Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd.
Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd. (YAMHF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (YAMHF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YAMHF | $7.55 | +0.00% | 7.3B | 7.26 | $1.04 | +4.42% |
| GELYY | $50.79 | +1.60% | 515B | 12.18 | $4.17 | +1.65% |
| TOYOF | $23.92 | +0.01% | 306.7B | 12.65 | $1.86 | +2.71% |
| BYDDF | $12.80 | +0.00% | 119.5B | 63.40 | $0.20 | +1.46% |
| BYDDY | $12.76 | +0.00% | 113.8B | 63.20 | $0.20 | +1.45% |
| MBGAF | $69.50 | +0.00% | 67B | 9.10 | $7.65 | +7.01% |
| MBGYY | $17.27 | +0.00% | 66.9B | 9.10 | $1.91 | +6.87% |
| BAMXF | $106.39 | +3.29% | 65.3B | 7.93 | $13.42 | +4.52% |
| BYMOF | $102.02 | +0.00% | 63.5B | 7.60 | $13.42 | +4.96% |
| VWAGY | $12.03 | +0.00% | 59.3B | 7.49 | $1.58 | +6.02% |
Stock Comparison
YAMHF vs GELYY Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, GELYY has a market cap of 515B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while GELYY trades at $50.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas GELYY's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GELYY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF is less volatile compared to GELYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAMHF.Check GELYY's competition here
YAMHF vs TOYOF Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, TOYOF has a market cap of 306.7B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while TOYOF trades at $23.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas TOYOF's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TOYOF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF is less volatile compared to TOYOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAMHF.Check TOYOF's competition here
YAMHF vs BYDDF Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, BYDDF has a market cap of 119.5B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while BYDDF trades at $12.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas BYDDF's P/E ratio is 63.40. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BYDDF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF is less volatile compared to BYDDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAMHF.Check BYDDF's competition here
YAMHF vs BYDDY Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, BYDDY has a market cap of 113.8B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while BYDDY trades at $12.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas BYDDY's P/E ratio is 63.20. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BYDDY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF is less volatile compared to BYDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAMHF.Check BYDDY's competition here
YAMHF vs MBGAF Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, MBGAF has a market cap of 67B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while MBGAF trades at $69.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas MBGAF's P/E ratio is 9.10. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MBGAF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF is less volatile compared to MBGAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAMHF.Check MBGAF's competition here
YAMHF vs MBGYY Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, MBGYY has a market cap of 66.9B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while MBGYY trades at $17.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas MBGYY's P/E ratio is 9.10. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MBGYY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF is less volatile compared to MBGYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAMHF.Check MBGYY's competition here
YAMHF vs BAMXF Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, BAMXF has a market cap of 65.3B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while BAMXF trades at $106.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas BAMXF's P/E ratio is 7.93. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BAMXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and BAMXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BAMXF's competition here
YAMHF vs BYMOF Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, BYMOF has a market cap of 63.5B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while BYMOF trades at $102.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas BYMOF's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BYMOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and BYMOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BYMOF's competition here
YAMHF vs VWAGY Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, VWAGY has a market cap of 59.3B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while VWAGY trades at $12.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas VWAGY's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VWAGY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF is less volatile compared to VWAGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAMHF.Check VWAGY's competition here
YAMHF vs VWAPY Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, VWAPY has a market cap of 59.1B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while VWAPY trades at $11.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas VWAPY's P/E ratio is 7.46. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VWAPY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF is less volatile compared to VWAPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAMHF.Check VWAPY's competition here
YAMHF vs VLKAF Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, VLKAF has a market cap of 58.3B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while VLKAF trades at $118.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas VLKAF's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VLKAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF is less volatile compared to VLKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAMHF.Check VLKAF's competition here
YAMHF vs VLKPF Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, VLKPF has a market cap of 58.3B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while VLKPF trades at $116.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas VLKPF's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VLKPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and VLKPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VLKPF's competition here
YAMHF vs MAHMF Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, MAHMF has a market cap of 47.4B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while MAHMF trades at $39.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas MAHMF's P/E ratio is 28.42. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MAHMF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and MAHMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MAHMF's competition here
YAMHF vs DRPRF Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, DRPRF has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while DRPRF trades at $49.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas DRPRF's P/E ratio is 40.00. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DRPRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and DRPRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DRPRF's competition here
YAMHF vs DRPRY Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, DRPRY has a market cap of 44.4B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while DRPRY trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas DRPRY's P/E ratio is 40.33. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DRPRY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF is less volatile compared to DRPRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAMHF.Check DRPRY's competition here
YAMHF vs HNDAF Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, HNDAF has a market cap of 44.4B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while HNDAF trades at $10.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas HNDAF's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HNDAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and HNDAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HNDAF's competition here
YAMHF vs TYIDY Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, TYIDY has a market cap of 39.8B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while TYIDY trades at $129.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas TYIDY's P/E ratio is 29.94. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TYIDY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF is less volatile compared to TYIDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAMHF.Check TYIDY's competition here
YAMHF vs HYMTF Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, HYMTF has a market cap of 39.5B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while HYMTF trades at $51.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas HYMTF's P/E ratio is 2.99. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HYMTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF is less volatile compared to HYMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAMHF.Check HYMTF's competition here
YAMHF vs TYIDF Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, TYIDF has a market cap of 37.7B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while TYIDF trades at $125.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas TYIDF's P/E ratio is 28.78. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TYIDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and TYIDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TYIDF's competition here
YAMHF vs SZKMF Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, SZKMF has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while SZKMF trades at $14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas SZKMF's P/E ratio is 11.38. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SZKMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF is less volatile compared to SZKMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAMHF.Check SZKMF's competition here
YAMHF vs SZKMY Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, SZKMY has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while SZKMY trades at $58.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas SZKMY's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SZKMY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF is less volatile compared to SZKMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAMHF.Check SZKMY's competition here
YAMHF vs GELHY Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, GELHY has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while GELHY trades at $43.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas GELHY's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GELHY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF is less volatile compared to GELHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAMHF.Check GELHY's competition here
YAMHF vs GELYF Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, GELYF has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while GELYF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas GELYF's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GELYF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF is less volatile compared to GELYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAMHF.Check GELYF's competition here
YAMHF vs HYMLF Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, HYMLF has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while HYMLF trades at $89.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas HYMLF's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HYMLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and HYMLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HYMLF's competition here
YAMHF vs GWLLF Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, GWLLF has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while GWLLF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas GWLLF's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GWLLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and GWLLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GWLLF's competition here
YAMHF vs BMWYY Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, BMWYY has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while BMWYY trades at $29.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas BMWYY's P/E ratio is 4.74. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BMWYY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF is less volatile compared to BMWYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAMHF.Check BMWYY's competition here
YAMHF vs EXXRF Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, EXXRF has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while EXXRF trades at $87.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas EXXRF's P/E ratio is -24.90. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EXXRF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF is less volatile compared to EXXRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAMHF.Check EXXRF's competition here
YAMHF vs XPNGF Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, XPNGF has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while XPNGF trades at $9.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas XPNGF's P/E ratio is -28.27. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to XPNGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and XPNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XPNGF's competition here
YAMHF vs GWLLY Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, GWLLY has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while GWLLY trades at $17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas GWLLY's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GWLLY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and GWLLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GWLLY's competition here
YAMHF vs FUJHY Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, FUJHY has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while FUJHY trades at $9.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas FUJHY's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FUJHY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF is less volatile compared to FUJHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAMHF.Check FUJHY's competition here
YAMHF vs POAHF Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, POAHF has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while POAHF trades at $42.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas POAHF's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to POAHF's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF is less volatile compared to POAHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAMHF.Check POAHF's competition here
YAMHF vs FUJHF Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, FUJHF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while FUJHF trades at $17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas FUJHF's P/E ratio is 7.69. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FUJHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and FUJHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FUJHF's competition here
YAMHF vs POAHY Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, POAHY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while POAHY trades at $4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas POAHY's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to POAHY's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF is less volatile compared to POAHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAMHF.Check POAHY's competition here
YAMHF vs ISUZY Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, ISUZY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while ISUZY trades at $18.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas ISUZY's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ISUZY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF is less volatile compared to ISUZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAMHF.Check ISUZY's competition here
YAMHF vs YAMHY Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, YAMHY has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while YAMHY trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas YAMHY's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to YAMHY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF is less volatile compared to YAMHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAMHF.Check YAMHY's competition here
YAMHF vs DNFGF Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, DNFGF has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while DNFGF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas DNFGF's P/E ratio is -140.00. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DNFGF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and DNFGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DNFGF's competition here
YAMHF vs RNLSY Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, RNLSY has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while RNLSY trades at $7.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas RNLSY's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RNLSY's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF is less volatile compared to RNLSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAMHF.Check RNLSY's competition here
YAMHF vs GNZUF Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, GNZUF has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while GNZUF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas GNZUF's P/E ratio is -9.80. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GNZUF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and GNZUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GNZUF's competition here
YAMHF vs NIOIF Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, NIOIF has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while NIOIF trades at $5.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas NIOIF's P/E ratio is -3.09. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NIOIF's ROE of -11.32%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and NIOIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NIOIF's competition here
YAMHF vs RNSDF Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, RNSDF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while RNSDF trades at $37.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas RNSDF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RNSDF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and RNSDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RNSDF's competition here
YAMHF vs JCYCF Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, JCYCF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while JCYCF trades at $27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas JCYCF's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JCYCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and JCYCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JCYCF's competition here
YAMHF vs ISUZF Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, ISUZF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while ISUZF trades at $15.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas ISUZF's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ISUZF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and ISUZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ISUZF's competition here
YAMHF vs JCYGY Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, JCYGY has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while JCYGY trades at $51.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas JCYGY's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JCYGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and JCYGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JCYGY's competition here
YAMHF vs NSANF Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, NSANF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while NSANF trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas NSANF's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NSANF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF is less volatile compared to NSANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAMHF.Check NSANF's competition here
YAMHF vs NSANY Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, NSANY has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while NSANY trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas NSANY's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NSANY's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF is less volatile compared to NSANY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAMHF.Check NSANY's competition here
YAMHF vs DNFGY Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, DNFGY has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while DNFGY trades at $56.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas DNFGY's P/E ratio is -113.28. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DNFGY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and DNFGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DNFGY's competition here
YAMHF vs VLVOF Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, VLVOF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while VLVOF trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas VLVOF's P/E ratio is 278.00. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VLVOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and VLVOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VLVOF's competition here
YAMHF vs VLVCY Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, VLVCY has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while VLVCY trades at $5.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas VLVCY's P/E ratio is 544.00. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VLVCY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and VLVCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VLVCY's competition here
YAMHF vs YMHAY Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, YMHAY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while YMHAY trades at $15.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas YMHAY's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to YMHAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and YMHAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YMHAY's competition here
YAMHF vs IVCGF Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, IVCGF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while IVCGF trades at $22.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas IVCGF's P/E ratio is 21.80. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IVCGF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and IVCGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IVCGF's competition here
YAMHF vs MZDAY Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, MZDAY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while MZDAY trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas MZDAY's P/E ratio is 25.06. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MZDAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF is less volatile compared to MZDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAMHF.Check MZDAY's competition here
YAMHF vs MZDAF Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, MZDAF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while MZDAF trades at $8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas MZDAF's P/E ratio is 24.14. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MZDAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and MZDAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MZDAF's competition here
YAMHF vs YADGF Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, YADGF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while YADGF trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas YADGF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to YADGF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and YADGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YADGF's competition here
YAMHF vs MMTOF Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, MMTOF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while MMTOF trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas MMTOF's P/E ratio is -138.00. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MMTOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and MMTOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MMTOF's competition here
YAMHF vs SMEBF Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, SMEBF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while SMEBF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas SMEBF's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SMEBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and SMEBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SMEBF's competition here
YAMHF vs BCAUF Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, BCAUF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while BCAUF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas BCAUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BCAUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF is less volatile compared to BCAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAMHF.Check BCAUF's competition here
YAMHF vs BCCMY Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, BCCMY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while BCCMY trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas BCCMY's P/E ratio is -18.08. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BCCMY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and BCCMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BCCMY's competition here
YAMHF vs BMCLF Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, BMCLF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while BMCLF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas BMCLF's P/E ratio is -23.20. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BMCLF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and BMCLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BMCLF's competition here
YAMHF vs HINOY Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, HINOY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while HINOY trades at $31.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas HINOY's P/E ratio is 11.45. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HINOY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and HINOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HINOY's competition here
YAMHF vs NFYEF Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, NFYEF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while NFYEF trades at $13.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas NFYEF's P/E ratio is -5.21. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NFYEF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF is less volatile compared to NFYEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAMHF.Check NFYEF's competition here
YAMHF vs HINOF Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, HINOF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while HINOF trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas HINOF's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HINOF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and HINOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HINOF's competition here
YAMHF vs FOVSY Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, FOVSY has a market cap of 936.9M. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while FOVSY trades at $13.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas FOVSY's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FOVSY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and FOVSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FOVSY's competition here
YAMHF vs NSNHF Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, NSNHF has a market cap of 922.4M. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while NSNHF trades at $6.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas NSNHF's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NSNHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and NSNHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NSNHF's competition here
YAMHF vs ELMWQ Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, ELMWQ has a market cap of 868.2M. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while ELMWQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas ELMWQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ELMWQ's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and ELMWQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELMWQ's competition here
YAMHF vs AMGDF Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, AMGDF has a market cap of 784.3M. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while AMGDF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas AMGDF's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AMGDF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF is less volatile compared to AMGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAMHF.Check AMGDF's competition here
YAMHF vs ARGGY Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, ARGGY has a market cap of 750.2M. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while ARGGY trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas ARGGY's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ARGGY's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF is less volatile compared to ARGGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAMHF.Check ARGGY's competition here
YAMHF vs PIAGF Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, PIAGF has a market cap of 740.2M. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while PIAGF trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas PIAGF's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PIAGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and PIAGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PIAGF's competition here
YAMHF vs KRSOF Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, KRSOF has a market cap of 444.6M. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while KRSOF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas KRSOF's P/E ratio is 49.40. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KRSOF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and KRSOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KRSOF's competition here
YAMHF vs RIDEQ Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, RIDEQ has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while RIDEQ trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas RIDEQ's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RIDEQ's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF is less volatile compared to RIDEQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAMHF.Check RIDEQ's competition here
YAMHF vs NRDE Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, NRDE has a market cap of 26.7M. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while NRDE trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas NRDE's P/E ratio is -7.22. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NRDE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and NRDE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NRDE's competition here
YAMHF vs FHYDF Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, FHYDF has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while FHYDF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas FHYDF's P/E ratio is -10.55. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FHYDF's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and FHYDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FHYDF's competition here
YAMHF vs LFEV Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, LFEV has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while LFEV trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas LFEV's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LFEV's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and LFEV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LFEV's competition here
YAMHF vs ELMSQ Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, ELMSQ has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while ELMSQ trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas ELMSQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ELMSQ's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF is less volatile compared to ELMSQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAMHF.Check ELMSQ's competition here
YAMHF vs SEVCF Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, SEVCF has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while SEVCF trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas SEVCF's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SEVCF's ROE of -1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF is less volatile compared to SEVCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAMHF.Check SEVCF's competition here
YAMHF vs CSBI Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, CSBI has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while CSBI trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas CSBI's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CSBI's ROE of +2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and CSBI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CSBI's competition here
YAMHF vs EVTGF Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, EVTGF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while EVTGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas EVTGF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EVTGF's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF is less volatile compared to EVTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAMHF.Check EVTGF's competition here
YAMHF vs FSRNQ Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, FSRNQ has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while FSRNQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas FSRNQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FSRNQ's ROE of -4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF is less volatile compared to FSRNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAMHF.Check FSRNQ's competition here
YAMHF vs ELCR Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, ELCR has a market cap of 681.6K. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while ELCR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas ELCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ELCR's ROE of +3.58%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and ELCR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELCR's competition here
YAMHF vs TUGAF Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, TUGAF has a market cap of 495.9K. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while TUGAF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas TUGAF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TUGAF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and TUGAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TUGAF's competition here
YAMHF vs GKIT Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, GKIT has a market cap of 494.9K. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while GKIT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas GKIT's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GKIT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and GKIT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GKIT's competition here
YAMHF vs ELEK Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, ELEK has a market cap of 279.4K. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while ELEK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas ELEK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ELEK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF is less volatile compared to ELEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAMHF.Check ELEK's competition here
YAMHF vs BINI Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, BINI has a market cap of 273.2K. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while BINI trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas BINI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BINI's ROE of +5.98%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF is less volatile compared to BINI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAMHF.Check BINI's competition here
YAMHF vs GACR Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, GACR has a market cap of 104.6K. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while GACR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas GACR's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GACR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and GACR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GACR's competition here
YAMHF vs EGOXF Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, EGOXF has a market cap of 9.4K. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while EGOXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas EGOXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EGOXF's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and EGOXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EGOXF's competition here
YAMHF vs RONN Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, RONN has a market cap of 7.9K. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while RONN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas RONN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RONN's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF is less volatile compared to RONN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAMHF.Check RONN's competition here
YAMHF vs ELIO Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, ELIO has a market cap of 3K. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while ELIO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas ELIO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ELIO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and ELIO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELIO's competition here
YAMHF vs ARVLF Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, ARVLF has a market cap of 1.8K. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while ARVLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas ARVLF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ARVLF's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and ARVLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARVLF's competition here
YAMHF vs NDVR Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, NDVR has a market cap of 892. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while NDVR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas NDVR's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NDVR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and NDVR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NDVR's competition here
YAMHF vs NVYAF Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, NVYAF has a market cap of 869. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while NVYAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas NVYAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NVYAF's ROE of -16.47%. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF and NVYAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NVYAF's competition here
YAMHF vs DDAIF Comparison February 2026
YAMHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YAMHF stands at 7.3B. In comparison, DDAIF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, YAMHF is priced at $7.55, while DDAIF trades at $62.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YAMHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas DDAIF's P/E ratio is 6.03. In terms of profitability, YAMHF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DDAIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, YAMHF is less volatile compared to DDAIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YAMHF.Check DDAIF's competition here