is priced at $8.88, while TOCOF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas TOCOF's P/E ratio is -7.38. In terms of profitability, YLWDF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to TOCOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWDF and TOCOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
YLWDF vs GWOX Comparison
YLWDF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWDF stands at 122.12M. In comparison, GWOX has a market cap of 193.77M. Regarding current trading prices, YLWDF is priced at $8.88, while GWOX trades at $425.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas GWOX's P/E ratio is 6.16. In terms of profitability, YLWDF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to GWOX's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWDF and GWOX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
YLWDF vs PCDAF Comparison
YLWDF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWDF stands at 122.12M. In comparison, PCDAF has a market cap of 111.66M. Regarding current trading prices, YLWDF is priced at $8.88, while PCDAF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas PCDAF's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, YLWDF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to PCDAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWDF is less volatile compared to PCDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YLWDF.
YLWDF vs CMTX Comparison
YLWDF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWDF stands at 122.12M. In comparison, CMTX has a market cap of 90.82M. Regarding current trading prices, YLWDF is priced at $8.88, while CMTX trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas CMTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YLWDF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to CMTX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWDF is less volatile compared to CMTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YLWDF.
YLWDF vs HKGEF Comparison
YLWDF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWDF stands at 122.12M. In comparison, HKGEF has a market cap of 40.57M. Regarding current trading prices, YLWDF is priced at $8.88, while HKGEF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas HKGEF's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, YLWDF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to HKGEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWDF is less volatile compared to HKGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YLWDF.
YLWDF vs STAOF Comparison
YLWDF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWDF stands at 122.12M. In comparison, STAOF has a market cap of 30.82M. Regarding current trading prices, YLWDF is priced at $8.88, while STAOF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas STAOF's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, YLWDF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to STAOF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWDF and STAOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
YLWDF vs SADL Comparison
YLWDF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWDF stands at 122.12M. In comparison, SADL has a market cap of 14.50M. Regarding current trading prices, YLWDF is priced at $8.88, while SADL trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas SADL's P/E ratio is 22.10. In terms of profitability, YLWDF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to SADL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, YLWDF is less volatile compared to SADL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YLWDF.
YLWDF vs GLMFF Comparison
YLWDF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWDF stands at 122.12M. In comparison, GLMFF has a market cap of 13.18M. Regarding current trading prices, YLWDF is priced at $8.88, while GLMFF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas GLMFF's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, YLWDF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to GLMFF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWDF is less volatile compared to GLMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YLWDF.
YLWDF vs XLMDF Comparison
YLWDF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWDF stands at 122.12M. In comparison, XLMDF has a market cap of 12.12M. Regarding current trading prices, YLWDF is priced at $8.88, while XLMDF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas XLMDF's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, YLWDF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to XLMDF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWDF is less volatile compared to XLMDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YLWDF.
YLWDF vs DTRL Comparison
YLWDF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWDF stands at 122.12M. In comparison, DTRL has a market cap of 11.52M. Regarding current trading prices, YLWDF is priced at $8.88, while DTRL trades at $305.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas DTRL's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, YLWDF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to DTRL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWDF and DTRL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
YLWDF vs IDWM Comparison
YLWDF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWDF stands at 122.12M. In comparison, IDWM has a market cap of 8.15M. Regarding current trading prices, YLWDF is priced at $8.88, while IDWM trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas IDWM's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, YLWDF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to IDWM's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWDF and IDWM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
YLWDF vs FMPR Comparison
YLWDF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWDF stands at 122.12M. In comparison, FMPR has a market cap of 4.46M. Regarding current trading prices, YLWDF is priced at $8.88, while FMPR trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas FMPR's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, YLWDF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to FMPR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWDF is less volatile compared to FMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YLWDF.
YLWDF vs FPNUF Comparison
YLWDF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWDF stands at 122.12M. In comparison, FPNUF has a market cap of 2.62M. Regarding current trading prices, YLWDF is priced at $8.88, while FPNUF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas FPNUF's P/E ratio is 2.11. In terms of profitability, YLWDF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to FPNUF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWDF is less volatile compared to FPNUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YLWDF.
YLWDF vs LEBGF Comparison
YLWDF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWDF stands at 122.12M. In comparison, LEBGF has a market cap of 2.24M. Regarding current trading prices, YLWDF is priced at $8.88, while LEBGF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas LEBGF's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, YLWDF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to LEBGF's ROE of +17.64%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWDF and LEBGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
YLWDF vs PDOS Comparison
YLWDF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWDF stands at 122.12M. In comparison, PDOS has a market cap of 32068.00. Regarding current trading prices, YLWDF is priced at $8.88, while PDOS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas PDOS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YLWDF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to PDOS's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWDF is less volatile compared to PDOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YLWDF.
YLWDF vs BKMP Comparison
YLWDF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWDF stands at 122.12M. In comparison, BKMP has a market cap of 12108.00. Regarding current trading prices, YLWDF is priced at $8.88, while BKMP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas BKMP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YLWDF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to BKMP's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWDF and BKMP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
YLWDF vs DIGI Comparison
YLWDF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWDF stands at 122.12M. In comparison, DIGI has a market cap of 7068.00. Regarding current trading prices, YLWDF is priced at $8.88, while DIGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas DIGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YLWDF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to DIGI's ROE of +1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWDF and DIGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
YLWDF vs HRDI Comparison
YLWDF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWDF stands at 122.12M. In comparison, HRDI has a market cap of 4140.00. Regarding current trading prices, YLWDF is priced at $8.88, while HRDI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas HRDI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YLWDF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to HRDI's ROE of +13.60%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWDF and HRDI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
YLWDF vs HRDIL Comparison
YLWDF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWDF stands at 122.12M. In comparison, HRDIL has a market cap of 4140.00. Regarding current trading prices, YLWDF is priced at $8.88, while HRDIL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas HRDIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YLWDF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to HRDIL's ROE of +13.60%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWDF and HRDIL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
YLWDF vs PEDH Comparison
YLWDF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWDF stands at 122.12M. In comparison, PEDH has a market cap of 447.00. Regarding current trading prices, YLWDF is priced at $8.88, while PEDH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas PEDH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, YLWDF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to PEDH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, YLWDF and PEDH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
YLWDF vs ACNI Comparison
YLWDF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWDF stands at 122.12M. In comparison, ACNI has a market cap of 439.00. Regarding current trading prices, YLWDF is priced at $8.88, while ACNI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas ACNI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YLWDF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to ACNI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWDF is less volatile compared to ACNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YLWDF.
YLWDF vs MAHI Comparison
YLWDF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWDF stands at 122.12M. In comparison, MAHI has a market cap of 324.00. Regarding current trading prices, YLWDF is priced at $8.88, while MAHI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas MAHI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, YLWDF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to MAHI's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWDF and MAHI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
YLWDF vs SALN Comparison
YLWDF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YLWDF stands at 122.12M. In comparison, SALN has a market cap of 99.00. Regarding current trading prices, YLWDF is priced at $8.88, while SALN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YLWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas SALN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YLWDF's ROE is +0.44%, compared to SALN's ROE of +2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, YLWDF is less volatile compared to SALN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YLWDF.